logo
World faces new danger of ‘economic denial' in climate fight, Cop30 head says

World faces new danger of ‘economic denial' in climate fight, Cop30 head says

The Guardian28-05-2025

The world is facing a new form of climate denial – not the dismissal of climate science, but a concerted attack on the idea that the economy can be reorganised to fight the crisis, the president of global climate talks has warned.
André Corrêa do Lago, the veteran Brazilian diplomat who will direct this year's UN summit, Cop30, believes his biggest job will be to counter the attempt from some vested interests to prevent climate policies aimed at shifting the global economy to a low-carbon footing.
'There is a new kind of opposition to climate action. We are facing a discredit of climate policies. I don't think we are facing climate denial,' he said, referring to the increasingly desperate attempts to pretend there is no consensus on climate science that have plagued climate action for the past 30 years. 'It's not a scientific denial, it's an economic denial.'
This economic denial could be just as dangerous and cause as much delay as repeated attempts to deny climate science in previous years, he warned in an exclusive interview with the Guardian.
As the climate crisis has gathered pace, temperatures have risen and the effects of extreme weather have become more obvious, scientists have been able to draw ever more clearly the links between greenhouse gas emissions and our impacts on the planet. So the argument has shifted, Corrêa do Lago believes, from undermining or misrepresenting the science to attempts to counter climate policy.
'It is not possible to have [scientific] denialism at this stage, after everything that has happened in recent years. So there is a migration from scientific denial to a denial that economic measures against climate change can be good for the economy and for people.'
The rise of populist politicians around the world has fuelled a backlash against climate policy, most clearly seen in the presidency of Donald Trump in the US, where he has set about cancelling policies intended to boost renewable energy and cut greenhouse gases, and dismantling all forms of government-sponsored climate-related institutions, including scientific research labs.
Corrêa do Lago wants to spur a new global effort to persuade people that remodelling the economy away from a reliance on fossil fuels and towards a clean energy future will reap benefits for all people. 'The new populism is trying to show [that tackling the climate crisis does not work],' he said. 'It's the turn of those who believe in the fight against climate change to show and to prove that fighting climate change is possible, and that it can come with economic advantages and with a better quality of life.'
Corrêa do Lago is an economist by training – the youngest of five brothers, all of whom became economists. 'My mother was horrified with our lack of originality,' he joked.
He has been a career diplomat, having joined Brazil's foreign service in 1983 and serving previously as ambassador to India and Japan. He is also a veteran of the Cop talks – the annual 'conference of the parties', which will take place this year in Belém, near the mouth of the Amazon, in November.
'Most of the answers have to come from the economy,' said Corrêa do Lago. 'Because we have now enough science, enough demonstration of how climate change can affect people's lives. Now we need answers [in the form of policy measures]. We need economists to rally.'
Over the past two decades, economists have begun to take on the challenge of the climate crisis, after the 2006 landmark review by Nicholas Stern, the former chief economist of the World Bank, which found it would be cheaper to tackle emissions than to allow them to run unchecked. That contradicted the conclusions of some previous economists, who had claimed it was not worth trying to move away from fossil fuels, or it would be too expensive.
Since then, multiple reports have proved the same point. Most recently, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and the UN Development Programme produced a joint report this year, with the final version to come out next month, showing that tackling the climate crisis would materially increase economic growth, rather than being a necessary cost.
But much mainstream thinking on economics does not take the climate crisis into account. Most governments preparing budgets, for instance, do not include climate impacts in their estimates, and nor do businesses. Many of the economic estimates of climate damage are also far too modest. For Corrêa do Lago, this shows that much more needs to be done.
'Climate has not been incorporated into economic theory in a satisfactory way yet,' he said. 'Because it's a very disturbing element.'
Corrêa do Lago also faces the task of corralling 196 nations into producing new national plans on greenhouse gas emissions within the next few months, and meanwhile Brazil is already wrestling with the logistical challenges of holding Cop30 in a rainforest. There was controversy earlier this year over a road being built through the forest to the city, though Brazilian officials said the road had already been planned before Cop30 was awarded to Belém. There are also concerns about the environmental credentials of the Brazilian president as his government continues to approve mines and oil drilling projects.
But those pale in comparison with geopolitical headwinds. Trump will not attend the talks and has withdrawn from the Paris agreement, and his actions have emboldened countries that wish to derail progress. Saudi Arabia, Russia, Argentina, Venezuela and a host of other countries, including petrostates and populist-leaning governments, are all possible mischief-makers. Other major economies may be less overtly disruptive but also could fall well short in their commitments, with equally damaging effects.
Each country is supposed to prepare a nationally determined contribution (NDC), a complex document setting out targets on greenhouse gas emissions to 2035 and sometimes beyond, and policies intended to meet them. But so far only a handful of countries – not including the EU, China, Japan or India – have submitted their NDCs, even though the deadline passed in February.
The UK's plan was submitted last year, along with Brazil's.
Brazil and last year's hosts, Azerbaijan, are working on a 'roadmap' that will set out what countries must do to achieve the financial goals that will also be a key issue. The outline will be ready before governments gather in the Amazon in November.
For Corrêa do Lago, the hope is that the world can come together to solve the existential crisis of the climate in the way governments did 40 years ago to tackle the hole in the ozone layer. 'Climate change is much more complex, and the gases act for much longer, and the impact on the economy is infinitely larger than the elimination of the gases that deplete the ozone layer. But the ozone layer is the only example of the phenomenon that connected human action could change the direction [of an environmental crisis].'
If we fail? 'The alternative is accelerating climate change.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Labor accused of ‘gaslighting' Australians on climate crisis as fossil fuel projects keep getting approved
Labor accused of ‘gaslighting' Australians on climate crisis as fossil fuel projects keep getting approved

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

Labor accused of ‘gaslighting' Australians on climate crisis as fossil fuel projects keep getting approved

Australian federal and state governments have approved a wave of fossil fuel developments over the past six weeks, sparking accusations Anthony Albanese and other leaders are 'gaslighting' the public – claiming they take the climate crisis seriously while pushing up emissions. Peter Dunn, a former commissioner of emergency services for the Australian Capital Territory, says the Albanese government is 'trashing its integrity' and has 'lost their licence to lead, days after the election'. Dunn, a member of Emergency Leaders for Climate Action who lived through the 2003 Canberra bushfires and the catastrophic 2019 fires at Lake Conjola on the New South Wales south coast, is furious about the government's decision to greenlight Woodside's extension of the North West Shelf gas processing plant. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email 'I'm bloody angry, bitterly disappointed, and I see a government that I was really hopeful for doing great things trashing its integrity,' he says. 'That's the thing that's really got me worked up at the moment – because there is no integrity in what I'm seeing [from the government] in the climate space whatsoever … You lose your integrity, you lose your licence to lead. They just lost their licence to lead, days after the election.' Federal and state governments and agencies have approved several fossil fuel projects since April, ranging from large developments to smaller extensions. They include the production operations for Santos' Barossa offshore gas project off the Northern Territory, two coalmine extensions in NSW, Viva Energy's floating gas terminal in Geelong, and nine new areas for gas exploration in Queensland. Decisions for other major projects are looming. On 22 May, Albanese and the NSW premier, Chris Minns, travelled to Maitland to get a better grasp of the scale of the flood disaster extending from the NSW Hunter up to Coffs Harbour. The prime minister told communities 'You are not alone', acknowledging that due to climate change 'tragically, we're seeing more extreme weather events'. Six days later, the environment minister, Murray Watt, a former minister for emergency management, announced provisional approval for the extension of Woodside's project to 2070 with 'strict conditions'. A final decision is due soon. When asked before the widely anticipated announcement how giving Woodside the green light aligned with Labor's climate commitments, Albanese said last week 'It is net zero, not zero' and 'You don't change a transition with warm thoughts'. 'I was really upset when I heard the prime minister say it's net zero not actual zero,' says Serena Joyner, the chief executive of Bushfire Survivors for Climate Action. 'It's gaslighting, because you have to actually reduce emissions or climate change will just run away. 'It's a cognitive disconnect.' Joyner lives in the Blue Mountains, another region badly hit by the 2019-20 black summer fires. She estimates her family has a few years left in the area before they will have to move due to the difficulty of insuring as bushfire risk grows, driven by the climate disaster. Bushfire Survivors for Climate Action (BSCA) was formed in 2018 to help ordinary people affected by climate-fuelled disasters engage with leaders. The group has spent years meeting with MPs, repeatedly sharing their stories and trauma to highlight the urgent need for climate policy action, which Joyner says brings a heavy emotional toll. She says the early weeks of the re-elected Albanese government have led to 'a reassessment of how to engage, because what we've been doing with Labor in the last couple of years, it's hard to see how it's working'. 'Being cooperative and playing nice with Labor isn't getting us anywhere,' she says. 'We're an organisation that works very hard to be reasonable, sensible: we don't go to rallies, we don't go to protests. We have meetings with politicians and tell them our stories. 'They offer sympathy and then just go and approve massive fossil fuel projects anyway.' Sign up to Afternoon Update Our Australian afternoon update breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion BSCA member Angela Frimberger says when governments approve new fossil fuel developments and expansions 'climate-affected people want to know what governments are thinking, and do they care about their problems at all'. 'You just want to sit across a table from them and say, 'What do you think is going to happen?',' she says. Frimberger lives on the edge of Lake Innes, south of Port Macquarie, on a property she and her family manage for biodiversity conservation. Their house survived black summer but fire tore through half of the habitat, which they have since worked to regenerate and restore. The fires were followed by floods in 2022 and then the record-breaking event of May this year. Days before Watt announced his North West Shelf decision, a soaked Frimberger stood in the rain filming a video for BSCA's social media pages, saying: 'It's happening again, another unprecedented event' and 'Minister Watt, please remember those of us out here'. She says she was 'devastated that our government would do this while reeling from a current disaster and still struggling to recover from past disasters'. 'The government is approving projects such that regular people like me have to pay the cost,' she says. Georgina Woods is the head of research and investigations for the Lock the Gate Alliance, a national organisation that developed out of community opposition to fracking proposals. She says people feeling the effects of climate change are frightened about what the approval of new fossil fuel projects means for them. 'The business model of coal and gas companies is based on demand assumptions that are wholly inconsistent with preventing catastrophic levels of global warming,' Woods says. 'By giving these companies approval to expand their operations, the Australian government is telling all of us it expects this outcome too.' A government spokesperson said that 'only Labor has a concrete, real plan to see our emissions reduce while ensuring our economy continues to grow'. 'As we've consistently said – gas has an important role to play in the transition as the ultimate backstop for renewables,' they said. The government pointed to climate action during its first term, including reforms to the safeguard mechanism, which they said had 'already begun to work'. 'This [North West Shelf] project is subject to those reforms, which means this plant is required to bring their emissions down each year and reach net zero by 2050 under the safeguard mechanism.'

Rate of Gaza children suffering acute malnutrition rate nearly triples, survey shows
Rate of Gaza children suffering acute malnutrition rate nearly triples, survey shows

Reuters

time2 hours ago

  • Reuters

Rate of Gaza children suffering acute malnutrition rate nearly triples, survey shows

GENEVA, June 5 (Reuters) - The rate of young children suffering from acute malnutrition in Gaza has nearly tripled since a ceasefire earlier this year when aid flowed more freely, according to data collected by humanitarian groups and released by the U.N. on Thursday. The report was issued at a time when aid distribution in the Palestinian enclave is under intense scrutiny because of deadly shootings close to the operations of a new U.S.-backed system. After the two-month ceasefire broke down in March, Israel blockaded aid supplies into Gaza for 11 weeks, prompting a famine warning from a global hunger monitor. Israel, which has only partially lifted the blockade since, vets all aid into Gaza and accuses Hamas of stealing some of it - something the militant group denies. Around 5.8% out of nearly 50,000 children under five who were screened in the second half of May were diagnosed with acute malnutrition, an analysis by a group of U.N. and other aid agencies known as the nutrition cluster showed. This was up from 4.7% in early May and nearly three times the rate in February during a pause in fighting in the 20-month war between Israel and Hamas, the analysis said. It did not specify the exact rate in February, nor say how many children were screened. The analysis also reported an increase in severe acute malnutrition cases among children -- a life-threatening condition that compromises the immune system. It said centres to support medical complications from severe cases in north Gaza and Rafah in the south of the enclave have been forced to close, leaving children without access to lifesaving treatment. It did not give a reason for the closures but many medical centres have run out of supplies, been damaged in the war or attacked by Israel, which accuses Hamas of using them for military purposes. Hamas denies using them in this way. A Palestinian minister reported 29 starvation-related deaths among the children and elderly in just a few days last month. Separately, medical charity Doctors Without Borders (MSF) said on Thursday that doctors in the Gaza Strip were donating their own blood to save their patients after scores of Palestinians were gunned down while trying to get food aid.

Starmer steps up call for aid to flow into Gaza after US vetoes UN resolution
Starmer steps up call for aid to flow into Gaza after US vetoes UN resolution

South Wales Argus

time2 hours ago

  • South Wales Argus

Starmer steps up call for aid to flow into Gaza after US vetoes UN resolution

The UK backed a UN Security Council resolution calling for Israel to lift restrictions on aid, but the move was vetoed by Donald Trump's US. The Prime Minister called for the restoration of a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas and the release of the remaining hostages being held by the group. At the UN late on Wednesday, the US vetoed the proposed resolution demanding an immediate and permanent ceasefire in Gaza because it was not linked to the release of hostages. The UK voted for today's resolution because Israel's block on aid into Gaza needs to end. Israel's new system is not working. Palestinians have been killed as they try to reach the very few aid sites that Israel has permitted. It is inhumane. Israel must let the @UN save lives. — UK at the UN 🇬🇧🇺🇳 (@UKUN_NewYork) June 4, 2025 It also did not condemn Hamas over the October 7 2023 atrocities or insist that the militant group must disarm and withdraw from Gaza — two other demands from the Trump administration. The UK was among the 14 other members of the 15-nation council to vote in favour of the resolution, which described the humanitarian situation in Gaza as 'catastrophic' and called on Israel to lift all restrictions on the delivery of aid to the 2.1 million Palestinians in the territory. Sir Keir told reporters during a visit to a school in Harlow: 'In relation to what's happening in Gaza, we've been absolutely clear that it is intolerable and we need to get back to a ceasefire urgently and that is our constant work with other allies to get us to that position. 'We need those hostages to come out, many of them have been held for a very long time. 'And of course, humanitarian aid needs to get in at speed and at volume, but that can only happen if we get back to a ceasefire so I'm absolutely clear that the situation as it is is utterly intolerable, and that's why we've taken measures like the trading talks have been stood down, the sanctions we've put in and we're working with allies to see what else we can do.' The IDF and Israel Security Agency (ISA) confirm that the bodies of two hostages – Judy Weinstein-Haggai (70) and Gadi Haggai (72) – were recovered from Gaza overnight. The couple was kidnapped from their home in Kibbutz Nir Oz on the 7th October and brutally murdered by… — Israel in the UK 🇮🇱🤝🇬🇧 (@IsraelinUK) June 5, 2025 In a briefing in Westminster, the Prime Minister's official spokesman said: 'Israel has clear obligations under international humanitarian law to agree to and facilitate humanitarian aid. 'The unimpeded entry of assistance at scale to meet the needs in Gaza must be restored. 'We made that clear through the UN Security Council yesterday as well and that's why we're working with allies at pace to to achieve that.' Israel said it had recovered the bodies of two hostages taken in the October 7 attack. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said the remains of Judih Weinstein and Gad Haggai had been recovered. Meanwhile, the Church of England's current most senior bishop condemned 'yet another callous, reckless attack' on the Anglican-run Al-Ahli Hospital in Gaza. Archbishop of York Stephen Cottrell said: 'Despite our repeated requests, the Israeli government has been unable to prove its claims that Al-Ahli Hospital has been used by Hamas. 'Instead this is part of a relentless and outrageous pattern of attacks on hospitals and healthcare facilities in Gaza. There is no justification for this under international humanitarian law.' According to Gaza's health ministry, which is led by medical professionals but reports to the Hamas-run government, three local reporters were killed and six people wounded in a recent strike on the courtyard of the hospital.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store