logo
RFK Jr.'s MAHA Commission Just Published Its First Report. Here Are 5 Crucial Things It's Missing.

RFK Jr.'s MAHA Commission Just Published Its First Report. Here Are 5 Crucial Things It's Missing.

Yahoo23-05-2025

ROBERT F. KENNEDY, Jr.'s Make America Healthy Again Commission's first report came out today, focusing on the causes of chronic disease in children in the US. Of course, America should be focusing on chronic diseases, which are the leading causes of death and disability, costing $4.5 trillion in annual health care expenditures. We lag far behind peer countries in life expectancy. More than 40% of adults and 20% of children are classified as obese.
We don't need a Commission to study the causes of chronic disease—because we already know them. Largely preventable, nonmedical risk factors such as poor nutrition, physical inactivity, and alcohol and tobacco use drive chronic diseases, which are unequally distributed, and strongly related to race, income, and geographic location.
The MAHA commission should focus on the primary drivers of chronic diseases, but its priorities mirror the pet peeves and anti-science views of RFK, Jr. The Commission's charge doesn't even mention foods that are high in added sugars and sodium, or even alcohol and tobacco. Instead, the charge includes issues that contribute to chronic diseases in limited ways (food additives), rest on shaky evidence (causes of autism), or represent the Secretary's long-held views (opposition to weight-loss medications).
These issues distract from policies already proven to work but have struggled to gain political support. Moreover, the focus on chronic disease should not come at the expense of ongoing investments in infectious diseases, particularly given the current avian H5N1 influenza and measles outbreaks.
There are clear policies that could help prevent chronic diseases, such as:
Reducing sodium and added sugars in food.
Front-of-package nutritional labeling.
Dietary guidelines encouraging fruits, vegetables, plant-based proteins, and whole grains, while limiting red or processed meat, refined grains, and foods high in saturated fat, sodium, and added sugar.
Tobacco control including reduced nicotine levels in cigarettes.
Protecting federal entitlement programs like Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP).
For more on these topics, see my recent article in JAMA Health Forum. Even though the MAHA commission is off to an inauspicious start, it could still become a catalyst for evidence-based investments and policies to reduce the burden of chronic diseases. That requires policies based on science and doing the hard political work.
You Might Also Like
The Best Hair Growth Shampoos for Men to Buy Now
25 Vegetables That Are Surprising Sources of Protein

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bird flu cases detected in seagulls in Cumbrian town
Bird flu cases detected in seagulls in Cumbrian town

Yahoo

time34 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Bird flu cases detected in seagulls in Cumbrian town

BIRD flu has been detected in a West Cumbrian town. Whitehaven Harbour Commissioners have confirmed that bird flu cases have been confirmed in the town. It is reported that the cases are affecting seagulls at the harbour. People are warned to take precautions when visiting the area, especially if walking a dog around the harbour. A Whitehaven Harbour Commissioners spokesman said: "Positive cases of avian influenza (bird flu) have been reported in the Whitehaven Harbour area. "There's no need to panic, but we kindly ask everyone to follow DEFRA's safety advice." Members of the public are urged to keep dogs on the lead at all times; do not touch wild birds; do not feed the birds; and wash your hands thoroughly if you come into contact with birds or droppings. Whitehaven Harbour Commissioners added: "We know it can be upsetting to see sick or injured birds but please do not approach or handle them. "For birds found on the Harbour, contact our office at 01946 590515 – a team member will help, or you can leave a message. "For birds in the water, please call Whitehaven Marina at 01946 692435. Thanks for helping keep our wildlife and community safe." The NHS says that bird flu, or avian flu, is an infectious type of influenza that spreads among birds. In rare cases, it can affect humans. There are lots of different strains of the bird flu virus. Most of them don't infect humans. The NHS website states: "Plans are in place to manage any suspected cases of bird flu in the UK. "H5N8 and H5N1 bird flu have been found in some poultry, other captive birds and wild birds in the UK. "H5N6 has also been found in some wild birds in the UK, but this is a different strain to the H5N6 virus that has infected some people in China."

The Republican Bill: Costs and Doubts
The Republican Bill: Costs and Doubts

New York Times

timean hour ago

  • New York Times

The Republican Bill: Costs and Doubts

To the Editor: Re 'G.O.P.'s Bill Would Swell U.S. Debt by $2.4 Trillion' (front page, June 5): This Big Bad Bill is not just about what it adds to the debt and the deficit, but also about what it takes away from millions of Americans. With the bill's planned cuts to Medicaid, almost 11 million Americans would lose their health insurance, according to a projection by the Congressional Budget Office. Protections from artificial intelligence abuses would be gutted, and funding for crucial global vaccination would be erased. All this so Silicon Valley billionaires, among others, would receive one of the largest tax cuts in history, amounting to some $3.8 trillion. The deficit would also explode, causing the interest we would have to pay on our debt to exceed what we spend on national defense. The bottom line is that this bill is what Elon Musk called it: a 'disgusting abomination.' Henry A. LowensteinNew York To the Editor: Re 'After Muscling Their Bill Through the House, Some Republicans Have Regrets' (Congressional Memo, June 3): Republicans in Congress didn't care what was in the bill, as long as President Trump was happy that they voted for it. Only now that the horrors of the bill have been made public do Republicans act shocked, shocked at what they voted for. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Are Pesticides in Your Food Harmful?
Are Pesticides in Your Food Harmful?

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Are Pesticides in Your Food Harmful?

Credit - iStockphoto—Getty Images Various chemicals, from those in plastics to food additives, have made headlines lately for their potential roles in triggering diseases. Pesticides are unique among chemicals, though, says Melissa Perry, an environmental epidemiologist and dean of George Mason's College of Public Health. 'They're deliberately manufactured to kill things.' By poisoning weeds, pesticides clear the way for farmers' crops to thrive. But their deadly design may undermine human health, too. A recent report by a new federal advisory board, the Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) Commission chaired by Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., calls for further investigation of pesticides' effects to determine if their use should be limited. Some evidence does suggest that long-term exposure could lead to cancer and several other serious health problems. More research is needed to better understand these risks, but in the meantime, experts recommend simple, practical steps to reduce intake. Here's what we know about the risks of pesticides and how to lower your exposure. The MAHA report assesses 'root causes' of poor health in U.S. children. It describes pesticides as one of eight types of chemicals giving rise to chronic diseases. The report specifically takes issue with two weed killers, glyphosate and atrazine. They're the most commonly used pesticides by American farmers, and research has focused on them in lab experiments on animals, with several concerning findings. Other studies have drawn links between glyphosate exposure—mainly by consuming trace amounts in food—and health problems, including earlier death. In 2019, a large research review identified a 'compelling link' between glyphosate intake and non-Hodgkin lymphoma in humans, though in 2024 a federal judge criticized this study's design and approach. Additional research points to a range of diseases potentially related to glyphosate, but a recent review by Italian researchers on glyphosate was inconclusive and called for further research. Read More: Seed Oils Don't Deserve Their Bad Reputation Based on the evidence, the World Health Organization (WHO) has described glyphosate as 'probably carcinogenic to humans,' whereas the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) found 'no evidence that glyphosate causes cancer in humans,' citing a dataset the agency considered more thorough than WHO's. The second widespread pesticide highlighted by the MAHA report is atrazine. Like glyphosate, it's been used by farmers since the 1960s, but research on animals in the 1990s began to show it could disrupt reproductive health and hormone regulation. Tyrone B. Hayes, a biologist at the University of California, Berkeley, found that atrazine interfered with the sexual development of frogs. Subsequent studies showed similar effects, as well as weight gain, in mice. Researchers have also observed that women in certain agricultural communities experience higher rates of abnormal menstrual cycles, compared to places with fewer farms. Other human studies show increases in several kinds of birth defects. Still more research links atrazine to breast cancer, but researchers at the National Institutes of Health have concluded 'no evidence of an association' with cancer. The EPA estimated that atrazine adversely affects 54% of all species and 50% of all critical habitats. 'I don't know how an Environmental Protection Agency can make a statement like that and then re-register the chemical,' Hayes says. In 2023, U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) data showed that 99% of food samples tested below the EPA's safety limit for pesticides. However, U.S. limits are considerably higher than what's allowed in the European Union, where atrazine has been effectively banned. Read More: The Best Longevity Habit You're Not Thinking About Pesticides called organophosphates have been studied by the EPA and others for links to neurological disorders such as ADHD. 'Research clearly shows that children exposed to higher levels did have more neurobehavioral problems,' says Jason Richardson, professor of physiology and pharmacology at the University of Georgia's Isakson Center for Neurological Disease Research. Overall, uncertainty and debate about pesticides continues partly due to research challenges. People are typically exposed to multiple types of chemicals, so it's 'hard to attribute disease to one pesticide or pinpoint the definitive dose or exposure time' that makes people sick, Perry says. 'Just because a chemical is present doesn't mean it's doing anything bad, but in combination with other chemicals, it may be,' Richardson says. 'Efforts are underway to measure these combinations.' 'The country's agricultural policy follows science, not fear, speculation, and fringe narratives,' says Becky Langer-Curry, director of innovation at the National Corn Growers Association. The Corn Growers were 'perplexed' by the MAHA report, she adds. 'We need faith in the EPA's regulatory system to review the science. They're ensuring our food is safe, well below human risk.' In an email to EPA spokesperson Mike Bastasch said the EPA'typically regulates pesticides at least 100 times lower than where no adverse effects are seen in safety studies.' The agency is 'confident that the fruits and vegetables our children are eating are safer than ever,' Bastasch wrote. However, he added that the EPA is updating its evaluation of glyphosate's cancer-causing potential, and it's currently working on an Updated Mitigation Proposal for atrazine. In the meantime, researchers including Perry, Richardson, and Hayes think pesticides are dangerous enough that people should take precautions—but especially young kids, people who are pregnant, those who live close to farms, agricultural workers, and seniors. The first step is to become aware of pesticides in your environment. They're more common than people think, Perry says. 'Exposures happen routinely for most members of the American public.' Experts recommend contacting the environmental office of your county or city to learn whether you're close to a food production facility that uses pesticides. In 2017, kids and teachers at a Hawaii middle school reported unusual throat irritation and dizziness. They suspected the symptoms were caused by pesticides applied in nearby fields, and researchers found residues in the school's indoor and outdoor air samples. Read More: What to Do If Fluoride Is Removed From Your Water The detected levels were deemed below concerning thresholds. Bastasch says that, for communities near farms, the EPA studies potential exposure through the air and other pathways to make sure safety levels are based on sound science. Still, Hayes worries about the long-term effects of pesticide contact and absorption. 'For someone living in a farming community that's constantly exposed to estrogen mimics like atrazine, you're more likely to develop adverse effects,' he says. People take in atrazine mainly through their drinking water, after farm runoff carries the pesticide into local water systems. But some utilities are more effective than others at removing pesticide residues. The Environmental Working Group rates local water utilities. For people on well water, the federal government provides guidelines for testing it. Pesticide use is widespread enough—and disperses at such distances—that everyone should probably use a high-quality water filter, experts say. Atrazine can travel as far as 600 miles, Hayes says. As far back as 1999, USGS noticed that pesticides, including atrazine, were detected in places where farmers hadn't applied them. Even for residents of areas where a water treatment plant removes the chemicals, buying a filter certified to the NSF/ANSI Standards 42 and 53 provides some additional assurance of water safety. Look for filters in refrigerators and water pitchers that meet this certification. Eating organic foods can also help to reduce intake of pesticides, especially glyphosate. About 90% of pregnant women have detectable amounts of glyphosate in their bodies, according to one study. 'But when you put people on organic diets, you start to see that they no longer have pesticides in their urine,' Perry says. Research in 2020 found that eating an organic diet dropped glyphosate levels by 70% in children and their parents. In 2023, researchers put pregnant women on an organic diet for one week. Those who went all-organic decreased glyphosate in their urine by 43%. A 2019 study found a 95% reduction in organophosphates. Richardson calls these studies on organic foods 'intriguing' while noting that natural compounds used in organic farming may also be toxic beyond certain thresholds. Even when eating organic, 'make sure you wash your fruits and vegetables very well,' he says. Read More: Dermatologists Have a Dirty Little Secret One study found that soaking apples in baking soda mixed with water for 12-15 minutes eliminated more residue than water alone. However, according to another study, washing produce with running water is superior to baking soda, sitting water, and vinegar. Other research shows a gentle rubbing action during washing is effective. Aim for 20-30 seconds or longer if you have time. Peeling the skin and outer pulp will get rid of additional residue that penetrates into some produce. There's a major downside, though: you lose a portion of the beneficial nutrients and compounds, like fiber and vitamins, that help protect against pesticide toxicity. Some research suggests that replacing processed foods with diverse whole foods can reduce how many pesticides you ingest (but some research suggests there may be fewer benefits if they're not organic). Aside from nutrition, other lifestyle behaviors such as exercise, stress management, and good sleep may build a baseline of health that helps thwart the cumulative effects of pesticides and other pollutants. Overall, they influence how someone's body responds to their 'exposome,' Richardson explains—your total environmental exposures and how they interact with lifestyle behaviors and risk factors like age and genetics. Bastasch says the EPA assesses the combined risks of groups of pesticides that affect the body in similar ways, adding that the agency is continuing to advance research in this area. The exposome probably matters more than any one chemical type, but 'we're really just breaking the surface of understanding these interactions,' Richardson says. Until more definitive science emerges, maintain smart practices like scrubbing produce and striving for a healthy lifestyle. Contact us at letters@

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store