
Will visa delays and border fears keep international fans away from the Club World Cup in the US?
As the United States readies for the FIFA Club World Cup, concern over such things as international travel, fan safety and even economic uncertainty threaten to diminish enthusiasm for the tournament.
The United States will see the arrival of 32 professional club teams from around the globe to 11 cities for the tournament. There's a $1 billion prize pool.
The Club World Cup is considered in many ways to be a dress rehearsal for the big event, the 2026 World Cup to be hosted by the United States, Canada and Mexico.
But there seems to be little buzz for the Club World Cup at home or abroad. The expansion of the field from seven to 32 teams has diminished the exclusivity of the event, and ticket sales appear slow.
At the same time, the tournament is being played amid reports of foreign tourists being detained and visa processing delays. Chaotic U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement activities and President Donald Trump's travel bans aren't exactly reassuring international fans, either.
Trump's policies appear to have already impacted travelers. The National Travel and Tourism Office released data showing visitors to the U.S. from foreign countries fell 9.7% in March compared to the same month last year. The travel forecasting company Tourism Economics has predicted that international arrivals would decline 9.4% this year.
The U.S. Travel Association, a nonprofit group that represents the travel industry, has urged the Trump administration to improve such things as visa processing and customs wait times ahead of a series of big sporting events on U.S. soil, including the Club World Cup beginning June 14, the Ryder Cup later this year, next summer's World Cup, and the 2028 Los Angeles Olympics.
Association President Geoff Freeman said, for example, that the wait in Colombia for a visa interview appointment is upwards of 18 months — already putting the 2026 World Cup out of reach for some travelers. He said his organization is working with the White House's World Cup Task Force to address issues.
'They (the task force) recognize how important this event is: success is the only option. So we're eager to work with them to do whatever it is we need to do to ensure that we can welcome the millions of incremental visitors that we think are possible,' Freeman said. 'But these underlying issues of visa and customs, we've got to address.'
Column: Pride and community at Chicago White Sox's Mexican Heritage Night game amid immigration crackdownsSecretary of State Marco Rubio, speaking at a House Committee on Foreign Affairs hearing last month, suggested consular staff could be put on longer shifts and that artificial intelligence could be used to process visas.
'We want it to be a success. It's a priority for the president,' said Rubio.
But the Trump administration may have added to the concerns for international visitors by issuing a ban on travelers from 12 countries, with restrictions on travel from nine more countries. Iran, one of the countries named, has qualified for the World Cup.
The proclamation included an exemption for 'any athlete or member of an athletic team, including coaches, persons performing a necessary support role, and immediate relatives, traveling for the World Cup, Olympics, or other major sporting event as determined by the secretary of state.'
It did not mention fans.
There are signs current immigration policies were already impacting soccer fans and spurring worries over safety. A Latin American supporters group in Nashville stayed away from a recent Major League Soccer game because of ICE activity in the city. The city's Geodis Park is set to host three Club World Cup matches.
Danny Navarro, who offers travel advice to followers on his social media platforms under the moniker TravelFutbolFan, said the World Cup Task Force announcement did not allay fears about travel, especially when Vice President JD Vance said, 'We want them to come. We want them to celebrate. We want them to watch the game. But when the time is up, they'll have to go home. Otherwise, they'll have to talk to (Homeland Security) Secretary (Kristi) Noem.'
That insinuated fans visiting the United States for the World Cup could use it to stay in the country, which is nonsensical, Navarro maintained. For many countries, fans traveling to the World Cup — an expensive travel plan with hiked flight and hotel prices — are broadly viewed as higher-spending and lower-risk for host nation security planning.
Navarro put the onus on FIFA.
'They must know that there is an anxiety among international travelers wanting to come in. They must know there's an anxiety among the U.S. fan base that is multicultural and wanting to go to all these places. Are they going to? Are they going to be harassed by ICE?' Navarro said. 'There is just a lot of uncertainty, I would say, too much uncertainty, that the fan base doesn't want to think about.'
It remains to be seen how outside factors will ultimately impact the Club World Cup, which is not the global spectacle or draw that the World Cup is.
Ticket sales, which were based on a dynamic pricing model, appear to be slow, with lowered prices from earlier this year and a slew of recent promotions. For a match between Paris Saint-Germain and Botafogo at the Rose Bowl on June 19, there were wide swaths of available seats going for $33.45.
FIFA created an incentive program that says fans who buy two or more tickets to the Club World Cup 'may' be guaranteed the right to purchase one ticket to the World Cup next summer.
Navarro said economic uncertainty and fears of inflation may make fans hesitant to spend their money on the Club World Cup — when the more desirable World Cup is looming.
What the Trump travel ban means for the 2026 World Cup and 2028 Olympics in the USIn some host cities, there's little sign the Club World Cup is happening. A light rail station in Seattle had a lone sign advertising the event. The Seattle Sounders are among the teams playing in the tournament.
Hans Hobson, executive director of the Tennessee State Soccer Association, suggested part of the problem is that, unlike the national teams that play in the World Cup, some of the club teams playing in Nashville are just not known to U.S. fans.
'It's not leagues that they watch. If it was the Premier League or the Bundesliga or something like that, then they'd go, 'Oh, I know players there. Let's go check it out,' Hobson said.
There were tickets available to LAFC's match against Esperance Sportive de Tunisie in Nashville on June 20 for $24.45.
FIFA President Gianni Infantino has traveled to several host cities to gin up enthusiasm. He has promised 'the world will be welcomed.'
But some say the United States isn't exactly rolling out the red carpet for visitors in the current climate.
'I could see trepidation for anyone looking to travel to the U.S. at this current political climate,' said Canadian national team coach Jesse Marsch. 'So it's a sad thing, I think, that we have to talk about visiting the U.S. in this way but I think everybody has to make decisions that are best for them and that fit best with what's going on in their life and their lifestyle.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
15 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Cory Booker Says He Won't Take Money From Elon Musk
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Senator Cory Booker, a New Jersey Democrat, said during an appearance on NBC News on Sunday that he would not accept campaign donations from billionaire Elon Musk, but added that he would "welcome" the Tesla CEO getting involved in politics "in a more substantive way." Newsweek has reached out to Booker for comment via email on Sunday. Why It Matters Musk led the cost-cutting task force known as the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) until the end of May. He served as a close adviser and key ally to President Donald Trump, and helped bankroll his 2024 campaign with more than $250 million in donations. On Tuesday, he turned against the administration, speaking out against the One Big Beautiful Bill spending proposal, calling it a "disgusting abomination." Musk's public rebuke marked a notable and apparent departure from the Trump administration's legislative agenda. The Trump-backed reconciliation package passed the House last month following weeks of negotiations in which House Speaker Mike Johnson, a Louisiana Republican, wrangled votes from the ultraconservative and more centrist factions of the GOP. While Trump praised the measure in its current form, Senate Republicans have made it clear they plan to make significant changes to it before it passes the upper chamber. What to Know NBC News' Meet the Press host Kristen Welker asked Booker, an opponent of Trump's spending bill, if he would accept money from Musk for a potential reelection campaign. He is up for reelection next year. Booker replied: "I will partner with anyone like I did in the last Congress," arguing that the bill is "an American issue. And I welcome Elon Musk, not to my campaign, I welcome him right now, not to sit back and just fire off tweets, to get involved right now in a more substantive way and putting pressure on Congress people and senators to not do this." Welker asked again if Booker would ever accept campaign funding from Musk, Booker said, "I would not accept money from Elon Musk for my campaign, but I would be supportive of anybody, including Elon Musk, putting resources forward right now to let more Americans know" about the bill. Following Musk posts on his social media platform X, formerly Twitter, calling the bill a "massive, outrageous, pork-filled" piece of legislation that is a "disgusting abomination," Representative Ro Khanna, a California Democrat, told Politico that the party should try to welcome Musk. "We should ultimately be trying to convince him that the Democratic Party has more of the values that he agrees with," the congressman said. On Saturday, Trump told NBC News that Musk will face "very serious consequences" if he starts to fund Democrats. He did not specify what actions he could take against Musk. When asked if he has any desire to repair the relationship between the pair, Trump simply said "No," adding that he "would assume" their relationship is over after the very public dispute. Musk posted a series of messages criticizing the bill, Trump and the Republican Party and some of its leaders. At one point, he posted a poll asking followers whether they support the creation of a new political party, dubbed "The America Party." Of the more than 5.6 million users who responded, 80 percent said yes. Senator Cory Booker, a New Jersey Democrat, is seen on May 14 in Washington, D.C. Inset: Elon Musk attends a news conference in the Oval Office of the White House on May 30 in Washington,... Senator Cory Booker, a New Jersey Democrat, is seen on May 14 in Washington, D.C. Inset: Elon Musk attends a news conference in the Oval Office of the White House on May 30 in Washington, D.C. More AP Photo/Evan Vuccifor Student Borrower Protection Center What People Are Saying Representative Thomas Massie, a Kentucky Republican, wrote on Wednesday on X: "The Big Beautiful Bill is a debt bomb ticking. It's also the biggest missed opportunity conservatives have ever had to put our country back on a track of fiscal sanity. If we defeat this bill, a better one can be offered that won't bankrupt our country." White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told Newsweek on Thursday: "This is an unfortunate episode from Elon, who is unhappy with the One Big Beautiful Bill because it does not include the policies he wanted. The president is focused on passing this historic piece of legislation and making our country great again." Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, a Georgia Republican, told reporters on Tuesday: "I have to agree with [Musk] on one hand. I always love it when Americans are angry at the federal government and express it. I think that should've been happening for years now. I mean, we're $36 trillion in debt for a reason." President Donald Trump posted to Truth Social on Thursday: "I don't mind Elon turning against me, but he should have done so months ago. This is one of the Greatest Bills ever presented to Congress. It's a Record Cut in Expenses, $1.6 Trillion Dollars, and the Biggest Tax Cut ever given. If this Bill doesn't pass, there will be a 68% Tax Increase, and things far worse than that. I didn't create this mess, I'm just here to FIX IT. This puts our Country on a Path of Greatness. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!" Senator Bernie Sanders, a Vermont independent, wrote in a X post on June 3: "Musk is right: this bill IS a 'disgusting abomination.' We shouldn't give $664 billion in tax breaks to the 1%. We shouldn't throw 13.7 million people off of Medicaid. We shouldn't cut $290 billion from programs to feed the hungry. Let's defeat this disgusting abomination." Senate Majority Leader John Thune, a South Dakota Republican, told reporters on Tuesday: "We obviously respect everything that Elon did with DOGE. On this particular issue, we have a difference of entitled to that opinion. We're going to proceed full speed ahead." What Happens Next Trump gave Senate Republicans a July 4 deadline to pass the bill and get it to his desk.
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tuchel insists ‘no harm done' by honest criticism of England win over Andorra
'I am the first one to ask if we could do better,' Thomas Tuchel told reporters at the post-match press conference. 'I am the first one to ask if we could do better,' Thomas Tuchel told reporters at the post-match press conference. Photograph: Eric Alonso/UEFA/Getty Images Thomas Tuchel has said his England players must accept his straight-talking criticisms if they are to advance to World Cup glory. The manager did not hold back after the lacklustre performance in the 1-0 qualifying win against Andorra in Barcelona on Saturday, questioning their attitude and body language. The result followed wins against Albania and Latvia at Wembley in March during Tuchel's first camp and means England have maximum points in Group K. They have also kept three clean sheets. Advertisement Related: England were dismal against minnows Andorra but it really doesn't matter | Jonathan Wilson Tuchel, however, was not shy about highlighting what he did not like against Andorra, which included how the players came to do their own things after they could not blow the tie open, a freestyle approach that led to an overall aimlessness. The travelling England fans also booed the team off at half-time and full time and they will want to see a significant improvement in the friendly against Senegal in Nottingham on Tuesday night. Tuchel said: 'What risk [in calling the players out]? What should I say? That we played a good match and are happy. The risk is only that you exaggerate it and make something of it that was not there. Everything I said I said already to the team. There is no harm done. We were not happy and no single player will be happy with what we showed. Why would the coach be? And why would we be shy of saying so? If we want to get better, we first need to address that we were not happy with the end of both halves. Advertisement 'I didn't name a single name. We do this as a team. Its always a 'we' and I didn't like how we ended the match and the way we ended the first half. I didn't like the attitude or the energy level and how that dropped. I liked the beginning [of the game]. It always includes me. 'This is a top group. I love the players. I love their character. They know that they underperformed. There is not a big thing in it. We know we underperformed and we are open about it and they are eager to do it better. We will now show them exactly what we want from them and how to it better in the video session tomorrow and the day after.' Tuchel was asked what he had done wrong. 'I don't know … we still won a World Cup qualifier. I am the first one to ask if we could do better. I felt us well prepared and I felt us good in the first 25 minutes. I don't really understand why we let the game slip away from us. 'It was OK at the start of the second half, we scored [through Harry Kane in the 50th minute] and we got a little bit like: 'Nothing will happen.' I would choose the same lineup again because that was my choice on what we saw and what we believed. I thought it was a very strong lineup.' Advertisement Tuchel was frustrated at the lack of dynamic running off the ball; how his players repeatedly settled for passes into feet. As for the body language, he has made great play of the need for positive interactions between teammates, good communication and even things like high fives. That did not happen. Tuchel made the point that Kane was 'one of the very few who stepped up and put a shift in at the end when things got a bit stuck and uncomfortable'. The German is not about to worry, even if there is the prospect of his honeymoon period in the job coming to an end. 'I always feel pressure as I am not happy with myself,' he said. 'The biggest pressure comes from myself. We have three wins and three clean sheets and we have a friendly match on Tuesday. I have felt more pressure than that. Are England managers judged differently? Fair enough. I am always ready for that.'


Politico
29 minutes ago
- Politico
Andrew Giuliani has a new job. It's a high stakes position in a global arena.
Mounting the world's largest sporting event is never easy. But the task of planning the FIFA World Cup in the United States next summer has grown more complicated by President Donald Trump's border crackdown and contentious relationship with co-hosts Canada and Mexico. The job of coordinating the federal government's role has fallen to Andrew Giuliani, the son of former New York City Mayor and one-time Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani. As a special assistant to the president, Andrew Giuliani served as a sports liaison during the first Trump administration and helped facilitate the reopening of U.S. professional sports leagues following the COVID-19 shutdown. But as head of the White House's FIFA World Cup 2026 Task Force, Andrew Giuliani — who returned to the Trump administration after a failed bid to be New York's governor in 2022 — now has a much larger challenge. Immediately ahead of him is the Club World Cup, another FIFA-run tournament that will kick off next weekend and which soccer's international governing body is using as a test run for the much larger, more logistically complicated World Cup. It will be followed by other high-profile sporting competitions on American soil, including the summer Olympics in Los Angeles in 2028 and the FIFA Women's World Cup in 2031, which Mexico will also co-host. 'If these are safe and secure games,' the 39-year-old former pro golfer said in an interview this week, 'then they're going to be successful games.' But even straightforward logistical questions that Giuliani faces, like how to expedite visa applications for players, fans and media, are fraught with geopolitical complexity: the first non-host country to qualify a team for next summer's tournament is Iran. (The transcript has been edited for length and clarity.) What do you say to those abroad wondering if they can or should travel to the United States given what they see from the administration's border policy? I would simply say: You're welcome here. If you apply early for your visa, if you qualify, then we want to have you here for the World Cup. President Trump has made it very clear that if you're going to come here to celebrate a great event like the World Cup, or America 250, we want you to come. If you're going to come here to cause trouble, then you're not welcome here. What I can tell you is we're going to be working hard on the back end to make sure that you have the opportunity to enjoy these games in person. What does that entail? The State Department has already seen a major reduction in times at some of these countries that were considered problem countries at the end of the Biden presidency. So I think you're going to see a real reduction in visa times. While we're not going to sacrifice our national security, we're going to make sure that the State Department has the resources that they need to process the visas to make the World Cup truly great from an American perspective — an America welcoming-the-world perspective. That language seems hard to reconcile with what this administration is actually doing immigration and trade. In my understanding of it, the President's America First mentality has never been America Only. So what exactly is the role of the FIFA World Cup 2026 Task Force? First and foremost, we're not recreating any federal agency. You look at our task force members, and whether it's the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Defense, Treasury, Commerce, FBI, DOJ, whoever it may be, we're not recreating their department here. What we're doing — to use a different football reference — is we're going to be lead blockers for them to make sure that we end up allowing them to coordinate to the point where we can maximize their strengths and to make sure we're efficient in getting through many of the roadblocks that exist in government. This task force should have been started three years ago, and we're playing catch-up. And that's right, there's a whole lot of work between now and really the Club World Cup, which was written into the executive order as a responsibility, but certainly with the World Cup in 2026, as well. Why do you think you were picked to run it? In 2020 a couple weeks into the shutdown — as we were getting into the great reopening of America — the President wanted to make sure that we could get our sports leagues open. And he tasked me, along with White House counsel and the State Department, to create a system to get our athletes and personnel in. And we were able to get nearly 15,000 athletes and support staff in at a time when it was very difficult. This will be more like 350,000 credentialed personnel — and you have ticket holders, and then we have potential fans here. But I can tell you already, we've set up a working group between FIFA, the State Department and the White House task force that works daily on recent issues for this Club World Cup. Soccer is known for its notoriously rowdy and sometimes violent fans. The last European final, in 2021, was marred by hundreds of ticketless fans storming Wembley Stadium in London. What can you do to prepare for that scenario? I'll give you a more recent example — 2024 in Copa América in Miami. This was a week after [the attempted assassination of Trump in] Butler. It was right at the end of the Republican convention. You had ticketless fans that basically stormed the gates at Hard Rock Stadium, and it took everything to get them off the field. So there have been security breakdowns as recently as last year. That's why for us, the focus is on making these games as safe and secure as humanly possible. That's where we've been focusing our energy. We've put together working groups with DHS, DOD, with our state and local partners. Already, we've done security briefs with nine of the 11 host cities for the Club World Cup games — we're going to be scheduling those other two — to look at their external security posture, their pitch protection, where we're looking at the pyrotechnics, and trying to make sure that the laws are enforced here. Are you prepared for the Club World Cup this year from a security standpoint? There is a different security posture with the Club World Cup versus the World Cup. For the Club World Cup — SEAR (Special Event Assessment Rating) level three and four events — there is no federal coordination team, the responsibility is on the state and locals and on the security of the stadiums for that. With that being said, we still are looking at the security posture, trying to see if there are holes that we can plug, of which we've done a few already and which we're continuing to do. Next year, that is when you will have the SEAR level one and level two events where you'll have federal coordination teams. Perimeters will be pushed out. You'll see some of that being tested already, which FIFA and some of the stadiums have agreed to for the Club World Cup. There will likely be fans crossing the U.S. borders with Mexico and Canada to see matches. Are you coordinating with law enforcement in those countries? We're going to get to that with Canada and Mexico. We had some engagement with them, as well. I think right now my five meter target, if you will, is the Club World Cup, making sure those go off safely and securely. Then I think we start to look kind of more at our engagements with Canada and Mexico after the Club World Cup ends in the middle of July, The 11 American cities that will host matches are counting on federal money to support their security needs around next year's tournament. There's $600 million for that in the reconciliation bill. Are you concerned about whether that money will reach host cities in time? Look, anybody who has a fiscal ask wants their money yesterday, right? I certainly think it works fine. The only other time the United States hosted the men's tournament was in 1994. Do you have any memory of that? I remember going with my father and mother. I think it was my father's first year in office. I remember how hot it was. America is my team, but being part Italian, my second team is Italy, and I got the opportunity to go to an Italy-Ireland game in which Ireland upset Italy. It was a big thing in New York, as you can imagine, with so many Italian and Irish Americans that live in the greater New York area. So that was an incredible moment. And I remember going to the semifinal game where Italy ended up winning and advancing to the final. Obviously the U.S. had an amazing run to get to the knockout stage, which really put U.S. soccer on the map and was the start of the creation of Major League Soccer. And then obviously the women winning in 1999 — the first opportunity here for U.S. soccer to take off. And that's how I kind of look at 2026 and 2031 here — as that next opportunity to launch U.S. soccer even further globally.