‘Camouflaged invasion': Panama opposition slams security pact with the US
Opposition politicians in Panama have accused the United States of launching a 'camouflaged invasion' of the country after President Donald Trump confirmed the deployment of US soldiers days after the two countries signed a security pact.
US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on Thursday confirmed that deals, including a memorandum of understanding, were reached between the US and Panamanian authorities in efforts to secure 'the Panama Canal from Chinese influence'.
'The Panama Canal is key terrain that must be secured by Panama, with America, and not China,' Hegseth said in a statement on Wednesday during his three-day trip to Panama.
Hegseth said a deal with the Panama Canal Authority would allow US warships and auxiliary ships 'first and free' passage through the canal that connects the Pacific Ocean with the Atlantic and is a chief conduit for global trade.
He added that US troops would be deployed at three former military bases – Fort Sherman, Rodman Naval Base and Howard Air Force Base – as part of a deal signed with Panama's Ministry of Public Security, raising concerns in Panama. The last US troops were pulled out from the country in 1999.
In a video posted on social media on Friday, Ricardo Lombana, the leader of the opposition Another Way Movement, called the memorandum of understanding reached between the US and Panamanian governments days earlier 'an invasion without firing a shot'.
The agreement was reached after a three-day visit by US Defense Secretary Hegseth.
On Thursday, President Trump confirmed that US soldiers and military personnel were deployed to Panama as part of the deal, telling reporters, 'We've moved a lot of troops to Panama.'
Despite an insistence by the Panamanian government that these are not 'military bases' and that the deal is temporary, the opposition believes the US has re-established its military presence in the country.
'No matter what you want to call it, what we've read in this memo is the establishment of military bases,' said Lombana, the opposition leader.
He added that the 'firm step' slogan that the government has been using in its political messaging now 'limps and kneels under pressure'.
The last US military bases in Panama were evacuated in 1999 as part of the Torrijos-Carter Treaties signed in 1977 with the aim of handing control over the canal to Panama.
The US also invaded Panama in 1989 as part of what it called 'Operation Just Cause' to depose leader Manuel Noriega.
US troops were accused of killing thousands of civilians and destroying homes and infrastructure during the operation, leaving a controversial legacy.
That is partly why frustration has been growing in Panama over Trump's declaration that he intends to 'take back' the Panama Canal.
The US has refused to acknowledge Panama's ownership over the canal as part of the negotiations that led to the defence pact signed earlier this week.
The Panamanian opposition, along with the local chapter of Transparency International, which works to promote more responsible governance practices, have called on the government to inform the country about the precise contents of the agreement with the US.
China has heavily criticised the agreement, maintaining that it views the Panama Canal as a permanently neutral international passageway.
The canal handles about 40 percent of US container traffic and 5 percent of global trade.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
10 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
World leaders weigh in on ‘alarming' Israel-Iran conflict
World leaders and senior officials have called on both Israel and Iran to walk back from the brink of all-out war as the bitter enemies traded intense attacks for a second day. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu claimed on Saturday that Israel's strikes on Iranian infrastructure had set its nuclear programme back years, without providing evidence, but rejected global calls for restraint. 'We will hit every site and every target of the Ayatollahs' regime, and what they have felt so far is nothing compared with what they will be handed in the coming days,' he said in a video message. During its surprise attack on Friday, the Israeli army targeted more than 200 military and nuclear sites, killing top Iranian army commanders, scientists and other senior officials. Iran strong retaliation penetrated Israel's lauded missile defence on Friday night and overnight into Saturday, with air raid sirens sounding across Israel. At least four people were killed, with the Israeli military saying Iran had fired about 200 ballistic missiles in four waves. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian warned on Saturday of a 'more severe and powerful response' if Israel continued to strike. In light of the escalation, world leaders have spoken to Iranian and Israeli top officials, fearing a possible regional war. Here is what some countries have said: The United States President Donald Trump says he spoke to his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin about the conflicts in the Middle East and Ukraine. 'He feels, as do I, this war in Israel-Iran should end, to which I explained, his war should also end,' Trump wrote in a social media post. Earlier, top Kremlin aide Yuri Ushakov told reporters Putin spoke to Trump and condemned Israel's attacks on Iran. Putin 'expressed serious concern about a possible escalation of the conflict, which would have unpredictable consequences for the entire situation in the Middle East', Ushakov said, According to Ushakov, Trump described the current events in the Middle East as 'very alarming'. The two leaders did not rule out a return to the negotiating meetings on Iran's nuclear programme, Ushakov said. President Recep Tayyip Erdogan told the Iranian president that Israel was looking to 'drag the whole region into the fire,' according to a statement from the Turkish presidency. Erdogan also told Pezeshkian that Israel's attacks aimed to divert attention from the genocide in Gaza. Erdogan told Saudi Arabia's Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman that Israel needed 'to be stopped', calling it 'the main threat to stability and security in the region'. The issue of Iran's nuclear programme 'can only be resolved through negotiations', he added. The Turkish leader also spoke with Jordan's King Abdullah II and Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi. Similarly, Erdogan told Trump in a phone call that he sees nuclear negotiations as the only way to resolve the conflict. Erdogan told Trump that Turkiye supports Washington's view that nuclear negotiations should continue to resolve the fighting and that Ankara is ready to help prevent an uncontrolled escalation, a statement by his office said. Foreign Minister Wang Yi spoke to his Iranian and Israeli counterparts and made clear Beijing's support for Tehran. Wang told Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi that Beijing 'supports Iran in safeguarding its national sovereignty, defending its legitimate rights and interests, and ensuring the safety of its people', according to a statement by the foreign ministry. Wang told Araghchi that Israel's actions 'seriously violate … the basic norms governing international relations', adding attacks on nuclear facilities 'have set a dangerous precedent with potentially catastrophic consequences'. During his conversation with Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar, Wang expressed that its attack on Iran was 'unacceptable'. 'Diplomatic means for the Iranian nuclear issue have not been exhausted, and there is still hope for a peaceful solution. Force cannot bring lasting peace,' Wang said, adding that Beijing was willing to play a role in de-escalating the conflict. Emir Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani also spoke with Pezeshkian and reiterated Qatar's strong condemnation and denunciation of the Israeli attack targeting the territory of Iran, considering it a 'blatant violation of Iran's sovereignty and security, and a clear breach of the rules and principles of international law'. The Qatari leader also called for a diplomatic solution to reach a lasting and comprehensive peace in the region. Pezeshkian has held a phone call with Saudi Arabia's Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, IRNA reports. The Saudi State news agency confirmed the call. 'Since taking office as president, I have sought to strengthen peace, stability and security in the region, but the Zionist regime has disrupted and sabotaged every area where we wanted to achieve something,' Pezeshkian was quoted as saying. The Saudi crown prince said, 'the Kingdom condemns ongoing attacks that undermine Iran's sovereignty and security. ' Ties between Riyadh and Tehran have improved significantly since the two countries agreed to restore diplomatic relations in 2023 after years of animosity. The British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said Saturday that the UK is moving military assets, including fighter jets, to the Middle East for contingency support across the region. Foreign Secretary David Lammy said he was 'alarmed' by the overnight strikes 'with reports of fatalities and injuries in Israel'. 'We must urgently de-escalate & prevent any further harm to civilians,' Lammy said on X, adding that he had spoken to his Iranian counterpart 'to urge calm'. Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul spoke to his Saudi Arabian counterpart, Faisal bin Farhan Al Saud, and warned that the risk of 'further escalation is real.' 'Iran's nuclear program threatens not only Israel, but also Saudi Arabia and the broader stability of the region. The countries here share a clear goal: to prevent nuclear proliferation. Germany is firmly committed to de-escalation,' he wrote on X. President Emmanuel Macron said he spoke to his Iranian counterpart and called for French 'diplomatic facilities and nationals in Iran and the wider region not to be targeted under any circumstances'. 'I also urged the utmost restraint to avoid escalation. Iran's nuclear program is a serious concern and must be resolved through negotiation,' Macron wrote on X. 'I therefore invited President [Masoud] Pezeshkian to return swiftly to the negotiating table to reach an agreement — the only viable path to de-escalation … We stand ready to contribute and to mobilise all our efforts to achieve that goal,' he added. Pope Leo XIV called on Israel and Iran to show responsibility and reason. 'The situation in Iran and Israel has seriously deteriorated at such a delicate moment. I wish to forcefully renew an appeal for responsibility and reason,' the pope said in a statement. 'The commitment to build a safer world free from the nuclear threat must be pursued through a respectful meeting and sincere dialogue,' he said. 'No one should ever threaten the existence of the other,' he added.
Qatar Tribune
17 hours ago
- Qatar Tribune
Nippon Steel's $11 billion US steel investment cleared under Trump order
Agencies President Donald Trump on Friday signed an executive order paving the way for a Nippon Steel investment in U.S. Steel, so long as the Japanese company complies with a 'national security agreement' submitted by the federal government. Trump's order didn't detail the terms of the national security agreement. But the iconic American steelmaker and Nippon Steel said in a joint statement that the agreement stipulates that approximately $11 billion in new investments will be made by 2028 and includes giving the U.S. government a ' golden share ' — essentially veto power to ensure the country's national security interests are protected against cutbacks in steel production. 'We thank President Trump and his Administration for their bold leadership and strong support for our historic partnership,' the two companies said. 'This partnership will bring a massive investment that will support our communities and families for generations to come. We look forward to putting our commitments into action to make American steelmaking and manufacturing great again.' The companies have completed a U.S. Department of Justice review and received all necessary regulatory approvals, the statement said. 'The partnership is expected to be finalized promptly,' the statement said. U.S. Steel rose $2.66, or 5%, to $54.85 in afterhours trading Friday. Nippon Steel's original bid to buy the Pittsburgh-based U.S. Steel in late 2023 had been valued at $55 per share. The companies offered few details on how the golden share would work, what other provisions are in the national security agreement and how specifically the $11 billion would be spent. White House spokesman Kush Desai said the order 'ensures U.S. Steel will remain in the great Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and be safeguarded as a critical element of America's national and economic security.' James Brower, a Morrison Foerster lawyer who represents clients in national security-related matters, said such agreements with the government typically are not disclosed to the public, particularly by the government. They can become public, but it's almost always disclosed by a party in the transaction, such as a company — like U.S. Steel — that is publicly held, Brower said. The mechanics of how a golden share would work will depend on the national security agreement, but in such agreements it isn't unusual to give the government approval rights over specific activities, Brower said. U.S. Steel made no filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on Friday. Nippon Steel originally offered nearly $15 billion to purchase U.S. Steel in an acquisition that had been delayed on national security concerns starting during Joe Biden's presidency. As it sought to win over American officials, Nippon Steel gradually increased the amount of money it was pledging to invest into U.S. Steel. American officials now value the transaction at $28 billion, including the purchase bid and a new electric arc furnace — a more modern steel mill that melts down scrap — that they say Nippon Steel will build in the U.S. after 2028. Nippon Steel had pledged to maintain U.S. Steel's headquarters in Pittsburgh, put U.S. Steel under a board with a majority of American citizens and keep plants operating. It also said it would protect the interests of U.S. Steel in trade matters and it wouldn't import steel slabs that would compete with U.S. Steel's blast furnaces in Pennsylvania and Indiana. Trump opposed the purchase while campaigning for the White House, and using his authority Biden blocked the transaction on his way out of the White House. But Trump expressed openness to working out an arrangement once he returned to the White House in January. Trump said Thursday that he would as president have 'total control' of what U.S. Steel did as part of the investment. Trump said then that the deal would preserve '51% ownership by Americans,' although Nippon Steel has never backed off its stated intention of buying and controlling U.S. Steel as a wholly owned subsidiary. 'We have a golden share, which I control,' Trump said. Trump added that he was 'a little concerned' about what presidents other than him would do with their golden share, 'but that gives you total control.' The proposed merger had been under review by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, or CFIUS, during the Trump and Biden administrations. The order signed Friday by Trump said the CFIUS review provided 'credible evidence' that Nippon Steel 'might take action that threatens to impair the national security of the United States,' but such risks might be 'adequately mitigated' by approving the proposed national security agreement. The order doesn't detail the perceived national security risk and only provides a timeline for the national security agreement. The White House declined to provide details on the terms of the agreement. The order said the draft agreement was submitted to U.S. Steel and Nippon Steel on Friday. The two companies must successfully execute the agreement as decided by the Treasury Department and other federal agencies that are part CFIUS by the closing date of the transaction. Trump reserves the authority to issue further actions regarding the investment as part of the order he signed on Friday.
Qatar Tribune
17 hours ago
- Qatar Tribune
Canada to boost mining amid China's rare earth curbs, says ex-finance minister
Agencies Canada's new government will invest more in mining at a time when the country's economy and manufacturing sector are facing 'challenges' related to China's curbs on rare earth exports, Bill Morneau, former Canadian finance minister, told the Post. 'One of the challenges for Canada is that we will need to increase our own mining,' Morneau, who was in office between 2015 and 2020 under then-prime minister Justin Trudeau, said in Shanghai on Friday. 'The initiative by new [Prime Minister] Mark Carney is to advance the ability to get big projects done. Certainly, mining is one of the critical ones,' Morneau explained. The former official acknowledged how Canada had taken some flak – collateral damage – amid US-China trade war escalations. Canadian firms, he said, have been affected by China's export restrictions on critical minerals that are still reverberating through the global industrial chain. 'Canada has a very significant part to play in the North American automotive sector. Any challenges around rare earths have an impact on that sector and, therefore, on Canada,' he said. 'So, there is a stake in that discussion for Canada. It's one of the important reasons that we hope these things get resolved.' Canada is sitting on a reserve of 15.2 million tonnes of rare earth oxide, according to a 2023 official estimate. Its reserves include both light and heavy rare earth elements, with key projects in Quebec and Labrador. Also on Friday, Ontario Premier Doug Ford was quoted by the Financial Times as saying that Canada was fast-tracking development of its critical minerals reserve over indigenous opposition, to generate revenue in response to US President Donald Trump's tariffs. Morneau also complained about how long it took to get mining approvals. Mining projects in Canada have traditionally been a complex process involving multiple levels of government, with discussions concerning the environment, indigenous rights and workers' safety, to name a few. Sometimes the process can take several years. 'Canada has much opportunity … But we have not been as rapid in getting mining approvals as we would like,' Morneau said. 'But clearly, China has a significant advantage in rare earths from the investments made over many years. I hope that we have – as much as possible – a free flow of trade in that area.' In a new development, China has granted permits to a major rare earth miner to facilitate shipments to the US and Europe. This is widely seen as a positive outcome after Chinese and US officials had 'agreed in principle' to a trade framework – pending approval from their respective leaders – following crunch talks in London and a call between presidents Xi Jinping and Donald Trump on June 5. Beijing's perceived slow progress in loosening its export controls, in place since April, on critical minerals, the lifeline for hi-tech industries – including smartphones, electric vehicles and fighter jets – was a major gripe for the US. Morneau, an advocate of closer ties with China as a hedge against uncertainties from Canada's long-standing ally, said he was encouraged to see the latest talks between Beijing and Washington. 'There is a need for an understanding between the two, which will help all other countries in the Western sphere to have better trading opportunities with China,' he talks hold out hopes of a mutual understanding, he said, adding, however, that everyone has to understand there will continue to be geopolitical rivalries – those are natural and expected. 'The acute issue right now is, can we get to a more stable trading situation? There are places where the US and China will not agree. That's just the way it is. But as soon as we can get to an understanding on where we do agree, then it's easier to have a trading relationship that works.' Getting down to the specifics in trade talks is a good place to start, he said. 'Discussions about rare earths are specific discussions,' Morneau explained. 'If we can agree on the specifics and places where we are going to allow businesses to successfully interact, then that will be a precursor to improved outcomes.' On the Chinese economy, Morneau said China faces challenges similar to those faced by many countries. 'There are long-term demographic issues. There are the obvious challenges of moving to domestic demand-led growth when you have more volatility around trade,' he said. His advice to Beijing was to improve social security. 'One of the reasons people increase consumption is their confidence. Social programmes always have an important place to play,' he said. 'That's been our experience in Canada.' After both Beijing and Ottawa had repeatedly clashed with Washington on trade, Carney and Chinese Premier Li Qiang, in a June 6 phone call, agreed on a 'reset' in the bilateral relationship after years of turbulence. Morneau expressed optimism that China and Canada could expeditiously resolve disputes and grow trade in agriculture, natural resources and tech. China is Canada's second-largest trading partner after the US, but a string of incidents in recent years deeply strained ties. China also imposes tariffs on Canadian agricultural exports such as canola and seafood.
