Airlines issue Heathrow third runway warning as they slam ‘quality of service'
Airlines have raised concerns over Heathrow's third runway plans as they believe its effectiveness as a hub airport is hampered by the way it is run.
Some 90% of respondents to a survey of 50 carriers which use the west London airport agreed with the assertion.
The standard of services and a lack of engagement were among the reasons cited by airlines for why they believe Heathrow's capability is hindered.
Heathrow's Airline Operators Committee (AOC), which represents the airport's airlines and commissioned the research, said it shows a third runway would be 'unaffordable' under the current system.
In response, the airport said it agrees that 'adjustments to the regulatory model are needed', but insisted 'airlines and passengers get good value for money'.
More than two out of three (67%) airlines agreed that the airport's operation stifles their ability to increase investment.
Some 60% of respondents believe Heathrow's service levels inside terminals is worse than at other major airports, with claims of long security lines, baggage system failures and poor treatment of passengers with restricted mobility.
Chancellor Rachel Reeves gave her backing for Heathrow's third runway project in a speech on growth in January.
The airport responded by saying it would submit detailed plans to the Government in the summer.
The cost of the project was estimated at £14 billion in 2014, but this is likely to have risen sharply.
Heathrow's AOC is part of the Heathrow Reimagined campaign, which is calling on the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) to reform how the airport is regulated.
Among the other organisations represented by the body are British Airways' owner International Airlines Group (IAG), Virgin Atlantic and tycoon Surinder Arora, who operates a number of hotels serving the airport.
The campaign claims Heathrow is the world's most expensive airport for charges, with airlines paying £1.1 billion more each year than if fees were in line with equivalent major European airports.
Airlines typically pass charges on to passengers through fares.
Nigel Wicking, chief executive of Heathrow's AOC, told the PA news agency the results of the survey reflect 'the performance challenges airlines have day to day at Heathrow'.
He said: 'When you when you look at that relative to the amount we spend at Heathrow, something's going wrong.
'We're spending a lot of money, it is the most expensive airport for charges, and yet the quality of service keeps on dropping, whether that's loss of bags, congestion or lack of availability of check-in space.'
He said New York's JFK airport offers a 'far better experience' because it has refreshed all its terminals within a 27-year period, whereas at Heathrow, Terminal 3 is more than 60 years old and Terminal 4 is nearly 40 years old.
The regulatory asset base (Rab) model used at Heathrow allows it to charge fees to airlines based on infrastructure improvement plans agreed with the CAA and permitted rates of return for investors.
Mr Wicking said: 'They've realised what they're sitting on in terms of the asset that is Heathrow, and with the regulatory model they've worked out how to make really good money.
'If they can get money onto the Rab – if they get capital spend – they will have a really good return on that capital spend, which is obviously very attractive to their shareholders but it doesn't drive efficiency.
'Whenever I see an another capital plan coming across my table for Heathrow to invest in, I just look to the skies and think 'where do you get these numbers from' because some of them are absolutely ludicrous.'
He added: 'The (airlines) do want expansion but it cannot be at any price.
'The current price is already too much.
'If you extrapolate that to the kind of spend we're talking about for a third runway and terminals, it would just make it unaffordable.'
Heathrow reported pre-tax profits of £917 million for 2024, up 31% from £701 million in 2023.
In December 2024, French company Ardian completed a deal to become Heathrow's largest shareholder with a 23% stake, while Saudi Arabia's sovereign wealth fund purchased a 15% share.
Mr Arora claimed Heathrow bosses 'take advantage of the monopoly' position as the UK's only major hub airport.
He gave examples – disputed by Heathrow – of the airport charging airlines £76,000 to remove three trees, spending £1.1 million on a smoking shelter at Terminal 4, and charging more than half a million each for two disabled toilets.
He said: 'We are 110% behind the Chancellor and the Government for expansion, for growth, except just a couple of caveats.
'We must do it for the right reasons, and we must do it for the benefit of the nation, and not for the benefit of lining the shareholders' pockets.
'We must make sure that we get value for money.'
A spokesperson for Heathrow said: 'Every penny invested in infrastructure at Heathrow is approved by airlines and our regulator.
'We agree adjustments to the regulatory model are needed to deliver a third runway, but airlines and passengers get good value for money at Heathrow.
'Our operational performance is good and improving, and the value we provide to airlines and passengers is easily seen by how many airlines want to include Heathrow in their network.
'Expanding Heathrow will drive a further step change and address many of the challenges identified with operating an airport that is already at full capacity.'
Heathrow recorded a 6% rise in the number of passengers travelling through its four terminals last year, to 83.9 million.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Sterling rises against a weaker dollar ahead of UK's spending plan
By Linda Pasquini (Reuters) -Sterling rose against the dollar on Monday, as the greenback weakened after rallying on Friday on the back of a better-than-expected U.S. jobs report and investors eyed a spending plan by Britain's government later this week. The pound has been helped by a UK economy that has proved relatively resilient to global turbulence. Investors will, however, be monitoring a spending review on Wednesday that will set government departments' budgets up to 2029, covering most of the remainder of the Labour Party's term in office, while concerns persist around Britain's sovereign debt levels. The pound gained about 0.4% to $1.3575. It held steady against the euro, which was only marginally lower at 84.21 pence. More upbeat business surveys and strong first-quarter GDP indicated the UK economy is recovering from a weak end to 2024, but the public remains impatient for improvements to living standards, finance minister Rachel Reeves said on Thursday. This week's April data on UK jobs, growth and industrial output will not show much, said Kit Juckes, chief FX strategist at Societe Generale. "I think the economy is vulnerable. The economy will ultimately be sterling's Achilles heel because we have no room for fiscal policy, not much economic momentum." However, decent pay rises on average across the economy have helped, he said. "The UK economy is not growing, but there are people turning up in shops and bars because there's some wage growth. And so I think the world is full of sterling bears who are getting frustrated." Markets effectively fully anticipate that the Bank of England will leave interest rates unchanged on June 19 when it announces the result of its next policy meeting, according to data compiled by LSEG. Many of sterling's gains this year have resulted from broad dollar weakness as investors factor in the risk that President Donald Trump's erratic policymaking could result in a U.S. recession that might spill over to the rest of the world. The pound has appreciated about 8% so far this year against the dollar. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


San Francisco Chronicle
an hour ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Russia skirts Western sanctions to ramp up its military footprint in Africa
DAKAR, Senegal (AP) — Even as it pounds Ukraine, Russia is expanding its military footprint in Africa, delivering sophisticated weaponry to sub-Saharan conflict zones where a Kremlin-controlled armed force is on the rise. Skirting sanctions imposed by Western nations, Moscow is using cargo ships to send tanks, armored vehicles, artillery and other high-value equipment to West Africa, The Associated Press has found. Relying on satellite imagery and radio signals, AP tracked a convoy of Russian-flagged cargo ships as they made a nearly one-month journey from the Baltic Sea. The ships carried howitzers, radio jamming equipment and other military hardware, according to military officials in Europe who closely monitored them. The deliveries could strengthen Russia's fledgling Africa Corps as Moscow competes with the United States, Europe and China for greater influence across the continent. The two-year-old Africa Corps, which has links to a covert branch of Russia's army, is ascendant at a time when U.S. and European troops have been withdrawing from the region, forced out by sub-Saharan nations turning to Russia for security. Mali, Burkina Faso and Niger have been battling fighters linked with al-Qaida and the Islamic State group for more than a decade. At first, mercenary groups with an arms-length relationship to the Kremlin entered the fray in Africa. But increasingly, Russia is deploying its military might, and intelligence services, more directly. 'We intend to expand our cooperation with African countries in all spheres, with an emphasis on economic cooperation and investments,' Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said. 'This cooperation includes sensitive areas linked to defense and security.' From the ports, Russian weapons are trucked to Mali Russia's 8,800-ton Baltic Leader and 5,800-ton Patria are among hundreds of ships that Western nations have sanctioned to choke off resources for Russia's war in Ukraine. The ships docked and unloaded in Conakry, Guinea, in late May, AP satellite images showed. Other ships made deliveries to the same port in January. They delivered tanks, armored vehicles and other hardware that was then trucked overland to neighboring Mali, according to European military officials and a Malian blogger's video of the long convoy. The military officials spoke to AP about Russian operations on condition of anonymity. The AP verified the blogger's video, geolocating it to the RN5 highway leading into Bamako, the Malian capital. After the latest delivery in Conakry, trucks carrying Russian-made armored vehicles, howitzers and other equipment were again spotted on the overland route to Mali. Malian broadcaster ORTM confirmed that the West African nation's army took delivery of new military equipment. AP analysis of its video and images filmed by the Malian blogger in the same spot as the January delivery identified a broad array of Russian-made hardware, including 152 mm artillery guns and other smaller canons. AP also identified a wheeled, BTR-80 armored troop carrier with radio-jamming equipment, as well as Spartak armored vehicles and other armored carriers, some mounted with guns. The shipment also included at least two semi-inflatable small boats, one with a Russian flag painted on its hull, as well as tanker trucks, some marked 'inflammable' in Russian on their sides. The military officials who spoke to AP said they believe Russia has earmarked the most potent equipment — notably the artillery and jamming equipment — for its Africa Corps, not Malian armed forces. Africa Corps appears to have been given air power, too, with satellites spotting at least one Su-24 fighter-bomber at a Bamako air base in recent months. Moscow's notorious secret unit For years, French forces supported counterinsurgency operations in Mali and neighboring Burkina Faso and Niger. But France pulled out its troops after coups in Mali in 2020 and 2021, in Burkina Faso in 2022 and Niger in 2023. Russian mercenaries stepped into the vacuum. Wagner Group, the most notable, deployed to Sudan in 2017 and expanded to other African countries, often in exchange for mining concessions. It earned a reputation for brutality, accused by Western countries and U.N. experts of human rights abuses, including in Central African Republic, Libya and Mali. Of 33 African countries in which Russian military contractors were active, the majority were Wagner-controlled, according to U.S. government-sponsored research by RAND. But after Wagner forces mutinied in Russia in 2023 and their leader, Yevgeny Prigozhin, was killed two months later in a suspicious plane crash, Moscow tightened its grip. Russian military operations in Africa were restructured, with the Kremlin taking greater control through Africa Corps. It is overseen by the commander of Unit 29155, one of the most notorious branches of Russia's shadowy GRU military intelligence service, according to the European Union. Unit 29155 has been accused of covertly attacking Western interests for years, including through sabotage and assassination attempts. The EU in December targeted Unit 29155 Maj. Gen. Andrey Averyanov with sanctions, alleging that he is in charge of Africa Corps operations. 'In many African countries, Russian forces provide security to military juntas that have overthrown legitimate democratic governments, gravely worsening the stability, security and democracy of the countries,' the EU sanctions ruling said. These operations are financed by exploiting the continent's natural resources, the ruling added. The Russian Ministry of Defense didn't immediately respond to questions about Averyanov's role in Africa Corps. Africa Corps recruitment Researchers and military officials say the flow of weapons from Russia appears to be speeding Africa Corps' ascendancy over Wagner, helping it win over mercenaries that have remained loyal to the group. Africa Corps is also is recruiting in Russia, offering payments of up to 2.1 million rubles ($26,500), and even plots of land, for signing a contract with the Ministry of Defense, plus more on deployment. Within days of the latest equipment delivery, Wagner announced its withdrawal from Mali, declaring 'mission accomplished" in a Telegram post. Africa Corps said in a separate post that it would remain. The changeover from Wagner to Africa Corps in Mali could be a forerunner for other similar transitions elsewhere on the continent, said Julia Stanyard, a researcher of Russian mercenary activity in Africa. 'Bringing in this sort of brand-new sophisticated weaponry, and new armored vehicles and that sort of thing, is quite a bit of a shift,' said Stanyard, of the Switzerland-based Global Initiative Against Transnational Organized Crime. Armed groups in Mali have inflicted heavy losses on Malian troops and Russian mercenaries. The al-Qaida linked group JNIM killed dozens of soldiers in an attack this month on a military base. Insurgents also killed dozens of Wagner mercenaries in northern Mali last July. Some of the latest hardware could have been shipped over specifically in response to such attacks, military officials said. They said the jamming equipment, for example, could help defend against booby traps detonated using phone signals. Russian escort's red flags The latest convoy attracted attention because a Russian Navy warship, the Boykiy, escorted the ships after they set off in April from Russia's Kaliningrad region on the Baltic. Last October, in what's considered a hostile act, the Boykiy's radar systems locked onto a French Navy maritime surveillance plane on patrol against suspected Russian efforts to sabotage underwater cables, according to military officials. The convoy included a third sanctioned Russian cargo ship, the Siyanie Severa. It continued onward as Baltic Leader and Patria unloaded in Conakry, docking in Bata, Equatorial Guinea. Satellite imagery from May 29 shows trucks lined up on the dock as the ship unloaded. The AP could not verify whether the cargo included weapons or the ultimate destination for the shipment, though Wagner has maintained a strong presence in the nearby Central African Republic.

Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Nervous families freeze spending in blow to growth hopes
Nervous families are freezing spending in a blow to hopes that the UK economy will continue its growth spurt. Retail sales rose by just 1pc in the year to May, according to new figures from the British Retail Consortium (BRC). The study, which suggests households are cutting back, will pile fresh pressure on Rachel Reeves amid concerns that the economy's surprisingly strong momentum in the first three months of 2025 is evaporating. The beleaguered Chancellor will likely be forced to find tens of billions of pounds more in the autumn to repair her fiscal headroom if her hopes of a growth miracle fall short. It raises the prospect of further tax rises. Helen Dickinson, chief executive of the BRC, said families were already cutting back on non-essentials amid growing nervousness. She added: 'Consumers put the brakes on spending, with the slowest growth in 2025 so far. This was due largely to declines in non-food sales, as fashion and full price big-ticket items were held back by lower consumer confidence.' Figures from Barclays separately showed card spending grew well below inflation at 1pc in the year to May, down from 4.5pc in April. Sarah Bradbury, from the Institute of Grocery Distribution, said confidence improved slightly in May but remained 'fragile' beneath the surface, adding: 'Shoppers are still navigating financial uncertainty and continue to rely on money-saving tactics like planning ahead and buying on promotion. 'While the mood has brightened, we've yet to see this translate into meaningful changes in behaviour.' It comes as Donald Trump's trade war and Britain's deteriorating job market spark uncertainty for households. Hiring confidence has fallen at the fastest rate since the height of Covid in summer 2020, according to ManpowerGroup UK. Figures from the recruiter revealed that employer confidence has plunged by 12 points to a net score of 19 since the start of the year. It is now at the lowest level since early 2023. In several large industries such as communications, energy and the public sector, more employers are now looking to reduce rather than increase their workforce for the first time since the pandemic. The share of bosses blaming headcount changes on economic challenges almost doubled from the start of the year, to 64pc from 36pc. Petra Tagg, at ManpowerGroup UK, said: 'Hitting this new low is a symptom of the entire labour market re-aligning after the changes imposed by the National Insurance and living wage increases, alongside the recent uncertainties of the US trade tariffs. 'From here, employers will 'wait and see' to gauge the volume of the reset rather than making any swift decisions towards the end of the year.' Meanwhile, BDO said there was a risk of companies 'being paralysed by fear' and stagnating if they put off hiring and investment decisions. The consultancy surveyed 500 C-suite executives at global businesses with more than $100m (£74m) in revenue. Some 84pc described global risks as more defined by crisis than ever.