GOP Senator Ignores Insane Town Hall Gaffe — And Social Media Goes Off
Sen. Joni Ernst (R-Iowa) made an unforced political error during a town hall Friday morning when she reminded constituents worried about Medicaid cuts that 'we are all going to die.'
But when she tried to put a positive spin on the event after it concluded, social media wouldn't let her ignore her controversial comments.
During the meeting in Parkersburg, Iowa, Ernst faced questions from voters concerned about proposed cuts to Medicaid and food stamp benefits.
'We are going to focus on those that are most vulnerable,' Ernst tried to assure the crowd, ABC Iowa City affiliate KCRG TV reported. 'We will protect them. OK? Medicaid is extremely important here in the state of Iowa. ... Leave those dollars for those that are eligible for Medicaid.'
Ernst then claimed the efforts to roll back Medicaid benefits would only affect people who aren't eligible for them, which led one woman in the crowd to yell, 'People will die.'
The senator had a callous response.
'People are not ― well, we all are going to die. So, for heaven's sakes, folks,' she said while the audience jeered.
Yes, there's video. Thank you for asking.
Indeed, all living forms on this planet will eventually cease to exist, but bringing up this truth sarcastically during a town hall meeting of concerned voters was probably not the wisest move.
Still, Ernst posted a 'rah rah' message about the town hall afterward, thanking constituents for listening to her 'sharing my work to cut government red tape for you.'
Thanks folks for coming out to my town hall in Parkersburg today!I always enjoy hearing from constituents and sharing my work to cut government red tape for you. pic.twitter.com/Roy06rQVvL
— Joni Ernst (@SenJoniErnst) May 30, 2025
Many people on X didn't appreciate Ernst's attempt to sweep her deadly serious comment under the rug ― and, much like the crowd in Iowa, they went off.
Ah yes, the red tape keeping people alive. Snip snip, huh?
— Giselle💃🍀🍻💃🥂🇺🇸 (@kgiselle653) May 30, 2025
Joni Ernst just had The Grim Reaper Town Hall
— Bill Johnson (@Bill43111) May 30, 2025
"Well, we all are going to die."What are things a sociopath would say for $400?
— Trixie- I ☕ ✏️📝 teach! (@MsTrixieRVA) May 30, 2025
You mean you can't wait for all of your constituents to die, MAGA Death Merchant Why have you chosen loyalty to convicted felon adjudicated rapist Epstein Bestie Donald Trump over our country? Resign immediately, because you serve Trump, not the people who elected you pic.twitter.com/gFc0vJM3o0
— Tara Dublin, Rock Star Author & Podcast Host (@taradublinrocks) May 30, 2025
You are a horrible person. History is watching.
— Jeremy London (@SirJeremyLondon) May 30, 2025
'We all die.' Please, Senator, you were elected to lead by example and represent your constituency. We'd love to see you enact policy for a change
— Greg J Stoker (@gregjstoker) May 30, 2025
So you really told your constituents that it's OK that you cut their benefits because we're all gonna die? Thank you for finally being honest about the GOP 🙏
— Vanman 🏴☠️ (@1crazyvanlife) May 30, 2025
pic.twitter.com/GzfZ71VIPU
— Journalistic Facts (@JournalistFact1) May 30, 2025
HuffPost reached out to Ernst's office for comment on the reaction to her quote.
And a spokesperson responded... with a statement that actually doubled down on the inevitability of death.
'While Democrats fearmonger against strengthening the integrity of Medicaid, Senator Ernst is focused on improving the lives of all Iowans. There's only two certainties in life: death and taxes, and she's working to ease the burden of both by fighting to keep more of Iowans' hard-earned tax dollars in their own pockets and ensuring their benefits are protected from waste, fraud, and abuse.'
GOP Senator Pooh-Poohs Fears On Medicaid Cuts: 'Well, We All Are Going To Die'
Wage Theft Is A Huge Problem. Trump Is Going To Make It Worse.
GOP Senator Blocks Bill That Would Codify Right To Birth Control
'Daily Show' Montage Mocks GOP Sen. Joni Ernst As 'Queen Of Prop Comedy'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
4 in 10 Republicans worried Medicaid cuts would hurt their communities: poll
At least 4 in 10 Republicans are worried about the consequences of Medicaid cuts on their families and communities, according to a new survey. The KFF poll, released Friday, found a partisan divide in the level of concern. Still, about 40 percent of Republicans said they were concerned Medicaid cuts would lead to more adults and children becoming uninsured and negatively impact hospitals, nursing homes and other health care providers in their communities. The findings also show how politically fraught Medicaid is and the dangers for Republicans who are seeking to cut billions of dollars from the program to pay for President Trump's domestic policy agenda. The House-passed legislation would cut nearly $800 billion from Medicaid, primarily by requiring childless adults up to age 64 to prove they are working, going to school or volunteering for 80 hours a month. It also puts a freeze on provider taxes, a practice used by many states to get increased federal reimbursement that often goes towards paying for Medicaid. The politics of the health insurance program for low-income Americans are changing, and Republicans now risk alienating their own voters. Lower-income, working-class people who rely on Medicaid are now a major part of the GOP base, which has become more populist since the emergence of Trump. While most Medicaid beneficiaries under age 65 are either Democrats or independent, 27 percent said they are Republicans or lean Republican, including 19 percent who identify as Trump's MAGA supporters, according to KFF. Among those GOP Medicaid recipients, the poll found three-quarters are worried that sweeping changes to the program would hurt their family's ability to get and pay for care, and nearly 70 percent are concerned the cuts would lead to an increase in the uninsured and negatively impact providers. Overall, Democrats and independents said they were much more likely than Republicans to worry about potential negative consequences of Medicaid cuts. But nearly a third of Republicans and 26 percent of MAGA supporters who aren't on Medicaid said they were concerned about their or their families' own access to health care, the survey found. Medicaid is also key to keeping many rural providers from closing. In Missouri for instance, which was the most recent state to expand the health program, industry experts said about 10 rural hospitals closed in the years leading up to the expansion vote. Ever since, there haven't been any closures. Overall, about seven in ten rural residents said they were worried Medicaid cuts would lead to more adults and children becoming uninsured, or that it would negatively impact health care providers in their communities, according to the poll. Nearly half of rural Republican respondents said they were worried about providers, while 37 percent of rural Republicans said they were worried Medicaid cuts could affect their access to care. According to the Congressional Budget Office, 7.8 million people could lose Medicaid coverage and become uninsured over the next decade. The survey was conducted May 5-26 among 2,539 U.S. adults. The margin of error was plus or minus 3 percentage points. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
It's not just Medicaid: GOP eyes possible Medicare cuts in megabill
About a month into his second term as president, Donald Trump told Fox News interviews they shouldn't worry about Republican plans for the nation's largest health care programs. 'Medicare, Medicaid, none of that stuff is going to be touched,' Trump said. As the GOP's domestic policy megabill — the inaptly named 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' — took shape, the president's promise related to Medicaid quickly evaporated. In fact, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, the Republicans' reconciliation package would cut Medicaid by hundreds of billions of dollars in the coming years. But as the party tries to advance the legislation in the Senate and GOP leaders scramble to make their arithmetic work, the other part of Trump's promise from February is suddenly in doubt, too. NBC News reported: Looking at new ways to pay for their sprawling bill for President Donald Trump's domestic agenda, Republicans are exploring ideas to slash 'waste, fraud and abuse' in Medicare, several senators said Thursday. And President Donald Trump has blessed the pursuit, they said. Senate Majority Leader John Thune didn't come right out and endorse Medicare cuts, but when asked whether his party would look for savings in the popular health care program, the South Dakota Republican told reporters, 'I think anything that can be — that's waste, fraud and abuse are open to, obviously, discussions.' At this point, some readers are probably thinking that topic this sounds vaguely familiar. After all, didn't The Washington Post already report recently on the GOP megabill and possible Medicare cuts? The answer is yes, but the details matter. The Post highlighted the fact that the Republicans' legislation would add so many trillions of dollars to the national debt that it might automatically trigger 'sequestration' changes that would force massive Medicare cuts. But there are budgetary tactics that Congress could, and likely would, take to prevent that from happening, which helps to explain why the Post's reporting from mid-May didn't have a greater political impact. This week's developments are qualitatively different: We're not just talking about the possibility of Medicare cuts being triggered by automatic budget constraints; rather, Republican senators are making a deliberate choice to look for Medicare savings as a way to pay for the massive tax breaks the party is eager to deliver to the wealthy. Time will tell what, if anything, comes of this, but Republican Sen. Roger Marshall of Kansas told the Post that the discussions among GOP members of the Senate Finance Committee have focused on Medicare Advantage, a program through which the federal government pays private insurers to enroll Medicare beneficiaries. The far-right Republican plan was already shaping up to be a political albatross for its proponents. Putting Medicare funding on the table probably won't help matters. This article was originally published on
USA Today
24 minutes ago
- USA Today
Big Beautiful Bill fight deepens: Trump threatens Musk over federal contracts, subsidies
Big Beautiful Bill fight deepens: Trump threatens Musk over federal contracts, subsidies Why is Elon Musk trashing the legislation demanded by President Donald Trump and ushered to a razor-thin approval margin in the U.S. House by Speaker Mike Johnson? Show Caption Hide Caption President Trump gives Musk a lift to Palm Beach aboard Air Force One President Donald Trump makes his ninth trip to his Winter White House at Mar-a-Lago in Palm Beach since taking office Elon Musk criticizes the "Big Beautiful Bill" supported by President Trump, calling it a "disgusting abomination." Musk, who previously supported Trump and led the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), now opposes the bill due to its potential impact on the national debt. The bill aims to extend the 2017 tax cuts and address border security, but critics argue it would negatively affect Medicaid. (This story has been updated include new information.) The acrimonious social-media salvos over the Big Beautiful Bill arguably mark the most stunning turnabout within the realm of MAGA. The world's richest man, Elon Musk, is currently trashing the legislation demanded by President Donald Trump and ushered to a razor-thin approval margin in the U.S. House by Speaker Mike Johnson. It would extend the 2017 tax cuts, a signature achievement of Trump's first term, and address border security, while Democratic critics say it would gut Medicaid. Musk posted on X that the legislation is "massive, outrageous, pork-filled" and declared it a "disgusting abomination." Trump has dismissed what he said are "false statements are being made about 'THE ONE, BIG, BEAUTIFUL BILL'' and has defended the measure as a "waste, fraud and abuse" slashing measure. On June 5, Trump said he was "very disappointed" by the opposition from Musk. "Elon and I had a great relationship," Trump said in answer to a reporter's question in the White House. "I don't know if we will anymore." Musk-Trump feud then turns bitter on social media The president continued on social media saying Musk was "wearing thin" and "I asked him to leave." He said Musk "just went CRAZY" when the administration "took away" the electric vehicle mandate. Late in the day, the White House insisted the bill required $1.7 trillion in savings despite the Congressional Budget Office calculations the bill would add $2.8 trillion in debt over the next decade. Trump then added in a Truth Social post that the"easiest way" to save taxpayer money would be to "terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts." He later wrote that, "I don't mind Elon turning against me, but he should have done so months ago." Musk fired back on X, saying Trump's assertions were "such an obvious lie. So sad." He also wrote that without his assistance Trump would have lost to Kamala Harris in the November election and the Democrats would control the U.S. Senate. Then he delivered a nasty blow. "Time to drop the really big bomb: @realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!" he posted on X. The reference is to the sex-abuse scandal involving the late Palm Beach financier Jeffrey Epstein. Trump knew Epstein but there has not been evidence or documents that tie Trump to Epstein's abuses. He followed that with a prediction that the "Trump tariffs will cause a recession in the second half of this year." He agreed with another X user who called for Trump to be impeached and replaced by Vice President JD Vance. The Musk-Trump public rift is remarkable considering it is over legislation that is both the administration's signature measure on Capitol Hill and the issue that was central to the Tesla and Space X chief's support for Trump in the 2024 campaign. Here are five things to know. Musk helped make cutting spending a central Trump campaign theme In an August conversation between Musk and Trump on X, the billionaire floated the idea of establishing a panel to look at reducing public-sector spending. Musk called for a commission to review federal budget expenditures as the two discussed the reason for inflation. Trump repeated his call to expand drilling to bring down consumer product costs, but the billionaire host insisted price increases resulted from government spending hikes by the Biden administration. "Sure, but back to this basic thing that people try to make complicated but it's not. Inflation is caused by government overspending. Would you agree that we need to look at government spending and have a government efficiency commission that tries to make the spending sensible so the country lives within its means?" Musk said. Soon after, Musk began appearing at Trump campaign rallies — and brazenly promised to cut $2 trillion from the $6 trillion-plus annual federal budget. He invested, reportedly, nearly $300 million to assist Trump in beating Harris. On Election Night, Musk was at Trump's watch party at Mar-a-Lago and then ventured with him as part of the entourage to a victory celebration at the Palm Beach County Convention Center in West Palm Beach. Trump won the election, and DOGE was born About a week after Trump won the Nov. 5 election, the transition team sent out a news release saying Musk and tech entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswamy would co-lead the Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE. Trump said DOGE would procure deep reductions in government spending and wrap up its work by July 4, 2026, America's 250th birthday. But by the time DOGE got to work, Ramaswamy was out — and off to campaign for the GOP gubernatorial nomination next year in Ohio. Musk and DOGE then set off to work at a much faster pace, sometimes frenetic if not manic. Pressed by DOGE, for example, some 177 employees at the National Nuclear Security Administration, which maintains the U.S. military's nuclear weapons arsenal, were reportedly fired in February and then the bulk of those were rehired following an uproar. Moreover, all federal workers were summarily ordered to send a weekly email outlining their activities or be summarily fired. In an Oval Office appearance, Musk admitted DOGE might "make mistakes" and "won't be perfect" but would fix errors "very quickly." All in all, estimates are that as many as 260,000 federal employees were ousted from jobs and savings under $200 billion were achieved. Those would be listed as significant achievements in any other administration, but juxtaposed against the hype and bombast of the Trump White House, they were viewed with disappointment by some and even the president reportedly asked if DOGE's accomplishments were "bull****." What was DOGE's impact on Florida? There's not a full accounting yet of how much the Musk-led DOGE budget-cutting slashed from Florida. Or how it will affect communities across the state. But anecdotes abound. The Miami office of the National Weather Service, critical to hurricane forecasting, has a vacancy rate of 38%, the highest of the five forecasting offices in Florida, according to the NWS Employees Organization. The NWS says it is hiring for 126 critical positions nationwide, but it is not clear how much DOGE's efforts contributed to the openings. In Palm Beach County, the Arthur R. Marshall Loxahatchee National Wildlife Refuge saw three employees fired in February, while three positions at Biscayne National Park, one at Big Cypress National Park and 12 at Everglades National Park were lost, according to the Association of National Park Rangers at the time. An oncologist-hematologist said her job offer from the West Palm Beach VA was rescinded on Jan. 21, a day after Trump took office. Federal workers, by the way, continue sending their weekly emails to DOGE documenting what they completed at work. Most recently, Florida State University lost $53 million worth of funding to DOGE's chain-sawing. Musk became a reviled political figure After Trump's victory, Musk became a frequent sight here in Palm Beach County. He was a ubiquitous presence at Mar-a-Lago during the transition period, and there were reports Musk was scouting for a residence in the area. The DOGE chief was frequently seen deplaning with Trump on Air Force One at Palm Beach International Airport during several of the president's 10 trips to the Winter White House through early May. Along the way, Musk became one of the most unpopular and reviled political figures in America. Shares in Tesla tanked and polls showed him with high unpopularity ratings. Protests sprung up at Tesla showrooms, including one near West Palm Beach where a demonstration almost ended in tragedy when a car sought to ram protesters, according to eyewitnesses and a police report. Musk also engaged in a tense confrontation with Secretary of State Marco Rubio over federal employee dismissals during a White House meeting in March. Trump hosted Musk and the former Florida U.S. senator at a dinner at Mar-a-Lago a few days later. Trump ally Steve Bannon reported in his podcast that Musk and Treasury chief Scott Bessent were involved in an altercation at the White House in April. That physical confrontation was over the state of budget-cutting, Bannon stated. Almost symbolically, Musk sported a black eye when he appeared at White House last month as his tour of duty with DOGE was concluding. Why does Musk oppose the Big Beautifil Bill? Musk's preoccupation with the landmark legislation, now before the U.S. Senate, deals with the $2.1 trillion that estimates say it will add to the U.S. national debt — more than 10 times the stated DOGE savings. Musk has referred to the measure as the "Debt Slavery Bill." He has urged his 220 million followers on X to call their senators and congressmen to warn them that "Bankrupting America is NOT ok!" and calling on them to "KILL the BILL." He even derided the name of the legislation, which stems from Trump's call on social media and in speeches for one "big, beautiful bill" that encompassed a wish list of measures on a range of policy issues. 'I think a bill can be big or it could be beautiful," Musk has said. "I don't know if it could be both.' Trump disagrees. On June 2, he wrote on Truth Social a statement that attacked Democrats, but did not mention Musk by name. He wrote: "So many false statements are being made about 'THE ONE, BIG, BEAUTIFUL BILL,' but what nobody understands is that it's the single biggest Spending Cut in History, by far! But there will be NO CUTS to Social Security, Medicare, or Medicaid. In fact, they will be saved from the incompetence of the Democrats." Democrats have said the legislation will reduce assistance to vulnerable Americans.. 'The Republican budget is a dangerous roadmap — laying the groundwork for the largest cuts to Medicaid and food assistance in U.S. history, all to fund massive tax breaks for billionaires and big corporations,' said U.S. Rep. Lois Frankel, D-West Palm Beach, after the measure passed in April. 'That means millions of Americans will lose their health care and struggle to put food on the table. A responsible budget should lower costs for hardworking families. That's what I'm fighting for.' It's hard to tell right now. but we can pretty much bet the Musk-Trump era will be the focus of both news and the history of Shakespearean drama. Reporting by Palm Beach Post reporter Kimberly Miller was used in this report. Antonio Fins is a politics and business editor at The Palm Beach Post, part of the USA TODAY Florida Network. You can reach him at afins@ Help support our journalism. Subscribe today.
