logo
Deere Tops Earnings Estimates, Reaffirms Focus on US Manufacturing

Deere Tops Earnings Estimates, Reaffirms Focus on US Manufacturing

Epoch Times16-05-2025

John Deere's revenue and earnings dropped in the second quarter of fiscal year 2025 due to a global decline in sales, but beat expectations. The company reaffirmed its guidance for the rest of the fiscal year, continuing to embrace local American manufacturing.
On May 15, the Moline, Illinois-based agricultural and construction equipment maker reported net income of $1.804 billion for the second quarter ended April 27, or $6.64 per share, exceeding market forecasts. That compares with net income of $2.370 billion, or $8.53 per share, for the same quarter a year earlier.
Net income was $2.673 billion, or $9.82 per share, for the first six months of the fiscal year, down from $4.121 billion, or $14.74 per share, for the same period last year.
Globally, net sales and revenue dropped 16 percent, to $12.763 billion, in the second quarter, also beating market forecasts.
'As we navigate the current environment, our customers remain our top priority,' said John May, chairman and CEO of John Deere. 'I'm incredibly proud of our team's execution this quarter, delivering exceptional performance despite challenging market dynamics.'
Meanwhile, the company kept its full-year revenue outlook at $4.75 billion to $5.50 billion, though slightly broader than the one provided in February. It also expects cash flow from equipment operations to remain between $4.5 billion and $5.5 billion, keeping its guidance steady despite market volatility.
Related Stories
4/22/2025
4/29/2025
'Despite the near-term market challenges, we remain confident in the future,' May said. 'Our commitment to delivering value for our customers includes ongoing investment in advanced products, solutions, and manufacturing capabilities.
'Over the next decade, we will continue to invest significantly in our core U.S. market, underscoring our dedication to innovation and growth while focusing on remaining cost-competitive in a global market.'
John Deere's shares rose 3.78 percent during the May 15 trading session. Over the past five years, the stock has risen nearly 310 percent, outperforming the S&P 500 Index, which has gained more than 106 percent over the same period.
Meanwhile, the company continues to embrace its American manufacturing heritage. It produces its products mostly at home, close to the farming markets it serves, with factories mostly in Iowa, Georgia, Illinois, Louisiana, and Wisconsin.
During the earnings call, May touted 'Smart Industrial,' the company's strategy of combining advanced technology with manufacturing.
'We will continue to invest capital robustly in R&D to bring these integrated solutions to market, enhancing our global competitiveness. I'm proud that this innovative work will build on our American roots, and we are prepared to invest $20 billion in the U.S.'
Meanwhile, the company noted that its profit margins surpassed projections despite tariff headwinds thanks to better-than-expected sales and lower production costs from efficiency gains in its material sourcing and factory operations.
That could change in the second half of the year, as global uncertainty continues to weigh on customer sentiment across business segments and markets.
'While the top end of our fiscal '25 outlook remains relatively unchanged from prior guidance, a fluid tariff environment has broadened our guidance range as we actively work to mitigate impacts to both our customers and Deere,' May said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Elon Musk's business empire was built on government help. How badly could Donald Trump hurt him?
Elon Musk's business empire was built on government help. How badly could Donald Trump hurt him?

Yahoo

time22 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Elon Musk's business empire was built on government help. How badly could Donald Trump hurt him?

Even for Elon Musk, this is — to use the precise technical term — bonkers. Barely one week after leaving the Trump administration with every semblance of amity, the world's richest person is going scorched earth against the leader of the world's richest nation. Insults and threats. Calls for impeachment. Sinister references to Jeffrey Epstein. Somehow, Kanye West is also involved. It's like the messiest online influencer drama you've ever seen, except the parties are two of the most powerful people on Earth. But when it comes down to brass tacks, what exactly does Musk stand to lose in this titanic celebrity divorce? If Trump were to follow through on all his threats, and use every available weapon against Musk's business empire, how badly could it hurt him? The short answer is: pretty badly. In fact, with some admittedly quick and dirty math, we can put a price tag on some of it. Elon Musk's estimated $388bn fortune — already $26.6bn smaller than it was before this frank exchange of thermonuclear warheads — depends on the success of two companies which are both intertwined with the U.S. political system. One is Tesla, which makes electric vehicles; the other is SpaceX, which builds rockets, spacecraft, and satellites. X, formerly Twitter, can be left aside for now; having bought the social network 2022 for $44bn, Musk is still struggling to recoup his investment and has almost certainly lost money overall. Let's start with Space Exploration Technologies Corp., aka SpaceX. Not many people can afford to rent a rocket, so a lot of its business comes from government contracts, and U.S. government contracts most of all. As of writing, according to federal data, the Texas-based company has been paid or promised just under $21bn by Uncle Sam since 2008. The total potential value of all SpaceX's existing contracts, however, is much higher: $89.2bn. If Trump cancelled every contract tomorrow, that would mean a theoretical maximum of $68bn in lost potential income. For context, that's more than four times SpaceX's entire forecasted revenue for 2025, and nearly 15 times its revenue from 2022. Of course, there's no way to know if those maximum payments would ever actually have been made. So we could also get a rough sense of what SpaceX stands to lose by looking at the actual cash it received from federal coffers every year. In 2022 that was $2.8bn; in 2023, $3.1bn; and in 2024, $3.8bn. On the plus side for Musk, the U.S. government is so dependent on SpaceX that some critics have called it a monopoly in the making. SpaceX ferries our astronauts to and from the International Space Station, is heavily involved in Nasa's moon landing program, and manages an increasing share of government satellite communications as well. Still, that does not guarantee safety. Would you really, in all soberness, bet against Donald Trump doing something that hurts the country merely to punish his personal enemies? In fact, as Talking Points Memo editor-in-chief Josh Marshall argues, SpaceX's critical role might actually put it in greater danger, because it leaves the feds with few options except "expropriation or nationalization". Like SpaceX, Tesla has benefited greatly from taxpayer money, mostly in the form of emission trading payments from non-electric carmakers and tax credits or consumers buying electric vehicles. An analysis by The Washington Post put Tesla's total income from emission credits since 2007 at $11.4bn as of this February. Its gain from tax credits, which allow more people to buy its cars at higher prices, has been estimated at $3.4bn. Those emission credit schemes are run by U.S. states, not by the federal government. Nevertheless, Trump and the Republican Party have tried to undermine such schemes by contesting states' ability to set their own emissions rules. The wider impact is difficult to calculate. In contrast to SpaceX, Tesla sells to ordinary people, who tend to have their own opinions independent of government. In reputational terms, splitting noisily with Trump could reverse some of its recent sales losses; on the other hand, it might just make Tesla hated on both sides of politics. The biggest risk may be regulatory. At the time of Trump's second inauguration, Tesla was being investigated by numerous federal agencies including the Justice Department, the National Labor Relations Board, and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration — which by itself had six pending probes. During his time at DOGE, Democrats feared Musk could use his power to influence or cancel these cases. But Trump's unabashed willingness to wield state power to punish those who displease him while rewarding loyalists cuts both ways. Live by the chainsaw, die by the chainsaw. How much that costs Tesla would depend on how far Trump is willing to go, and on the outcome of any ensuing court battle. But when U.S. stock exchanges closed on Thursday its share price had crashed by nearly 12 percent, wiping $122bn off its market value. So far we've only addressed Elon Musk's finances. Yet there are other, more personal ways that Trump could hurt him if the former reality TV star truly isn't here to make friends. For example, Trump's old advisor Stephen Bannon — who has previously branded Musk a "parasitic illegal immigrant" — urged the administration to investigate Musk's immigration history, and potentially deport him. Unlike some of the feverish allegations that emanate from the extended Trump-o-sphere, this one actually has some substance. An investigation by The Washington Post last year alleged that Musk had worked illegally in the U.S. while launching his Silicon Valley career in the mid-90s. Musk has denied this, and in any case he has been a U.S. citizen since 2002. Still, legal experts have said his citizenship could technically be revoked if he were proven to have lied to immigration authorities. And while those laws have only rarely been enforced in the past 25 years, some Trump aides and allies have said they want that to change. Nor is that anywhere close to the only alleged skeleton in Musk's closet. What is his relationship with ecstasy, Adderall, ketamine, or magic mushrooms? Has he ever been in regular contact with Vladimir Putin? Did his colleagues at DOGE rigorously follow information security laws when extracting sensitive data from federal systems? What happened to all that data after it was obtained? At least we can probably can rule out plain old assassination by government special forces. Although, to be fair, that is literally something that Trump and his lawyers have argued should be protected by presidential immunity. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Quantum Breakthrough: D-Wave Soars Over 1,000% in a Year
Quantum Breakthrough: D-Wave Soars Over 1,000% in a Year

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Quantum Breakthrough: D-Wave Soars Over 1,000% in a Year

D-Wave Quantum Inc. (NYSE:QBTS) stock surged more than 10% on Friday, extending a rally that tops 150% this month. The gains reflect progress across hardware, software and enterprise deployments. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 3 Warning Signs with QBTS. Over the past year, QBTS has climbed about 1,281%, far outstripping the Internet Software industry's 35% rise and the S&P 500's 12%. Rigetti Computing (NASDAQ:RGTI) and IonQ (NYSE:IONQ) have also jumped but lag D-Wave, up 840.6% and 402%, respectively. In Q1 2025, D-Wave's 1,200-qubit Advantage2 prototype solved a complex magnetic simulation in minutes, a task estimated to take one million years on the Frontier supercomputer. That real-world demonstration of quantum supremacy underscored the firm's annealing approach. The company also scaled up its Advantage2 system to more than 4,400 qubits, boosting coherence times and connectivity for tackling optimization tasks and AI challenges. D-Wave unveiled a Proof of Quantum Work model suggesting blockchain energy use could drop by up to 1,000x. Corporations such as Ford Otosan and NTT DOCOMO are piloting D-Wave's systems for manufacturing and telecom optimization. Investors may view these advances as validation of the technology's commercial potential. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Sign in to access your portfolio

Nvidia, Meta, Apple Lead Tech Rebound After Robust Jobs Data
Nvidia, Meta, Apple Lead Tech Rebound After Robust Jobs Data

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Nvidia, Meta, Apple Lead Tech Rebound After Robust Jobs Data

June 6 - Stocks climbed after May's U.S. jobs data beat estimates, sending indexes higher. The Dow Jones Industrial Average jumped about 510 points, or 1.2%. The S&P 500 also added roughly 1.2%, reaching the 6,000 mark for the first time since late February. The Nasdaq Composite rose 1.4%. Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) led gains among major names, jumping more than 3% after tumbling the previous day amid a public spat involving Elon Musk. Nvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA), Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:META) and Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) also traded higher. Nonfarm payrolls rose by 139,000 in May, topping economists' projections of 125,000 but coming in slightly below April's revised 147,000 gain. The jobless rate remained at 4.2%. Today's jobs report may not prompt the Fed to cut rates, said Eric Merlis, co-head of global markets at Citizens. He noted that while other indicators point to a softer labor market, demand for workers remains stable as firms adapt to policy shifts. Earlier this week, weekly unemployment claims came in above forecasts, and ADP data showed private payrolls grew by just 37,000 in May, missing estimates. For the week, the S&P 500 and Dow are up nearly 2% and 1.5%, respectively, while the Nasdaq is more than 2% higher. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store