
Charles Medawar obituary
My friend Charles Medawar, who has died suddenly aged 82, campaigned on consumer safety and corporate accountability. He started his career in the 1960s working with Michael Young at the Consumers' Association, where his research included the first testing of tar and nicotine in cigarettes (not that it stopped him from smoking at the time). After he became unhappy with the unquestioning promotion of consumerism and consumption, he went to the US, where he spent a formative time working with the activist Ralph Nader.
Back in the UK, having secured financial backing from the Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust, Charles set up Social Audit and the charity Public Interest Research Centre in 1972. Their groundbreaking work on transparency and corporate social responsibility was decades ahead of its time and went on to spawn the campaigns that secured the UK's freedom of information and whistleblowing laws.
From the late 80s, Charles focused on researching the way the pharmaceutical industry and regulators approached drug safety. This culminated in his books Power and Dependence (1992), on tranquillisers, and Medicines Out of Control (2004), on anti-depressants, which exposed how the risks of these addictive drugs were being downplayed and overlooked. Committed to openness, he made his work freely available on the internet, where it attracted around a million visits a year.
While he was not medically trained or qualified, Charles' expertise on pharma was called on by the World Health Organization and the UK parliament's health select committee. When group actions for drug injuries were first launched in the UK, it was no surprise that he was sought out by the claimants. In the Opren litigation (1985-88), there was a rare ruling from the court of appeal that approved his status as an expert. He played a notable role in establishing the case for haemophiliacs who had contracted HIV after being treated with infected blood products.
Charles was born in Oxford. His parents were Sir Peter Medawar, who won a Nobel prize for his pioneering work on transplantation, and Jean Taylor, a leading light in the Family Planning Association. He attended Westminster school and briefly Oxford University, before transferring to Indiana University, where he graduated in Russian. Despite, or perhaps because of, his establishment background, he was undaunted by power and authority and spent his life challenging the complacency and lack of accountability it can foster.
In 1974 he met Caroline Vogel, who became his wife, and they lived in Primrose Hill, north London, in former stables that he had designed and converted himself. Charles was a lovely man, whose integrity, mercurial charm and irreverence endeared him to all who knew him.
He is survived by Caroline, his three stepchildren, Anna, Toby and Dan, eight grandchildren and his siblings, Caroline, Louise and Alexander.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
8 hours ago
- Reuters
US FDA places clinical hold on 2 Gilead trials of weekly HIV pill combination
June 10 (Reuters) - The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has placed a clinical hold on Gilead Sciences' (GILD.O), opens new tab trials testing a combination of two of its experimental HIV treatments, the company said on Tuesday.


Telegraph
8 hours ago
- Telegraph
US aid cuts threaten South Africa's status as powerhouse of HIV and tuberculosis research
South Africa risks losing its status as a powerhouse of HIV and tuberculosis research as sweeping American funding cuts jeopardise dozens of experimental trials. At least 27 HIV trials and another 20 TB trials in the country have been put at risk by Donald Trump's deep cuts to foreign assistance and global health spending, new analysis shows. Loss of the trials would hit research projects looking for new vaccines into both infections, as well as new long-lasting protective medicines and studies into the best way to treat children. Having intense HIV and TB epidemics as well as world class universities and research institutes has made South Africa a leader in combating the two diseases. Yet while the research has often been led by South African scientists, it has overwhelmingly been conducted with international funding, particularly with 20 years of generous United States government aid spending. Prof Salim Abdool Karim, director of the Centre for the Aids Program of Research in South Africa, said: 'The US is such a big player in our country – South Africa is a powerhouse in medical research because of what the US spends.' The bulk of funding for research came from the US National Institutes of Health (NIH), with the country receiving an estimated £111m ($150m) each year. Prof Ntobeko Ntusi, the president and chief executive of the South African Medical Research Council (SAMRC), said earlier this year: 'In many ways the South African health research landscape has been a victim of its own success, because for decades we have been the largest recipients of both [official development assistance] funding from the US for research [and] also the largest recipients of NIH funding outside of the US.' Now, unless alternative sources of money can be found, South African academic and research institutes could lose about 30 per cent of their annual income and may be forced to lay off hundreds of staff, the analysis found. 'There's been a huge dependence on US funding. The loss of it for South Africa means the cancellation of a huge amount of research,' said Tom Ellman, director of the MSF's Southern Africa Medical Unit (SAMU). The joint analysis by Treatment Action Group (TAG) and Doctors Without Borders (MSF) of NIH-funded research found 39 TB and HIV clinical research sites are under threat, placing at least 27 HIV trials and 20 TB trials at risk. The effect of cuts could be wider still, with research also funded through other US channels, including the US President's Emergency Plan for Aids Relief (Pepfar), which has been slashed by Donald Trump's administration. Global research 'in peril' Lindsay McKenna, TB project co-director of TAG said: 'Public funding from the US government to South Africa is the scaffold on which pharmaceutical companies, philanthropies, and other governments invest in transformative TB and HIV science.' 'These ongoing funding disruptions by the US government don't just affect US-funded research projects, they put in peril a much wider ecosystem of global research.' Dr Ellman said a combination of the infections found in South Africa, its research base and its strong grass roots activism had combined, with US funding, to make the country so prominent in research. He said: 'For years, South Africa has spearheaded the research and development of critical innovative medical tools for the prevention, diagnosis, treatment and care of HIV and TB which have saved lives not just within South Africa's borders, but also in communities worldwide.' The country has more HIV patients than any other, with an estimated 8 million currently infected and 105,000 deaths annually. The high prevalence of HIV goes hand-in-hand with a high prevalence of tuberculosis, because TB takes advantage of patients' weakened immune systems. Tuberculosis is the biggest cause of death among those with HIV in South Africa, which recorded 54,000 TB deaths in 2023. At the same time, the country has strong research institutions and universities, and a history of medical innovation, including conducting the first heart transplant in 1969. Finally, the history of the apartheid struggle, and later the fight in the early 2000s to get antiretroviral drugs in the face of government AIDS denialism, has produced well-organised and politically-engaged health activists. According to the joint analysis, HIV trials now at risk include studies into using broadly neutralising antibodies (bNAbs) to find a cure, and also trials into long-lasting anti-HIV preventative jabs. The Brilliant Consortium, a collaboration of African researchers led by the SAMRC working to develop an HIV vaccine, lost all funding even as it was about to begin an early stage vaccine trial. Dr Ellman said: 'I think it would be a disaster if we gave up on the hope of finding an effective vaccine for HIV. All of that has been done with South Africa and without access to South African research and communities, it's not going to be possible.' The emergence of some resistance to antiretroviral drugs has also highlighted the importance of trials to find new drugs which can deal with the phenomenon. HIV trials are also looking at honing and improving existing treatment regimes, as well as simplifying and rolling out expensive techniques first used in the developing world. TB trials at risk include studies for new drugs and shorter, safer regimens for treatment and prevention. The cuts have a ripple effect beyond individual trials, because they also weaken research infrastructure which is used and relied on by other funders. That could have a knock-on effect on trials looking at new TB jab possibilities, including the promising new M72/AS01E vaccine candidate. South Africa is now scrabbling for alternative sources of funding to try to salvage as many of the research projects as possible. Dr Ellman said: 'We call on all potential donors to step up, as without sustained investment, we will never end these deadly epidemics.'

Leader Live
16 hours ago
- Leader Live
Psychological support system opens to infected blood victims
The nationwide service began a phased rollout in September, and is now open to people infected and affected across the country. The Infected Blood Psychological Service will include talking therapies; peer support and psychosocial support, NHS England said. More than 30,000 people in the UK were infected with HIV and hepatitis C after they were given contaminated blood and blood products between the 1970s and early 1990s. And more than 3,000 people have died as a result, while survivors are living with lifelong health implications. The new service is open to victims of the scandal as well as bereaved partners, parents, children and their extended families. People can self refer by phone or can be referred to the service by their GP. Officials said that a specialist therapist will help create tailored mental health plans for those in need of support. The Infected Blood Inquiry Report is now published on the Inquiry website. Access the Report here: — Infected Blood Inquiry (@bloodinquiry) May 20, 2024 Claire Murdoch, national mental health director at NHS England, said: 'The contaminated blood scandal and the subsequent long fight for answers have had life-altering physical and psychological impacts for thousands across the country and the NHS is determined to ensure that anyone infected or affected can receive evidence-based support and treatment. 'It has been so important that the Infected Blood Psychological Service has been co-designed with members of the infected blood community to ensure the best and most personalised care possible, and we are very grateful to all our partners who have helped establish these vital new services.' Nicola Leahey, from Lancashire, was infected with Hepatitis C following blood transfusions in 1975 and/or 1980, and was part of the expert advisory group to the new service. 'After my diagnosis, I felt that my body had been violated, that I had been physically and mentally abused, stripped of my dignity, my self-esteem diminished, I mourned lost opportunities, I felt betrayed,' she said. 'So many of us have long awaited the opportunity to have professional support to try to cope with the trauma and life-long effects that we've been subjected to. 'I'm thrilled that this much-needed service is now operational for both those infected and affected members of the infected blood community across England.' Professor Meghana Pandit, co-national medical director for secondary care at NHS England, added: 'Following the recommendations of the Inquiry, this new service represents a vital step in ensuring patients and families affected in England can be offered tailored psychological treatment and support, and we are pleased that specialist clinics are now open in all areas of England. 'This bespoke psychological treatment is already making a difference to the lives of the first people to access it, and we now want to ensure everyone eligible is aware of the services provided.'