Alabama legislator introduces bill to make human cloning illegal
MONTGOMERY, Ala. (WIAT) — A new bill has been introduced in the Alabama Legislature that would classify human cloning as a felony.
HB380, introduced by Rep. Phillip Rigsby, R-Huntsville, classifies human cloning as a human asexual reproduction accomplished by any of the following:
Introducing the genetic material from one of more human somatic cells into an egg whose nuclear material has been removed in order to produce a living organism that is virtually identical to an existing human organism.
Artificially subdividing a human embryo to result in more than one human organism.
Introducing pluripotent stem cells from any source into a human embryo under conditions where the introduced cells generate all or most of the body tissues of the developing organism.
Genetically modifying human skin cells or organisms into a viable egg or sperm with genetic material from the same source as the egg or sperm used in reproduction to create an embryo.
The bill states that a person will commit the crime of human cloning if they intentionally perform or participate in an attempt to perform human cloning, if they ship, transfer or receive an embryo produced by human cloning or if they ship, transfer or receive any oocyte, embryo, fetus or human somatic cell for the purpose of human cloning.
However, human cloning would not be restricted in the areas of scientific research that focus on the use of cloning techniques to molecules, DNA or cells other than embryos, tissues, organs, plants or animals other than humans. It would also not apply to in vitro fertilization (IVF) or the administration of fertility-related drugs or any procedures used to assist a woman with pregnancy, as long as the procedure doesn't aim to result in the birth of a child who is genetically identical to another embryo, fetus or human being.
If passed, the bill would go into effect on Oct. 1 and treat its defined concept of human cloning as a class C felony.
The full bill can be read here:
HB380-intDownload
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Guns, voting: Lombardo rejects AB105, 6 other bills to bring total to 56 vetoes
LAS VEGAS (KLAS) — Republican Gov. Joe Lombardo on Monday vetoed a bill that would have outlawed carrying a gun at election sites. Assembly Bill 105 (AB105) was a second attempt to keep guns away from polling places, and it met the same fate as a bill (AB354) that Lombardo vetoed two years ago. Seven vetoes on Monday put Lombardo's total at 56, still 19 shy of the record he set in 2023 by rejecting 75 bills passed by the Nevada Legislature. Lombardo reasoned that there are already federal laws against intimidating, threatening or coercing others in ways that interfere with their right to vote. He also cited a state law making it a felony to interfere with the conduct an election. 'The provisions in AB 105 are therefore redundant and do not offer meaningful new protections. Instead, they simply create additional 'gun-free zones,' without clear justification,' Lombardo's veto message said. 16 new vetoes boost Lombardo total to 49; HOA limits, price fixing bill rejected Anti-gun groups criticized the veto and supported Democratic Assembly Majority Floor Leader Sandra Jauregui's efforts against guns. 'Free, fair, and safe elections are a cornerstone of our democracy. In vetoing a bill that bans guns from polling places, Gov. Lombardo puts Nevada communities and Nevada's elections in danger,' according to Kris Brown, president of Brady United. 'The presence of a firearm alone at voting booths can intimidate voters, especially in a country where so many people have experienced the devastating consequences of gun violence. Everyone deserves to safely cast their vote, and this veto will make it harder for Nevadans to exercise that right,' Brown said. Emily Persaud-Zamora, executive director of Silver State Voices, said, 'In our years of experience with conducting an election protection program, voters have repeatedly expressed that feeling safe at the polls is a crucial factor when casting their ballot. While this is unfortunate, this will not deter us from fighting for gun violence prevention and voting rights for Nevada voters.' Lombardo also rejected Senate Bill 156 (SB156), which would have set up a Special Counsel for the Prevention of Gun Violence under the Nevada Attorney General's Office. He argued it politicizes the issue of gun violence because the attorney general is an elected position. Another bill involving elections, SB100, was rejected as an overreach that imposed 'unnecessary state-level control' over local decisions. Democratic State Sen. Skip Daly sponsored the bill, which addressed a new wrinkle in the smooth operation of Nevada elections. Washoe County commissioners had refused to certify election results last year, prompting Secretary of State Francisco Aguilar and Attorney General Aaron Ford to file a petition with the Nevada Supreme Court to compel the commission to certify the vote. Daly's bill would have given that authority to the secretary of state. Two commissioners who were holding out eventually voted for certification. A third continued to refuse, but a 4-1 vote ended the matter on July 17. Lombardo's veto message emphasized the portion of SB100 that dealt with the selection of ballot-counting systems. He said local authorities should choose the vendors they use. Other bills vetoed on Monday: AB434, AB589, SB71 and SB428. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Military members boo Newsom, Biden and the press during Trump speech
Members of a crowd filled with members of the military and their families booed and jeered President Trump's political rivals and the press Tuesday at the president's prompting during his address at Fort Bragg in North Carolina. The response from attendees, most of whom were wearing military fatigues, was a jarring sight given the military's history as a traditionally nonpartisan entity. Presidents have historically drawn criticism when they have been seen as using the military as a political pawn. Trump opened with a dig at his predecessor, noting the Biden administration had renamed Fort Bragg to Fort Liberty under a 2023 congressionally mandated rule to rename installations honoring Confederate generals. The Trump administration has since changed the name back. 'Can you believe they changed that name in the last administration for a little bit?' Trump asked, eliciting boos from those in the crowd. Trump later bragged that he didn't think former President Biden would be able to draw a similar crowd. 'Do you think this crowd would have showed up for Biden? I don't think so. I don't think so. I don't think so, maybe I'm wrong,' he said to more jeers from the crowd. At one point, Trump invoked the unrest in Los Angeles, where demonstrations in response to immigration raids have at times turned violent. The president referred to the 'governor of California' and 'the mayor of Los Angeles,' which triggered boos from some in the audience directed at Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) and Mayor Karen Bass (D). The president identified journalists in attendance as 'the fake news,' a comment that prompted jeers from some service members on hand. The address drew criticism from some Democrats. 'It's truly disgraceful to watch Trump give a nakedly political speech at Fort Bragg, and encourage uniformed members of the military to boo and hiss political opponents,' Tommy Vietor, who served in the Obama White House, posted on the social platform X. 'I realize we've given up on norms from the before times, but it's still awful and harmful to the military!' Trump was at Fort Bragg in North Carolina to attended a military demonstration and mark a celebration of the Army's 250th anniversary. For his speech, hundreds of service members were in attendance, including dozens seated behind the president's podium. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Associated Press
35 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Arizona governor vetoes bill to ban teaching antisemitism in Arizona's public schools
PHOENIX (AP) — Arizona Gov. Katie Hobbs has vetoed a proposal that would ban teaching antisemitism at the state's public K-12 schools, universities and colleges and expose educators who violate the new rules to discipline and lawsuits. On Tuesday, the Democratic governor said the bill is not about antisemitism but rather about attacking teachers. 'It puts an unacceptable level of personal liability in place for our public school, community college, and university educators and staff, opening them up to threats of personally costly lawsuits,' she said in a statement. Additionally, it sets a dangerous precedent that unfairly targets public school teachers while shielding private school staff.' The measure cleared the Legislature on Wednesday on a 33-20 vote by the House, including a few Democrats who crossed party lines to support it. It's one of a few proposals to combat antisemitism across the country. The proposal would prohibit teachers and administrators from teaching or promoting antisemitism or antisemitic actions that create a hostile environment, calling for the genocide of any group or requiring students to advocate for an antisemitic point of view. It also would bar public schools from using public money to support the teaching of antisemitism. Educators would personally be responsible for covering the costs of damages in lawsuits for violating the rules. Democrats tried but failed to remove the lawsuit provision and swap out references to antisemitism within the bill with 'unlawful discrimination' to reflect other discrimination. The bill's chief sponsor, Republican Rep. Michael Way, of Queen Creek, has said his proposal would create accountability when educators fail to protect students from the rise in antisemitism since the start of the Israel-Hamas war. Opponents say the bill aims to silence people who want to speak out on the oppression of Palestinians and opens up educators to personal legal liability in lawsuits students could file. Students over the age of 18 and the parents of younger pupils would be able to file lawsuits over violations that create a hostile education environment, leaving teachers responsible for paying any damages that may be awarded, denying them immunity and prohibiting the state from paying any judgments arising from any such lawsuits. The proposal would create a process for punishing those who break the rules. At K-12 schools, a first-offense violation would lead to a reprimand, a suspension of a teacher or principal's certificate for a second offense and a revocation of the certificate for a third offense. At colleges and universities, violators would face a reprimand on first offense, a suspension without pay for a second offense and termination for a third offense. The proposal also would require colleges and universities to consider violations by employees to be a negative factor when making employment or tenure decisions. Under the proposal, universities and colleges couldn't recognize any student organization that invites a guest speaker who incites antisemitism, encourages its members to engage in antisemitism or calls for the genocide of any group. Elsewhere in the U.S., a Louisiana lawmaker is pushing a resolution that asks universities to adopt policies to combat antisemitism on campuses and collect data on antisemitism-related reports and complaints. And a Michigan lawmaker has proposed putting a definition of antisemitism into the state's civil rights law.
