West Palm pays $550,000 to two men hurt by the same cop after firing him over cocaine use
West Palm Beach has agreed to pay $550,000 to settle lawsuits by two men who say they were injured by the same police officer within a two-month span.
The men say former Officer Nicholas Lordi attacked them in separate incidents in November 2019 and January 2020. The first interaction led to Lordi's arrest in 2022, though prosecutors later dropped the case.
Lordi was not fired over either incident but was terminated in 2023 after testing positive for cocaine use, police personnel records show.
In the first case, John Monroque, a 63-year-old retired city public works employee, was detained by Lordi as a suspected trespasser outside a grocery mart on the 5500 block of Broadway Avenue on Nov. 1, 2019.
Surveillance video showed Lordi push Monroque into a police car, place him in a headlock and wrestle him to the ground. He then punched Monroque 11 times, breaking his nose and knocking him unconscious.
He was cleared by his department's internal affairs division, but when surveillance video footage emerged online afterward, the Florida Department of Law Enforcement launched its own probe and arrested him on an aggravated battery charge in February 2022. Prosecutors dropped the charge seven months later.
Monroque filed a federal lawsuit in August 2023. In December city commissioners approved a settlement with him for $500,000.
In the second case, police were on the street in the 600 block of Fourth Street on Jan. 11, 2020, while paramedics assisted a man who had been attacked.
As the medics attended to the patient, a man named Jamiah Smith, then 34, appeared and demanded to know what had happened to the patient, his stepfather, according to court records.
Lordi wrote in a police report that Smith ignored commands to step away from the ambulance. In his lawsuit, Smith alleged Lordi tackled him, threw him to the ground and twisted his arm back, causing a wrist fracture.
The suit alleged that when Smith was tackled by Lordi he presented 'no actual or apparent threat and was merely inquiring about the well-being of a loved one who was seriously injured.'
Smith was arrested on a charge of resisting arrest without violence, but the charge was later dropped. In his suit, Smith contented that the city was liable for his injury given that Lordi had beaten Monroque two months earlier and had faced previous complaints of injuring residents.
'it was unreasonable for defendant, City of West Palm Beach, not to investigate or take corrective action which included, but not limited to, discharge or reassignment,' the suit stated.
WEST PALM NEWS: Stephen Ross' luxe condo project wanted extra kitchens; so West Palm is changing its rules
WEST PALM NEWS: Families of WPB police officers who died of COVID-19 win $90,000 settlements from city
WEST PALM NEWS: 'A city that basically screwed them': West Palm Beach leaders stunned by old, racist city plans
City commissioners agreed this month to settle Smith's suit for $50,000.
Lordi was fired in July 2023 for 'violation of agency or training school policy' after testing positive for cocaine during an unannounced drug test in December 2022.
The positive test led to an internal investigation and the police chief's decision that he be terminated. A grievance filed by Lordi was denied by the city's human resources director.
A police department spokesperson confirmed Lordi no longer works for the department but declined to provide additional comment.
Andrew Marra is a reporter at The Palm Beach Post. Reach him at amarra@pbpost.com.
This article originally appeared on Palm Beach Post: West Palm settles with 2 men injured by former city police officer
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Former O.C. Supervisor Andrew Do headed to prison for COVID relief bribery scheme
Andrew Do, the former Orange County supervisor who took more than $550,000 in bribes over COVID-relief money meant to buy meals for needy, elderly constituents, was sentenced Monday to five years in federal prison. 'I just do not believe a sentence anything less than the maximum reflects the seriousness of the crime,' said U.S. District Judge James Selna. "Public corruption brings damage far beyond the monetary loss to the county." The judge expressed displeasure that the law allowed him to sentence Do to only five years. Do fled war-torn Vietnam with his family as a child to become an attorney and one of Southern California's most powerful Vietnamese American politicians. As part of a plea deal, Do admitted last year that he funneled more than $10 million in federal pandemic funds to a nonprofit that in turn steered money to his two daughters. The scandal was uncovered in 2023 by the news site LAist, which reported that Do approved contracts worth millions to the nonprofit, which promised to provide meals to the poor, elderly and disabled residents of Little Saigon but could show scant evidence of its effort. Do approved the contracts without disclosing that his 23-year-old daughter Rhiannon, a law student at UC Irvine, had signed documents identifying herself as the nonprofit's president or vice president. As accusations mounted, Do claimed he was the victim of slander, responding with defiant vitriol against the reporter who broke the story, Nick Gerda, and demanding his firing. When the Orange County Register called for Do's resignation, he accused the newspaper of spreading 'gross misinformation.' Late last year, however, Do agreed to resign from the Board of Supervisors and pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit bribery. Federal prosecutors said the Viet America Society gave Rhiannon a job, and paid her as an employee, after her father voted in favor of the lucrative contracts. Prosecutors also said the organization steered money to Do's other daughter through an air conditioning company. 'I'm very grateful that the judge saw the case for what it is,' said Janet Nguyen, the current First District Supervisor. 'He benefitted while people suffered. He took advantage during the pandemic, when no one was watching.' She said the county is conducting an audit to better understand how Do's scheme was allowed to occur. Prosecutors accused Rhiannon Do of making a false statement on a loan application, but agreed to defer the charge, allowing her to enter a diversion agreement in exchange for her cooperation. The elder Do, a Republican, worked as a deputy public defender and a prosecutor before he won a special election in 2015 to represent Orange County's 1st Supervisorial District, which covers Cypress, Fountain Valley, Garden Grove, Huntington Beach, La Palma, Los Alamitos, Westminster and Seal Beach. He became the second Vietnamese American ever to serve on the board, and was later elected to two four-year terms. He was known for his efforts to combat homelessness and for his sponsorship of a Tet Festival in Fountain Valley that drew thousands of people annually. At a time when Vietnamese immigrants face increased threats of eviction and deportation, the disgraced supervisor's behavior 'erodes the already precarious level of trust our community has in the government,' said Mai Nguyen Do, the research and policy manager for the Harbor Institute for Immigrant and Economic Justice, a community group. 'After he's released, it wouldn't surprise me if he goes about his life, and meanwhile so many working-class people in the community don't have the resources to pick themselves up again after they're incarcerated,' said Do, who has no relation to the former supervisor. Jodi Balma, a professor of political science at Fullerton College who has followed the Do scandal, wondered how the bribery scheme somehow passed through the checkpoints of the county bureaucracy. 'There are really good and smart though somewhat annoying procedures in place to verify all contracts with the county,' Balma said. 'Somebody had to say, 'Approve that payment' without any receipts or verification or services. And those people have not been held responsible.' Balma also wondered whether it was fair that Rhiannon Do was allowed to enter a diversion program. 'If there is no punishment for his daughter, that feels unfair to all the other law students who might not be accepted to the California Bar Association because of misconduct,' Balma said. 'This is huge misconduct for someone who wants to be a lawyer.' Andrew Do's defense attorneys asked that he be sentenced to 33 months in prison. In a court filing, they said he had been volunteering at a maritime institute that teaches sailing to underprivileged teens, adding that the head of the program had praised Do's 'unwavering ethical compass.' The defense attorneys said that Do had expressed 'shame' and 'deep sorrow' for his crimes, that his license to practice law had been suspended and that his life has been 'destroyed by his own acts.' Do had 'received no actual payment to himself—all significant funds were provided to his daughter Rhiannon Do,' the defense wrote in a court motion, claiming he had been 'willfully blinded to the violations by the desire to see benefit to his adult daughter.… He now recognizes how completely wrong he was in this catastrophic self-delusion.' The plea deal called for restitution between $550,000 and $730,500, with the sale of the family's forfeited house in Tustin credited against that figure. 'This episode of poor judgment stands out as unique in his otherwise commendable life,' the defense wrote. 'He had a catastrophic lapse of judgment when he failed to stop payments to his daughters, and because VAS was helping his family, he failed to see the red flags of these illegal acts.' Pleading for leniency, defense attorneys invoked Do's backstory as a man who rose to public service after a childhood in war-ravaged Vietnam. But prosecutors said his background only amplified his guilt, considering many of the constituents he victimized had similarly difficult pasts, and he was aware of their vulnerability. Do 'made the decision to abandon the elderly, sick, and impoverished during a national emergency so that he could personally benefit,' prosecutors wrote. 'When the County and nation were at their most vulnerable, defendant saw an opportunity to exploit the chaos for his own benefit and, in so doing, betrayed the trust of hundreds of thousands of his constituents,' prosecutors wrote. 'The scheme was far-reaching and premeditated, and defendant had no qualms about pulling others into his criminal enterprise, including his own children.' Do's crimes, the prosecutors wrote, were 'an assault on the very legitimacy of government.' Calling his conduct 'despicable' and his attempt to minimize his crimes 'absurd,' prosecutors said that of the more than $10 million he steered to the Viet America Society , much of it supposedly for meal programs for the elderly and disabled, only $1.4 million went to that purpose. Do's willingness to involve his family in his scheme pointed to his 'moral indifference,' prosecutors said, while his campaign of invective against the press aggravated his culpability. In connection with the Do case, the U.S. Attorneys office announced charges last week of bribery against the founder of the Viet America Society, and for wire fraud against a man affiliated with another Orange County relief group. The judge ordered that Do surrender himself to federal custody by Aug. 15 and recommended he be incarcerated in the federal prison in Lompoc. Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Baltimore's top prosecutor seeks funding for division he says helped lower city's crime rates
BALTIMORE — Baltimore City State's Attorney Ivan Bates is asking the city to fund its division that reviews body camera footage, which he says has played a key role in helping drive down the city's crime rates. 'There's no more important division to the success of our office than the body-worn camera (division),' he said Wednesday at a city council budget hearing. The money for reviewing body camera footage previously came through federal COVID-19 grant funding, which is expiring at the end of this month. Bates has requested continued funding from both city and state leaders at a time when both are grappling with budget deficits. The two-year, $1.7 million grant was allocated by the Governor's Office of Crime Prevention and Policy, using funds from the federal American Rescue Plan Act. The money allowed the state's attorney's office to hire 10 people for the division. This year, Bates is asking the city to provide another $864,000, enabling his office to hire 10 permanent full-time paralegals for its body camera unit. Bates said prior to receiving the grant, prosecutors were leaving the state's attorney's office because they didn't have enough time to review video footage as part of preparing their cases. Even if the key footage for a case lasts only five minutes, the total video that needs to be reviewed could be hours long, Bates said. With the grant, other staff can take the time to help review the footage. 'Now instead of that prosecutor spending those five hours on reviewing body camera footage, they now can spend those five hours preparing that case and other cases,' Bates said. He added that this was the 'secret sauce' his office needed in order to increase criminal convictions over the past two years. If no money is provided to replace the grant, Bates said his office will have to make budget cuts related to its work with partner agencies and organizations. The body camera division has reviewed 1,916 cases comprising 22,065 videos containing 14,621 hours of footage, Bates said. 'Ensuring accountability and transparency in law enforcement is crucial to fostering trust between the police and communities they serve,' Bates told council members during the hearing. The state's attorney's office has one Evidence Review Unit staff member for every 140 police officers in Baltimore City. The ratio in surrounding jurisdictions is smaller: 1 to 51 in Howard County, 1 to 69 in Anne Arundel County and 1 to 112 in Baltimore County. Bates said the industry standard is a ratio of 1 to 110. 'We're doing more with less compared to these other jurisdictions, but we still have so much more we need to do,' Bates said. Bates said the office's workload has increased because of an increased number of police arrests, including 'double' the number of cases in its misdemeanor jury trial division compared with last year. Councilmember Paris Gray asked Bates whether he had asked the governor or anyone else at the state level for the evidence review unit funding, noting the 'tremendous deficit' the city and state are both facing. Bates said his office reached out to the Governor's Office of Crime Prevention and Policy and that they will 'continue to talk to Governor Moore and his team.' 'That was one-time ARPA money, and so we'd have to try to find out a special way to try to do that,' Bates said. 'We're trying to find the money however we can.' Gray suggested Bates and Mayor Brandon Scott ask the governor to provide the funds if it's not fiscally possible for the city. The governor's and mayor's offices didn't respond to separate requests for comment about whether the state or city would provide the requested funding. Council President Zeke Cohen said in a statement to The Baltimore Sun that he supports the state's attorney's request for additional personnel to review footage from body cameras. 'This is a powerful tool for ensuring investigations can proceed in a timely manner to deliver justice for the victims of crimes and their families,' he said. Gray said Bates's office is operating with a $2 million surplus this year and asked for an explanation about his request for additional funding. Bates said that the office spent almost $900,000 of its rainy day funds to defend against a cyberattack and install a new firewall, and that the office needs money set aside to reconfigure employee raises. He added that the surplus resulted from the departure of a number of prosecutors with six-figure salaries. 'I'm a real big believer — if we're going to be stewards of the public's money — I do everything I can, and we try to do everything we can, not to ever have a deficit. Because you never know when a rainy day's going to happen,' Bates said. _____
Los Angeles Times
an hour ago
- Los Angeles Times
Ex-O.C. Supervisor Andrew Do gets 5 years prison in bribery case
Former Orange County Supervisor Andrew Do, who resigned as part of a plea deal stemming from a bribery scheme involving disbursement of COVID-19 relief funds, was sentenced Monday to five years in federal prison. Attorneys for Do, 62, were asking that he serve just shy of three years in federal prison. Five years was the maximum sentence available under the plea agreement. Prosecutors pushed for the maximum sentence. From 2020 through 2024, Do 'used his position as the supervisor for Orange County's First District to steer millions of dollars to his personal associates in exchange for hundreds of thousands of dollars in bribes,' prosecutors said in their sentencing brief. 'When the county and the nation were at their most vulnerable (during the COVID-19 pandemic), defendant saw an opportunity to exploit the chaos for his own benefit and, in so doing, betrayed the trust of hundreds of thousands of his constituents,' prosecutors said. 'The scheme was far-reaching and premeditated, and defendant had no qualms about pulling others into his criminal enterprise, including his own children.' Prosecutors argued that 'public corruption is a unique form of democratic sabotage,' and added, 'It can be more corrosive than overt violence in destabilizing democratic norms, because it operates subtly, behind closed doors, infecting institutions that are meant to embody impartiality.' The prosecutors argued Do earned harsher punishment for his corruption. Prosecutors wrote that U.S. District Judge James Selna 'should treat defendant's crimes not merely a theft or fraud by a public official, but as an assault on the very legitimacy of government,' prosecutors said. Do admitted in his plea agreement that in exchange for more than $550,000 in bribes, he cast votes on the Board of Supervisors beginning in 2020 that directed more than $10 million in COVID relief funds to the Viet America Society, where his daughter Rhiannon worked, according to the U.S. Attorney's Office. When Do pleaded guilty in October, Selna told him he could face a stiffer sentence, but then it could be appealed. But Do waived all of his appeals and cannot withdraw the plea if the sentence does not exceed the five years. From 2021 to 2023, Do funneled more than $10 million in county contracts to VAS, prosecutors said. The money was part of a food-delivery program during the pandemic as well as a $1 million grant for a Vietnam War Memorial in Mile Square Park in Fountain Valley, prosecutors said. Rhiannon worked for VAS and will be able to take advantage of a diversion program as part of her father's plea deal. Rhiannon Do was paid $8,000 monthly between September 2021 and February 2024, for a total of $224,000, prosecutors said. In July 2023, $381,500 from VAS was put in escrow so Rhiannon Do could buy a $1.035 million house in Tustin, prosecutors said. Do's other daughter received $100,000 in October 2022, prosecutors said. Do used $14,849 of the money to pay property tax for two properties in Orange County that he owned with his wife, Orange County Superior Court Judge Cheri Pham, prosecutors said. Do used another $15,000 to pay off credit card debt, prosecutors said. Do's 'bribery scheme with VAS was not only corrupt, it also turned out to be a fraud on the county as VAS was not providing the meals to elderly and disabled residents as it had promised,' prosecutors said. VAS 'only spent about 15% ($1.4 million) on providing meals,' they added. Prosecutors slammed Do for making online videos praising VAS and its owner as a 'selfless community hero.' Meanwhile, later Monday, a new co-defendant in the case — 61-year-old Thanh Huong Nguyen of Santa Ana — is expected to make his initial appearance in federal court on charges of conspiracy to commit wire fraud, wire fraud and concealment of money laundering. Nguyen was named in an indictment Wednesday that was unsealed Friday. Nguyen operated the Hand to Hand Relief Organization. Do's friend and associate Peter Anh Pham, 65, of Garden Grove, who ran VAS, was also indicted on single counts each of conspiracy to commit wire fraud, conspiracy to commit honest services wire fraud bribery and six counts each of wire fraud and concealment of money laundering. But Pham's whereabouts are unknown and federal prosecutors say he is considered a fugitive. Probation officials recommended 48 months in prison for Do, but prosecutors said Do should get the five years because he 'literally sold out his most defenseless constituents for his own personal gain during a global medical emergency when they needed him for their very survival.' Prosecutors also faulted Do for choosing 'to involve his family in his crime, broadening the conspiracy and exposing them to prosecution. This was not only deceptive, it was strategic. It was not a spur-of-the-moment lapse of judgment, but a sustained effort to evade scrutiny through manipulation of personal relationships and familial trust.' Do's other daughter lost her job and Rhiannon Do 'faces consequences to her potential career as an attorney,' prosecutors said. Prosecutors also knocked Do for settling a Fair Political Practices Commission Complaint in 2017 for helping a political donor in pursuit of a government contract. Do's attorneys argued that he 'received no actual payment to himself — all significant funds were provided to his daughter Rhiannon Do,' and that he was 'willfully blinded to the violations by the desire to see benefit to his adult daughter, and his belief that his daughter was providing worthwhile services to those who provided the benefits to her.' Do, however, 'now recognizes how completely wrong he was in this catastrophic self-delusion,' his attorneys said. 'He has watched the complete destruction of his career, reputation, his life and that of his family,' his attorneys said. 'He apologized to his family, his community and former colleagues and to this court. In short, Andrew Do's life has been destroyed by his own acts.' He agreed to resign his post as supervisor, had his state bar license suspended, stopped working and volunteers his time to benefit the community, his attorneys said. Do also agrees that restitution should be between $550,000 and $730,500 and that the sale of the home in Tustin will go toward that, his attorneys said. Do's attorneys highlighted his service as a public defender and prosecutor as well as an elected official. His 'implicit agreement' to 'reward' Do for the contracts for VAS was not a 'quid-pro-quo' conspiracy, his attorneys argued. The corruption was limited to the dealings with VAS, his lawyers emphasized. 'All of this is important because it underscores that what we are dealing with here is a blind spot involving his daughters, and no way a pattern of corruption,' his attorneys said. Do's attorneys also recounted his history growing up and ultimately escaping war-torn Vietnam. Do said in a letter to Selna that he was born in Saigon during the Vietnam War and arrived in the United States when he was 12 years old and settled into a refugee camp in Alabama where his parents worked in a cotton mill. He said he and his siblings worked odd jobs in the neighborhood and 'learned to cope with the anti-immigrant and racist atmosphere that some, but not all, in the community expressed.'' His family moved to Garden Grove in 1976, where '11 of us shared a two-bedroom apartment,' he wrote. Do wrote in his letter, 'I am guilty. I am ashamed, and I fully admit the wrongs that I have done. I only ask that you look at the larger picture in evaluating my acts.' He added, 'In retrospect, I can't believe that I did not see the evil of allowing this nonprofit (whose money came from the county) to assist my daughter in purchasing a home. I was blinded by a father's seeing his daughter as being worth every penny of what they paid her. 'My daughter did, indeed, work hard for the nonprofit, and I am proud of the work she did. However, it is clear that I simply did not want to see the payments for what they were (a bribe) and now my bad judgment has derailed all that I had sought to achieve before I left public office.'
