Pop star to take stand in fraud trial
Guy Sebastian is expected to take the stand in a Sydney court in the coming days as his former manager battles allegations he embezzled hundreds of thousands of dollars from the Aussie pop star.
Titus Emanuel Day is standing trial in the NSW District Court where he has denied he embezzled hundreds of thousands in royalties and performance fees owed to the superstar musician.
On day one of Mr Day's trial on Thursday, Crown prosecutor Brett Hatfield SC told the jury that the inaugural Australian Idol winner had an arrangement with Mr Day and his company 6 Degrees to manage his career and affairs.
Mr Hatfield told the court that Mr Sebastian placed a 'significant trust' in his manager and that he 'abused' that by embezzling his money.
'Through his role as Mr Sebastian's manager, and his capacity of collecting his money on behalf of Mr Sebastian, the accused is alleged to have embezzled Mr Sebastian's money and he's done that by collecting Mr Sebastian's money and failing to remit it in accordance with his agreement,' Mr Hatfield said. Guys Sebastian's former manager Titus Day is facing trial in the NSW District Court. NewsWire / John Appleyard. Credit: News Corp Australia
Mr Day has pleaded not guilty to 34 counts of embezzlement as a clerk or servant and one count of attempting to dishonestly obtain financial advantage by deception.
Mr Sebastian is expected to be called to give evidence in the coming days.
The court was told on Thursday afternoon that Mr Sebastian was previously managed by the 22 Management agency, where he first worked with Mr Day.
He then agreed to join Mr Day's 6 Degrees company as a marquee client when Mr Day broke away and formed his own company in 2009.
The court heard that their relationship began to deteriorate over time after he found what he alleged were irregularities in his financial records.
The court heard that Mr Day worked on a commission of 20 per cent of Mr Sebastian's income after costs.
It's alleged by the Crown that Mr Day failed to remit performance fees and royalties which were collected on Mr Sebastian's behalf. Titus Day and Guy Sebastian before their split. Supplied Credit: News Corp Australia
The court was told that one of the charges related to an allegation that Mr Day failed to remit $187,000 to Mr Sebastian for performance fees as a support act for Taylor Swift on her 2013 tour of Australia.
The court was told that in 2018 Mr Sebastian filed proceedings in the Federal Court, which prompted Mr Day and 6 Degrees to file a counterclaim.
'Mr Sebastian will tell you that this agreement reposed significant trust in the accused and the Crown case is that the accused abused this trust by dishonestly embezzling Mr Sebastian's money,' Mr Hatfield said.
The trial before Judge Alister Abadee will continue with Mr Hatfield's opening submissions on Friday before Mr Day's barrister Thomas Woods will give his opening to the jury.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
8 hours ago
- News.com.au
Wardrobe malfunction that helped inspire 26-year-old's entire business
The cost of living crisis has made most people reevaluate their spending, and a young Aussie has pointed out the common cheap act that is costing us more in the long run. Maddie Langshaw, 26, was earning more than $100,000 working full-time in social media and marketing when she decided to start her slow fashion brand Audrey Atelier. It wasn't just her love of fashion that spurred on the decision — she said she also came to the realisation fast fashion was a rort. 'It feels cheap in that exact moment but the cost builds,' she told 'Whether it's the constant need to replace poor quality items, or the environmental damage, or just the mental clutter of owning too much that doesn't mean anything.' Ms Langshaw said the danger with embracing fast fashion was you were always left wanting to buy more. 'It encourages this mindset of constant consumption, where clothes lose all meaning. It's not fashion, it's waste,' she said. 'It's also emotionally draining, because it keeps us in a loop of wanting more but never feeling truly satisfied.' The fashion designer understands the perils of fast fashion because she's been a consumer in the past. 'I definitely fell into it in the past, buying things just because they were cheap or trendy. But over time, the charm completely wore off,' she said. 'The clothes didn't last, and honestly, I didn't feel like me in them. Now, my wardrobe is 90 per cent thrifted or second-hand. 'If I do buy something new, it takes me at least five or six rounds of research. I want to know who made it, what it's made of, and whether it's something I'll love long-term.' Ms Langshaw argued that fast fashion created the illusion that more was better and clothes were disposable. 'It's a trap that keeps us buying and never feeling fulfilled. Once you shift the mindset out of it, you save more money long term and invest in pieces that you have forever,' she said. She's also had some horror experiences with fast fashion, where the lack of quality led to flat-out wardrobe fails. 'I've had seams unravel after one wear, things shrink beyond saving, and fabrics pill within days,' she said. 'Once, I wore a dress to dinner and the hem literally came undone mid-meal. I remember thinking, 'Why am I putting my money and energy into clothes that don't respect me back?'' she said. 'I have removed the majority of the fast fashion brands from my wardrobe due to this, the fact they don't ever last infuriates me, and over time I spend the same for less cost per wear thrifting.' Ms Langshaw isn't the only one rethinking how she's spending her money on clothes — and she wouldn't have started her business if she was. Her marketing background helped her notice a big shift in consumer habits, with Aussies being more 'conscious' about where they spent their money. 'I think there's this amazing shift happening. Fashion isn't just about the look anymore, it's about the story,' she said. 'Conscious shoppers are choosing meaning over mass production.' Ms Langshaw's been thrilled but unsurprised to see how shoppers have embraced her brand Audrey Atelier, where a blazer might cost $150 instead of $30 from a retail chain, but it is created to last. 'Even with tighter budgets, people want to feel good about what they're buying; they want pieces that last, feel considered, and come with a story,' she said. 'It's not about buying more, it's about buying better. Audrey Atelier connects with that craving for intention. 'It's a small, quiet revolution, and I'm so proud to be part of it. I have had overwhelming support from the community, with most of the buyers saying they want to support small, slower fashion.'
News.com.au
9 hours ago
- News.com.au
‘There is no doubt': CEO makes bold WFH claim, sparking big debate
An Aussie boss has revealed the big problem with working from home after an American CEO claimed remote work would have stopped her from becoming such an success. The working from home debate certainly isn't one that will be settled anytime soon, and American CEO Emma Grede has just stirred the pot all over again. Ms Grede appeared on the podcast Diary of a CEO and claimed that if she'd been WFH in her twenties, she'd never have achieved such success. 'If I had been a work from home person in my twenties I would not be where I am today. There is no doubt,' she said. The 42-year-old is the mastermind behind Khloe Kardashian's denim brand Good American, and she co-founded Kim Kardashian's shapewear brand Skims. Skims has been valued at over $4 billion and Good American has been valued at over $3 billion. It's a big statement, but Australian boss Jessy Marshall, 36, founder of the PR agency Hive HQ, can't help but agree. Ms Marshall said that working from home can hold back people's careers 'depending on the role', and this is something she is hyperaware of. 'If you are taking my role as a publicist as an example, we work with many Australian start-ups and us being together as a team in the office is where we get our energy, our creativity, and how we best execute,' she told 'Our job is entirely about execution. If we were doing this from home, we would have no vibe, no hustle and we wouldn't be achieving the results we are.' The 36-year-old doesn't doubt she'd have succeeded if she had worked from home in her twenties, but she doesn't think it would have been on the same scale. 'Maybe because of my personality, I would have been driven enough to get here anyway, but learning on the job fast-tracked my ability and success,' she said. 'You have to learn and fail and learn again; you simply cannot do that as sufficiently by yourself at home. Seeing examples from good and bad bosses helps build your career and your skills.' Ms Marshall's opinion echoes Ms Grede's who spoke at length on the podcast about the downsides of flexibility. The CEO explained that, since the pandemic, her staff has worked only four days in the office and one day from home. Ms Grede said people talk a lot about flexibility but don't talk about what WFH 'takes away from work' and how Zoom life has impacted businesses. 'I met my husband at work, I made my best strongest relationships in my life. (They are) the most important things to me and they're the foundation of my happiness,' she said. Ms Grede finds it 'interesting now' that there's an aversion to working from the office, saying young people are missing out as a result. 'It is so interesting to me because I'm like an in-person person. I want to be with people, I want to collaborate. I want to do things quickly and the culture of work right now makes that so hard,' she said. Ms Grede believes rise of fully-remote jobs is making it harder for young people to learn from seniors at work, which is something she finds that disappointing. 'All of that is lost,' she said. 'I feel a little bit sad for the way that we're working right now because I don't think we're having that exchange of what happens when you're in a really dynamic environment and you're able to learn from people around you.' The CEO's working from home opinion immediately divided workers, with plenty quick to disagree. 'Maybe not everyone wants to be a CEO. Some people want to work to live not live to work,' one argued. 'I would never work in an office again,' another said. 'Interesting perspective! It's important to evaluate how working from home impacts long-term career growth and success,' someone else said. 'Remember half of us are introverts who prefer to be home. We're just as valuable. I also don't want to spend hours of my precious life commuting,' one said. 'Life is not just work,' someone wrote. 'WFH is overrated,' another declared. Someone else argued that some workers get more done working from home, but another said that when she worked WFH, it was the 'loneliest' she'd ever been. Recruitment expert Roxanne Calder said bosses are 'spot on' if they say working from home is holding back young people's careers. 'When you are starting out in your career you need to be around people to learn,' she told 'If you're not among people then you can't learn as quickly. It is critical in that career stage.' Ms Calder said it is invaluable to be able to turn to your co-worker and ask a question or even observe their habits and learn from them, and this isn't happening over Zoom. The recruitment expert said that, despite the 'pushback' and the clear benefits of working from the office, workers don't want to come back. 'I find a lot of people don't want to come into the office still, despite the pushback that has been evident now for 18 months,' she said. Ms Calder said that workers know that 'learning is better in the office', but they'd rather have flexibility over career growth. 'The advice I'd give to anyone in their twenties or in your thirties is definitely to be in the office; it is important for career building,' she said. 'It is relationships that get you places and people seeing you do things.'
News.com.au
10 hours ago
- News.com.au
‘Cost is a crucial factor': Aussie business owners reveal why their products are made in China
Two Aussie business owners defended themselves against the 'stigma' of having their products made in China, exposing a huge issue for Australia in 2025. Alexandra Pappas, 36, is the founder of statement homewares company No. 22 and she's found it impossible to get her products made in Australia. 'We have found that producing our products in China costs, on average, around one-third of what it would be to manufacture the same products in Australia or other regions,' she told 'As we look to develop a new range of glassware, the quotes we have received from Australian-based manufacturers are significantly higher than those from Chinese factories.' Ms Pappas argued that 'cost is a crucial factor' in decision-making, and if it costs more to make something, ultimately, she has to pass on that cost to consumers. Her focus has to be on keeping the business profitable. And Aussies might like to say they want things made in Australia, but do they want to pay inflated prices? It is a question that Ms Pappas isn't prepared to risk asking her customers. 'For example, we are currently collaborating on a limited-edition collection with a specialist factory in Greece,' she said. 'The production costs for this collection are approximately four times higher than our core range. As a result, this collection will be positioned at a premium price point in order for it to be feasible and successful for us.' The business owner argued that getting stuff made in China isn't just a money-saving technique — it's also a great place to have products made. 'China offers world-class manufacturing capabilities, particularly when it comes to producing high-quality ceramics at scale,' she said. 'The factory we work with is home to highly skilled artisans who have crafted for some of the world's leading lifestyle and homewares brands.' Ms Pappas argued that there's still a stigma when someone hears something is 'made in China', one she disagrees with. 'There is still a misconception that manufacturing in China equates to lower quality,' she said. 'Many of the best lifestyle products are produced there because of the unmatched craftsmanship, access to materials and capacity for consistent, high-volume production.' Tina Grosso, the founder of underwear brand Chou Chou intimates, has a similar perspective, but her decision stems from what she couldn't find in Australia. 'Choosing to manufacture in China isn't just about lowering costs, it's about accessing a level of craftsmanship, technical capability, and scalability that's incredibly hard to find in Australia,' she told 'Locally, I am yet to find a factory equipped to handle the kind of specialised work we do at the scale we do it, especially when it comes to lingerie or detailed garment construction.' Ms Grosso, 30, said that while 'manufacturing offshore does offer cost efficiencies,' she believes the real value comes from the makers there. 'The real value is in working with partners who understand our product, share our quality standards, and can support our long-term growth,' she said. 'We've built relationships with trusted suppliers who are experienced, ethical, and deeply skilled in their craft.' Before she started manufacturing her products in China, quality was her 'biggest concern,' and she wanted to make sure she understand exactly how the process would work. 'Before committing to any purchase orders, I physically went and visited the production sites, requested multiple samples, asked for and reviewed all their audits and certifications,' she said. Despite how much she can justify her decision to manufacture her brand offshore, she knows it comes with criticism. 'There's still a lot of outdated stigma attached to 'Made in China,' especially in fashion,' she said. 'I think brands hesitate to talk about it because they fear it might dilute their perceived value but the truth is, where something is made matters less than how it's made and who you're working with.' At the end of the day, though, the business owner simply couldn't find a local supplier in Australia who could meet her needs. 'Especially since lingerie requires specialised machinery and technical expertise. Beyond that, finding enough skilled seamstresses to produce at scale, particularly in NSW, would be incredibly difficult,' she said. 'Based on my research, if we were to factor in local wages, limited access to materials, and smaller production runs, I estimate the cost would be at least 60-70 per cent higher than manufacturing in China.' That reality means that once she crunched the numbers, there was no way she could afford to make her lingerie in Australia. 'At that cost, even with minimum margins, the retail price of our garments would be pushed beyond what most customers are willing to pay — making the product commercially unviable,' she said. 'The difference isn't just about saving — it's what enables us to reinvest into quality, sustainability and storytelling while keeping our pieces accessible.'
