
South Africa Is a Warning
This essay is part of The Great Migration, a series by Lydia Polgreen exploring how people are moving around the world today.
When people in the rich world imagine a migrant from the poor world, I suspect the image conjured is that of a desperately impoverished person with no marketable skills who will travel any distance and brave any risk to grab an unearned fistful of Western wealth.
But the truth is that a migrant is much more likely to look like a man I met last year named Fikre Gebrie Orebo. Growing up in a fertile but deeply impoverished southern region of Ethiopia, he had dreamed of attending university to become an engineer. But he was the firstborn son, and his family depended on him to start working immediately. And so he hit the road, leaving his hometown and heading to the capital, Addis Ababa. He found work as a laborer, digging foundations by hand and moving stones on construction sites.
It didn't take long for him to realize he'd need to keep moving. The brutal work paid little, and there were few opportunities for young men like him. The government was dominated by a northern ethnic elite that shunned his southern tribe. The last straw came when the government started rounding up young men to send them to fight an ill-advised war with Eritrea. Orebo feared that southerners like him would be used as cannon fodder in a pointless conflict.
But when he finally set off on his cross-border journey, he didn't head north, toward Europe, or try to somehow get to the distant, prosperous lands of North America, where hundreds of thousands of Ethiopians have settled. He set his sights on Kenya, his country's neighbor to the south, where he found a job in a cafe, then farther south still, to South Africa, sub-Saharan Africa's biggest economy, where he had heard that an enterprising young person could make a prosperous life.
There, he told me, he was granted asylum as a member of a persecuted minority, and he ultimately settled in Heidelberg, a town about an hour's drive southeast of Johannesburg. Finally, his dreams came to life. He built a successful business, a pair of convenience stores, known locally as spaza shops, in the nearby Black township of Ratanda. He married a young South African woman, and they are raising their children in a comfortable, suburban-style home. He has long sent money home to Ethiopia, supporting his siblings while they were in school and helping to build a house for his father, who had been a farmer, to enjoy a comfortable retirement.
Orebo's story illustrates an important but often occluded fact in this age of migration. Despite the panic in rich countries over the arrival of people fleeing poor, war-tossed nations, most people from the global south who migrate don't head north. The majority who flee in haste end up quite near where they came from, hoping to go home as soon as possible. And even those who migrate farther afield — searching for work, fleeing political persecution or simply wanting a new life — tend to remain in their own region or continent. In our hyperconnected, jet-powered age, the median distance traveled by modern migrants is less than 400 miles.
This pattern has been repeated across the globe in the biggest crises of our time. The 2015 surge of Syrian refugees that remade European politics was a small fraction of the total number of Syrians forced to flee; a vast majority ended up in neighboring countries, with Turkey alone playing uncomfortable host to some three million people, roughly three times that of the entire European Union.
More than seven million Venezuelans have fled their country's long-running political and economic crisis. President Trump's recent spat with the president of Colombia over deporting Colombian migrants looks quite different when you consider that Colombia, a country of some 50 million people, with a per capita G.D.P. of less than a tenth that of the United States, has taken in about four times as many Venezuelans as America. Indeed, 85 percent of Venezuelan refugees and migrants have remained in Latin America and the Caribbean.
Perhaps the most urgent refugee crisis in the world right now, one of the largest since the partition of India in 1947, was set off by the civil war in Sudan, which has forced some 14 million people to flee their homes. Most of Sudan's refugees have fled into often troubled bordering nations: Chad, the Central African Republic, South Sudan, Egypt, Libya and Ethiopia. Vanishingly few have managed to reach Europe or North America.
Sudan is just the latest of the many long-simmering refugee crises on the continent. Decades of turmoil in Somalia, Ethiopia, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Zimbabwe and more have produced floods of refugees. Sub-Saharan Africa leads the world in the number of forcibly displaced people, with some 45 million on the move, more than doubling since 2017. But an estimated 96 percent of those people remain within the continent.
While governments across the global north panic over a relative trickle of migrants, a very real migration crisis is unfolding in the global south. And as wealthy countries in the global north raise their fences ever higher and outsource their border control to countries beyond their frontiers while slashing development aid to the poorest nations, the pressure on migrant destinations in the global south is ratcheting up — sparking violence, xenophobia and instability. By closing their borders to the relatively small numbers of migrants who make the crossing, rich countries risk destabilizing some of the most important nations for regional stability across the globe.
That danger is abundantly clear in South Africa, where a country long home to migrants has now turned against them, with devastating effect. For other magnet countries in the global south facing great flows of migrants fleeing war, poverty and the degradation of their land by climate change, South Africa is a potent cautionary tale. And for the rest of the world, it's a warning.
When I went to South Africa on the eve of its national elections last May, I found unease. The vote came 30 years after the end of apartheid, but the mood was anything but celebratory. Bitter and disappointed by the failure to achieve broad prosperity for Black citizens, political opportunists have redirected resentment from white residents, who still hold much of the country's land and wealth, and refashioned it into an often violent antipathy toward African migrants who have flocked to South Africa, the continent's wealthiest nation.
Xenophobia in South Africa is not new, but the issue gained political significance in last year's elections. Since 1994, the African National Congress has held large majorities, a virtual hammerlock on electoral politics with a broad-church approach that papered over many of the cleavages within the country's diverse population. But its support has been steadily slipping, and the fault lines within its coalition have taken on predictable if tragic forms: stoking ethnic divisions and scapegoating of foreigners.
'Dissenting politics, arising from the sort of poverty, unemployment and deep problems that we have in our society, will not necessarily produce progressive politics,' Noor Nieftagodien, a professor at the University of the Witwatersrand, told me. 'Xenophobia is an important expression of the kind of regressive politics that can be produced under those circumstances.'
To understand how those politics were playing out ahead of the vote, I went to Ratanda, where Orebo had made his modest fortune. He had been living in South Africa for about 18 years. From the moment he arrived, he felt a sense of optimism and possibility, completely different from the torpor and political conflict gripping his homeland. He quickly found work, selling goods in a market in the center of Johannesburg, then saving up enough money to start a shop of his own in Ratanda.
He told me that he had a great life in South Africa, even if there were problems along the way. Running a cash business in a poor township wasn't easy. He had been robbed at gunpoint a number of times, but he took these incidents in stride.
'In South Africa, this robbery thing is normal,' he told me. 'We don't mind once the robbery comes. You only take what we sell on that day. But the following day, we will start again. So it was not a problem.'
Orebo arrived in South Africa in 2006, a time when the economy was in the midst of a postapartheid boom and the governing African National Congress saw the country as a beacon for Africa, opening its doors to people across the continent who sought safety and opportunity. 'South Africa belongs to all who live in it,' the preamble to South Africa's Constitution boldly declares, while avoiding the word 'citizens.'
The A.N.C. had long embraced a Pan-African ethos, advocating much freer movement across the continent, arguing that antiquated barriers to trade and migration were a colonial hangover. 'South Africa cannot be an island of prosperity in a sea of poverty' was a popular refrain in the party, often attributed to Nelson Mandela. Why, the party asked, should the most talented Africans go to Europe or America when there was so much potential waiting to be tapped so much closer to home?
South Africa certainly had abundance. There were seemingly endless tracts of fertile farmland; rich seams of precious gold, diamonds and platinum; gorgeous landscapes to draw tourists from across the globe; and high-quality infrastructure to move people and goods easily within the country and beyond its borders.
But the terms of the settlement that ended apartheid sowed the seeds of xenophobia in ways that, looking back, are painfully obvious. Black South Africans gained political power and freedom of movement. But despite the American right-wing fantasies fueled by Trump and Elon Musk of a persecuted white minority being chased off their land and stripped of their wealth, most of the country's riches remained stubbornly held by the white minority.
This was the price of a peaceful transition: an agreement to transfer political power without broadly redistributing wealth. A handful of politically connected Black elites, people like the country's current president, Cyril Ramaphosa, who had played a critical role in ending apartheid as the leader of a mineworkers' union, had been dealt into the upper reaches of the economy, becoming fabulously wealthy.
Just about everyone else was left behind. When the World Inequality Lab examined South Africa's economy in 2021, it found that despite the country's political transformation, 'there is no evidence that wealth inequality has decreased since the end of apartheid.' The wealthiest 10 percent own more than 85 percent of the country's household wealth, it found. About a third of the work force is unemployed.
South Africa had long been a magnet for workers across southern Africa when Robert Mugabe's seizure of white-owned farms plunged Zimbabwe into free fall, sending more than a million people across the border not long before the postapartheid boom started to fade. Horrific acts of violence targeting African migrants became commonplace, with widespread riots breaking out in 2008 and 2015.
The mobs would sometimes interrogate suspected foreigners, asking if they knew the isiZulu word for 'elbow.' Spaza shop owners, in particular, were frequent targets, including those from Somalia. Many had very dark skin and striking aquiline features that made it impossible to pass for locals, and their work in townships made them sitting ducks for xenophobic violence.
Maybe he was just lucky, but Orebo told me he had not faced such prejudice. There was some rioting in Ratanda 2012, when he and other foreign shopkeepers were looted and closed their shops for a few days, but otherwise he felt welcome in the community. He married a local woman, and their three children were South African citizens. His business thrived, and he told me with pride that at one point he had three cars.
Spaza shops, where locals buy small daily household items like food, toiletries and cigarettes, have long been a battleground in the wars between South Africans and outsiders. Migrant groups, especially those from Somalia and Ethiopia, have thrived in this niche, giving rise to resentment from locals. After years of dodging such violence, Orebo ran out of luck in the fall of 2023.
A mob of anti-migrant activists — including, I was told, supporters of a group known as Operation Dudula — swarmed the township, blocking streets with flaming tires. They burned and looted shops owned by foreigners, including Orebo's. He went to the township later that night to survey the damage and salvage what he could but was confronted by armed men.
'They came with a gun, and they shot at me,' Orebo told me. 'But God saved me.'
Orebo is merely the latest in a centuries-long line of migrants who have made the country we now know as South Africa, which has seen wave upon wave of migration, with each shaping its culture, politics and language in profound ways. About 1,700 years ago, Bantu people from West and Central Africa migrated south, bringing farming and other innovations to lands that had been home to the nomadic Khoekhoe and San communities. Explorers from Europe arrived in the 15th century, followed by waves of white settlers, mostly from the Netherlands, France, Germany and Britain. Thousands of enslaved people, stolen from East Africa and Asia, were forced to labor there.
The discovery of diamonds and gold in the 19th century transformed South Africa into a powerful magnet, drawing fortune hunters from Europe, the United States and Australia. The mines created many dangerous and difficult jobs that needed filling, and decades before the formal imposition of apartheid, the government of South Africa created a complex system of recruitment and exploitation of Black African workers from across southern Africa. Unlike white migrants, who were permitted to settle permanently in South Africa, Black Africans who worked in mines could stay only as long as their employers permitted.
Later, it became the explicit policy of the apartheid state to rely on foreign workers from around the region rather than Black South Africans, who were denied full citizenship rights, forced off their land and herded into areas that white people didn't want, so-called homelands based on tribal and linguistic identities. The prime land freed up by this forced migration of millions of people was sold cheaply to white settlers — a source of profound economic inequality that has endured.
The end of apartheid was supposed to lift Black South Africans and give them a share of the country's bounty. But when that failed to happen, migrants offered an easy scapegoat.
'There is a long history of the South African elite, largely the white elite, using immigrant labor as a way of undermining Black South African power,' Loren Landau, a leading scholar of migration in South Africa, told me. If antimigrant populists in rich countries are promising a return to a supposedly better past, South Africa's populists are playing a different game. Agitation against migrants, he said, was a misplaced attempt 'to find a way of reclaiming this promised future' of a postapartheid South Africa that never materialized.
In Ratanda these politics were playing out with deadly and mysterious violence. I visited the family of Veli Ntombela, a supporter of Operation Dudula who had opened his own spaza shop after many of the migrant shop owners were pushed out of the township. A few weeks earlier, someone approached the small store attached to Ntombela's tidy concrete block house and asked to buy cigarettes.
He was running low, so he asked his partner, Sibongile Miya, to go back into the house to fetch some more. Moments later, she heard a series of sharp cracks, at first not recognizing the sound as gunfire. She raced back into the shop, where she found Ntombela lying there, bleeding. She fell to the ground in shock. Later that evening he was declared dead from his wounds.
Ntombela's was the latest in a series of unsolved killings involving South Africans who had set up spaza shops after the expulsion of foreigners. Ratanda was abuzz with theories about the shootings. The foreign shopkeepers, I was told, were migrants from Pakistan and members of Islamic extremist groups, to boot. No, others said, they came from Somalia and were affiliated with Al Shabab, a militant group. Some thought that foreigners had hired hit men from neighboring Lesotho to kill upstart shopkeepers like Ntombela in the hopes of reclaiming their businesses.
As these rumors circulated, Election Day was fast approaching. Utility poles were festooned with signs from Operation Dudula, which had transformed itself into an upstart regional political party. 'Mass deportation of all illegal immigrants,' one read, featuring a picture of the party's leader in camouflage fatigues. 'Our economy. Our heritage.'
The party traces its origins to a vigilante group formed in 2021 in Soweto, the fabled township at the heart of the struggle against apartheid. Dudula is an isiZulu word that means to 'force out' or 'knock down,' and the group has repeatedly been accused of targeting and harassing foreigners.
Ntombela, who was 39, was a prominent supporter of the party. Tall with a chiseled physique, he had worked on the fringes of South Africa's movie industry as a stuntman and actor. His relatives proudly showed me a photograph of him, smiling and shirtless, wearing a loincloth on the set of a 2013 film based on Nelson Mandela's autobiography, 'Long Walk to Freedom,' starring Idris Elba.
Ntombela's family, like a lot of Black South Africans, had been supporters of the A.N.C., but worries about crime and migration pulled them away from the party in recent years — first toward a party linked to messianic churches that promised to restore the death penalty and restrict foreign ownership of businesses and ultimately to the even more hard-line Operation Dudula.
As a new party, Operation Dudula didn't get very far in the elections, winning less than one-tenth of a percent of the vote. But xenophobia was a crucial wedge issue driving voters from the A.N.C. to political parties like the breakaway uMkhonto weSizwe and the Patriotic Alliance, both of which promised harsh border controls. Their success underscored the country's hardened attitude to migrants and outsiders.
Orebo, for his part, was forgiving. He said he understood why South Africans might resent foreigners who find success in the country, given how many young people struggle to eke out a living. 'To be honest, South Africans, they're very good people,' he said. 'South Africans, they have a right to cry, because they overloaded this country. Every border gate is open.'
He has sent word back to Ethiopia, though, warning young people tempted to make the dangerous overland journey that it isn't worth it. Better to set your sights elsewhere, he advises any young person who asks. Since the attack on his shops, he has not been able to reopen and has been surviving by selling off what he can — the three cars are long gone — and doing odd jobs.
'I'm really struggling,' he told me. For the first time since he went to South Africa, he's been thinking he may need to migrate once again, perhaps to Canada or the United States. 'Really, I give up,' he said. 'If I get any chance to go from this country, wherever I can go. Because here, now, I'm hopeless.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
9 minutes ago
- Forbes
Brute-Force Router Login Attacks Confirmed — What You Need To Know
AyySSHush campaign targeting thousands of routers confirmed. Thousands of routers worldwide have been targeted by a sophisticated campaign that leverages a two-year-old vulnerability, authentication flaws, and brute-force attacks. The researchers who uncovered the AyySSHush attacks have suggested it is likely the work of a nation-state threat actor. Here's what you need to know. The as-of-yet unidentified threat actors behind the AyySSHush campaign have targeted routers from major manufacturers, with at least 9,000 ASUS router models known to have already been compromised, using a stealthy and persistent backdoor that can survive firmware updates and reboots. State-sponsored hacker groups are known to have been behind everything from Windows password-stealing attacks, targeting presidential political campaigns, and even ransomware attacks against predominantly Western targets. Espionage, however, is one of the primary drivers of these hackers working in tandem with government resources. And what better way to get a data eavesdropping foothold than to compromise a router? Researchers at GreyNoise have reported that just such a sophisticated compromise campaign, that is said to be consistent with such advanced persistent threat actors, although it cannot attribute it to a specific group at this point in time, 'the level of tradecraft suggests a well-resourced and highly capable adversary,' the report stated. Although the GreyNoise research has confirmed that at least 9,000 ASUS routers have been compromised to date, and the number is increasing all the time, it has been reported that other routers from other major vendors such as Cisco, D-Link, and Linksys have also been targeted by AyySSHush. The researchers explained that attackers gain initial access through brute-force login attempts, along with authentication bypass techniques that exploit known vulnerabilities that owners have yet to patch. They then insert a public key that is under their control for remote access. While no malware is installed, the backdoor itself 'is stored in non-volatile memory and is therefore not removed during firmware upgrades or reboots,' GreyNoise warned. I have reached out to ASUS for a statement. "Even something as mundane as a router becomes a strategic asset once it gains long-term identity in a threat actor's infrastructure,' Wade Ellery, field chief technology officer at Radiant Logic, said. Which is why, at the organizational level at least, real-time identity-aware telemetry across all assets, including those routers, is essential. Debbie Gordon, CEO at Cloud Range, meanwhile, wanted that the campaign highlighted a dangerous shift in attacker strategy from quick hits to long-haul persistence. 'AyySSHush's ability to survive factory resets and firmware updates is a wake-up call,' Gordon said, 'edge devices like routers are no longer low-value targets.' With both SoHo and consumer routers targeted by this latest attack, routers can no longer be treated as set-and-forget devices.


Black America Web
an hour ago
- Black America Web
Tyler Perry, Terri Vaughn Sued Over ‘She The People' Netflix Series
Source: Taylor Hill / Getty A lawsuit alleges that Tyler Perry's new Netflix series 'She The People' infringes on the brand identity and goodwill of a nonprofit organization and political space of the same name. Aimee Allison, president and founder of the nonprofit She the People, filed suit shortly before the release. Allison filed against Netflix, Perry, his company, Tyler Vision, LLC, and actress Terri Vaughn. According to her complaint, Allison previously contracted with Vaughn to develop a docuseries based on the 'She the People' concept. She further alleged that Vaughn and Perry's Netflix series pulls in many of the themes and frames from her work. 'The Series echoes many of the same themes regarding Black women's experiences in politics that Ms. Allison addresses through her activism under the SHE THE PEOPLE mark, albeit in a slightly different format,' reads the complaint. 'With a lighthearted and comedic touch, the Series trailer (the 'Trailer') shows the newly-elected lieutenant governor confronting a number of issues likely to resonate with women of color[.]' While the scenarios themselves are not unique, coupled with the She the People brand, it could suggest the unfair usage of Allison's intellectual property. A quick trademark search shows that Perry applied for the She the People trademark through legal representation. The application was initially denied in part due to the likelihood of confusion with Allison's existing trademark. Allison has not provided any public comment on the show, but she posted a video last week talking about the importance of defending your brand and creative ideas. A seasoned political strategist, Allison was also a significant supporter of former Vice President Kamala Harris during both her 2020 and 2024 presidential campaigns. Ahead of the 2024 election cycle, Allison launched a podcast under the She the People brand in partnership with Design Observer. In her personal capacity, Allison supported several fierce state and federal candidates for office, including Stacey Abrams. Through She the People and related work, Allison has established a network of relationships and engagements designed to uplift Black and other women of color. Much of her work has involved breaking through stereotypes of who is considered electable and challenging barriers to entry to Black and other women of color into politics. Founded in 2018, She the People has existed as a space of convening and conversation for Black and other women of color. Allison organized two convenings for Black and other women of color political leaders in 2018 and 2019. The 2019 event centered on a presidential forum that elevated the leadership and voices of Black and other women of color leaders and organizers, as well as several major presidential candidates. Several media outlets covered the event and notable moments from several 2020 candidates, including Sen. Bernie Sanders, Sen. Elizabeth Warren, and Vice President Kamala Harris. I attended both convenings first as a staffer with former Democracy for America in 2018 and then as a freelance journalist in 2019. Across every moment, curated under the She the People brand, has been focused on shifting the cultural perception of who can be a leader. Allison has been in conversation with Congressional leaders like Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman and newly elected Oakland Mayor Barbara Lee. Former Atlanta Mayor Keisha Lance Bottoms said she was glad to sign on as an executive producer despite people in her inner circle warning her to stay away from the project. Despite her involvement in similar social circles, it's unclear whether Bottoms knew about the 'She the People' connection to Allison's work. 'The world is full of people who wish they had good ideas,' Allison said in an Instagram Reel. 'And too many who'll try to take yours when they see it catching fire. So, put your paperwork in place. And prepare to protect the soul of what you've built.' SEE ALSO: St. Louis Community Fills Relief Gaps Left by Federal Delay Coalition Pushes New Media Code Of Ethics In Crime Reporting SEE ALSO Tyler Perry, Terri Vaughn Sued Over 'She The People' Netflix Series was originally published on Black America Web Featured Video CLOSE


Black America Web
an hour ago
- Black America Web
Target, Walmart Warn Investors About Consumer Boycotts
Source: Gary Hershorn / Getty Several companies have learned the hard way that the Trump administration isn't as 'pro-business' as it claimed. The administration's pronounced crackdown on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives has resulted in several companies rolling back, if not outright ending their DEI programs, which in turn has inspired consumer boycotts that have directly impacted sales at several companies. In fact, consumer boycotts have proven so successful that companies are now warning investors about the potential risks they pose to their future bottom line. CNN reports that companies such as Target, Walmart, and Home Depot listed consumer boycotts around DEI initiatives as a potential risk in their annual regulatory filings with investors. In recent years, consumer boycotts have become a common trend across political lines. In 2023, Bud Light faced backlash from the MAGA set for *checks notes* doing a brand deal with a trans woman. Wait, I thought we were supposed to be snowflakes? 'Companies face a Catch-22 situation,' Kristen Jaconi, director of the Peter Arkley Institute for Risk Management at USC, told CNN. 'Consumers may be dissatisfied if a company takes a particular position on a social issue or if a company takes no position at all.' I'd push back against the assertion that it's a Catch-22, as evidenced by the fact that we've seen both Costco and Apple maintain their DEI initiatives with little to no pushback, and we've yet to see any legal action taken against these companies by the government. In the case of Costo, its support of DEI initiatives has resulted in increased brand loyalty. The company is predicted to post strong quarterly sales in an earnings report set to be released on May 29. A company choosing to withdraw its DEI initiatives is an active choice to bend the knee to the current administration and only goes to show that their initial efforts weren't sincere, but simply political theater. If they truly believed in it, they'd have no problem standing on business (quite literally in this case). Source: NurPhoto / Getty Companies having to acknowledge consumer boycotts as a financial risk in their filings is proof that boycotts work. The first quarter sales for Tesla and Target show us that boycotts work. Tesla has faced consumer boycotts worldwide as a result of CEO Elon Musk's active role in the Trump administration. The company's first-quarter revenue fell by 20%, and in Europe, sales of Tesla vehicles have dropped 49% compared to last year. Considering that electric cars are predominantly favored by left-leaning individuals and have repeatedly been demonized by President Trump, no less, Musk's heel turn into being a right-wing troll isn't just weird, but also reveals a startling lack of business acumen. Target has been the focus of several consumer boycotts since it announced it'd be sunsetting it's DEI initiatives and ending a program designed to help Black employees advance their careers. Foot traffic has consistently been down in the company's stores, and it recently revealed a drop in its first-quarter sales. No one was surprised Walmart ended their DEI initiatives, given their clientele largely consists of brokies who think 'Buck Fiden' hats are the epitome of style and humor. Target's move was a shock considering how much they courted Black dollars in years past, only to turn around and play in our faces. Listen. I'm a staunch leftist who thinks Ronald Reagan was the worst thing to happen to Black people since Jim Crow, but I'm aware I don't live in a vacuum. America is filled with folks from all different ideological leanings. As a business, if your core clientele largely consists of a particular group, wouldn't it make more sense to double down on moves that engender that base to your business? It's as if these companies still haven't learned the inherent truth of running a business in the digital age: it's impossible to be everything to everyone. Consumer boycotts are inevitable in this day and age, so pick a lane and stay true to the base that's loyal to you. Otherwise, you'll be out here looking like Target, and who would want that? SEE ALSO: Affinity Graduations Canceled Amid Trump's DEI Crackdown California Teen Spurs Outrage With Racist Promposal – They Scared: Target, Walmart Warn Their Investors About Consumer Boycotts was originally published on