&w=3840&q=100)
Putin open to talks, questions Zelenskyy's legitimacy for inking peace deal
Zelenskyy has repeatedly called for a meeting with Putin, stating that he alone can resolve pressing bilateral issues, including disputes over territory
ANI Europe
Russian President Vladimir Putin has expressed doubts about Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy 's authority to sign a treaty, while indicating he was open to meeting him for peace talks, RT reported.
"Signature must come from legitimate authorities," the Russian President said on Wednesday.
Zelenskyy has repeatedly called for a meeting with Putin, stating that he alone can resolve pressing bilateral issues, including disputes over territory. However, speaking to international media at the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum, Putin raised concerns over the Ukrainian leader's legitimacy.
RT quoted Putin as saying, "If the Ukrainian state entrusts someone to negotiate on its behalf, suit yourself, let it be Zelenskyy. The question is, who will sign the document?"
Zelenskyy's presidential term officially ended last year, and no successor has been elected due to the imposition of martial law. Zelenskyy argues that he can remain in office under the current conditions, though the Ukrainian Constitution states that presidential powers should be transferred to the parliament's speaker in such a case.
"Propagandistically, one can say anything about the legitimacy of the current authorities, but we care about legal aspects and not propaganda when dealing with serious issues," RT quoted Putin as saying.
He also noted that since many Ukrainian officials are appointed by the president, Zelenskyy's questionable legal status casts doubt on the authority of those serving under him.
RT reported Putin as stating, "But the signature must come from legitimate authorities. Otherwise, whoever comes after him will toss it to the dumpster. That's not a way to conduct serious business."
Despite these concerns over legitimacy, Russia has returned the remains of 1,212 Ukrainian soldiers in the latest exchange with Kyiv, RT reported, citing Kremlin official Vladimir Medinsky.
The bodies, recovered from multiple front-line regions, mark a continued effort in the humanitarian coordination between the two nations.
According to RT, the Ukrainian Coordination Headquarters for the Treatment of Prisoners of War first announced the transfer.
The remains were recovered from Kursk, Donetsk, Lugansk, Kherson, and Zaporozhye regions of Russia, along with Ukraine's Kharkiv region. No individual identities were released. Meanwhile, Russia received the remains of 27 of its soldiers during the exchange.
RT further reported that Medinsky, Moscow's chief negotiator in talks with Kiev, stated on Telegram that both sides had agreed to initiate "urgent sanitary exchanges" involving severely wounded prisoners of war. He emphasized Russia's commitment, saying, "Russia does not abandon its own people."
The exchange followed discussions held earlier this month in Istanbul. As per RT, Moscow had earlier offered to return over 6,000 Ukrainian bodies but accused Kiev of delaying acceptance. Despite logistical setbacks, Russian Lieutenant General Aleksandr Zorin affirmed Moscow's intent to uphold the agreement, calling it a "purely humanitarian action.
(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
36 minutes ago
- First Post
What is Iran's Arak heavy water reactor ‘created to build nukes' that Israel struck?
Israel carried out strikes on Iran's Arak heavy water reactor in its latest offensive against Tehran's controversial nuclear programme. While the facility was not active and contained no uranium fuel, Israeli officials said it could one day enable Iran to produce plutonium, a powerful material used to develop atomic bombs read more Israel on Thursday carried out strikes on Iran's Arak heavy water reactor in its latest offensive against Tehran's sprawling nuclear programme, dramatically escalating the conflict in West Asia. The massive explosion, captured in dramatic satellite footage, showed fire and smoke billowing from the site, just 250 kilometres southwest of Tehran. The Israel Defence Forces (IDF) shared a video of the nuclear reactor, claiming that it was being used by Iran to create a nuclear bomb. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'This nuclear reactor in Arak was created for one purpose: to build a nuclear bomb. It has now been neutralised. Here is a closer look at the reactor itself,' it said, sharing the video. ⭕This nuclear reactor in Arak was created for one purpose: to build a nuclear bomb. It has now been neutralized. Here is a closer look at the reactor itself: — Israel Defense Forces (@IDF) June 19, 2025 This strike marked the latest move in Israel's campaign to dismantle Iran's nuclear infrastructure, following recent attacks on facilities in Natanz, Isfahan, and near Tehran. As questions swirl about the implications of this strike, the Arak reactor has once again become the centre of global attention. Here's what we know about the facility. A legacy of Iran's nuclear ambitions The Arak reactor traces its origins back to Iran's military nuclear ambitions in the 1990s, following the country's brutal war with Iraq. When foreign powers refused to supply the necessary reactor technology, Iran took matters into its own hands and began constructing the facility independently. Designed as a heavy water reactor, Arak uses a special type of water where the hydrogen atoms are replaced by deuterium. This setup allows the reactor to run on natural uranium, which in turn produces plutonium as a byproduct, a material that can potentially be extracted and used in nuclear weapons. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD A satellite image shows infrastructure at the Though Iran has long maintained that its program is for peaceful purposes. However, it also had been enriching uranium up to 60 per cent, a short, technical step away from weapons-grade levels of 90 per cent. Iran was the only non-nuclear-weapon state to enrich at that level. The international community has remained deeply uneasy about Arak, especially since other countries have used similar reactors to produce plutonium for nuclear arms. Adding to the concern is the secrecy surrounding the site's development, with reports suggesting that foreign experts—possibly including Russian engineers, were involved in its construction. The full extent of that involvement, however, remains unclear. A key player in Iran's 2015 nuclear deal After Iran secretly developed its heavy water research reactor, a turning point came in 2015, when Iran signed a historic agreement with several world powers, including the United States. Commonly referred to as the Iran nuclear deal, the pact aimed to roll back Tehran's nuclear programme in exchange for relief from billions of dollars' worth of international sanctions, Politico reported. As part of the deal, Iran committed to redesigning the Arak reactor and scaling back parts of its nuclear infrastructure to address global concerns around nuclear proliferation. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD In 2019, Iran proceeded with launching the secondary circuit of the Arak reactor. While this did not constitute a formal breach of the 2015 agreement, it was widely seen as a significant step that nudged the country closer to nuclear weapons capability. In 2019, Iran proceeded with launching the secondary circuit of the Arak reactor. It was widely seen as a significant step that nudged the country closer to nuclear weapons capability. AP However, the Arak reactor returned to the global spotlight, following the US exit from the deal. Ali Akbar Salehi, a top Iranian nuclear official, claimed on Iranian state television in 2019 that Iran had obtained extra parts to replace the section of the reactor that had been sealed with concrete as per the nuclear agreement. With Iran increasingly limiting access to its nuclear facilities, the IAEA later said it had lost 'continuity of knowledge' regarding the country's heavy water production. This meant inspectors could no longer independently verify how much heavy water Iran was producing or stockpiling. Why Israel struck the Arak heavy water reactor Although the Arak reactor has never been brought online and has never been fuelled with uranium, Israel said the facility posed a significant risk that needed to be neutralised. Nuclear analysts estimate that if Arak were ever fully operational, it could generate up to 9 kilograms of plutonium each year, an amount sufficient to build at least one nuclear weapon annually, provided the spent fuel is reprocessed. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD In Thursday's strike, Israel claimed to have specifically targeted the reactor's dome and core seal, with the intention of rendering it permanently unusable for producing plutonium, a material central to making an atomic bomb. 'The strike targeted the component intended for plutonium production, in order to prevent the reactor from being restored and used for nuclear weapons development,' Israel said. The IAEA later confirmed that there were no radioactive substances present at the site and assured that there was no radiological threat to the public. However, the agency also repeated its longstanding position that nuclear facilities, whether operational or not, should never be treated as military targets. With input from AP
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
36 minutes ago
- First Post
What are cluster munitions that Iran used against Israel? What makes them so dangerous?
On Thursday, Iran launched a ballistic missile at Israel carrying a warhead that dispersed roughly 20 cluster submunitions over an eight-kilometre radius in central Israel. The warhead split mid-air at an altitude of seven kilometres. While one bomblet struck a home in Azor, many failed to explode. Israel and Iran are not signatories to the 2008 ban on such weapons read more A Ukrainian military serviceman holds a defused cluster bomb from an MSLR missile that did not explode on impact, in the region of Kharkiv, Ukraine, October 21, 2022. File Image/Reuters On Thursday, Iran fired a missile at Israel that dispersed multiple small explosive devices intended to inflict greater harm on civilians, according to the Israeli military and its embassy in Washington. This marks the first known use of cluster munitions in the ongoing week-long conflict. 'Today, the Iranian Armed Forces fired a missile that contained cluster submunitions at a densely populated civilian area in Israel,' the embassy said in an email to Reuters. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'Cluster weapons are designed to disperse over a large area and maximize the chances of a harmful strike,' the email continued. 'Iran unlawfully fired deliberately at civilian population centers, and seeks to maximise the damage to civilians in them by using wide-dispersal munitions.' What are cluster munitions? Cluster munitions are explosive weapons designed to disperse smaller submunitions — often referred to as 'bomblets' — over a wide area. These submunitions, which weigh less than 20 kilogrammes each, are released mid-air from a central dispenser or container, and descend unguided toward the ground. Each submunition is intended to explode on impact, causing widespread damage to personnel, vehicles and soft targets spread across several hundred meters. They are deployed through various delivery systems, including artillery shells, missiles, rockets and air-dropped bombs. A typical artillery shell may carry dozens of submunitions, while a Multiple Launch Rocket System (MLRS) rocket can carry hundreds. For instance, the M26A1/A2 variant of the MLRS rocket contains 518 bomblets, while the M864 variant of a 155mm artillery shell carries 76. The United States had produced all three types — air-delivered, artillery and rocket-launched — but stopped producing them in 2008 and has gradually converted its stockpiles to comply with international conventions. Nonetheless, these weapons were once the US standard during the Cold War and remained in stockpiles for decades. The most advanced US submunition, the M77, has dual-purpose capabilities — penetration for vehicle targets and fragmentation for personnel. Unlike a 'unitary' warhead, which detonates in a single powerful blast, cluster munitions are designed for wide-area impact, increasing the chance of hitting multiple targets but also dramatically increasing the risk to civilians and non-combatants. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD How did Iran deploy cluster munitions in Israel? On Thursday, Iran launched a ballistic missile at Israel equipped with a warhead containing cluster submunitions, in what the Israeli Defense Forces described as the first such usage since the beginning of the recent hostilities. The warhead reportedly split at an altitude of around 7 kilometres (4.3 miles) above ground and dispersed approximately 20 submunitions across an estimated 8-kilometre (5-mile) radius. The small bomblets do not possess any propulsion or guidance system of their own. They simply fall to the ground and are designed to detonate upon impact. However, in this case, many reportedly did not explode. One submunition did hit a home in the town of Azor, causing structural damage. The Times of Israel reported that the damage was equivalent to that of a small rocket, as each of the bomblets carried an explosive charge of approximately 2.5 kilogrammes. While no injuries were reported from the attack, the presence of unexploded ordnance raised alarms. The IDF Home Front Command said sappers located and disposed of at least 20 unexploded bomblets but warned the public not to approach missile remnants, which could act as de facto landmines. Brigadier General Effie Defrin of the Israeli military noted, 'The terror regime seeks to harm civilians and even used weapons with wide dispersal in order to maximise the scope of the damage.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Why are cluster munitions considered dangerous? Cluster munitions are highly controversial due to their indiscriminate nature and the enduring danger posed by unexploded submunitions. The explosive bomblets, when deployed over a wide area, cannot distinguish between military targets and civilians. This makes their use in populated regions particularly devastating. Humanitarian concerns primarily focus on the dud rate — the proportion of submunitions that fail to explode as intended. These unexploded devices can remain hidden for years, causing injuries or fatalities long after active hostilities have ceased. Estimates of dud rates vary widely, from as low as 2 per cent to as high as 40 per cent, with US-made munitions generally performing better and Russian versions often exhibiting higher failure rates. 'They are egregious weapons with their wide-area destruction, especially if used in a civilian populated area and could add to the unexploded ordnance left over from conflicts," said Daryl Kimball, Executive Director of the Arms Control Association. He added that Iranian missiles tend to be imprecise, making it even more likely that such munitions will hit civilians rather than military targets. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The 2008 Convention on Cluster Munitions, signed by 112 countries and 12 observer entities, explicitly prohibits the use, development, production, acquisition, stockpiling or transfer of cluster munitions. The text of the convention states that these weapons 'kill or maim civilians, including women and children, obstruct economic and social development… impede post-conflict rehabilitation and reconstruction (and) delay or prevent the return of refugees and internally displaced persons… for many years after use.' However, Iran, Israel, Russia, Ukraine and the United States have not joined the treaty. While the US halted production in 2008 and converted many stockpiles, it has maintained the right to deploy such munitions in certain conflict scenarios. In 2023, after prolonged debate, the US transferred cluster artillery shells to Ukraine for use against Russian forces, as Kyiv accused Moscow of deploying similar weapons in the ongoing conflict. Could Iran have MIRV capability? In the aftermath of the missile strike, Israeli military technicians began recovering dozens of unexploded canisters and are now investigating whether Iran's missile technology may include true MIRV (Multiple Independently Targetable Reentry Vehicle) capability. While MIRVs differ from cluster munitions, they also deploy multiple warheads from a single missile. However, each warhead in a MIRV system is capable of being directed at separate, distinct targets and is guided, unlike the bomblets in a cluster bomb which are unguided. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD While no official confirmation has been made regarding MIRV usage, the inquiry highlights increasing concern over Iran's missile technology and whether its capabilities may be more advanced or diversified than previously assessed. Also Watch: With inputs from agencies
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Orban's anti-Ukraine campaign targets political rival as Hungary's elections loom
As Hungary heads toward national elections next spring and the populist government's popularity slumps, Prime Minister Viktor Orban has zeroed in on a central theme he hopes will sway voters: an alleged threat posed by neighboring Ukraine. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now While most European Union countries have offered political, financial, and military support to Kyiv since Russia's full-scale invasion in 2022, Hungary under Orban has charted a starkly different course - refusing to supply Ukraine with weapons or allow their transit through Hungarian territory, demanding sanctions relief and rapprochement with Russia, and adopting a combative stance toward both Kyiv and its EU backers. With his ruling Fidesz party slipping in the polls and a new opposition force gaining momentum, Orban has escalated a sweeping anti-Ukraine campaign - presenting the upcoming election as a referendum on peace or war. Going further, he has accused his leading political opponent of entering into a treasonous pact with Kyiv to overthrow his government and install a pro-Western, pro-Ukraine administration. Orban opposes Ukraine's accession to the EU Some of his ideas mirror the growing anti-Ukraine messaging coming from right-wing populists in the West, including from President Donald Trump. "Let's be under no illusions: Brussels and Ukraine are jointly building up a puppet government (in Hungary)," Orban said on June 6 in comments to state radio. "They want to change Hungary's policy toward Ukraine after the next elections, or even sooner." At the heart of Orban's claims is Ukraine's ambition to join the EU, something Kyiv believes would place it firmly within the embrace of the West and provide a measure of security against potential Russian attacks in the future. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now While Orban was a firm supporter of Ukraine's eventual EU accession shortly after Russia launched its full-scale invasion, he now argues that its membership - which will likely take many years - would flood Hungary with crime, cheap labor, and low-quality agricultural products, threatening national sovereignty and economic stability. He has also spuriously claimed that Brussels and Kyiv intend to force Hungarians to fight Russia on the front lines. On Monday, Orban posted a video to his social media page depicting animated, artificial intelligence-generated scenes of bloodied, machine-gun wielding Hungarian soldiers engaged in armed conflict, and rows of caskets lined beneath Hungarian flags. "We don't want our children, in the form of the Hungarian army, to be deployed to the Ukrainian front lines or to Ukrainian territory and to come back in coffins," he said in the video. Campaign targets the main opposition leader Central to Orban's life-or-death narrative of the Hungarian election is his growing campaign against his main political rival, Peter Magyar, a former Fidesz insider whose new Tisza party has surged in popularity. Once married to Hungary's former justice minister, Magyar has become the most formidable challenger to Orban's rule since the EU's longest-serving leader took office in 2010. With Tisza leading Fidesz in most independent polls, some analysts and domestic critics believe Orban may be laying the groundwork to discredit or even disqualify Magyar ahead of the 2026 election. Peter Kreko, director of the Budapest-based Political Capital think tank, said Orban's attempt to link Magyar and Tisza to the image of a dangerous Ukraine is aimed at neutralizing his domestic opposition as popular sentiment appears to be turning against him. "There is an ongoing campaign against any critical voices in Hungary saying that they are agents of Ukraine, and this can be used also against the Tisza party," he told The Associated Press. "If you can't win back public opinion anymore, then you can try to use a more authoritarian toolkit." Beyond political rhetoric, such accusations have reached the highest levels of diplomacy. In May, Ukraine's main security agency said that it had arrested two people on suspicion of spying for Hungary by gathering intelligence on Ukraine's military defenses in the west of the country. That set off a tit-for-tat series of diplomatic expulsions, and accusations from Hungary's government that the affair was part of a concerted Ukrainian campaign involving Magyar and his party to undermine Orban. The prime minister accused Magyar and Tisza of being "pro-Ukrainian" and supporting Ukraine's EU bid, and alleging that a prominent Tisza member, the former chief of staff of the Hungarian military, has "deep ties with Ukrainian intelligence." No evidence has been provided to support the claims, which Magyar has dismissed outright. "It is outrageous and blood-boiling when a patriot who trained and prepared to be a soldier since the age of 14 and who took a military oath ... is accused of treason by people who would sell their country out," Magyar told a news conference on June 5. Ukraine pushes back To reinforce its message, the Hungarian government launched a state-funded communication blitz in March, accompanied by a non-binding "national consultation" on Ukraine's EU membership. Billboards, television ads, and social media posts have flooded the country, portraying Ukrainian President and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen as the architects of a plot to undermine, or even destroy Hungary. "They would bring Ukraine into the EU, but we would pay the price!" reads one poster. "Let's vote no!" Ukrainian officials have been restrained in reacting to the Hungarian campaign. But in an interview published last week in Hungarian outlet Valasz Online, Zelenskyy criticized the government's use of his face as part of its media barrage, and accused Orban of being "anti-Ukrainian and anti-European." "He is using this in his domestic policy: he wants to turn the war in Ukraine to his own advantage in the elections. That is dishonest," Zelenskyy said. In a post on X on Tuesday, Ukraine's foreign ministry also pushed back on Hungary's accusations. "The Hungarian government's communication line, which demonizes Ukraine and President Zelenskyy, has gone off the rails," the ministry's spokesman, Heorhii Tykhyi, wrote. "We don't see Hungary demanding that Russia accept a ceasefire ... They remain silent when principled action is needed and make baseless accusations when diplomacy is required."
