Floyd Shivambu faces uncertain political future amid fierce criticism
Floyd Shivambu's future in the MK Party hangs in the balance as he is not included in the Parliament list yet.
Image: X
The future of Floyd Shivambu, former secretary-general of the uMkhonto weSizwe Party (MKP), hangs in the balance after a series of scathing attacks from prominent political figures.
Shivambu's removal from his position earlier this month has sparked speculation about his potential departure from the party and the possibility of starting his political venture.
To fire the first salvo was ANC Youth League President Collen Malatji, who has been particularly brutal in his assessment of Shivambu, describing him as "a small boy" who lacks support.
Malatji's comments suggest that Shivambu would not be welcome in the ANC, and that the party would not survive if he were to join.
"I don't want Floyd in the ANC; I want Julius," Malatji reportedly said, referring to EFF leader Julius Malema.
Malatji further stated that Shivambu had no support base and Zuma had used him and spat him out.
'Floyd hates the ANC, and the ANC hates him. On the other hand, Julius (Malema) has a support base and he can be more useful to the ANC,' he reportedly said.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Next
Stay
Close ✕
In another attack, MK Party Leader Jacob Zuma warned party members who oppose leadership decisions after some members threatened to protest for Shivambu's reinstatement at a June 16 rally in Durban on Monday.
"If those people want to start their own party, they should go ahead," Zuma said.
"We are not going to be apologetic and bow down to individuals in this party. No matter how good, important, and educated you are."
Zuma's comments suggest that Shivambu's future in the party is uncertain and that he may be forced to explore alternative options.
"There are people who want to protest because we have made a certain decision. This means this party is not as strong as we want it to be… Even those who left, we did not chase them away; they left on their own. Many of them had erred in a big way. So now you guys want to get into things you know nothing about," he said.
He said these decisions were made at a higher level, and people should stick to their lane.
"It is the high command that decides who is right and who is wrong, who causes problems, and who does not cause problems," Zuma said.
Shivambu's former ally and friend, Malema, has also dismissed the idea that Shivambu could go back to the EFF after he detracted last August.
At the time, Malema had made an emotional speech, saying that "his brother" (Shivambu) could come back to the EFF anytime he wanted to; however, he has now changed tune saying it is no longer his decision to welcome back Shivambu into the party but that of the Central Command Team and the party's constitution.
Malema also dismissed assertions that Shivambu could boost the MKP's performance in Parliament.
This was after the MKP indicated that Shivambu was stripped of his secretary-general hat so that he could promote the MKP's participation in the National Assembly.
"If you're saying this person is going to be a holy spirit and boost the MK Party's presence in those committees, it's practically impossible," Malema said. "He cannot match the kind of leadership that we have deployed."
Despite the uncertainty surrounding his future, sources close to Shivambu suggest that he may be consulting with a plan to start his party.
According to insiders, Shivambu is not on the MK party's parliamentary list, and his future in the party looks bleak.
"The list that is doing the rounds, Floyd's name is not in the list, leaving senior caucus members surprised. There are about 10 vacant parliamentary seats for the MKP, and so far, Shivambu has been left out.
'Floyd has a lot to prove right now, and so he is consulting with a plan to start his party because there is a fierce debate whether Shivambu should be included in the list or not.
'Some members are outright opposed to it and others say it's a relief but will be less effective in Parliament,' sources said.
Shivambu's phone rang unanswered in an attempt to get his response on the matter.
However, in a recent speech to the Maanda-Ashu Workers Union of South Africa, Shivambu stated that since his removal from his MK Party post, he has had no other work and has reached out to the organisation for volunteer opportunities.
mashudu.sadike@inl.co.za
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
8 hours ago
- IOL News
Pro-Palestinian activists detained in Cairo while marching for Gaza aid
South African delegation at the third checkpoint with global activists from 80 different countries. Image: Jimi Matthews Over 200 international pro-Palestinian activists, including notable figures like Mandla Mandela, were arrested in Cairo, while attempting to march to the Rafah border crossing to demand increased humanitarian aid for Gaza. Among the detainees were activists from Algeria, Australia, France, Morocco, the Netherlands, Spain, the United States and South Africa. Mandela, Chief of the Mvezo Traditional Council and grandson of former South African president Nelson Mandela, was among the activists who were detained at a checkpoint for over six hours on June 13. Basheerah Soomar, the head of the South African delegation for Global March to Gaza, was among 53 South Africans, who travelled to Cairo, Egypt, as part of the delegation. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ 'About half of us left South Africa for Cairo on June 11 and the remainder left on June 12. Seven South Africans were detained at the airport upon arrival. They were kept for a few hours without being told why they were there, along with activists from other countries, including Greece and Spain. 'Our embassy put immediate pressure on the authorities to demand reasons for their detention and release. The authorities could not give a clear answer and eventually allowed them into Cairo where they rejoined the bigger group,' said Soomar. She said after the issue at the airport, none of their delegates were detained again but most of them had their passports forcibly removed at various tollgates as they were leaving Cairo to travel to Ismailia, a city in north-eastern Egypt. 'We were travelling in small groups of two to four people via taxis and Ubers when they trapped us into a large group at the tollgates. We were stranded without our passports and they forced us into a group to make it seem as though we were gathering illegally. 'We were held at these points for up to six hours before our passports were returned. Some people from our delegation were violently thrown into buses and others peacefully complied. We were then dropped off at random points across the city. "Half of the delegates have since returned to South Africa, while the other half have flights booked to return to the country by the end of this week. They are all safe and all 22 of them will return home this week. They are able to return whenever they want but they are not there under duress." Soomar, who returned home to Johannesburg on Sunday, said she was not surprised by the treatment meted out in Cairo. 'I was prepared for this scenario and worse scenarios as the head of the delegation. It was stressful, of course, because I felt responsible for others. But I managed to remain level-headed and I kept emotion out of it. "I put the Palestinian people at the centre of every decision that we made as we were purely there for them. We had a great support team at home, who we were liaising with us 24/7; such as lawyers, coordinators, and media liaisons." Hasina Kathrada, an activist and journalist from Johannesburg, also returned home on Sunday. She said she left for Egypt on June 11 and faced challenges at the final checkpoint. 'My passport was taken at Kamphasheer tollgate, an hour away from Cairo. We were heading to Arish, from where we were going to walk to Rafah. There were 3 checkpoints. My passport was held at the third checkpoint along with about 250 other activists from around the world. 'Through it all, there was great camaraderie among activists. We shared food and water and supported each other during the six hours that we were together. The march to Rafah may have been stopped but the solidarity continues. The people of Gaza know they are not alone. The world has not forgotten them,' said Kathrada. In a video that has been circulating on social media, Mandela explained with a large crowd behind him facing the same issue, that he was being detained. 'We are about an hour out of Cairo and our passports have been confiscated. We are held here at one of the checkpoints without being permitted to proceed,' said Mandela on Saturday. Mandela, in another video highlighted the issues he and other activists faced while trying to get through Egypt. 'Those who managed to come into Cairo, such as myself, had no problems entering Egypt and coming through the airport but we have had immense challenges with going through each and every tollgate. We have been subjected, just like how Palestinians are in the Westbanks in checkpoints, where they have to produce their identity documents. We have been subjected to that in the second checkpoint that we are in. Our passports were taken away and we were held here for over six hours."
Daily Maverick
8 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Reimagining unity: The imperative of National Dialogue 2.0 in SA's political crisis
It is a common cause that 31 years after the formal demise of apartheid, the promises, great expectations and dreams of democracy are rapidly turning into horrific nightmares for the poor and disadvantaged. At the same time (new and old) elites rule the roost. Socioeconomic and spatial inequalities of the apartheid era widened while the politically connected continued to accumulate wealth and power at the expense of the poor. Crime and corruption escalated exponentially and are inextricably connected to political elites; global mafia operations of every genre magnetically gravitate to our country; and gender-based violence is a pandemic. South Africa has one of the highest unemployment rates in the world (33%), especially among young adults. The poor have inadequate access to essential services like water, electricity, healthcare and basic education. Many of these challenges were aggravated by State Capture. As highlighted by the Zondo Commission, State Capture in South Africa involved the systematic and deliberate subversion of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) for private gain. State Capture eroded good governance practices within SOEs and government departments (including law enforcement and intelligence services), decreasing operational performance and effectiveness. This entailed influencing appointments, procurement procedures, governance, and institutional structures to favour specific individuals and organisations. Key SOEs like Eskom, Transnet, and South African Airways were significantly affected by State Capture, with subsequent multiplier effects on all aspects of South African life, destroying the economy. Hegemonic rule of the ANC All these problems and challenges were aggravated during the hegemonic rule and reign of one political party, the ANC. Not surprisingly, some of its senior members were implicated in the State Capture report. Still, no one has yet been convicted because of the hollowing out of capacity in the National Prosecuting Authority. When he was firmly ensconced on the throne, Jacob Zuma said on more than one occasion that the 'ANC will rule until Jesus returns'. However, there were some obvious indications that the ANC was haemorrhaging — for example, in the 2021 Local Government Elections it received 45.59% of the vote. In the May 2024 General Elections, the ANC lost its parliamentary majority, winning 40.18% of the vote. Ironically, Zuma's newly established uMkhonto Wesizwe (MK) party (while he still claimed to be a disciplined member of the ANC) eroded the support of the ANC, winning 14.58% of the vote. The notion of a National Dialogue entered the public domain against the background of the ANC's declining electoral support. Former president Thabo Mbeki initially proposed a national dialogue in May 2024, calling for 'seismic reflections'. This was endorsed by President Cyril Ramaphosa, who in his inauguration address after the May 2024 national elections, invited 'all parties, civil society, labour, business and other formations to a National Dialogue on the critical challenges facing the nation'. Ramaphosa said: 'By establishing the Government of National Unity, by preparing for a National Dialogue, we have deliberately set ourselves along the path towards a 'co-operation nation'. We would like all of us as South Africans to behave like 'weaver birds'… despite all the challenges, despite our differences, despite all the headwinds.' Political legitimacy There is a view that ruling elites have frequently utilised National Dialogues to obtain or regain political legitimacy. According to the Geneva-based Inclusive Peace and Transition Initiative: 'National Dialogues are typically convened when the fundamental nature or survival of a government in power is questioned. Thus, they usually intend to redefine the relationship between the state, political actors, and society by negotiating a new social contract.' A National Dialogue can be used for peacebuilding and reconciliation to increase confidence and trust among national actors, encourage inclusive engagement, and advance agreement on critical social, political, and economic challenges. The National Dialogue Handbook defines National Dialogues as 'nationally owned political processes aimed at generating consensus among a broad range of national stakeholders in times of deep political crisis, in post-war situations or during far-reaching political transitions'. The goal is for national leaders (political, business, religious, civil society, sports, etc.) across the ideological spectrum to debate, discuss and encourage inclusive engagement and advance agreement on significant social, political, and economic challenges. It is worth noting that the first National Dialogue was the Convention for a Democratic South Africa (Codesa), which took place in Johannesburg in December 1991. It was a critical step in the process of transitioning South Africa from apartheid to a democratic state. Nineteen political organisations participated, including the ruling National Party and the dominant African National Congress (ANC), comprising 228 delegates. Key aspects of Codesa included signing a 'Declaration of Intent' committing to negotiations and creating a new, democratic Constitution. The parties agreed on the principles of a unified, democratic, and non-racial South Africa, with a supreme Constitution and an independent judiciary. Crucial step Codesa established the foundation for negotiations for a democratic South Africa. While there were many disagreements, Codesa was a crucial step in the process of dismantling apartheid and building a new nation. The procedure was sufficiently adaptable to permit the creation of new forums and committees and modifications to existing ones based on political exigencies. As South Africa's transition from apartheid proceeded (with all its twists and turns), a Multi-Party Negotiating Process was established in March 1993, culminating in the adoption of an interim Constitution and preparations for the country's first non-racial elections. Parties with opposing views had to make substantial concessions during this process. Given the protracted conflict and violent past, the comparatively quiet and orderly democratic transition was praised globally as a miracle. Essential outcomes from the first National Dialogue were the Reconstruction and Development Programme and the Constitution. The National Development Plan, which presented a long-term vision and goals for South Africa to achieve by 2030, was released in 2012. All three documents can influence outcomes in the National Dialogue 2.0. There is no need to reinvent the wheel. Almost a year after it was initially proposed, on 10 June 2025, Ramaphosa released the names of the Eminent Persons Group to 'guide and champion the National Dialogue'. The problems in South Africa cannot be solved by National Dialogues alone. For a National Dialogue to be successful, several challenges must be addressed, including political actors' opposition and resistance to change, a lack of support from groups, persistent violence, crime, corruption, instability, and a lack of inclusivity. The National Dialogue 2.0 should not be about saving the ANC. It is about saving our country. All stakeholders must put their shoulders to the wheel, rise above personal, parochial, and party interests, and put South Africa first.
TimesLIVE
8 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
'Fail!' – ActionSA rejects GNU's progress
As the government of national unity (GNU) marked its first anniversary on June 14, ActionSA has poured cold water on its progress in office, saying they are nowhere near delivering on promises they made to the electorate. In fact, they have awarded the GNU an F on their report card in their self-generated GNU tracker, saying the grand coalition is a 'complete failure', adding that they have had no meaningful performance, and their obligations have remained entirely unmet, with a collapse in delivery and accountability. The party's parliamentary leader Atholl Trollip said this outcome rubber-stamps their decision not to join the governing coalition, as they were concerned about playing a 'constructive role' in the opposition. Taking a swipe at the MK Party and the EFF, Trollip said they made this decision because with 'regressive forces in the opposition benches of parliament, who played key roles in robbing the state of hundreds of millions during the state capture era, along with the radical, violence-inducing rhetoric that was recently put on display for the whole world, we recognised that ActionSA's most effective role was in opposition'. With a six-seater caucus in parliament, the party vowed to hold the executive to account, scrutinise the delivery of services and monitor how public funds are spent. 'To do this, ActionSA in parliament developed our GNU Performance Tracker, a comprehensive index designed to monitor and hold accountable the GNU. Drawing on data from sources such as Stats SA and official parliamentary replies, the tracker benchmarks performance against government targets, international best practice and ActionSA policy positions.'
