
Elon Musk says his next product will be the most important Tesla has ever produced. And he says it's (finally) almost here
Will Elon Musk finally make good on six years of robotaxi promises?
Musk said in a social media post this week that Tesla's long-awaited robotaxi service will roll onto the streets of Austin, Texas on June 22. The Tesla CEO is betting the company's future on autonomous vehicles (AV) and a robotaxi service – which will hopefully inject much-needed cash just as the company's sales and profits are slumping.
While Musk is championing the promise of robotaxis – self-driving cars without a driver than can ferry around paying passengers – there are concerns about both safety and their viability as a business.
Traditional automakers like General Motors have already abandoned plans for a similar service despite spending billions, blaming the 'considerable' resources needed and 'an increasingly competitive robotaxi market.' Ford dropped its AV efforts altogether.
But even with their exit, some experts say the real competition for Tesla are the human drivers of Uber and Lyft.
'The challenge is less technological and more economic,' said Bryant Walker Smith, an affiliated scholar at the Center for Internet and Society at Stanford Law School, an expert in autonomous vehicles. 'If a company that needs to pay engineers and mechanic and remote assistance has to compete with Uber drivers who might be making less than minimum wage to maintain their own older vehicle, that's kind of hard to do.'
None of that has stopped Musk from making outsized projections about how the technology could reshape Tesla and the world.
'I don't see anyone being able to compete with Tesla at present,' Musk said during April's earning call about why he believes Tesla's robotaxi service will succeed. 'But at least as far as I'm aware, Tesla will have, I don't know, 99% market share or something ridiculous.'
Musk cautioned in his social media post that the June 22 date was tentative. Whenever it does kick off, though, Tesla will be playing catch-up to far more established services.
'There are real robotaxis on the road today. None of them is a Tesla,' said Smith.
That includes Google's Waymo, which is already providing 250,000 paid rides a week in four US cities – San Francisco, Los Angeles, Phoenix and Austin. Companies in China also have active robotaxi services.
Google parent Alphabet does not disclose the financial performance of its AV unit Waymo. But the segment of the company that includes Waymo reported a $4.1 billion loss last year, even as Alphabet poured in $5.6 billion.
That loss is little more than a rounding error for a company that reported net income of $100 billion. In contrast, Tesla last year reported net income of $7 billion, down 53% from 2023.
Waymo, which began as a paid service in 2020, is growing rapidly, with ridership up more than 50% in the last six months. Last month, it announced that its 1,500 vehicles had logged more than the 10 million paid rides – up from 5 million rides through the end of last year.
Uber – which has a partnership with Waymo in Austin – plans to expand the alliance into Atlanta next year. Uber CEO Dara Khosrowshahi told a Bloomberg technology forum last week that while he expects the company to rely on human drivers for years into the future, he sees a growing role for robotaxis.
'We want to help these players develop, by investing in them in some cases, and really by working with them to bring their product to market,' he said. 'These are technologies that are unbelievably promising, but they've taken billions of dollars to develop. It's one of those overnight success that has taken 20 years of development. But it's finally ready to hit the market and we want to help that ecosystem get there.'
For years after automated elevators were invented, building owners paid to have human elevator operators because people were worried about riding in an elevator without one.
Robotaxis could face similar safety concerns, experts say.
Smith said he's seen people grow comfortable with robotaxis after giving them a try, even though it's too early to say whether the driverless cars are safer than ones with a person at the wheel.
'I often see… people are really nervous about it getting in a robotaxi. And then they get in, and within literally minutes, (they're) on their phones, and they're checked out, it's normal,' he said.
Tesla's current self-driving technology, known as 'full self-driving' or FSD, uses just cameras, not radar or lasers known as 'lidar,' to detect obstacles in front of them.
Musk has mocked the idea of lidar, which is used on Waymo and some other self-driving cars, writing on X in March, 'People don't shoot lasers out of their eyes to drive. Just try Tesla self-driving today, which just uses cameras and AI, and you will understand.' He described lidar as 'expensive sensors that are unnecessary' and 'friggin stupid.'
While not using lidar gives Tesla robotaxis a cost advantage over Waymo, many experts consider lidar safer to detect obstacles – including people – in the road.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has announced several investigations into the safety of Telsa's FSD, including a fatal accident in which a car using the feature hit and killed a pedestrian.
The car using FSD 'experienced a crash after entering an area of reduced roadway visibility…. from conditions such as sun glare, fog, or airborne dust,' said the agency's statement about the probe.
Smith said that those real-world experiences show the problem with using just cameras for detection.
'If you could enable drivers to have lasers shooting out their eye to avoid sun glare and things, it would be a good thing,' he said.
Tesla needs a turnaround. The company has experienced plunging sales and profits, including its first drop in annual sales last year and its biggest drop in quarterly sales, thanks in part to backlash against Musk's political activities.
Tesla's stock (TSLA), which hit a record high in mid-December on expectations that Musk's close ties to President Donald Trump would lead to Tesla-friendly policies, have plunged 30% since then.
Musk and his fans on Wall Street are convinced that Tesla will soon explode in value due to its AV capabilities and future robotaxi service, largely because self-driving robotaxis can operate more hours in a day than human driver.
'I think this will be the largest asset value increase in human history,' Musk told investors in January.
Tesla did not respond to a request for comment.
Musk has repeatedly projected the service will change life on the planet by radically reordering how people move around, while Tesla owners rent out their cars for the robotaxi service to generate a cash return.
But the Tesla CEO has been promising that his robotaxi service was a year away since at least 2019, only to fall short of those ambitious targets.
GLJ Research analyst Gordon Johnson predicts Tesla's robotaxi launch this month will be more flash than substance.
'This is a Tesla proof of concept exercise, not a rollout or a testing of a commercial asset for sale,' Johnson, a long-time critic of Tesla, wrote in a note to clients Tuesday.
And Smith doubts Musk will be able to live up to his current promises any better than the past ones.
'I don't know why anyone refers to things he says with any measure of credulity,' said Smith. 'When we're talking about the future, it's important to recognize that that future is not one that Tesla has demonstrated itself able to deliver.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Times
18 minutes ago
- New York Times
Las Vegas agrees two-year Formula One contract extension through 2027
MONTREAL — The Las Vegas Grand Prix will remain part of the Formula One calendar for at least the next two years after officials confirmed they have agreed an extension to cover 2026 and 2027. Las Vegas joined the F1 calendar in 2023 on an initial three-year contract, albeit with a long-term commitment in place from the casino partners and a 10-year approval from Clark County for the race to take place along the Strip. Advertisement Earlier this week, F1 announced the 2026 calendar including Las Vegas despite there being no formal communication about the race being renewed beyond this year. Senior leadership members from casino partners including Wynn, the MGM Grand, Caesars and the Venetian, plus the Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority, were in Montreal on Saturday to take part in a media panel discussing the future of the Las Vegas Grand Prix, and referred to an 'extension' being in place. Asked by The Athletic to clarify the contractual status of the grand prix, Emily Prazer, the president of the Las Vegas Grand Prix and chief commercial officer of F1, confirmed that a two-year renewal had been agreed by the various partners. 'We've agreed collectively that we're going to do a two-year extension for 2026 and '27,' Prazer said. 'We want to make sure that we're continuing to evolve what we're doing. But the intent is a much longer-term arrangement. 'As we all know, the race has had its challenges, but we're coming out the other side. So we want to make sure that it continues to work for both sides. 'So collectively, we sat down and agreed that was the best approach. We're very much planning longer-term, but that's kind of where we're at right now.' Steve Hill, the CEO and president of the LVCVA, added: 'The length of extensions don't really reflect anything other than it just makes sense incrementally, we know what's going to happen over the next couple of years. 'We're planning on this being a permanent race, we'll just keep planning extensions that will probably expand as we go forward.' The Las Vegas Grand Prix endured a tricky debut in 2023 amid concerns from fans about ticket and hotel prices, as well as an issue with a loose water valve cover on Thursday night in practice that led to FP1 being cancelled and FP2 being significantly delayed. Advertisement But it ended up being one of the best races of the year with plenty of overtaking, and the track layout proved popular with the drivers, while the high price points were addressed for 2024, including a significant drop in hotel rates. For 2025, officials in Las Vegas have brought forward the start time from its previous slot of 10 p.m. PT on Saturday to 8 p.m. after feedback from both paddock personnel and fans about it being too late to start the race. (Alex Bierensfor Heineken)


Forbes
19 minutes ago
- Forbes
New iPhone Warning: Another Phone Will No Longer Receive Support
Friday the 13th has a ring of bad luck to it, and this month, it has brought a change of status to the iPhone XS. As of June 13, that phone is added to its vintage product list. Here's why, and what it means. Apple iPhone XS T3 Magazine/Future via Getty Images Apple adds products to its vintage (and later its obsolete) lists on a strict schedule, shown on a support page. 'Products are considered vintage when Apple stopped distributing them for sale more than 5 and less than 7 years ago,' the company says. The iPhone XS went on sale in September 2018 and though it was discontinued a year later, it was still on sale through select resellers. So, that means it's only just passed the five-year point to reach vintage status, something spotted by Joe Rossignol at MacRumors. This doesn't mean the phone is no longer usable, nor that Apple won't support it — though it's now on a countdown to obsolete, which will mean it's not supported at all. More on that below. For now, you can still get the phone repaired either by an Apple Store or Apple Authorized Service Provider, although this is subject to the continuing availability of parts, and there's no guarantee how long that will be. As for software support, the iPhone XS runs the current software, iOS 18, but it will not be compatible with this fall's update, which is called iOS 26 (as part of a wholesale renaming policy by Apple for the operating systems for all its devices) though the latest iPhone 16 series will be supported. This also doesn't mean it won't receive software updates. Apple routinely releases new updates to the previous OS when the next one launches, primarily for those users who aren't ready to jump on board with the next version. Additionally, it will usually continue with software updates containing security fixes, for instance, for some months after the new OS has taken root. Things change when the iPhone reaches obsolete status, which for the iPhone XS will be in two years' time. 'Products are considered obsolete when Apple stopped distributing them for sale more than 7 years ago… Apple discontinues all hardware service for obsolete products, and service providers cannot order parts for obsolete products,' the company says. For now, though, if you're happy with the iPhone XS, there's no urgent need to switch.


Forbes
27 minutes ago
- Forbes
The Chime IPO Will Kickstart A Fintech Investment Comeback
Chris Britt, co-founder and chief executive officer of Chime Financial Inc., during the company's ... More initial public offering at the Nasdaq MarketSite in New York, US, on Thursday, June 12, 2025. Chime launched its IPO with a splash. Shares jumped as much as 59% above the $27 offering price—opening at $43 and closing near $37—marking a bold public debut for the US's largest neobank. With a valuation hovering between $11.6 billion and $15 billion—well below its 2021 private peak of $25 billion—the surge raises the question: Will this trigger renewed investment in neobanks and fintech? Chime's IPO follows strong debuts from fintechs like Circle and eToro. PitchBook's Rudy Yang framed Chime as 'a strategic breakthrough—marking a return of fintech liquidity' after the sector saw VC exit values plummet from $222 billion in 2021 to under $30 billion in the past few years. Chime could be a bellwether for a neobank--and broader fintech--recovery if it: There is another side of the coin: Is Chime's IPO really a pivotal moment for the fintech industry and a validation of the digital-banking model and a template for future bank challengers? No. Chime's debut feels more like a secure base camp than a flag planted atop Everest. It suggests that public markets are open to credible fintech challengers—provided they bring scale, strong unit economics, and realistic valuations. The critical questions for neobanks: 1) Can they diversify revenue beyond interchange (loans, wealth, insurance)? 2) Will macro conditions hold stable enough to sustain IPO markets? 3) Will consumer-trust and customer growth trajectories support future public offerings? The answers are no. There are market factors impacting neobanks that have closed the door to new neobanks coming into the market: 1) Megafintechs have better economics and business models. Among consumers who consider a digital bank or neobank their primary checking account or payments provider, half of them say their primary provider is PayPal or Square Cash App. Neobanks don't just compete with incumbent banks—they compete with the megafintechs, whose platform business models give them scale and revenue diversity. 2) Interchange isn't a reliable revenue source. Relying on interchange runs against consumer behavior trends regarding: 3) The niche affinity play is tough for startups. This strategy requires neobanks to identify a segment's unique financial needs and Be the dominant affinity. Neobanks' claims of how big their affinity groups are misleading because most of us belong to multiple affinity groups. Fintech has entered a new phase—one defined by realism, consumer impact, and long-term value creation. The new phase, however, isn't about bank disruption and displacement--it's about banking industry infrastructure upgrade and replacement. The Chime IPO will help create more VC interest in fintech investment--but that investment won't go to new neobanks. Instead, it will go to startups that bring two things to the financial services industry: 1) AI-driven process reinvention from machine learning, Generative AI, and Agentic AI tools and technologies, and 2) Stablecoin and other cryptocurrency-related payments innovation. The latter may do more to disrupt banks than Chime and other neobanks have done.