
Welfare work requirements empower, slashing funding can help science and other commentary
Conservative: Welfare Work Rules Empower
Setting a work requirement to collect welfare is more than 'a way to reduce costs,' argues Merrill Matthews at The Hill: 'Its real benefit is to help individuals regain the dignity and self-respect that comes from having a job.'
As the GOP budget bill moves to 'require states to enforce a work requirement' for some able-bodied individuals on Medicaid, liberals 'claim the heartless Republicans are trying to punish people just for being poor.'
Libs 'think they are doing welfare recipients a favor, but they're not,' as time out of the workforce makes people 'lose needed work habits and skills' and 'respect for themselves,' — which can encourage drug and alcohol abuse. People who are 'required to work for their benefits' often 'discover that work is empowering'; they just need 'a little push to get started.'
Libertarian: Slashing Funding Can Help Science
'There's a good chance' President Trump's slashing of 'federal spending will liberate science from the corrupting forces that Eisenhower warned us about' in a 1961 speech, when he 'cautioned Americans about the growing power of a 'scientific, technological elite,'' points out Reason's Zach Weissmueller.
When government controls funding, 'there's homogenization, and only one set of ideas is allowed to emerge,' says University of Buckingham biochemistry professor Terence Kealey, crushing 'what's so important in science, which is different ideas competing in a marketplace of ideas.'
Weissmueller notes: 'Before government money flooded in, private research facilities like Bell Labs were centers of innovation,' and could be again. 'If Kealey is right, slashing science funding could, counterintuitively, accelerate' innovation in fields like medicine 'in the long run.'
Eye on DC: Senate Keeps Nominees Hanging
The GOP Senate's 'two-and-a-half-day work week and lackadaisical work ethic' has stymied President Trump's agenda, fumes Rachel Bovard at the Federalist, as 'nearly 80 nominations for crucial Executive Branch roles 'now languish' for want of a floor vote.
Don't blame Democrats, as 'the Senate filibuster no longer exists for presidential nominations.' Republicans could 'easily clear every nomination' in a single 40-hour work week — but that 'requires work — more hours, more workdays, and the physical presence of GOP senators in the Senate chamber (the place, ironically, senators most hate to be).'
After 'the permanent bureaucracy' thwarted the voters' will in Trump's first term, everyone understands 'how critical these appointees are — everyone, it seems, except the people whose job it is to confirm them.'
Politics beat: Heed Starmer's Reset, Dems
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer is the latest politician 'hurrying to the front of the march to claim it as their own,' snarks Dominic Green at The Wall Street Journal. 'Starmer opposed the Brexit campaign to 'take back control' over British immigration policy but now promises to 'take back control' over the borders.'
He flipped because this month's local elections 'confirmed' that 'Nigel Farage's anti-immigration Reform UK party is gaining significant ground.'
Starmer's reset 'should be instructive for America's Democrats as they struggle through their post-woke identity crisis.'
To 'regain public trust,' Dems need 'new leaders who acknowledge past errors and recognize new realities by embracing elements of Donald Trump's agenda and cultivating his voter coalition.'
MidEast beat: Free Gaza From Hamas Rule
As US campus activists hold pro-Hamas demonstrations, 'Palestinians in Gaza are demonstrating — and risking their lives to do so — against Hamas's continued despotic rule,' thunders Commentary's Seth Mandel.
'Gazans would like Hamas to surrender' — and they shouldn't 'be the only ones demanding this.'
Those 'Western governments pressuring Israel to leave Hamas in power are doing so not out of any concern for Palestinians,' but just 'bending to public pressure' that's 'being applied by pro-Hamas protesters and orchestrated by pro-Hamas entities' to 'ignore the will of the Gazans suffering under Hamas.'
Western governments should 'grow a spine and push back against the Hamasniks in your streets,' not for Israel, but 'for the people you are claiming to help.'
— Compiled by The Post Editorial Board

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Atlantic
14 minutes ago
- Atlantic
Ukraine Got a Major Battle Victory. Trump Is Not Happy.
Ukraine's drone strikes deep into Russia delivered a humiliating blow to Moscow last weekend. Kyiv's defenders celebrated the attack as a triumph of modern warfare and a warning to Russian President Vladimir Putin. But the extraordinary operation got a different response inside the White House: anger. Donald Trump has openly vented in recent weeks about Putin's unwillingness to end the war. But since Sunday's attack, which hit a series of Russian military airfields, the president has privately expressed frustration that the strike could escalate the conflict, according to three administration officials and an outside adviser to the White House. (They spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss internal deliberations.) These sources told me that the drone strike has reignited the president's long-held displeasure with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, and prompted a new debate in the White House about whether the United States should abandon Ukraine. Throughout the war, Trump has deemed Zelensky a 'bad guy' and a 'hothead,' the outside adviser said—someone who could be pushing the globe toward World War III. Trump privately echoed a right-wing talking point this week by criticizing Zelensky for supposedly showboating after the drone attacks; according to the adviser, Trump was impressed with the audacity of the strikes but believes that Zelensky's focus should have been on Ukraine-Russia negotiations in Istanbul. Trump spoke with Putin yesterday, and, in a readout of the call on Truth Social, the U.S. president relayed the Kremlin's plans to strike back against Ukraine. 'We discussed the attack on Russia's docked airplanes, by Ukraine, and also various other attacks that have been taking place by both sides,' Trump wrote. 'It was a good conversation, but not a conversation that will lead to immediate Peace. President Putin did say, and very strongly, that he will have to respond to the recent attack on the airfields.' Trump did not say whether he had warned Putin against retaliating, and two of the administration officials told me that he has not decided on his next steps. Officials have presented him with options that include sanctioning Russia and reducing American aid to Ukraine. Meanwhile, Trump told aides this week that he does not believe a summit with him, Zelensky, and Putin—which he once hoped would be a way to bring the war to a close—will happen any time soon, one of the administration officials told me. Trump, who on the campaign trail last year vowed to end the war within his first 24 hours in office, made a renewed push for a peace deal last month. While Zelensky agreed to an immediate cease-fire, Putin rejected the offer and ratcheted up his bombing of Ukrainian cities. That led Trump to threaten to walk away from peace talks, and to flash some rare ire at Putin. The president had hoped that some progress would be made in this week's talks in Turkey, but the meeting was overshadowed by the drone strikes and went nowhere. The White House has said that the U.S. was not told in advance about the surprise attack, which was carried out by drones hidden across five of Russia's time zones that hit nuclear-capable bombers and inflicted billions of dollars in damage, according to a preliminary estimate from the White House. Steve Bannon and other influential MAGA voices have berated Ukraine for the attack and are attempting to push Washington further from Kyiv. On his podcast this week, Bannon blamed Ukraine for, in his view, sabotaging peace talks while potentially provoking a massive response from Russia. 'Zelensky didn't give the president of the United States a heads-up to say he's going to do a deep strike into strategic forces of Russia, which is going up the escalatory ladder as quickly as you can, on the day before your meeting in Turkey?' Bannon said. 'On the eve of peace talks or cease-fire talks, he takes the Japanese role in Pearl Harbor—the sneak attack.' Bannon has conveyed similar messages to senior West Wing advisers, a fourth administration official told me. Keith Kellogg, Trump's Ukraine envoy, warned on Fox News that 'the risk levels are going way up' because the drones struck part of Russia's 'national survival system'—its nuclear program—potentially pushing Moscow to retaliate in significant ways. Trump has not increased aid to Ukraine since taking office again in January, and he has yet to endorse a bipartisan Senate push, led by his ally Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, to impose harsh economic penalties against Russia and countries that do business with it. There have been other recent signs that the White House is distancing itself from Ukraine, too. Yesterday, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth did not attend a meeting of 50 defense ministers at NATO headquarters in Brussels. In the past, the meeting has been an important venue for coordinating military aid for Ukraine. Hegseth was the first U.S. defense secretary to skip the event in three years. The Pentagon cited scheduling issues for his absence. When I asked a White House spokesperson for comment about the drone strikes, she pointed me to Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt's briefing-room remarks on Tuesday, when Leavitt said that Trump 'wants this war to end at the negotiating table, and he has made that clear to both leaders, both publicly and privately.' In public remarks about the strikes, Putin downplayed the chances of a cease-fire, asking, 'Who has negotiations with terrorists?' But Zelensky told reporters that the operation over the weekend, code-named Spider's Web, would not have been carried out if Putin had agreed to a U.S.-proposed truce. 'If there had been a cease-fire, would the operation have taken place?' Zelensky asked. 'No.' Exasperated with the conflict, Trump continues to muse about walking away from any sort of diplomatic solution. In his Truth Social post about his call with Putin, the president seemed eager to change the subject to focus on ending a different international crisis. 'We also discussed Iran,' Trump wrote about ongoing talks regarding Tehran's nuclear ambitions. 'President Putin suggested that he will participate in the discussions with Iran and that he could, perhaps, be helpful in getting this brought to a rapid conclusion.'


Forbes
15 minutes ago
- Forbes
Musk Digs Up Trump's 12-Year-Old Tweet To Attack His Policy Bill
Elon Musk directly jabbed President Donald Trump over his policy bill Thursday— in his most pointed attack on Trump himself—over the legislation Musk has previously mostly blamed Republican lawmakers for. President Donald Trump speaks during a news conference with Elon Musk in the Oval Office of the ... More White House in Washington, DC, on May 30, 2025. (Photo by ALLISON ROBBERT/AFP via Getty Images) Musk reposted a 2013 tweet from Trump that said he was in disbelief and 'embarrassed' Republicans were extending the debt ceiling, captioning the repost 'wise words.' Trump on Wednesday said the debt limit should be 'entirely scrapped' as a provision of his 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act,' which would raise the debt ceiling ahead of its expected expiration date in August. This is a developing story and will be updated.


The Hill
15 minutes ago
- The Hill
Watch live: Trump, German chancellor hold bilateral meeting
President Trump and newly minted German Chancellor Friedrich Merz will meet Thursday at the White House with the conversation likely to center on foreign and trade policy. The visit between Trump and Merz comes as the European Union is in talks with U.S. officials on a potential trade deal — and after the president's 50 percent tariff on steel and aluminum imports went into effect. Merz has also been a strong defender of Ukraine amid its war with Russia. Trump too has aired frustration with Russian President Vladimir Putin in recent weeks as ceasefire talks have been unfruitful. The president also issued a new travel ban on Wednesday that will affect 19 countries starting next week, including 12 countries with full bans and seven with restrictions. The event is scheduled to begin at 11:45 a.m. EDT. Watch the live video above.