
Union Township school superintendent retiring after 20 years
If Union Township School Corp. Superintendent John Hunter's office seems spartan for someone who has been superintendent for 20 years, it's because he's been cleaning his office in preparation for his retirement just days from now.
June 8, graduation day for Wheeler High School seniors, is also Hunter's graduation to retirement.
'It's amazing how much stuff you accumulate in 20 years,' he said. 'I took more boxes home than my wife would have liked.'
That 20 years began at a time when the district was growing. Hunter took over from E. Ric Frataccia, who had been superintendent for 10 years. 'It was pretty academically sound,' Hunter said.
The district had just added a pool, auditorium, fieldhouse and 10 classrooms to the middle school and high school.
The facilities have changed even more since then.
'None of the classrooms at that point in time had telephones in them,' Hunter said, an obvious concern when school safety was becoming an issue following the start of the nation's epidemic of school shootings.
Teachers at Union Center Elementary School had buttons in their classrooms to call the office over the intercom, but many weren't working.
The district put in a robust information technology infrastructure, including voice over internet protocol phones. Hunter remembers those days. He had to dial 7 to get an outside line, and there were just four phone lines available. 'I had to dial 10 digits to get anyone from Simatovich (Elementary School),' he said.
'Through the years, we did a lot for school safety,' Hunter said.
Entrances now require key fobs to open doors. 'Back in that day, every door in the building was open.'
That's not all the facility changes that have happened over the last 20 years. As might be expected, there have been upgrades to HVAC systems, roofs and the like.
At Union Center, 'we basically replaced that entire school,' Hunter said.
A new transportation building was built so buses don't have to be stored at the schools.
The football stadium was upgraded, including a turf field, tennis courts and tracks. Turf baseball, softball and multipurpose fields were installed.
The athletics complex has a new driveway and parking lots. A grassy area can be used for either soccer or football, depending on how the stripes are laid down.
Along the way, the school district has seen a string of successes, including state championships for boys basketball in 2010 and girls softball in 2011. The girls soccer team has been state runner-up twice. There have been academic successes, too, including for the high school science team and English team. Individual competitors have advanced to state competitions, too.
Among the biggest challenges Hunter faced at Union Township was the period from 2008 to 2010, when the economy soured. In December 2008, Gov. Mitch Daniels forced the district to cut $400,000 from its budget.
'We couldn't just not pay people,' Hunter said, so administrators took pay cuts, staff took furlough days, some noncertified employees were laid off, retirement buyouts were offered and fees were increased.
The COVID-19 pandemic was hard on schools. 'That was a big challenge for everybody,' Hunter said. The county's school superintendents met with the health department March 13, 2020. Hunter remembers it well. They met in the school library not far from his office.
Together, they devised a time to close schools thinking it would be over in two weeks. Instead, they were closed the rest of the school year.
'It was a very stressful time for a lot of them,' Hunter said, as students and educators adjusted to virtual classes after a lifetime of in-person instruction.
Deaths over the years, including students, hit hard, too. 'It's tough on schools, tough on our community. They're our family,' he said.
Hunter's education career was shaped by a new teacher he had as a sixth grader. She put their desks in small groups instead of rows. She had student helpers, 'which changed my perspective on learning.'
Through middle and high school, he had more teachers like that.
At Indiana State University, during his first semester, education students were put in a classroom to get a taste of teaching. 'I thought it was ingenious at the time,' he said, to help college students decide early on whether a career as an educator seemed right.
When Hunter began teaching, Gov. Robert Orr's Primetime initiative had just begun to lower class sizes in kindergarten and first grade. But Hunter taught third grade in Elkhart. 'I had 33 third-graders my first year,' he said.
When Indiana decided to stop issuing lifetime teaching licenses for educators with master's degrees, Hunter hurried to qualify under the old rules and got an administrator license as well.
After 14 years as principal, first in Goshen and then at Brummit Elementary in Chesterton, Hunter got his superintendent license, persuaded to do so by one of his ISU professors.
His 20 years at Union Township make him one of the state's longest-serving school superintendents. Tom Hunter, at Greensburg, has been there 25 years. When Greensburg had an opening for an assistant superintendent, John Hunter joked about applying just to confuse people.
The two Hunters are unrelated.
John Hunter said he doesn't have specific plans for his retirement. He would be open to serving as an interim superintendent somewhere, and he would consider a business development position.
'I'm definitely going to hit that little white ball a little more often than I do now,' he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Mayor of Fuengirola calls for help after Eddie Lyons Jr and Ross Monaghan murders
THE mayor of Fuengirola has called for help from the Spanish Government after two Scottish men were killed in a 'gangland' shooting in the town. A gunman fired several shots at Monaghan's Bar in Andalusia, Southern Spain, on Saturday evening, killing Eddie Lyons Junior and Ross Monaghan. Spanish detectives previously told BBC News that investigations into the double murder, which took place at around 11.30pm on the day, were ongoing. READ NEXT: Spain bar shootings: Who was Glasgow man Ross Monaghan? Left to right: Eddie Lyons Junior and Ross Monaghan (Image: Mike Gibbons, Spindrift) Now, Ana Mula, mayor of Fuengirola, is asking for more resources and help from the Spanish central government, Sur in English reports. In an emergency meeting with national and local police, as well as the area's councillor for public safety, Jose Luis Ponce, she demanded more police specialised in organised crime. She said: 'We live in a world and at a time when crime knows no borders. And in places like the Costa del Sol, phenomena are occurring which, by expansion, affect us irremediably. 'This is why our determination is to tackle it without hot air, to put all possible threats on the table and to prepare ourselves to face this new context, with the means at our disposal, with the best guarantees. 'We need the involvement of the state to be much greater in this matter.' READ NEXT: Mayor Mula stated that she had organised the meeting to 'reinforce collaboration and improve prevention and action in terms of public safety'. She did, however, go on to highlight that this is already 'extraordinary'. It comes after graphic footage of the shooting emerged recently. Spanish TV aired the horrific scenes inside Monaghan's Bar on Fuengirola's promenade. (Image: BBC) These showed Ross Monaghan in his final moments, just seconds after Eddie Lyons Junior was gunned down outside. The gunman appeared to be wearing a black baseball cap, a black jacket, black shorts, and had a white T-shirt around his neck, which he is thought to have used to hide his face before opening fire. He later fled on foot before rejoining an accomplice in a car. No details about the getaway vehicle have been released. READ NEXT: Spanish police confirmed on Monday that they had yet to make any arrests. A spokesperson said: 'The investigation is continuing into the fatal shooting of two men at a pub in Fuengirola, with nothing new at the moment.' There is speculation that the shootings are linked to the ongoing 'gangland feud' in central Scotland, which has resulted in dozens of incidents, including alleged attempted murders, and more than 40 arrests. Some of the people targeted in the violence are linked to the Daniels crime group - long-time rivals of another serious organised crime group, the Lyons family, of which Eddie Lyons Junior, 46, and Ross Monaghan, 43, were members. Monaghan was acquitted of the murder of Kevin 'Gerbil' Carroll in 2010 after the judge at his 2012 trial ruled there was insufficient evidence. Kevin 'Gerbil' Carroll (Image: Archives) Eddie Lyons Junior had previously been shot in 2006 in an incident that was believed to be part of a gang feud. Meanwhile, Monaghan was shot in the back after dropping his child off at a primary school in Glasgow in 2017.

Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Lizette Miller, Grand Forks Public Schools' first Classified Employee of the Year, offers a 'personal touch'
Jun. 3—GRAND FORKS — Even when it was time to surprise Community High School secretary Lizette Miller with her Classified Employee of the Year award, it was nearly impossible to drag her away from her work. Earlier this month, at the open house event celebrating the alternative high school's 40th year, Miller was busy welcoming the school's alumni and other visitors when Principal Terry Bohan stopped her. "Terry pulled me aside and he's like, 'I need you guys in the commons, we have some announcement we've got to make,'" Miller recalled. "And I was just like, 'Well, I'm kind of manning the entry,' and he's like, 'I've got someone coming to cover you.'" Even when she was greeted by her husband, son, parents and extended family from California, it didn't register that she was the one everyone had gathered in the commons to celebrate. "There's a picture captured where I'm kind of covering my face, like 'oh my God," she said. "It was just great. Tears, obviously. It was just a very humbling experience. My family was super happy, ecstatic, and very proud of my accomplishments, as well." Miller is the district's first-ever classified employee of the year. The district has long recognized classified employees of the quarter, as well as teachers of the year. Last year, however, district leadership realized they were missing an opportunity to recognize classified school staff with an annual award, according to district spokesperson Melissa Bakke, who sits on the Employee Recognition Committee. The committee selected Miller from a pool of 32 nominees using a rubric-based scoring system. Employee of the year nominations are open to staff members and, for the first time this year, parents and students. Those are the fun ones to read, Bakke said. "If a student goes home and they talk about experiences and parents really remember that, and then go and recognize them and take the time to recognize those teachers, I think that's really eye-opening," she said. "It's really exciting to see." Although there's no shortage of employees doing impactful work in the district, Bohan said it's no surprise that Miller ultimately rose to the top. "She keeps the mission of our students from our school in mind all the time all the time while offering a fantastic personal touch," he said. "It really sets her apart. ... It makes people remember, and makes others feel cared for because of her professional personal touch. She's well-deserving of this award." Bohan described her as a tactician in the school's front office, paying special attention to the details day to day and moment to moment that make the school administration run smoothly. And as the first person many people see when they enter the school, she has a talent for addressing a wide range of people and helping to put them at ease, from older adults trying to pursue their GED to younger families seeking English language classes. Miller, who is multilingual, also can communicate with people in Spanish and French. She first worked at the district from 2008 to 2011, working at Twining Middle School on Grand Forks Air Force Base. She left to start a daycare and raise her youngest children, then returned in 2019 to work in Community's front office. During her time at Community, she has been instrumental in digitizing the school's driver's education program. As part of her Classified Employee of the Year award, Miller received a $500 check, a gift card and a box of Widman's chippers. She was also presented with a plaque at a recent School Board meeting that will be displayed in the district office. For Miller though, the work is its own reward. "Just seeing these kids' lives change, both academically and personal," she said. "Some of these kids come here with not such a good experience, either in their personal lives or in an academic sense, so seeing them come here and seeing them flourish, and just become a whole different person from the moment they walked in to the person they become once they leave this school, has just been such a rewarding job."
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Polling About War Crimes Comes With Extra Responsibilities
Against the backdrop of Israel's escalating ground offensive in Gaza and this weekend's massacre at a humanitarian aid distribution site there, several recent polls show Israeli support for the war in Gaza on the decline. Approximately 70 percent of Israelis now prefer to end the war if it means bringing home the hostages still being held in the territory. Distinguished Israeli leaders are also speaking out more forcefully against what they view as crimes against humanity committed by Israeli forces in Gaza. In a recent op-ed, former Prime Minister Ehud Olmert wrote Israel is waging a 'war of extermination: the indiscriminate, unrestrained, cruel, and criminal killing of civilians,' a view he reiterated on CNN on Sunday. Over 1,200 Israeli academics have penned a letter calling for an end to the suffering of the Palestinians. And as many as 40 percent of Israeli conscripts are refusing service; one stated, 'I would prefer [jail] over killing children.' But even as this peace—or anti-war crimes—movement gains ground, a much more disturbing poll of Israeli citizens published on May 22 alleges that nearly half of Israelis support the extermination of all Palestinians in Gaza. This poll had asked Israelis to signal their support for or opposition to Israeli policies in Gaza as well as dehumanizing rhetoric, particularly biblical references to exterminating enemies, popularized by rightwing religious figures and political elites since Hamas' attacks of Oct. 7, 2023. The survey focused on the rhetoric of ultra-orthodox Rabbi Yitzhak Ginsburg, but Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has used similar references to justify Israel's siege warfare against Gaza, which has killed an estimated 64,000 people—a third of them under 18 years old—according to Reuters, with many more at risk of starvation. The poll was conducted using rigorous weighted sampling methods by Israeli polling firm Geocartography Knowledge Group at the request of two U.S.-based historians—Tamir Sorek and Shai Hiskani of Penn State University and the University of Maryland, respectively. None of the standard meta-data—including margins of error, demographic breakdowns and comprehensive question wording—appear to have been made public in English, but the scholars' stated aim, according to an op-ed in Haaretz, was to 'ask impolite questions' to discover 'just how appealing the apocalyptic language offered by Ginsburg is to Israeli-Jews from all walks of life.' To get more in-depth news and expert analysis on global affairs from WPR, sign up for our free Daily Review newsletter. The poll asked respondents whether they 'support the claim that the [Israeli military], when conquering an enemy city, should act in a manner similar to the way the Israelites acted when they conquered Jericho under the leadership of Joshua, that is, kill all its inhabitants?' Just under half of respondents—47 percent—responded in the affirmative. And 82 percent supported forced displacement of Palestinians from Gaza, which may have sounded to respondents like a more humane option by contrast to extermination. Given these scholars' previous work on conflict and resistance, the publication of their op-ed in a left-wing, secular newspaper like Haaretz, and a separate piece outlining their concerns over what they refer to as the 'mainstreaming' of genocidal rhetoric, it is reasonable to believe their intent was to generate opposition to war crimes in Gaza, if not the war itself. But unfortunately, based on what social scientists know about the politics of conflict research, it is more likely this survey could have an exacerbating rather than constraining effect on Israel's campaign in Gaza. The first thing to know is that survey respondents who are invited to express support for war crimes may be likelier to believe such acts aren't crimes at all. This effect is illustrated by research conducted by myself and colleagues Alexander Montgomery and Alexandria Nylen a few years ago. We analyzed what happens to U.S. public attitudes on the laws of war when respondents are asked to express a preference for or against a policy that qualifies as a war crime. The fictional scenario in question involved a gross violation of humanitarian law—firebombing an Iranian city—presumably to end a war, a question we replicated from an earlier study. One difference between the original study and ours is that we also asked our respondents their attitudes on the lawfulness of targeting civilians in the abstract. But we asked a randomly selected half of the respondents this other question before they were asked their views on the Iran scenario, and the other half after. This enabled us to determine not only whether respondents' baseline views on targeting civilians affected their attitudes toward the firebombing scenario, but also to measure how much the experience of first answering the firebombing question affected their views on the legality of targeting of civilians. Both effects were evident. Knowledge of international law, or even just being asked to think about international law, reduced support for the deadly strike. But conversely, being asked to express a policy opinion about targeting actual civilians reduced respondents' belief that doing so was even banned by international law at all—even for those who in fact opposed the strike. So researchers can inadvertently affect citizens' viewpoints on what conduct is legally permissible in the way they ask survey questions. Since studies show international law has a powerful moderating effect on citizen attitudes, when researchers undermine those understandings, they may inadvertently 'prime' respondents to go along with war crimes. Second, this effect can actually be exacerbated when such survey results are disseminated in the media through press releases or op-eds that get picked up and uncritically circulated by other sources. For example, the bombing survey we were replicating had been publicized with headlines like 'Americans Wouldn't Mind if We Just Nuked Somebody.' To test the impact of this dynamic, we created a treatment group in our survey, informing them about the earlier survey result that Americans were 'okay' with targeting civilians. That knowledge increased their own willingness to firebomb the Iranian city. Ours was a fictional scenario, but this effect may be worse in ongoing conflicts, such as Israel's war in Gaza, where the media ecosystem is especially polarized. Finally, publicizing popular support for war crimes risks affecting conflict dynamics directly. A perception of public support, however accurate, can make it easier for politicians to order abuses and dilutes the political space for resisting atrocities. The perception that support for war crimes is widespread among a population also increases support for crimes against that population. This risks putting all civilians in danger of revenge attacks for crimes perpetrated by their nation's army, even if many of them actually oppose those crimes, as 53 percent of Israelis did in the poll in question. Understanding the political psychology of public support or opposition to war crimes is vitally important, and we know what we do about the subject thanks to good survey research. Nevertheless, because of the framing effects that survey designs themselves create, pollsters and social scientists are increasingly cognizant of their role in measuring public opinion—but also their responsibility to avoid potentially influencing it in ways that harm. That responsibility is even greater when asking respondents about ongoing atrocities rather than fictional scenarios. Some best practices are emerging in the social sciences and the opinion polling industry to gather information on conflict psychology while minimizing potential harm in high-risk environments. Among these are transparency—pollsters should always make their methodologies and question wording easily available to audiences; neutrality—pollsters should adopt a nonpartisan stance applying equally to both conflict parties; and protection of human subjects' data—pollsters should ensure informed consent and confidentiality. These precautions protect vulnerable populations and the integrity of the research enterprise. But conflict researchers can go beyond this to ensure their work minimizes social harm. First, when it comes to researching war crimes, conflict researchers and pollsters can use the preamble to the actual survey questions to highlight current international legal standards. They can then invite respondents to evaluate policymakers' actions and rhetoric against those standards, rather than simply inviting them to express support for illegal acts. A study structured in this way would likely yield a different result. Of course, the purpose of the study conducted by Sorek and Hiskani was specifically to analyze the influence of apocalyptical biblical references on Israeli attitudes toward the war in Gaza, rather than legal standards alone. So how might researchers get at questions like this without giving the impression that such policies are legitimate? One possible solution would be to compare two respondent groups, each receiving a neutral question about proposed policies in Gaza and facts about current international law, but with only one group also hearing mention of the biblical reference to Jericho in the preamble, rather than baked into the question itself. This approach captures the impact of rhetoric on answers about policy without privileging that rhetoric or inviting citizens to directly endorse it themselves. And it allows a comparison of the two groups' answers in order to isolate the effect of the framing. However, social scientists already know a lot about how genocidal rhetoric affects attitudes, and less about how to counter it. So, one could also imagine studying the effect of biblical references that support tolerance, restraint and protecting the innocent rather than those that include genocidal rhetoric—or even comparing the influence of both. And pollsters can build on what we already know: Even just adding an informational disclaimer at the end of such a survey, citing actual international legal standards, while doing so in any press releases as well, is a way to inoculate respondents and audiences against the pernicious effects of thinking about the unthinkable. Another solution is asking respondents to think aloud about how to solve specific policy problems, without priming them with specific policy options at all. This creates a more neutral window into what resonates in a particular political moment without the risk of over-determining the result. For example, in a separate Iranian firebombing study, we asked one group of respondents not a close-ended question about whether they supported or opposed the strike, but rather an open-ended question: 'If you were the Commander-in-Chief what would you do in this scenario?' The number wishing to bomb the city dropped dramatically when not forced into one of two boxes. Many respondents thought outside the box altogether, a sorely needed ability in polarized conflicts. The point is not to criticize this particular survey but to highlight choices pollsters can make in conflict zones. Like other forms of reporting on war and peace, surveys carry risks but can also have a constructive informational effect on conflict-affected populations: amplifying alternative frames, opening space for resistance and yielding results that, when published, can support efforts to resolve rather than escalate violence by stressing humanizing rather than dehumanizing narratives across collective groups. The same critical lens could be applied to other opinion polls on Israel's war in Gaza. Polls asking Israelis whether they care more about eradicating Gaza or bringing the hostages home imply these are the only options—and mutually exclusive ones at that. And polls asking Israelis whether they support the war rarely ask, among those who say yes, whether they nonetheless oppose war crimes. Measured correctly, the opposition might be much stronger than observers think, if not as strong as they wish. Without that ethical nuance, such polls are unlikely to fully capture public opinion and may instead risk perpetuating a polarizing media climate that increases the possibility of war crimes and decreases the chances for peace. Rather than dwell on the resonance of the more alarming narratives measured by this latest poll, it may be worth thinking about how to amplify and measure the impact of the Israeli and Palestinian voices now fighting so hard to offer alternatives. Charli Carpenter is a professor of political science and legal studies at University of Massachusetts-Amherst, specializing in human security and international law. She tweets at @charlicarpenter. The post Polling About War Crimes Comes With Extra Responsibilities appeared first on World Politics Review.