Ben & Jerry's rips Israel for ‘genocide' in Gaza amid fight with parent company Unilever
Ben & Jerry's stoked controversy on Thursday after its independent board issued a statement labeling the conflict in Gaza a 'genocide' — placing renewed strain on its already tense relationship with parent company Unilever.
'We stand with all who raise their voices against genocide in Gaza—from petition-signers to street marchers to those risking arrest,' the left-leaning ice cream maker's board said in a statement that was first reported by The Wall Street Journal.
'When humanity is at stake, silence is not an option, now is the time to speak truth to power.'
Advertisement
4 Ben & Jerry's stoked controversy after its independent board issued a statement labeling the conflict in Gaza a genocide.
In Pictures via Getty Images
The statement marks one of the most forceful corporate condemnations of Israel's conduct in Gaza since the conflict began, and could further deepen the divide between Ben & Jerry's progressive board and the more cautious multinational that owns it.
Ben & Jerry's has long used its brand to champion progressive causes. In 2021, it stopped selling ice cream in Israeli-occupied territories, citing inconsistency with its values — a move that triggered backlash, shareholder divestment and legal disputes with parent company Unilever.
Though the matter was settled in 2022, a new lawsuit alleges Unilever has again tried to silence the brand's support for Palestinian rights.
Advertisement
Unilever on Thursday quickly moved to distance itself from the board's remarks.
'The members of Ben & Jerry's social mission board do not speak for anyone other than themselves,' a Unilever spokesperson told the Journal on Thursday.
'We call for peace in the region and for relief for all those whose lives have been impacted.'
Advertisement
The response is the latest indication of a longstanding and fraught dynamic between the Vermont-based brand and its London-based owner.
4 An Israeli soldier stands on a tank as it is taking position in front of the northern Gaza Strip on March 18.
Getty Images
Last month, Unilever said it had no intention of selling Ben & Jerry's — despite a bid by the founders of the popular ice cream brand to buy back the company.
Unilever also recently threatened to cut its $5 million annual funding to the Ben & Jerry's Foundation unless it agrees to a fast-tracked audit of its donations, escalating tensions over the brand's progressive activism.
Advertisement
In March, Ben & Jerry's accused its corporate owner of ousting the ice cream maker's chief executive over the brand's anti-Trump political activism.
When Unilever acquired Ben & Jerry's in 2000, the deal included a unique arrangement: the company's independent board retained authority over the brand's social mission and marketing.
That unusual structure has led to numerous public clashes in recent years, particularly over the Israel-Palestinian dispute.
4 A woman holding a baby cries as Palestinians check the site of an overnight Israeli strike in the central Gaza Strip on Friday.
AFP via Getty Images
In legal filings, Unilever has criticized the board's 'decision to continue to embroil B&J's and Unilever in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, one of the most divisive and polarizing topics of our time.'
Ben & Jerry's co-founder Ben Cohen made headlines earlier this month when he and other activists disrupted a Senate health committee hearing.
As he was removed by security, Cohen shouted: 'Congress is paying to bomb poor kids in Gaza and paying for it by kicking poor kids off Medicaid in the US.'
The latest statement comes amid renewed scrutiny of Unilever's ice cream division.
Advertisement
The company recently announced plans to spin off its ice cream business entirely in order to streamline operations and focusing on higher-growth areas.
Analysts have noted that Ben & Jerry's activism — and the backlash it frequently generates — has added complications for the broader Unilever brand.
4 Ben & Jerry's co-founder Ben Cohen was removed by Capitol Police on May 14, 2025, during a Senate Health Committee hearing on the Department of Health and Human Services budget.
REUTERS
Tensions between the two entities reached a boiling point in 2021 when Ben & Jerry's announced it would stop selling its products in Jewish settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem — citing inconsistency with its values.
Advertisement
That decision prompted legal and financial consequences for Unilever, which was accused of violating anti-boycott laws in several jurisdictions.
The backlash led to lawsuits, sanctions and the withdrawal of hundreds of millions of dollars in Unilever stock, according to a March legal filing by the company.
In response, Unilever sold its Ben & Jerry's business in Israel to a local distributor — an effort to ensure continued sales across Israel and the West Bank.
Advertisement
Ben & Jerry's then sued its parent company, alleging that the sale breached the terms of the acquisition agreement and undermined the board's control over social impact decisions.
The Post has sought comment from Ben & Jerry's and Unilever.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
34 minutes ago
- New York Post
Hamas' cease-fire ‘counteroffer' is just a demand for Israel to give up the war
Hamas on Saturday announced it had 'responded to' the latest ceasefire proposal from US envoy Steve Witkoff, apparently seeking assurances that Israel won't simply go back to eliminating it when the 60-day pause is up. Reality check: The terrorists are only talking because they're losing, badly — losing whatever support they had from ordinary Gazans as well as militarily. Hamas' main hope is to somehow manipulate Team Trump's peace efforts into a license to survive — to somehow have the war end with it intact in Gaza, still in power and with its sponsors and enablers again resupplying it. Advertisement To that end, it aims to leverage President Donald Trump's hopes to end the bloodshed as well as: Israeli public opinion, include the deep desire to recover the 20 or so still living hostages as well as the remains of the dozens who've died in captivity, plus general war-weariness and partisan opposition to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his coalition Sympathy for its other hostages: Gaza's 2 million civilians. Hamas has never cared a whit for their lives or well-being, except as potential recruits, human shields and reason for an influx of aid that the terrorists can siphon off for their use. It will happily martyr any or all of them for the cause of destroying Israel — even as it pretends to make concessions in their name to serve its true agenda. Advertisement Its de facto fifth column all across the West, including the 'tentifada' fanatics and fools on Columbia and other campuses, and all the politicians and media figures who buy the terrorists' propaganda. The dogged self-deception of the international 'peace process' veterans, still imagining that a 'two-state solution' is the key to resolving all the region's conflicts — an 'answer' that's now a complete fantasy that disregards every development of the last three decades. Arab rulers' inability to simply abandon decades of anti-Israel propaganda even though they (mostly) recognize it no longer serves their most urgent needs. Israel's current offensive has already taken out hundreds more Hamas fighters and yet another round of leadership, including the last Sinwar. The IDF is poised to take full control of Gaza, clear the final bunkers and tunnels and crush the remaining terror brigades. Advertisement And Jerusalem has cut off Hamas' resupply, refusing to allow aid to enter Gaza without firm controls that ensure it goes straight to civilians. Not allowing the terrorists to capture it — and to charge civilians for access to any of it — has helped turn the tide of public opinion: Ordinary Gazans increasingly know the war continues only because Hamas won't surrender or even negotiate a departure of its remaining forces. Witkoff's latest offer would have Hamas turn over 10 living hostages and a dozen or two bodies, in exchange for 125 terrorists serving life sentences plus another 1,000-plus jailbirds and a 60-day ceasefire and ongoing talks toward a full peace settlement. But Hamas knows full well that Netanyahu won't end the war until the terrorists are all dead, surrendered or expelled from Gaza: He refuses to allow for any possibility of another Oct. 7, and Israeli public opinion so far supports him. Advertisement So the terror group's counteroffer is to demand some kind of guarantee that Washington won't let the IDF resume operations when the 60 days are up, as well as the resumption of aid entering under UN or similar auspices, without Israeli controls. As things stand, Hamas is toast within months. To get hostages returned, Israel will allow it a respite — and so risk some development (Netanyahu's ouster, a drastic shift in the region, Washington concluding it needs the war ended; who knows?) that would let the terror group hang on in Gaza. Unless Team Trump decides to overrule Israel's unchanged war goals, Hamas will have to settle for that hope of a lifeline, or no deal is happening.
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
10 Ukrainian civilians killed in Russian air strikes, while Zelensky slams Russia for ‘not serious' peace talks
A barrage of Russian drone and missile attacks killed at least 10 civilians in Ukraine Saturday — including a 9-year-old girl — as Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky sowed new doubt whether Monday's peace talks in Istanbul will even take place. At least 32 people were injured in the attacks, as Russian troops launched more than 109 drones and five missiles across Ukraine overnight into Saturday, the country's air force said. The young girl was killed by a Russian strike on the frontline village of Dolynka in the Zaporizhzhia region — a 16-year-old boy was also injured, regional officials confirmed. Advertisement 5 Rescuers work to put out a blaze at the site of a Russian drone strike in the Odesa region. via REUTERS Moscow said Saturday it had gained control of a village in the Donetsk region and one in northern Sumy, leading to mandatory evacuations in 11 Ukrainian settlements near the Russian border – bringing the total number of Sumy settlements under evacuation orders to 213. 5 Ukrainian rescuers worked to extinguish a fire in a trolleybus depot following a drone strike in Kharkiv overnight. AFP via Getty Images Advertisement Zelensky also warned this week that Moscow was amassing more than 50,000 troops nearby in a sign of a possible offensive. In the southern region of Odesa, the attacks hit the town of Izmail, Ukraine's biggest port on the Danube River — infrastructure critical for the war-torn country's imports. Meanwhile, the Ukrainian leader cast uncertainty Saturday whether the planned peace talks scheduled for Monday in Istanbul, Turkey will happen, saying Kyiv is now preparing for 'new diplomatic steps' with Europe and the US. 'There is no clear information about what the Russians are going to Istanbul with. We don't have it, Turkey doesn't have it, the United States doesn't have it, and other partners don't either,' Zelensky said on Telegram. Advertisement 'It doesn't look very serious,' he said of the talks. 5 Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky is still uncertain Ukraine will attend the talks Monday. Getty Images Zelensky also rebuked Russia for failing to turn over negotiating documents ahead of the Monday meeting – a nonstarter for Kyiv. Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov unilaterally announced the talks Wednesday, saying Moscow would present a memorandum towards a cease-fire then. Advertisement But Zelensky countered that the Kremlin's plans should be offered up ahead of time — and accused Moscow of 'doing everything it can to ensure' the meeting is 'fruitless.' 5 Police officers carry a part of a Russian drone after the overnight air strike in Kharkiv. REUTERS 'For a meeting to be meaningful, its agenda must be clear, and the negotiations must be properly prepared,' he wrote on X Friday after hosting Turkey's foreign minister in Kyiv, Ukraine's capital city. Moscow had previously promised to present the document after last week's prisoner's exchange. Ukraine has sent its proposals to the US and Russia, which centers on 'a full and unconditional ceasefire.' 5 Growing increasingly impatient, President Trump gave Putin two weeks to prove he's serious about ending the war. POOL/AFP via Getty Images President Trump has grown increasingly frustrated with Russian President Vladimir Putin, and on Wednesday gave the Russian leader two weeks to prove he's serious about ending the war. Advertisement The Kremlin's sweeping demands, according to sources, remain unchanged from even before Putin launched his brutal invasion in 2022 — barring Ukraine, and any country east of it, from joining NATO as well as lifting Western sanctions on Russia. Delegations from the two countries last met in Istanbul on May 16 but the session yielded little other than an agreement for the war's largest prisoner swap.
Epoch Times
2 hours ago
- Epoch Times
Hamas Responds to US-Backed Gaza Cease-Fire Plan
The Hamas terrorist group said Saturday it had issued a formal response to a U.S.-backed cease-fire proposal that would pause the war in Gaza for at least 60 days and secure the release of about half of the remaining hostages. The group said in a statement issued on its Telegram channel on May 31 that, under the deal, it will release 10 living hostages and 18 bodies in return for Israel's release of an 'agreed-upon number of Palestinian prisoners.'
