
Trump used Juneteenth to denounce ‘nonworking holidays.' Some political observers say it wasn't a coincidence
For social justice activist Glenn Harris, President Donald Trump's statement on Juneteenth, arguing there are 'too many nonworking holidays in America' costing the country 'billions of dollars,' was no surprise.
Harris said the comments coming on the federal holiday commemorating the end of slavery in the United States were consistent with Trump's most recent policies and practices working against people of color.
'In many ways it's just a continuation of this administration's attempt to erase the civil rights, free speech and literally the history of Black and brown people,' said Harris, who is president of Race Forward.
Since taking office in January, the Trump administration has sought to eliminate diversity, equity and inclusion practices in the federal government, corporate America and college campuses. The administration has also dismissed high-ranking minorities from the military, removed government webpages celebrating the historic achievements of people of color and accused the National Museum of African American History and Culture of being influenced by 'divisive, race-centered ideology.'
Trump's attacks on DEI led some groups to scale back or cancel Juneteenth events this year.
Juneteenth marks the day Union Army Maj. Gen. Gordon Granger went to Galveston, Texas, to tell slaves they were free in 1865. This came more than two years after President Abraham Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation on January 1, 1863.
In 2021, former President Joe Biden signed legislation passed by Congress to designate June 19, or Juneteenth National Independence Day, as a US federal holiday.
The bill came one year after the nation faced a racial reckoning sparked by the murder of George Floyd.
It was the first federal holiday to receive approval since Martin Luther King Jr. Day, which was established in 1983.
Civil rights activist Opal Lee spent years lobbying for Juneteenth to receive national recognition, including leading a walk from Texas to Washington, DC, and starting a petition which garnered millions of signatures.
Lee has been nicknamed the 'Grandmother of Juneteenth.'
Jeremy Paul, a constitutional law professor at Northeastern University, said making Juneteenth a federal holiday gave it fresh significance to the US.
'It changes the culture of the country when we decide that this is something that we either want to celebrate or commemorate,' Paul said.
Harris shared those sentiments, saying Juneteenth represents joy for Black Americans. But Harris said he's concerned Trump's comments on the holiday are only creating more division.
'It's the nation naming its values, and I think in that moment people find hope, find inspiration, lean into possibility,' Harris said. 'But sadly for some people they find fear. They are worried about losing power rather than imagining that collectively we as a nation are more powerful when we see and hear each other and learn from each other about what it means to be free.'
Trump himself once supported making Juneteenth a holiday.
During the 2020 presidential campaign, Trump rolled out a plan to appeal to Black voters, including a pledge to make Juneteenth a federal holiday. He also took credit for making Juneteenth 'very famous,' saying during his first term, 'nobody had ever heard of it.'
Despite Trump's decision not to recognize or honor Juneteenth this year, it will remain a federal holiday, experts said, because just like it required Congressional approval to make it a holiday, Congress would have to also vote to rescind it.
In 2021, the bill passed the House 415-14 after the Senate unanimously passed the legislation.
'He lacks the legal authority' to cancel the holiday, Paul said.
Still, some experts said it was no coincidence Trump complained about the number of federal holidays on the day celebrating Black liberation.
Paul said he believes it was an appeal to Trump's base.
'It's unlikely that the fact that he chose to make the statement on Juneteenth was accidental,' Paul said. 'I think he's trying to send a message to the people who wish that Juneteenth had never been made a holiday, who are unhappy with the growing multicultural nature of our society … that he sees them and they have a place in America too. It's sad but that's where he is.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
5 Top Ways Your Paycheck Will Change If the Supreme Court Allows Mass Layoffs
In recent news, it was announced that the Trump Administration's mass layoff plan — also called a 'reduction in force' plan — has once again moved to the Supreme Court for final approval. If it passes, 22 government departments could be affected as thousands of federal employees would be let go from their jobs. Read Next: Find Out: If the Supreme Court allows this mass layoff, it could have a ripple effect across both federal and non-federal employees. Here's how experts think it might impact workers in the U.S. — and potentially your paycheck. Recent changes have already impacted employees across the board. For federal workers, there's a significant increase of those being forced to leave the workforce without severance pay. 'While, initially, many of the federal workers cut from the workforce accepted a voluntary incentive to leave the ranks earlier than they might otherwise have left, there are thousands more who were simply severed without compensation,' said Eric Steffy, Founder and CEO at Federal Solutions Support. Steffy added that many of those who were severed without pay were employees who were still on probation and contract workers. That said, many of those severed are still eligible for state unemployment benefits as they seek new opportunities in the private sector. Mass layoffs in the federal government could have implications regarding job stability and workplace confidence. 'Even for non-federal workers, substantial cuts in the federal workforce can create impacts on job stability, local economic systems, and public confidence,' said Eric Kingsley, Partner at Kingsley Szamet Employment Lawyers. 'It is possible that we can witness shrinking consumer spending, increased competition for available jobs, and a general sense of insecurity pervading the job market.' Increased competition could also lead to more skilled workers vying for jobs with a lower starting salary. This is especially plausible as more federal workers seek private sector opportunities. The average federal worker earns $106,382 annually. However, federal workers often get paid less than their private sector counterparts. As per The Federal News Network, there's a 24.72% wage gap between federal and private sector workers who have jobs where they perform similar duties. Given this, federal employees who get laid off and need to make the switch could see a pay increase. Just because many people would be laid off doesn't mean everybody would be. After all, someone still needs to perform the tasks at hand. But even here, there could be the downside of heavier workloads and more responsibilities for those who remain. Some experts believe this could also lead to longer hours, potentially without overtime pay — that's more work. 'Salaried employees, who are not eligible for overtime pay, may be expected to work longer hours without additional compensation,' said George Carrillo, former Director of Social Determinants of Health for Oregon and current Co-founder & Chief Executive Officer at Hispanic Construction Council. 'Hourly workers typically won't see a pay increase either, since government compensation is fixed within existing budget agreements and union contracts.' Another potential impact is that on small businesses — both the owners and the employees. As Steffy pointed out, many small businesses work in part based on federal grants and contracts. This has led to some businesses shutting down permanently, while others have laid off some of their employees as a result of canceled contracts. 'This has been painful not only for those business owners who must now weigh whether their work can go forward, but for severed employees now without a paycheck and those downstream who benefited from their services,' Steffy said. Mass layoffs on any level are stressful, but they're not the end of the world. 'One thing is certain, the marketplace will continue to evolve. Federal and non-federal jobs will come and go but the skillset, mindset, and lifetime experience that you bring to the table are needed in multiple venues,' said Steffy. If you're stressing about your livelihood, take a moment to calm down. It might help to talk to someone you trust and to make a plan — just in case. More From GOBankingRates 10 Unreliable SUVs To Stay Away From Buying This article originally appeared on 5 Top Ways Your Paycheck Will Change If the Supreme Court Allows Mass Layoffs
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Stock Market Today: Dow Jones Rallies On Trump Ceasefire Declaration, Powell Speech Due Next (Live Coverage)
The Dow Jones index rallied Tuesday after President Trump declared a ceasefire in the Israel-Iran conflict. Fed Chairman Jerome Powell is due to speak shortly.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Fact Check: Trump allegedly claimed in 2011 tweet that Obama would start war with Iran to get elected. We checked his timeline
Claim: President Donald Trump tweeted on Nov. 29, 2011: 'In order to get elected, @BarackObama will start a war with Iran.' Rating: In mid-June 2025, a claim about a tweet from U.S. President Donald Trump's account gained widespread circulation on social media. The tweet, allegedly posted in 2011, stated: "In order to get elected, @BarackObama will start a war with Iran." Multiple users across various platforms shared screenshots of this tweet, with some questioning its authenticity. One example occurred on June 16, 2025, when an X account posted (archived) a screenshot of the tweet with the caption "OLD TRUMP TWEET RESURFACES..." This post received over 221,000 views and over 3,700 likes in four days. (DramaAlert/X) The claim also appeared on Facebook (archived) and Hindustan Times (archived), an Indian English-language daily newspaper based in Delhi. The circulation coincided with ongoing tensions (archived) between Israel and Iran, with Trump facing decisions (archived) about potential U.S. military involvement in the Middle East as president. Our examination confirmed that Trump posted this tweet on Nov. 29, 2011, at 12:48 p.m. EDT. The tweet remains (archived) on Trump's account and can be verified through direct examination of his Twitter history. In order to get elected, @BarackObama will start a war with Iran. — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 29, 2011 This November 2011 tweet was the first in a series of predictions Trump made about former President Barack Obama and Iran between 2011 and 2013. As we documented when we first examined this topic in 2019, Trump posted at least seven tweets predicting that Obama would launch military strikes against Iran for various political motivations, including to "get elected," "boost his poll numbers," "save face," and "show how tough he is." According to our reporting in 2019, these predicted military incursions did not occur. Obama completed both presidential terms without ordering military attacks on Iran. Obama pursued diplomatic negotiations that resulted in the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) in 2015, an international agreement limiting Iran's nuclear program in exchange for sanctions relief. On June 21, 2025, Trump announced he had ordered U.S. bomber attacks on nuclear sites on nuclear sites in Iran: — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) June 21, 2025 Mikkelson, David. "Did Trump Tweet Multiple Predictions That Obama Would Attack Iran?" Snopes, July 2, 2019, Accessed June 20, 2025. Gambrell, Jon, Melanie Lidman, and Julia Frankel. "Israel strikes Iran's nuclear sites and kills top generals. Iran retaliates with missile barrages," AP News, June 18, 2025, Accessed June 20, 2025. Patta, Debora, and Tucker Reals. "Trump says no decision yet on U.S. joining Israel's attacks on Iran, after Iran warns it would risk 'all-out war,'" CBS News, June 18, 2025, Accessed June 20, 2025. Obama, Barack. "Statement by the President on Iran." Obama White House Archives, July 14, 2015, Accessed June 20, 2025.