
Iranians ‘moved enriched uranium before US strikes'
Iran claims to have smuggled almost all of the country's highly enriched uranium to a secret location before the United States launched strikes on its nuclear bases.
Donald Trump dispatched seven B-2 stealth bombers from American soil to drop massive bunker-busting bombs on three enrichment facilities, Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan, on Saturday night, in an effort to pummel Tehran's nuclear programme.
Following the strikes, Mr Trump on Sunday said the US took the bomb 'right out of Iran's hands'.
In a post on Truth Social, he wrote: 'We had a spectacular military success yesterday, taking the 'bomb' right out of their hands.'
His defence secretary, Pete Hegseth, said Iran's nuclear ambitions had been 'obliterated'.
But officials believe that most of the material at Fordow, 400kg of 60 percent enriched uranium, had been moved elsewhere before the attack codenamed Operation Midnight Hammer.
Satellite images of convoys leaving all three sites in recent days appeared to support Iran's claims that it moved its 400kg stockpile – much of it previously held at Isfahan.
One image, released by Maxar Technologies, a US defence contractor, appeared to show a line of 16 trucks snaking down a road near to the entrance of the Fordow plant on June 19, which is concealed with earth and rubble.
Trucks, bulldozers and security convoys appeared to swarm Fordow, with analysts suggesting the image revealed a 'frantic effort' to move centrifuges or shielding materials, according to TS2 Space, a Polish defence firm.
Other images showed that Natanz, Iran's largest enrichment site, had already been damaged by extensive Israeli strikes.
This means Iran could still possess the material needed to develop a nuclear weapon, although this would be several years away and dependent on Tehran's ability to rebuild vital equipment.
Ronen Solomon, an Israeli intelligence analyst, told The Telegraph that even if Iran had moved its uranium, it would be 'like having fuel without a car', adding: 'They have the uranium, but they can't do a lot with it, unless they have built something we don't know about on a small scale.'
Ali Shamkhani, an adviser to the supreme leader, said: 'Even assuming the complete destruction of the sites, the game is not over, because enriched materials, indigenous knowledge, and political will remain intact.'
Uranium enrichment is the process of increasing the concentration of the uranium-235 isotope in natural uranium.
To build a nuclear weapon, uranium must be enriched to about 90 per cent U-235. Once enriched to that level, the material is considered 'weapons grade'.
Iran enriches uranium using centrifuges, which spin uranium hexafluoride gas at high speeds to separate the uranium isotopes, increasing the concentration of U-235.
This process, called centrifuge enrichment, is done in stages called cascades. Iran has been progressively installing more advanced centrifuges, like the IR-2m and IR-6 models, which are faster and more efficient than the older IR-1 centrifuges.
The more advanced the centrifuge, the faster and more efficiently it can separate uranium-235 from uranium-238 and in turn, speed up the time needed to make a nuclear bomb.
Iran's current centrifuge capacity could allow it to produce enough weapons-grade uranium for a bomb in less than two weeks, according to the Arms Control Association.
It is transported inside steel cylinders, specially designed to withstand significant pressure and temperature changes, according to the World Nuclear Association. The cylinders are then placed inside an extra level of protective casing, called an overpack, and can be transported via rail, road and sea.
Iran produces most of its near weapons-grade material at Fordow, its most heavily fortified nuclear facility, buried deep within a mountain, and considered a high-value target for America.
The base, reportedly shielded by half a mile of rock, could only be penetrated by the GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrators or MOP, weapons experts said prior to the attack.
The bunker-busting MOPs are the largest and most powerful conventional bombs in the US arsenal.
As of May 17, Iran has amassed 408.6kg (900.8 pounds) of uranium enriched up to 60 per cent, a report by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) found.
It was an increase of 133.8kg (294.9 pounds), or almost 50 per cent, since the IAEA's last report in February.
JD Vance, the US vice-president, appeared to confirm the suggestion that the material had been moved at the 11th hour.
'We're going to work in the coming weeks to ensure that we do something with that fuel,' he told ABC News.
On Saturday, stealth pilots pummelled Iran's nuclear programme with 14 GBU-57 bombs, each weighing 30,000lbs, while a US submarine launched a further two dozen Tomahawk missiles.
In a televised address to the US a few hours later, Mr Trump said the strikes had 'completely and totally obliterated' three of Iran's nuclear sites – and warned of worse to come.
'This cannot continue. There will be either peace or there will be tragedy for Iran far greater than we have witnessed over the last eight days,' he added.
The full extent of the damage inside Fordow remains unclear.
At a news conference on Sunday, Gen Dan Caine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said: 'Final battle damage will take some time, but initial battle damage assessments indicate that all three sites sustained extremely severe damage and destruction.'
Yet Two Israeli officials told the New York Times that their initial analysis suggested the fortified site at Fordow had sustained serious damage but had not been completely destroyed.
They also said Iran appeared to have moved equipment and uranium away from the site.
IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi told CNN that it was not yet possible to assess the damage done underground.
A senior Iranian source told Reuters that most of the highly enriched uranium at Fordow had been moved elsewhere before the attack. Reuters could not immediately corroborate the claim.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Sky News
13 minutes ago
- Sky News
Israel-Iran live: 'Bullseye!!!' - Trump claims Iran strikes caused 'monumental damage'; says he's open to 'regime change'
Donald Trump has asked why there would not be a "regime change" in Iran following US strikes, calling to "make Iran great again". Meanwhile, Iran's UN envoy says the current situation provides a "historic test" for the body. Watch and follow the latest below.


Sky News
19 minutes ago
- Sky News
Regime change: Is Trump about to 'Make Iran Great Again'?
👉 Follow Trump100 on your podcast app 👈 The US bombs Iran. Three nuclear sites heavily hit. Cue condemnation from Iran - and promises of retribution. As the Iranian foreign minister heads to Moscow to meet Vladimir Putin and discuss what to do next, we ask: what has happened, why did the Trump administration decide to take action, what's the response domestically and internationally - and what on earth could happen next. If you've got a question you'd like the Trump100 team to answer, you can email it to trump100@ Don't forget, you can also watch all episodes on our YouTube channel.


BBC News
24 minutes ago
- BBC News
US asks China to stop Iran from closing Strait of Hormuz
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has called on China to prevent Iran from closing the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world's most important shipping comments came after Iran's state-run Press TV reported that their parliament had approved a plan to close the Strait but added that the final decision lies with the Supreme National Security Council. Any disruption to the supply of oil would have profound consequences for the global economy. China in particular is the world's largest buyer of Iranian oil and has a close relationship with Tehran. Oil prices have surged following the US' attack, with the price of the benchmark Brent crude reaching its highest level in five months. "I encourage the Chinese government in Beijing to call them (Iran) about that, because they heavily depend on the Straits of Hormuz for their oil," said Marco Rubio had said in an interview with Fox News on Sunday. "If they [close the Straits]... it will be economic suicide for them. And we retain options to deal with that, but other countries should be looking at that as well. It would hurt other countries' economies a lot worse than ours."Around 20% of the world's oil passes through the Strait of Hormuz, with major oil and gas producers in the Middle East using the waterway to transport energy from the region. Any attempt to disrupt operations in the Strait could could send global oil prices skyrocketing. They jumped to their highest since January, with the price of Brent crude reaching $78.89 a barrel as of 23:22 GMT Sunday. "The US is now positioned with an overwhelming defence posture in the region to be prepared for any Iran counter attacks. But the risk for oil prices is the situation could escalate severely further," said Saul Kavonic, Head of Energy Research at MST Financial. The cost of crude oil affects everything from how much it costs to fill up your car to the price of food at the in particular buys more oil from Iran than any other nation - with its oil imports from Iran surpassing 1.8 million barrels per day last month, according to data by ship tracking firm analyst Vandana Hari has said Iran has "little to gain and too much to lose" from closing the Strait. "Iran risks turning its oil and gas producing neighbours in the Gulf into enemies and invoking the ire of its key market China by disrupting traffic in the Strait", Hari told BBC News. The US joined the conflict between Iran and Israel over the weekend, with President Donald Trump saying Washington had "obliterated" Tehran's key nuclear sites. However, it's not clear how much damage the strikes inflicted, with the UN's nuclear watchdog saying it was unable to assess the damage at the heavily fortified Fordo underground nuclear site. Iran has said there was only minor damage to Fordo. Trump also warned Iran that they would face "far worse" future attacks if they did not abandon their nuclear Monday, Beijing said the US' attack had damaged Washington's credibility and called for an immediate UN Ambassador Fu Cong said all parties should restrain "the impulse of force... and adding fuel to the fire", according to a state-run CCTV report. In an editorial, Beijing's state newspaper Global Times also said US involvement in Iran "had further complicated and destabilized the Middle East situation" and that it was pushing the conflict to an "uncontrollable state".