
Remembering Gerry Connolly: Can one member make a difference in Congress?
An online newsletter recently carried a headline that read, quite simply, 'The missing branch.' I didn't have to read further to know it was about the lowly state into which Congress has fallen, particularly with its failure to respond to the administration's ongoing encroachments on its constitutional prerogatives.
Missing in action is not an enviable position for a major institution of the federal government.
Through it all I have wondered how the institution's decline has affected average House members and their expectations of what their job should be. Tarring Congress with a broad brush has been a popular sport for decades now, especially by columnists and commentators (present company included). But do we neglect the trees for the forest? Have we been giving short shrift to the dozens of members who labor quietly in the vineyards, serving their districts, their party, and the country with little thought of how they are portrayed in the media? I'm talking here about the workhorses versus the showhorses.
This thought slammed home to me last week in reading in the Washington Post last week about the passing of Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-Va.) who died of esophageal cancer. I made a list of all the characteristics we would want in our ideal representative in Congress. These include conscientious service to the district (bringing home the bacon); fairly reflecting the views of constituents in voting; working closely with colleagues on both sides of the aisle to enact effective laws; promoting the national interest through committee and chamber actions; and protecting the prerogatives of Congress as an institution by standing up to the executive. Connolly checked all of the boxes.
What distinguished Connolly from others was that he was not a lifelong pol who lived and breathed politics from the beginning, always with an eye to the cameras and getting elected and reelected. Instead, he eventually became involved in politics as a way to advance the many interests he had developed in other positions prior to elective office.
Connolly had originally studied for the priesthood for five years but abandoned that when the church did not take a stand against the Vietnam War. He went on to graduate with a B.A. in literature and a master's in public administration.
Along the way, he was associate director of the Freedom from Hunger Foundation, then executive director of the U.S. Committee for Refugees. He spent a decade on the staff of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, where he specialized in foreign assistance, drafting its annual foreign aid bills. By then, he was living in Fairfax County, Va., where he was drawn into local politics when an environmental disaster — a toxic chemical spill — occurred in his backyard.
This in turn eventually led to his election to the Fairfax County board and ultimately to his election as its chairman, focusing on transportation and infrastructure issues.
In 2008 he successfully ran as a Democrat for the U.S. House seat vacated by moderate Rep. Tom Davis (R-Va.). Connolly became an influential member of both the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and the Foreign Affairs Committee, pursuing his interests in the environment, high tech development and human rights. His district became a hub for attracting IT businesses and grew exponentially thanks to his efforts to bring the requisite infrastructure to sustain such growth, including the extension of Metro's Silver Line to Dulles Airport.
Although he twice failed to be elected chair of the House Oversight Committee, before being elected its ranking Democrat this year, he made his mark as a very effective chair of its subcommittee on government operations where he held the Trump administration to account through his oversight investigations and hearings.
Despite the rough and tumble party battles for committee leadership, Connolly distinguished himself by his bipartisan outreach to Republicans to co-sponsor bills that had a good chance to become law. One notable example of this was enactment of the Federal Information Technology Acquisition Reform Act in 2014, co-sponsored with Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.). It was the first major overhaul of federal IT management and oversight since 1996.
Connolly once noted the similarity between religious commitment and public service: they both involved a ministerial function to help people, especially those underserved both at home and abroad. That commitment shone through in all his endeavors both prior to and after entering electoral politics.
The key to success, I concluded, lies in having diverse interests and background experiences that take priority over political ambitions alone. Members today would do well to reflect on Connolly's legacy and what public service should be all about. It just might help allay some of the petty partisan bloviating and restore what the word 'Congress' really means: a coming together.
Don Wolfensberger is a 28-year congressional staff veteran culminating as chief of staff of the House Rules Committee in 1995. He is author of 'Congress and the People: Deliberative Democracy on Trial' (2000), and, 'Changing Cultures in Congress: From Fair Play to Power Plays' (2018).

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
House panel to consider advancing amended assault weapons ban bill to R.I. House floor
Yellow shirts of Second Amendment supporters frame the view of Rep. Jason Knight, a Barrington Democrat, lead sponsor of the bill to ban assault-style weapons, during a House Committee on Judiciary on Wednesday, March 26, 2025. Knight's amended bill is set for a vote on Tuesday, June 3. (Photo by Christopher Shea/Rhode Island Current) After securing a big win at the federal level Monday, Rhode Island's gun safety advocates are hoping the momentum continues at the State House Tuesday when a House panel will consider an amended bill to ban assault-style firearms. The U.S. Supreme Court declined to take up a challenge by gun rights advocates against the state's 2022 law banning firearm magazines that hold more than 10 rounds of ammunition. Rhode Island Attorney General Peter Neronha said in a statement he's grateful the court did not overturn the ban. 'As the Rhode Island General Assembly prepares to vote on the assault weapons ban, it is my hope that this office's successful defense of the large-capacity magazine ban inspires our leadership to act, and act boldly,' Neronha said. 'One life lost to gun violence is one too many.' The 15-member House Committee on Judiciary meets Tuesday at 3 p.m. to consider advancing amended legislation sponsored by Rep. Jason Knight, a Barrington Democrat, to the floor for a full vote by the chamber. Knight's bill has support from 38 of the House's 75 members. Speaker K. Joseph Shekarchi has previously indicated support for a ban on assault-style weapons. The proposal includes revisions based on feedback from a March 26 Judiciary Committee hearing where hundreds of Second Amendment advocates in yellow T-shirts outnumbered gun safety advocates. Under Knight's bill, assault weapons are defined as semiautomatic rifles, pistols, and shotguns equipped with accessories such as pistol grips, folding stocks, or threaded barrels. The amended version removed bayonet mounts and certain .22 caliber rimfire rifles and Olympic-style target pistols from the definition. The amended legislation now takes effect July 1, 2026, rather than Jan. 1, 2026. Knight said the new date was picked in order to give store owners more time to prepare for the change, and for state and local police to develop a voluntary firearm certification program for assault-style weapons acquired ahead of the ban. Knight's original legislation proposed that grandfathered weapons be registered with state or local police. Weapons acquired ahead of the ban would continue to be exempt from the legislation, but the amended bill also exempts firearms passed down through a family. The amended bill now exempts retired law enforcement officers. That's in addition to active police and members of the armed forces who would be allowed to keep assault-style weapons under the original bill. 'We got rid of one or two things upon reflection we probably did not need,' Knight said in an interview Monday. 'The vast majority of Rhode Islanders want this policy change,' he added, acknowledging two recent polls that found widespread support for banning assault weapons. A University of New Hampshire poll released May 29 found that 55% of the 653 residents surveyed were in favor of banning the sale and manufacture of firearms with 'military-style features.' A February poll conducted for the Rhode Island AFL-CIO found 64% of Rhode Islanders support the ban. Knight has backed legislation to ban assault-style weapons since 2018 — the same year then-Gov. Gina Raimondo established a gun-safety working group after a gunman killed 17 students in Parkland Florida with an AR-15. 'You see random acts of violence that involve multiple victims stepping up,' Knight said. 'It's our responsibility as a legislature to provide public order and safety.' What's not changing in the amended bill: Violators of the proposed ban would face up to 10 years in prison, a fine of up to $10,000 and forfeiture of their assault-style weapon. 'It's a good bill,' Melissa Carden, executive director of the Rhode Island Coalition Against Gun Violence, said in an interview. 'This is really momentous. This is the reason that the coalition was formed, it's been our priority for a really long time.' But Knight's changers are still not enough to appease gun rights advocates, who remain opposed to the proposed ban. 'Their concern is passing a bill for the win, and not reducing gun violence,' Glenn Valentine, president of the Rhode Island Second Amendment PAC, said in a text message Monday. The Gaspee Project, a nonprofit that touts its opposition to progressive and 'special interest' policies on its website, took to social media Friday evening to urge gun owners to keep opposing Knight's legislation. 'This amended version is just as awful as the original,' the group wrote on X. Companion legislation is filed in the Senate by Lou DiPalma, a Middletown Democrat, where the bill has 23 additional sponsors — including Senate President Valarie Lawson. DiPalma's bill was heard by the Senate Committee on Judiciary on May 14 where it was held for further study The bill has not been scheduled for the committee's consideration as of Monday. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Romanian pleads guilty to 'swatting' US lawmakers and top officials
By Raphael Satter WASHINGTON (Reuters) -A Romanian man has pleaded guilty to participating in a years-long series of dangerous hoax phone calls and bomb threats targeting American legislators, law enforcement leaders, and government officials, the U.S. Justice Department said Monday. In a statement, the department said that Thomasz Szabo, 26, who was extradited to the United States last year, admitted targeting more than 75 officials, four religious institutions, and multiple journalists in his campaign of intimidation. Officials said Szabo targeted private residences, including the homes and families of senior government officials. Authorities say Szabo routinely phoned in bomb threats and reports of ongoing violence or hostage situations at his targets' homes or places of work, a technique called 'swatting' because it is meant to elicit the emergency deployment of heavily armed police officers. Emails seeking comment from Szabo's lawyers were not immediately returned. Justice officials described Szabo as the leader of a group that made a series of false reports to U.S. law enforcement, including a December 2020 threat to commit a mass-shooting at New York City synagogues and a January 2021 threat to detonate explosives at the U.S. Capitol and kill then-President-elect Joe Biden. The department said that, in a two-month period alone, members of Szabo's gang targeted at least 25 members of Congress or their family members, six then-current or former senior U.S. federal officials, "including multiple cabinet-level officials," at least 13 then-current or former senior federal law enforcement officials, including the heads of multiple federal law enforcement agencies. Others targeted included members of the federal judiciary, state government officials, and members of the media. It was during that time that one of Szabo's subordinates boasted of "creating massive havoc" in the United States, the department said.
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Independent report reveals Lamont staffer used government-issued vehicle for personal use
HARTFORD, Conn. (WTNH) — An independent report commissioned by Gov. Ned Lamont (D) showed that a government official in his office was using a government-issued vehicle for personal use, according to a press release from the governor's office. Connecticut lawmakers reach deal on two-year budget, heads to House vote Jonathan Dach was chief of staff to the Office of the Governor (OTG) from Jan. 4, 2023 to July 3, 2024, at which time he transitioned to Senior Advisor. The report revealed that from Jan. 2023 to Sept. 2024, Dach used a Ford Escape issued by the OTG for personal use, using it to commute to and from work, parking it in prohibited locations, purchasing fuel with state funds and speeding. His personal usage violates a Connecticut state law that prohibits a public official from using their public office for personal gain. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.