Alessandro Cavuoto found guilty of murdering housemate by setting him on fire
A man has been found guilty of murdering his housemate by setting him on fire at their home in Adelaide's west in 2021.
Warning: This story contains content which some readers may find distressing.
Alessandro Giovanni Cavuoto was found guilty of the murder of 31-year-old Todd Bradmore in South Australia's Supreme Court on Tuesday.
The 36-year-old was also found not guilty of two aggravated counts of creating likelihood of serious harm in relation to two people who were present at the home at the time of the incident.
The trial previously heard Mr Bradmore suffered burns to 80 per cent of his body when Cavuoto doused him with "two-stroke fuel" just after 3:30am on March 17, 2021, at their Woodville West home.
He was rushed to the Royal Adelaide Hospital where he later succumbed to his injuries on March 19, 2021.
Outside court, Mr Bradmore's father Ian Bradmore said the verdict was a "relief".
"He was always going to be guilty with the horrific way he murdered my son, burning him alive is something that is unimaginable," he said.
"He took advantage of Todd's vulnerability … took full advantage of him and decided to set him alight.
"He's nothing short of a mongrel, he deserves where he is."
In her opening statement to the court last year, then-prosecutor Lisa Dunlop SC said there was a "conflict" between the pair in the lead-up to the murder, and that Cavuoto was "angry" when he approached Mr Bradmore in the early hours of March 17.
"On the prosecution case, when the accused walked into that room with the two-stroke fuel in his hand and a lighter in his other hand, he was angry," she said.
Ms Dunlop said there had been a power outage at the home on that evening, and Mr Bradmore was holding a candle, and was surrounded by candles, when Cavuoto approached him.
"A candle ignited the vapours and Mr Bradmore caught fire immediately," she said.
"The accused, on the other hand, walked out the door in which he came, walked out the house, walked to his car, got in his car and drove away.
"On the prosecution case, your Honour will hear, when he was found by police, there was not a mark on him."
Ms Dunlop also told the court Cavuoto then went to a petrol station, where he saw his other housemate, whom he told "I just set Todd on fire".
The court heard Cavuoto then fled the state and was arrested in New South Wales, following a car accident, and extradited back to Adelaide.
Mr Bradmore said the death of his son was "inhumane" and compared it to "burning at the stake".
"You just can't imagine what he went through … it's such a bad way to go," he said.
Mr Bradmore said his son was "very kind" and would "give his heart to anybody".
The matter will return court in August for a pre-sentence hearing where the court is expected to hear numerous victim impact statements.
Cavuoto faces a mandatory sentence of life imprisonment, with a non-parole to be determined at a later date.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

ABC News
2 hours ago
- ABC News
Erin Patterson had no reason to murder in-laws with toxic mushrooms, defence tells jury
Erin Patterson's defence barrister has told the jury in her triple-murder trial that the "devoted" mother had no motive to deprive her children of their "wonderful" grandparents. Ms Patterson, 50, has pleaded not guilty to three charges of murder and one of attempted murder over a beef Wellington lunch she hosted at her regional Victorian home in 2023. The trial of Erin Patterson, who stands accused of using a poisoned meal to murder three relatives, continues. Look back at how Tuesday's hearing unfolded in our live blog. To stay up to date with this story, subscribe to ABC News. On Monday, prosecutors told the jury Ms Patterson had engaged in four substantial deceptions as part of the alleged murder plot. Crown prosecutor Nanette Rogers SC said these were a lie to the guests about cancer, the "secretion" of death cap mushrooms in a "nourishing meal" of individually parcelled beef Wellingtons, feigned illness after the lunch and a sustained cover-up as guests fell critically ill. On Tuesday morning, Dr Rogers wrapped up her closing address by telling the jury a fifth deception had been played upon it, when the accused spun a "carefully constructed narrative" in court in a bid to fit the evidence against her. She said "perhaps the starkest" of these was Ms Patterson's evidence about plans to undergo gastric-bypass surgery a few months after the lunch. During her evidence, Ms Patterson told the court she had booked an appointment for gastric-bypass surgery at a clinic in Melbourne and had lied to relatives about potential cancer treatment as a cover story. When she was told in cross-examination that the clinic did not offer gastric-band surgery, Ms Patterson said she must have been "mistaken" and she had also been considering liposuction. "There's no way that the accused's earlier evidence can be twisted to fit that new claim," Dr Rogers told the jury. The prosecution alleged several other lies were told by Ms Patterson in the period surrounding the lunch, including admitted lies to police about owning a food dehydrator and foraging for mushrooms. "Erin Patterson told so many lies it's hard to keep up with them," Dr Rogers said. Dr Rogers told the jury Ms Patterson was "not a credible witness" and significant parts of the defence case that rested solely on her evidence should be closely scrutinised. She also told the jury it should disregard any claim from the defence that Ms Patterson's actions after the lunch were the result of "innocent panic" rather than a sustained cover-up. The prosecutor said any parent who believed their children may have consumed death cap mushrooms would "move mountains" to get them to hospital, in contrast to Ms Patterson's initial reluctance to take her children out of school. Dr Rogers also told the jury that Ms Patterson's venting to Facebook friends about her in-laws showed that the accused was "leading a duplicitous life when it came to the Pattersons". "She presented one side, while expressing contrary beliefs to others," Dr Rogers said. In closing her address, Dr Rogers told jurors they should make their deliberations based on the facts before them. "You may not want to believe that anyone could be capable of doing what the accused has done," she said, describing the alleged actions as "horrible", "cold" and "beyond comprehension". "But look at the evidence, don't let your emotional reaction dictate your verdict one way or the other." In his closing address, defence barrister Colin Mandy SC told the jury the prosecution had been "cherry picking" evidence that suited their case, while "disregarding inconvenient truths" that challenged it. He told the jury if they believed there was a reasonable possibility that death cap mushrooms were added to the meal accidentally and a reasonable possibility that Ms Patterson did not intend to kill or cause serious injury to her guests, then they should find her not guilty. The lawyer said the prosecution case lacked a motive, which would usually be "fundamental" to proving the required element in the charges of intent to kill or seriously injure. Mr Mandy told the jury there had been evidence during the trial that demonstrated a warm relationship existed between his client and her in-laws. "Erin Patterson had a motive to keep these people in her world so that they could keep supporting her and her children," he said. "And there's absolutely no doubt that Don and Gail had a great relationship with [their grandchildren] … absolutely no doubt that Erin was devoted to her children. Mr Mandy told the jury it should regard a period of tension that arose between Erin and Simon Patterson over financial matters as a "brief spat" about child support which was "resolved amicably" before too long. Mr Mandy said there was no proof to support the idea that this tension could have formed a reason for Ms Patterson murdering her husband's parents and aunt and uncle. "It's an unsatisfactory piece of evidence," he said. Mr Mandy told the jury an "intelligent person carefully planning a murder" in the way alleged by the prosecution would know that they and the meal they had prepared would come "under suspicion" and that they would be in the "spotlight". He said Ms Patterson's actions after the lunch — including disposing of the dehydrator at a tip and paying with her own bank card — were born out of panic and not guilt. "If you're planning a murder, what's the one thing you really should plan to dispose of? That's the murder weapon," Mr Mandy said. He suggested to the jury that if the deadly meal had been premeditated, Ms Patterson "would've disposed of [the dehydrator] months before and never told anyone she had one". "It speaks volumes about her state of mind," he said. Mr Mandy is expected to continue delivering his closing address for the defence on Wednesday.

ABC News
2 hours ago
- ABC News
Queensland police Detective Inspector Glenn Horan allegedly used police database to track former partner
A high-ranking Queensland detective allegedly used a police database to search an address his then-partner visited, with a prosecutor saying it seemed "unlikely" he did so because he saw something suspicious. Detective Inspector Glenn Horan is facing one charge of using a restricted computer without consent (domestic violence) and pleaded not guilty at the Brisbane Magistrates Court. The prosecution alleges Inspector Horan suspected his then-partner, Senior Constable Celeste Batticciotto, was in a relationship with someone else. Prosecutor Kim Bryson claimed Inspector Horan used the police database QPRIME in October 2021 to find out who lived at the address Senior Constable Batticciotto had been visiting. The address was that of one of Queensland's top cops, now Deputy Commissioner Cameron Harsley, who Senior Constable Batticciotto said was a friend. Six days after the QPRIME search, the senior constable alleges she was at Mr Harsley's home around lunchtime when she saw Inspector Horan outside near the fence line. She said she had been at Mr Harsley's home to discuss buying a house and home loans. "I ran … I ducked and was absolutely terrified," she told the court on Monday. Defence barrister KC Saul Holt rejected the allegations, and said his client told police he searched the address a week earlier as he had been exercising and saw something suspicious. Ms Bryson on Tuesday said the events in question might be considered "too perfectly aligned to simply be remote". "The defendant's concern was so serious that he conducted a search of the address yet took no further action," she said. Senior Constable Batticciotto said when she returned to the house where she lived with Inspector Horan, he was red-faced and angry. "He was fuming, he was slamming things down," she said. The court heard when she told Inspector Horan she saw him at the house he said "I don't know what you're talking about". Senior Constable Batticciotto told the court Inspector Horan believed he would be in trouble as there would be an automatic flag on the senior officer's address in QPRIME on account of his rank. "He told me he would be in trouble and this was my fault," she said. "He said the consequences for me would be bad." Senior Constable Batticciotto said she was a constable of general duties and Inspector Horan was a detective senior sergeant when they met in Cairns in 2012. The pair later moved to Brisbane and Senior Constable Batticciotto alleges by 2021 "things were not good" between them. Senior Constable Batticciotto claimed there was domestic violence in the relationship, which Inspector Horan's representatives denied. Mr Holt said there was no evidence produced that Inspector Horan was not somewhere else on the day Senior Constable Batticciotto claimed she saw him at Mr Harsley's house. Mr Holt said it was not in dispute that Inspector Horan had conducted a check on the property a week earlier after seeing "suspicious activity near the stairs and a suspicious person coming from the house". He argued Inspector Horan was an authorised user of QPRIME and was given a password and a username. Mr Holt said there was no evidence that Inspector Horan knew of any link between Senior Constable Batticciotto and the search address. He said Inspector Horan and Senior Constable Batticciotto's relationship "if not over, was close to being over". Deputy Commissioner Harsley said on Monday he met Senior Constable Batticciotto through work, and she would visit him sometimes on Saturdays at his home. The deputy commissioner told the court he and Senior Constable Batticciotto were sitting on the couch talking when she "reacted quite animatedly" and said that she'd seen Inspector Horan. He said he looked through the back window and saw a man fitting the description of Inspector Horan about 9 or 10 metres away, but he didn't see the person's face. He said he later rang Inspector Horan and asked if he'd been at his house that day. "Glenn said he was on the northside of Brisbane," the deputy commissioner said. The three-day hearing is expected to conclude on Wednesday when a judgement is delivered.

ABC News
2 hours ago
- ABC News
Queensland life coach Wolfgang Raven Wildgrace jailed for years of child sexual abuse, rape
A Queensland man who once touted himself as a life coach and therapist, has been sentenced to almost a decade behind bars for rape and child sexual abuse. One of Wolfgang Raven Wildgrace's claims was that he helped people "manage their emotions effectively". It was this reputation that led him to his involvement with an AFL pre-season camp for the Adelaide Crows in 2018 that became notorious for being "psychologically stressful" and offensive to Indigenous players. But in the years before, he psychologically manipulated two children and sexually abused them. Wildgrace was sentenced to nine-and-a-half years behind bars at the District Court in Cairns today after pleading guilty to a raft of offences. They include two counts of rape, two counts of repeated sexual conduct with a child, and more than 30 counts of indecent treatment of a child under 16. The court heard Wildgrace, now 59, committed the offences over eight years from about late 2009 until 2017. The abuse escalated to occurring on an almost weekly basis, the court heard, with victims made to believe the acts were "sexual training". Wildgrace's former partner Sonya Maria Lindley-Jones, 52, also pleaded guilty to two counts of indecent treatment of a child under 12. Her charges related to an incident in which the couple performed a sex act in the presence of children. A concern was first raised with police in 2015, but the victims did not disclose the abuse when they were questioned. Almost a decade later, in early 2024, Wildgrace disclosed the offending to a friend after learning a report was to be made to police. But after a meeting was called to discuss the offending, he and Lindley-Jones suddenly disappeared from their south-east Queensland home, leaving their bank accounts untouched. The pair was arrested and charged in March last year, having been found in the far north Queensland town of Kuranda. Wildgrace and Lindley-Jones' victims addressed them directly in court, reading out statements in which they detailed how the "twisted sort of therapy" shattered them psychologically. "You knew the moment you met me that I had no-one to look out for me, to protect me," one victim told Wildgrace. Another told the court she needed regular therapy to recover from what she had endured. She said the fact that Wildgrace and Lindley-Jones ran a therapy business themselves had "shattered the trust a person should be able to place in a healthcare professional". Defence counsel Aaron Dunkerton, representing Wildgrace, said his client was sorry, had suffered abuse as a child, and had PTSD symptoms from a siege in the 1990s when he was held hostage by a gunman. From 2011, Wildgrace had been drinking heavily and he had also used cannabis and mushrooms, which caused his sense of reality to "become quite warped", Mr Dunkerton said. Rachelle Logan, acting for Lindley-Jones, said her client was "genuinely remorseful" and had only since understood she was controlled by Wildgrace in their relationship. Neither Wildgrace nor Lindley-Jones had any criminal history. In sentencing, Judge Anthony Rafter SC said the offending was serious and involved a "grave breach of trust". Wildgrace will be eligible for parole at the end of 2028. Lindley-Jones was sentenced to two-and-a-half years' jail, but the remainder of her sentence is suspended, having already served 14 months. She will be subject to three years' probation on release.