Spending Review appeal for Devon railway link
Rail campaigners are battling for £1.5m government cash in the upcoming Spending Review to make a business case for a railway link in Devon.
TavyRail campaign group would like to see a five-mile (8km) section of track between Tavistock and Plymouth reinstated.
Services to Tavistock ended in the 1960s during the cuts by Dr Richard Beeching when the railways were restructured.
The Department of Transport (DfT) said it was "committed" to delivering transport infrastructure to "boost growth and opportunity".
It added: "The Government inherited an extremely challenging financial position, and these projects will be considered as part of the upcoming Spending Review."
TavyRail said only £1.5m of the project's £150m budget was needed to complete its business case and obtain necessary reports, with the remainder not required until construction in 2028.
Richard Searight, Tavyrail chairman, said the initial outlay would pay for experts to consider whether the line to Plymouth via Bere Alston would be "practical and value for money".
He said by 2028 the government would hopefully be in a "more secure" financial position.
The previous Conservative government said savings from scrapping the northern leg of the HS2 project could be used to reopen the line between Plymouth and Tavistock.
Devon County Council (DCC) submitted a business case for restoring the line in 2022, with hourly trains to Plymouth via Bere Alston.
In 2024, the Labour government outlined plans to cancel or shelve a number of rail projects because they were promised without funding or a plan to deliver them.
Deputy mayor of Tavistock, Anne Johnson, who is also vice-chairman of TavyRail, said housing plans had been agreed "off the back of the railway" and there was a "desperate need" for it to go ahead.
Steve Hipsey, Mayor of Tavistock, said: "The current estimate is that we have about 1,600 people commuting into Plymouth every day along the A386, and that can't be a good thing in terms of sustainability and carbon emissions."
"I think the whole thing makes a lot of sense in terms of economy, sustainability and social aspects as well."
Lack of South West transport funding criticised
Government urged not to ditch Devon rail scheme
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
UK Government ‘betraying Wales' over rail funding, Plaid leader says
Plaid Cymru has called for the First Minister of Wales to condemn the UK government for 'betraying Wales' on rail funding. Rhun ap Iorwerth, leader of Plaid, criticised the UK Labour Government for reclassifying the £6.6 billion Oxford to Cambridge line to an England and Wales project. The designation means Wales will not receive the additional rail funding it would get if branded an England-only project. Mr ap Iorwerth called on Eluned Morgan, the Welsh Labour First Minister, to condemn the reclassification. Baroness Morgan agreed Wales was not getting its fair share but said she was expecting to see positive changes in the UK Government's spending review on Wednesday. Mr ap Iorwerth's comments come following reports that revealed the project had originally been listed as England-only from 2020 to 2024. The Treasury told the BBC the classification was a 'publishing error' and insisted it was always considered an England and Wales development. Speaking First Minister's Questions in the Senedd on Tuesday, Mr ap Iorwerth said: 'We were getting our share until Labour actively moved the goalposts. 'Labour went out of its way to make sure Wales wouldn't get the money when the big spending really began.' He added: 'She should be joining me in condemning the UK Labour Government for betraying Wales. Will she?' Mr ap Iorwerth argued the reclassification was a 'new HS2 scandal' – a rail project that has been controversial in Wales. Despite none of the track being laid in the country, it was also designated an England and Wales project by the last UK Conservative government. Plaid has said this designation cost Wales £3.9 billion in funding. Responding to Mr Iorwerth, Baroness Morgan said: 'I've learned to expect nothing but constant negativity from the Plaid Cymru leader. 'I've been clear and I've been consistent when it comes to rail funding that we have not been getting our fair share of funding, in a position that the Tories left us with for over a decade. 'The difference between the Tories and the UK Labour Government is that they've recognised that injustice. 'I don't know what's going to be in the spending review, but the one thing I do know is that if Labour gave Wales a total land of milk and honey, Plaid Cymru would still find fault.' Baroness Morgan added they were 'expecting something positive from the spending review', but the Welsh government would have to keep on making the case for a fair share of funding. In January, the UK government admitted Welsh railways had been underfunded, with spending at 'low levels' in recent years. However, Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander did not announce any additional funding at the time.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Sir Edward Osmotherly, civil servant behind the Osmotherly Rules on select committees and Whitehall
Sir Edward Osmotherly, who has died aged 82, became the stuff of Whitehall legend by formulating in 1980 the rules governing how much information departments and senior civil servants need provide to Parliament's select committees. To this day the 'Osmotherly Rules' – revised in 2014 by Francis Maude – govern that relationship. In 2016 one of the Cabinet Office's two new rescue cats was named 'Ossie' in his memory; its mother was christened Evie after Dame Evelyn Sharp, Whitehall's first female Permanent Secretary. Osmotherly had a varied career in public service, including three years at the Department of Transport responsible for British Rail and eight as a tenacious local government ombudsman. But his early work during a few months heading the Civil Service Department's machinery-of-government section would prove his legacy. The Osmotherly Rules were drawn up as the Commons, with Norman St John Stevas to the fore, set up a set of select committees to shadow and monitor each Whitehall department; previously the panels had been organised by theme, with considerable gaps. Working to his political masters Paul Channon and Barney Hayhoe, Osmotherly produced a set of internal guidelines determining Whitehall's relationship to select committees of both Houses. And although they have 'no formal parliamentary standing or approval, nor claim to have', the Osmotherly Rules stuck. A similar document had been circulating during the 1970s, but Osmotherly codified the rules. 'Prepared entirely for use within Government', they were formally issued in May 1980. They start from the principle that civil servants are not directly accountable to Parliament, as are ministers and PPSs. Rather, they are carrying out actions under ministerial authority, so are protected by the same rule that prevents MPs being summoned. If there is a dispute about an official appearing, the relevant minister should attend instead as a courtesy. Osmotherly set out the limitations of Select Committees' powers to 'send for persons, papers and records'; the procedures on committees summoning retired officials; the impact of parliamentary privilege; the point at which the cost of supplying information is reckoned excessive; the rules of sub judice with respect to current, likely and pending litigation; and when evidence can be withheld or redacted on grounds of national security and public interest. During the Westland affair of 1985-86, ministers became concerned that MPs might question officials too closely about the conduct of individuals; they were reassured that the Osmotherly Rules were tightly drawn. Edward Benjamin Crofton Osmotherly was born on August 1 1942, to Crofton and Elsie Osmotherly, and educated at East Ham Grammar School and Fitzwilliam College, Cambridge. Graduating in 1963, he joined the Ministry of Housing and Local Government, serving from 1966 as a private secretary to ministers. He spent 1972-73 as a guest scholar at the Brookings Institution in Washington and at Berkeley in California. Osmotherly returned to what had become the Department of the Environment as an assistant secretary, then in 1979 was briefly seconded to the British Railways Board before joining the Civil Service Department and drawing up his Rules. Soon after he had finished Margaret Thatcher abolished the CSD, and he moved to the DoT as Under Secretary (Railways), just as the Serpell Report suggesting drastic cuts in the network was published then hastily shelved. In 1985 Osmotherly was given charge of the personnel, management and training departments of the DoE and DoT. From 1989 to 1992 he headed the DoT's public transport and research department, before briefly serving as its establishment and finance officer. He left Whitehall in 1993 to be Local Government Ombudsman, then from 2003 to 2010 was clerk adviser to the Commons European Scrutiny Committee. Osmotherly also chaired the Commission for Local Administration in England, and in 1996 a review of Government business statistics. He was appointed CB in 1992, and knighted in 2002. Osmotherly developed a rare dementia called posterior cortical atrophy (PCA), which affected his spatial awareness, but left his memory largely intact. Aged 76 he took part in a study at University College London investigating the balance problems caused by PCA, in which he was fitted with motion sensors and asked to paint lines of yellow paint on a canvas. He told the BBC's Fergus Walsh that he had enjoyed the experience ('much more fun than a drug trial') and he appealed to the public: 'Please talk to people with dementia as if they were human beings. Don't be frightened of them.' Edward Osmotherly married Valerie Mustill in 1970. They had a son and a daughter. Edward Osmotherly, born August 1 1942, died February 18 2025 Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Acorn Project funding to be announced in spending review
Funding for a carbon capture project in Aberdeenshire is expected to be announced in the UK government's spending review, BBC Scotland News understands. The Acorn Project based in St Fergus would take greenhouse gas emissions and store them under the North Sea, in a process known as carbon capture and storage (CCS). There have been growing calls from business leaders for investment in the project which has been on a reserve list for funding. Chancellor Rachel Reeves will announce the budgets for all government departments over the next few years on Wednesday, which will include information on what new projects will receive investment. In the House of Commons on Tuesday, ministers were asked a number of times about funding for the project. Energy Minister Sarah Jones told MPs they didn't have long to wait to see what the spending review had to say about the project. She said: "We have always been clear that we support the Acorn Project" adding "we know what an important proposal it is. "The decision is a matter for a spending review but we are very close to having those decisions". In March, business leaders including oil tycoon Sir Ian Wood and organisations such as the Scottish Chambers of Commerce signed a letter urging the chancellor to back the project. The letter argued that the project had faced two decades of setbacks, and that it is needed to help Scottish industry decarbonise. The project missed out on support in 2021, when funding instead went to two areas in the north of England, and Acorn was placed on a reserve list for future backing. The UK government said Acorn had already received more than £40m for its development. If it is given the go-ahead, waste CO2 will be piped from central Scotland to St Fergus using redundant pipelines which previously carried natural gas south. Experts say the technology is vital for Scotland to meet its climate targets. Sites which are signed up include the refineries at Mossmoran and Grangemouth as well as a new power station at Peterhead. Climate campaigners, Friends of the Earth Scotland, have previously criticised "public subsidies" for CCS projects. The group's head of campaigns, Mary Church, said: "These projects risk yet more missed climate targets and turning the seas off Scotland into Europe's carbon dumping ground." Spending Review: When is it and what might Rachel Reeves announce? Business leaders urge backing of Acorn project Carbon capture scheme 'best placed' for UK backing
