Proposed vape regulation bill sparks debate; House committee vote delayed one week
NASHVILLE, Tenn. (WKRN) — A bipartisan bill aims to regulate the vape industry and protect children in Tennessee, but some vape retailers call it a 'big tobacco bill' that would put them out of business.
The proposed legislation would create a universal carding requirement, a 10% tax on 'open system' vape products where users add their own liquid to the cartridge, and a ban on products that aren't FDA-approved or approval pending.
Sen. Ken Yager (R-Kingston), the bill's Senate sponsor, told reporters several judges in his district are concerned about the youth vaping rate and the safety of the products.
'A lot of these products being sold in these containers are not FDA approved,' Yager said. 'In fact, they're being made in China and sent here, and I just don't want to see our children poisoned by these toxins that are being imported by the communist Chinese government.'
The bill would also establish a state registry of products that can be sold in Tennessee, which would include the 34 FDA-approved vape products and the 400-some others in the FDA approval pipeline.
Classroom cellphone ban bill passes TN House of Representatives
'The market is being flooded with illicit vapes that are overwhelmingly manufactured and exported from China,' Rep. David B. Hawk (R-Greeneville), the bill's House sponsor said.
However, vape industry experts testified to lawmakers the bill would require them to pull 99% of the products they sell off the market and would put them out of business.
'An outright registry and a ban on our products is not proper,' Danny Gillis, president of the TN Smoke Free Association said. 'It's actually a prohibition, and it's going to cause harm in our state—health harm.'
Gillis argued he has thousands of customers who have used vapes to quit smoking. He said the 34 products currently approved by the FDA are all owned by 'big tobacco.' He's concerned the bill would enable the big tobacco companies to take control of the vape industry, which is meant to reduce harm.
'When they implement such regulation or opposing tax structures, it drives people back to smoking or goes straight into a black market,' Gillis said.
During testimony in the House Government Operations Committee on Monday, March 3, the Tennessee Smoke Free Association (TSFA) argued the products they sell already go through a review process by the FDA.
'The FDA, if they ban products, which they do all the time, they're taken off distribution. The labs are closed; they stop the imports,' Gillis said. 'The FDA is already doing exactly what this registry is trying to accomplish. It is going to be a burden on this state, and it is going to be a burden on stores to try to know what is available to sell, and we're going to strand our customers to the black market.'
TSFA Vice President Chris Lautz said states that have enacted similar registry legislation suffered negative financial consequences and saw increased smuggling rates.
'Massachusetts was one of the first ones back in 2020. They ended up seeing a $135 million loss in revenue; smuggling went from 19.9% to 37.6%; the state lost an additional $224 million annually,' Lautz said. 'California did the same thing in 2023. They're looking at a $150 to $200 million tax shortfall because of this bill. Alabama, Louisiana, Oklahoma, these are just some of the states that passed this, but every one of these states has had a massive negative impact, not only on taxes, but small business support; a lot of these businesses are closing.'
Lautz told lawmakers Louisiana saw 100-plus store closures after approving a similar registry bill, which represents 25% of vape retailers in the state.
However, Yager called the concern over businesses closing a 'false issue.'
'That is not the intention of this bill to put anybody out of business, and under the terms of this bill, it will not put anybody out of business,' Yager said.
⏩
Lawmakers pointed out that while Lautz and Gillis are responsible vape retailers who 'do it the right way,' that's not the case for all vape stores in Tennessee.
'For everyone that's doing it the right way, like these gentlemen, there's thousands that aren't doing it the right way, and it's harming our kids,' Hawk said.
The House version of the bill was rolled to the next Government Operations Committee hearing due to timing issues. Hawk hopes proponents of the proposed legislation will testify at the next hearing, scheduled for March 10.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indianapolis Star
38 minutes ago
- Indianapolis Star
Mike Braun is failing Indiana, yet wants to be president
Mike Braun hated being a U.S. senator and left after one failed term. Now, he's not quite six months into a failing term as Indiana governor, and he's already looking for his next job. Politico's Adam Wren reports Braun is discussing a run for president in 2028, the strongest signal yet that he is as delusional as he is inept. Here's Braun's record as governor so far: He over-promised a massive property tax cut and couldn't deliver. It won't get better from here. The economy is worsening, which means Braun is likely to oversee an era of increasingly draconian budget cuts, rising unemployment and accelerated decline in rural areas. That is not the stuff of presidential campaigns. Put aside Braun's botched first legislative session. Presidents need to be good at politics. Braun is bad at politics. Braun didn't have the political acumen to stop Micah Beckwith's lieutenant governor nomination last year, but he thinks he can navigate a presidential primary? Does he know that other people will be running? Briggs: Jim Banks would let Trump commit any crime you can imagine Braun's fiasco at last year's Indiana Republican Party convention saddled him with a lieutenant governor who overshadows him at every turn and is openly opposing him. Remember, President Trump actually endorsed Braun's preferred running mate, state Rep. Julie McGuire, and it didn't matter. Beckwith won anyway because Indiana's populist right views Beckwith as authentic and Braun and his team as MAGA cosplayers. Beckwith's outsized presence has forced Braun into errors, such as making the ill-advised property tax promise and then doubling down on it at a Beckwith-headlined rally where Braun was the third wheel. Braun lacks principles and objectives, so he operates as a copycat politician. But he doesn't actually understand why figures such as Trump or Beckwith are successful, so he offers awkward imitations and looks pathetic. Yes, Braun has won big elections. He ran an exceptional campaign for U.S. Senate in 2018 and then lucked his way through an overcrowded and underwhelming GOP primary field for governor last year before winning in November. Despite all that winning, he doesn't have a single substantive achievement to serve as a foundation for a presidential run. He doesn't even have a lame culture war win. Braun is a sad man in a blue shirt who can't appreciate any of his business or electoral success because he's always looking for the next big, powerful job to give his life meaning. There is no national demand for someone like this to run for president. Braun is not going to be president. What's worse, Braun also won't be much of a governor. Who do you know who excels at a job they don't want? Braun is bored with being governor, just like he got bored early in his Senate term. We're stuck for three and a half years with someone who pursued the governor's office for a dopamine rush and now would prefer to be elsewhere. Briggs: Diego Morales is rubbing our faces in his corruption. Impeach him now. Braun checking out on Indiana was entirely predictable. Why did he want to be a senator? Why did he want to be governor? Why does he want to be president? I'm genuinely asking. As far as I can tell, Braun has no theory of government external to his own ambitions. He runs for office for the sake of running for office. Unlike when Braun was a non-factor in the Senate, Hoosiers will notice him checking out now. Braun is not even a sure thing to win a second term as governor, should he decide to run, much less a top-tier contender for the presidency. The only thing ahead for Braun, 71, is retirement. He can either come up with something productive to do and try to leave a lasting impact on Indiana, or keep doing TV hits and signing inconsequential executive orders to look busy. Either way, his presidential ambition is a fantasy. The most pitiful thing about Braun is he'll be the last person to figure that out.
Axios
an hour ago
- Axios
U.S. races to break China's hold on rare earth magnets
While U.S. trade negotiators work to ease an immediate shortage of rare earth magnets from China, the Trump administration is scrambling to line up viable alternatives that would reduce America's reliance on its chief economic rival. Why it matters: Small-but-powerful rare earth magnets are essential to high-tech products, from cars and robots to electronics and weapons. But China controls 90% of the world's supply of the critical components. The contentious trade relationship between the U.S. and China has amplified the economic and security risks of that reliance. Global automakers are "in full panic" that China's limits on rare earth exports will trigger supply chain shocks like the pandemic-related semiconductor shortages that occurred in 2021 and 2022. The big picture: It's not a new problem. U.S. officials have been talking about the need to mitigate American dependence on China for years. China also dominates processing of metals like lithium, cobalt, nickel and graphite used in batteries. The latest: U.S. and Chinese officials met Monday and Tuesday in London to try to iron out their trade issues, amid reports that China was willing to expedite export licenses for U.S. and European automakers if the U.S. loosened export controls on jet engine parts and software. Late Tuesday both sides said they'd reached a framework of a deal, pending approval from both countries' leaders, that would in theory resolve the most recent export issues. Yes, but: There's still an urgency to find alternative sources. President Trump in April called for an investigation into national security risks posed by U.S. reliance on imported processed critical minerals, including rare earth elements. He has also used a series of executive orders to try to bolster domestic supply chains, like fast-tracking environmental reviews for U.S. mining projects. In Congress, meanwhile, rare earth competition with China has galvanized both parties. A spate of bills would create a tax credit for production of high-performance rare earth magnets, use Defense Production Act authority to direct emergency funding, and establish an Energy Department program to finance minerals projects. Two Republicans and two Democrats are pressing legislation that allows the president to strike free trade agreements exclusively focused on critical minerals and rare earth elements. "There is fairly broad bipartisan support around becoming more resilient, especially in areas that invoke national security — and this is clearly one of them," Sen. Todd Young, an Indiana Republican leading that bill, told Axios last month. Zoom in: One deal that's getting a lot of attention is a potential partnership between California-based MP Materials and Saudi Arabia's flagship mining company, Maaden. The deal was inked in May on the sidelines of the U.S.-Saudi Investment Forum, coinciding with a broader agreement between the U.S. and Saudi Arabia to cooperate on energy and critical minerals. MP Materials operates California's Mountain Pass, the only rare-earths mine in the U.S., which produces 12% of the global supply. At maximum production, Mountain Pass could yield enough rare earths to supply more than 6 million electric vehicles, the company says. But the bottleneck is magnets, which MP Materials is just beginning to produce. Maaden, a fast-growing, government-controlled mining company, is developing mines for a variety of critical minerals, but doesn't produce rare earths today. What to watch: Together, the companies seek to jointly develop a vertically integrated rare earths supply chain in Saudi Arabia—mining, separation, refining and magnet production—for global consumption. Zoning and environmental regulations in the U.S. make it hard to open a rare earth mine, but Saudi Arabia moves more quickly and is anxious to wean its economy off of oil. Saudi expertise in petrochemical refining can be leveraged for minerals processing, while MP brings experience across the entire rare earths supply chain, including mining, refining and magnet production. Reality check: The preliminary deal is non-binding, so it could still fall apart.
USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
As trade talks continue, new data shows Chinese imports hit 5-year low
As trade talks continue, new data shows Chinese imports hit 5-year low Show Caption Hide Caption Commerce Secretary Lutnick optimistic about US-China trade talks As delegations from the US and China begin a second day of trade talks, US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said things are "going well." Bloomberg As U.S. and Chinese officials hold trade talks this week, new data shows massive tariffs drove Chinese imports to their lowest levels in more than five years. U.S. tariffs on Chinese goods topped out at 145% in April when the Census Bureau collected trade data that showed a continuing decline in Chinese imports from March. In May, the nations agreed to a 90-day pause in mutual triple-digit tariffs ahead of trade talks. Through February and March, overall imports to the U.S. hit record highs as traders anticipated rising tariffs. But under the withering tariff rates President Donald Trump announced on April 2, what he called 'Liberation Day,' that overall import number plunged from more than $340 billion in March to just $273 billion in April. 'People were importing in anticipation of the imposition of tariffs. Then, when he made the Liberation Day announcement, everything collapsed,' said Marcus Noland, executive vice president and director of studies at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, a think tank based in Washington, D.C. 'China is just the best example because when the United States does something, China retaliates. And so that's why we got into the escalatory spiral and ended up with triple-digit tariffs,' Noland added. 'People couldn't import. Some people literally did not have the money to pay the import tariff.' Ocean freight volumes from China to the U.S. fell sharply in April, down 34% from a year earlier, according to Kristy Garcia-Quintela, director of ocean freight at GEODIS, a global logistics company. '34% is pretty big,' said Garcia-Quintela, who added the U.S. demand for global ocean shipping saw a 6% decline in April compared to the same month last year. Besides Chinese imports dropping to a post-pandemic low, shipments from the United States' other largest trading partners – the European Union, Mexico, and Canada – also fell in April. Purchases from the European Union, for example, dropped in April to $53 billion after surging to an all-time high just a month earlier at nearly $82 billion. Despite a partial pullback in tariffs and ongoing trade talks, the trade tensions still remain high, and experts expressed concerns about the road ahead. 'The truly catastrophic tariffs that were announced on Liberation Day have been avoided, but it's not like everything is looking good right now,' said Noland, the economist.
