Iranian cyberattacks remain a threat despite ceasefire, US officials warn
WASHINGTON (AP) — A ceasefire between Iran and Israel has not ended the threat of cyberattacks from hacking groups supportive of Tehran, the FBI and federal cybersecurity officials warned Monday.
In a public bulletin, the authorities warned that hacking groups affiliated with or supportive of Tehran may still seek to disrupt or disable critical infrastructure systems in the U.S. such as utilities, transportation and economic hubs. Hackers may also target defense contractors or other American companies with ties to Israel, the agencies said.
'Despite a declared ceasefire and ongoing negotiations towards a permanent solution, Iranian-affiliated cyber actors and hacktivist groups may still conduct malicious cyber activity,' the agencies warned.
The warning of continued cyberthreats after a halt to conventional warfare reflects the often opaque nature of cyber conflict. Hacking groups may have only loose ties to a nation state, and may seek to retaliate as an alternative to traditional military action.
The bulletin outlined recommendations, including the use of regular software updates and strong password management systems to shore up digital defenses.
Hackers backing Tehran have targeted U.S. banks, defense contractors and energy companies following American strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities — but so far have not caused widespread disruptions.
While it lacks the technical abilities of China or Russia, Iran has long used its more limited capabilities to steal secrets, score political points or frighten opponents.
Analysts have tied some of these activities to groups working on behalf of Iran's military and intelligence agencies. But in other instances, the groups appear to act independently.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Toronto Star
39 minutes ago
- Toronto Star
Hawaii's governor signs bills cracking down on illegal fireworks after deadly New Year's explosion
HONOLULU (AP) — Hawaii's governor on Monday signed five bills cracking down on the rampant use of illegal fireworks in the islands after a massive explosion at a New Year's party killed six people and severely burned more than a dozen others. The new laws take effect immediately. Police will be authorized to issue $300 tickets to those who shoot off fireworks, while repeat offenders and those whose actions cause serious injury or death could get prison time for felony crimes.
Winnipeg Free Press
an hour ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Japanese manufacturers are slightly more optimistic despite Trump tariff worries
TOKYO (AP) — Business sentiment among large Japanese manufacturers has improved slightly, according to a survey by Japan's central bank released Tuesday, although worries persist over President Donald Trump's tariffs. The Bank of Japan's quarterly tankan survey said an index for large manufacturers rose to plus 13 from plus 12 in March, when it marked the first dip in a year. The survey is an indicator of companies foreseeing good conditions minus those feeling pessimistic. Major manufacturers include auto and electronics sectors, whose exports to the U.S. drive the Japanese economy. U.S. auto tariffs are a worry for major manufacturers like Toyota Motor Corp., but some analysts note global auto sales have held up relatively well in recent months. The U.S. has imposed 25% tariffs on auto imports. Japanese automakers have plants in Mexico, where Trump has announced a separate set of tariffs. The U.S. has also imposed 50% tariffs on steel and aluminum. Japanese officials have been talking frequently with the Trump administration, stressing that Japan is a key U.S. ally. Trump posted on his social media site Monday that Japan wasn't buying enough rice from the U.S. 'They won't take our RICE, and yet they have a massive rice shortage,' the president wrote, adding that a letter to Japan was coming. Also on Monday, National Economic Council director Kevin Hassett told reporters at the White House that Trump 'is going to finalize the frameworks we negotiated with a whole bunch of countries after the weekend.' The Bank of Japan, which has kept interest rates extremely low for years to encourage growth, is expected to continue to raise interest rates, but some analysts expect that to wait until next year. The central bank raised its benchmark rate to 0.5% from 0.1% at the start of this year and has maintained that rate. The next Bank of Japan monetary policy board meeting is at the end of this month. The tankan findings work as important data in weighing a decision. Monday Mornings The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week. The weak yen has raised the cost of materials for Japan at a time when the U.S. dollar has been trading at around 140 yen, up considerably from about 110 yen five years ago. A weak yen is a boon for Japan's exporters by boosting the value of their earnings when converted into yen. The tankan showed sentiment for large non-manufacturers fell to plus 34 from plus 35. That was better than some forecasts, which projected a deeper decline. The Japanese government reported last week that the nation's unemployment rate in May stood at 2.5%, unchanged from the previous month. ___ Yuri Kageyama is on Threads:
Japan Forward
an hour ago
- Japan Forward
Deciphering Lee Jae-myung and South Korea's New Diplomatic Course
Is Lee Jae-myung a pragmatist or a populist firebrand? Since taking office on June 4, South Korea's new president has defied easy classification. Critics on the right dismiss him as a leftist populist bereft of a coherent philosophy. Others view him as a shrewd realist, driven by a desire for more political power. Moon Chung-in, a former presidential adviser and expert on East Asian affairs, offers a different take. He describes Lee as a principled pragmatist — a leader guided by a clear-eyed pursuit of national interest. In an exclusive interview with JAPAN Forward, Moon, a distinguished professor at Yonsei University, discussed the early direction of Lee's foreign policy and how his administration is likely to diverge from that of his conservative predecessor. Professor Moon Chung-in attends the CogitASIA conference in 2015. (©Crawford Forum) From what I have observed, Lee is neither a leftist nor a populist in the conventional sense. A better way to describe him is as a progressive pragmatist. His goals lean progressive, championing peace, equality, and justice. But his methods are grounded in pragmatism. He seeks truth through facts and prioritizes people's tangible interests over lofty abstractions. Lee Jae-myung delivers a speech at the National Assembly on June 26. (©Lee Jae-myung/FB) Distinguishing between populism and pragmatism is difficult because the line separating them may be paper-thin. Policy driven by practicality but lacking in foundational principles quickly descends into opportunism and populism. When anchored in firm principles, however, pragmatism becomes an effective means of navigating complex domestic and global issues. I see the new president being the latter. President Lee didn't attend the 2025 NATO Summit in June and instead sent his National Security Advisor. By contrast, his predecessor, Yoon Suk-yeol, had attended the summit for three consecutive years, beginning in 2022. Lee's absence drew sharp criticism from conservatives at home and the United States, who saw it as a retreat from the American-led alliance. They argue his decision, likely influenced by fears of backlash from China, Russia, and North Korea, signals wavering commitment to the traditional alliance. Lee Jae-myung, fifth from the left in the back row, appears in a G7 family photo. (©Lee Jae-myung/FB) But such criticisms seem misplaced. The presidential office cited urgent domestic issues and global economic uncertainty following the Israel–Iran conflict as reasons for skipping the international forum. In truth, Lee was not fully prepared to attend. Less than three weeks into office, his cabinet remains incomplete, with no foreign or defense ministers appointed. There was also a practical concern. A bilateral meeting with President Donald Trump would have been a crucial benchmark for success. But due to Trump's shortened trip, that meeting was unlikely to happen. Their previous meeting at the G7 in Canada had been canceled at the last minute. Lee likely wanted to avoid a similar embarrassment. The previous administration prioritized value-driven diplomacy, focusing on concepts like democracy and human rights. Yoon often called the Seoul–Washington partnership a "value alliance." In contrast, President Lee takes a more interest-driven approach, emphasizing national interests over abstract ideals. This suggests that Lee's administration may pursue improved relations with China and Russia while maintaining close bilateral ties with Washington and trilateral cooperation with Tokyo and Washington. It's a hard balance to strike, for sure. Chinese President Xi Jinping (left) and US President Donald Trump at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing, November 2017 (©Kyodo). The approach to peace is another important dividing line. Yoon stressed the principle of 'peace through strength' and advocated the doctrine of preemptive strike, decapitation of North Korean leadership, and massive retaliation and punishment. Lee takes an opposite posture. He favors the principle of 'peace first through reconciliation and cooperation.' He once said, "A dirty peace is still better than a winning war." His top priority is on preventive diplomacy that can reduce tensions, enhance confidence-building, and open a pathway to the denuclearization of and the creation of a peaceful regime on the Korean Peninsula. Yoon is known to have, by and large, delegated foreign policymaking to his immediate and trusted staff. But Lee is less inclined to delegate his power and authority. He will handle major foreign policy issues personally, while closely consulting with his staff and external advisors. Reviving South Korea–Japan relations was a top priority for former President Yoon, with backing from President Joe Biden at the time. Washington believed closer ties between Seoul and Tokyo were essential for advancing the US Indo-Pacific strategy. President Lee is expected to maintain the overall policy direction toward Japan. While he may reduce the frequency of trilateral military exercises with the US and Japan, he will continue to honor the Camp David declaration signed in 2023. Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba and South Korean President Lee Jae-myung meet each other in person on the sidelines of the G7 Summit in Kananaskis, Canada. (©Prime Minister's Office) His administration is also likely to retain the Yoon-era third-party compensation scheme for wartime forced laborers. However, he may simultaneously urge reciprocal measures from Tokyo, such as contributions from Japanese companies or industry groups like Keidanren (Japan Business Federation). On territorial issues like Dokdo [Takeshima] or other historical matters, the new president may take a firmer stance. My hope is that the US will not compel South Korea to choose between Washington and Beijing, as Vice President Joe Biden did in 2013 during the Obama administration. It's a demand that is neither appropriate nor constructive. The Trump administration might exert immediate pressure by tying an increase in Seoul's defense cost contributions for American forces to a potential reduction or withdrawal of troops stationed in South Korea. Indeed, President Trump has urged Seoul to increase its defense spending to 5% of GDP and raise its cost-sharing for US forces from the current $ 1.1 billion to $10 billion. I don't believe the Lee administration can easily comply with such demands, given strong domestic opposition. President Lee will need to carefully weigh a strategic balance of loyalty, advocacy, and leverage. But one thing is clear: Lee is a tough negotiator. He, therefore, will not blindly follow Washington's conditions as some previous administrations have. Author: Kenji Yoshida
