Trump's TACO codename will make him so mad he'll enforce tariffs just to make a point: expert
The TACO codename used by Wall Street traders to describe President Donald Trump is more likely to make him stick with his international tariffs 'just to prove a point.'
The nickname— short for 'Trump Always Chickens OUT' — came about because of the president's habit of making tariff threats, resulting in a drop in the markets, only for him to walk the threat back and see the markets rebound.
'We think that, unfortunately, as the so-called TACO trade becomes more viral, it becomes more likely that Trump will stick to higher tariffs just to prove a point,' Joachim Klement of investment bank Panmure Liberum told Reuters.
The acronym was coined by Financial Times columnist Robert Armstrong writing about Trump's so-called 'Liberation Day' in April, which caused the markets to hit historic lows before he ordered a 90-day pause one week later. It led to record highs.
'The US administration does not have a very high tolerance for market and economic pressure, and will be quick to back off when tariffs cause pain,' Armstrong said. 'This is the TACO theory: Trump Always Chickens Out.'
It did not go down well with Trump, who responded with fury when asked about the acronym last week. 'That's a nasty question,' he said. 'To me, that's the nastiest question.'
'You call that chickening out? It's called negotiation,' Trump said, visibly irked.
Since the nickname took off online, people shared AI-generated memes of the president in a chicken suit.
The president was caught off guard and was unaware of the term, according to CNN. 'He thought the reporter was calling him a chicken,' a White House official told the outlet. Trump was reportedly irritated that his team did not tell him about the phrase as it gained traction in financial circles and the media.
'It clearly bothered him, primarily because it demonstrated a lack of understanding about how he actually utilizes those threats for leverage,' a person familiar with the matter told CNN. 'But obviously he's not a guy who looks kindly on weakness, so the idea anyone would think that with respect to his actions isn't received well.'
The frustration follows the Court of International Trade's ruling that the Trump administration must dismantle the 'reciprocal' tariff policy. The federal court ruled he lacked the authority to create it, which the White House immediately appealed.
The administration won a reprieve, which means the tariffs will be reinstated while the case makes its way through the courts, but uncertainty looms over the economy.
Errore nel recupero dei dati
Effettua l'accesso per consultare il tuo portafoglio
Errore nel recupero dei dati
Errore nel recupero dei dati
Errore nel recupero dei dati
Errore nel recupero dei dati
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Musk calls Trump's tax bill a 'disgusting abomination'
Elon Musk has hit out at President Donald Trump's signature tax and spending bill, describing it as a "disgusting abomination", in a widening rift between the two. The tech billionaire posted on X that the bill would add to the US budget deficit and saddle Americans with "crushing" debt. The budget, which includes huge tax breaks and more defence spending, was passed by the House of Representatives last month and is now being considered by senators. "Shame on those who voted for it," said Musk, hinting that he may try to unseat the politicians responsible at next year's midterm elections. The bill has the backing of President Donald Trump and would be the legislative linchpin of his second-term agenda if it passes Congress. Musk left the administration abruptly last week after 129 days working to cut costs with his team, known as Doge. The comments mark his first public disagreement with Trump since leaving government, after having previously called the plan "disappointing". The South African-born tech billionaire's time in the Trump administration came to an end on 31 May, although Trump said that "he will, always, be with us, helping all the way". In its current form, the bill - which Trump refers to as the "big beautiful bill" - has been estimated to increase the budget deficit - the difference between what the government spends and the revenue it receives - by about $600bn (£444bn) in the next fiscal year. It's Musk's last day - what has he achieved at the White House? In a series of posts on X on Tuesday, Musk said that the "outrageous, pork-filled" spending bill will "massively increase the already gigantic budget deficit to $2.5 trillion (!!!) and burden America [sic] citizens with crushingly unsustainable debt". In American politics "pork" refers to spending on projects in lawmakers' constituencies. Musk has previously vowed to fund campaign challenges against any Republican that votes against Trump's agenda. But on Tuesday he fired a warning to those who backed the bill. "In November next year, we fire all politicians who betrayed the American people," he wrote. Asked about Musk's comments soon after the first post, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said "the President already knows where Elon Musk stood on this bill". "This is one, big, beautiful bill," she added. "And he's sticking to it." The legislation also pledges to extend soon-to-expire tax cuts passed during the first Trump administration in 2017, as well as an influx of funds for defence spending and to fund the administration's mass deportations of undocumented immigrants. To the dismay of fiscal conservatives, it would lift the limit on the amount of money the government can borrow, known as the debt ceiling, to $4tn. The comments from Musk reflect wider tensions among Republicans over the plan, which faced stiff opposition from different wings of the party as it worked its way through the House. The Senate has now taken it up, and divisions are already emerging in that chamber, which is also narrowly controlled by Republicans. Kentucky Senator Rand Paul has said over the last few days he will not support the bill if it raises the debt ceiling. "The GOP [the Republican Party] will own the debt once they vote for this," he told CBS News, the BBC's US partner, over the weekend. Trump responded to Paul with a series of social media posts, accusing him of having "very little understanding of the bill" and saying that the "people of Kentucky can't stand him". "His ideas are actually crazy," Trump wrote. Republican lawmakers pushed back on Musk's comments, with Senate majority leader John Thune telling reporters the party plans to "proceed full speed ahead" despite "a difference of opinion". "We have an agenda that everybody campaigned on, most notably the president," he said. Mike Johnson - the Republican Speaker who has ushered the legislation through the House - told reporters on Capitol Hill that "my friend Elon is terribly wrong". "It's a very important first start. Elon is missing it," Johnson said. Johnson said he had a 20-minute phone call with the tycoon about the bill on Monday, adding that its phasing out of electric vehicle tax credits could "have an effect" on Tesla, Musk's firm. "I lament that," Johnson said, expressing surprise that Musk criticised the bill despite their call. "I just deeply regret he's made this mistake.' Among the issues that upset Musk involved air traffic control at the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), according to Axios. Musk was hoping it would be run on his Starlink satellite system, but he was denied because of issues relating to the technology and the appearance of a conflict of interest, the political outlet reported. Some Democrats welcomed Musk's comments despite their previous criticism of him and the work of Doge. "Even Elon Musk, who's been part of the whole process, and is one of Trump's buddies, said the bill is bad," Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said. "We can imagine how bad this bill is." Trump and Republicans in Congress have set a deadline of 4 July to get the measure passed and signed into law. Musk supported Trump in last year's November election with donations of more than $250m. To make peace with spending hawks, Trump is also asking Congress to pass a plan that would reduce current spending by $9.4bn, a figure derived from Doge's work. It would mainly slash funding for foreign aid, the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and for broadcasters NPR and PBS. It's Musk's last day - what has he achieved at the White House? Elon Musk plans to cut back political spending Musk 'disappointed' by Trump's tax and spending bill Follow the twists and turns of Trump's second term with North America correspondent Anthony Zurcher's weekly US Politics Unspun newsletter. Readers in the UK can sign up here. Those outside the UK can sign up here.
Business Journals
8 minutes ago
- Business Journals
Impact on tariffs on the M&A market
As the second quarter of 2025 is nearing its end, it remains unclear when the Trump administration's trade and tariff policies will stabilize or when agreed upon trade deals will be reached with key nations. While many of the announced tariffs have now been paused or reduced from their levels initially set on 'Liberation Day,' allowing time for trade deals to be negotiated, this state of limbo has led to significant uncertainty as dealmakers attempt to navigate a challenging mergers and acquisitions (M&A) market. Tariffs have long been a tool used by governments to regulate trade and protect domestic economies and industries. Dealmakers and their advisors have always had to pay attention to trade laws in M&A transactions to ensure they are conducting appropriate diligence and taking trade matters into account in their valuation models. What is new, however, is the volatility of the constantly changing tariff landscape. This volatility is preventing dealmakers and M&A professionals from confidently projecting future earnings or creating long-term plans, which in turn makes it harder to value businesses. Additionally, in response to tariff uncertainty and its potential economic impact, the Federal Reserve has held interest rates steady instead of continuing planned rate reductions. U.S. M&A activity in the first quarter of 2025 as compared to the first quarter of 2024 has been significantly lower, both in terms of the number of deals that took place and the amount of capital being invested and when isolating Georgia M&A activity, the difference is even more drastic. While initial interest rate cuts in the late summer, coupled with expectations of a strong economy after the election resulted in optimism at the end of 2024 about an increase in M&A activity in 2025, this sluggish start suggests that the tariff landscape has made dealmakers more hesitant under current market conditions. There are deals still happening though, and for companies continuing to execute M&A strategies, the impact of tariff uncertainty has led to valuation adjustments, required buyers to reassess their strategic M&A initiatives and investment focus, and forced more flexibility on deal structure and risk shifting. 1. Valuation adjustments Buyers are taking tariffs into account for purposes of financial and valuation modeling, particularly in industries heavily reliant on international trade. Companies in industries with significant exposure to tariffs (such as automotive, construction and manufacturing, agriculture and port logistics) may see decreased profit margins and have increased uncertainty on how tariffs will impact their business, resulting in lower valuations that can stifle deal activity and cause buyers or sellers to cancel or delay a potential transaction. On the other hand, domestic companies in industries otherwise impacted by the looming tariffs may become attractive targets. 2. Reassess targets and investment focus In response to the new tariff policies, buyers are reassessing their acquisition targets to enhance their competitive positions. Targets with local manufacturing capabilities or alternative supply chains are becoming more attractive to domestic buyers as a way to reduce dependence on overseas supply chain, and similarly, to international buyers with a goal of mitigating tariff impacts. Investors have also shifted focus toward companies that are less vulnerable to tariff fluctuations so as to mitigate valuation fluctuations from dynamic changes in tariff rates. This can lead to increased M&A interest in sectors such as technology, services and food and beverage, where tariffs play a less significant role compared to traditional manufacturing industries. 3. Deal structure and risk shifting Tariffs have caused buyers to deviate from the traditional M&A structure. We have seen more of a focus on joint ventures, partial stake sales and other strategic alignments instead of the traditional stock or asset sale. To reduce tariff risk and bridge valuation gaps, buyers are becoming more creative by offering earnouts, equity and other contingent consideration conditioned on certain performance metrics. In terms of risk-shifting, buyers need to be prepared for increased trade diligence and exclusions to coverage in representation and warranty policies. Diligence efforts now include a closer eye toward trade, including navigating trade regulations, reviewing potential short-term and long-term tariff implications, and evaluating potential antidumping risks. With respect to representation and warranty insurance, buyers should expect insurers to exclude tariff exposure from coverage, which could lead to sellers having to absorb more post-closing risk if buyers insist on indemnification coverage from sellers to close the gap. In conclusion, during the first two quarters of 2025, we have seen how the uncertainty around tariffs is having profound implications on the M&A market, influencing company valuations, assessments of targets and investment focus, deal structure and risk shifting, and overall market dynamics. As businesses adapt to changing trade policies, understanding the tariff landscape and having M&A advisors who are familiar with these challenges is critical for companies focused on inorganic growth. Staying informed about the potential risks and opportunities associated with tariffs can help businesses make strategic decisions that bolster their competitive positioning in a global economy. To learn more about King & Spalding's global M&A practice, please visit With nearly 140 years of service, King & Spalding is an international law firm that represents a broad array of clients, including half of the Fortune Global 100, with 1,300 lawyers in 24 offices in the United States, Europe, the Middle East and Asia. Michelle Stewart represents public and private companies, including private equity firms and their portfolio companies, in M&A and other strategic corporate transactions, including acquisitions, divestitures, carveouts and minority investments. Stewart counsels clients in a variety of industries, including in the technology, financial services, industrial, health care, food and beverage, logistics and manufacturing sectors. Baylie Evans' practice focuses on mergers and acquisitions, joint ventures, strategic corporate transactions, and general corporate and governance matters. Evans works across a range of sectors, including consumer services, business services, health care, industrial, technology, hospitality, logistics and manufacturing sectors.
Wall Street Journal
11 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Podcast: U.S. Doubles Steel and Aluminum Tariffs to 50%
President Trump's tariffs on steel and aluminum imports jumped to 50% overnight. Industry players have warned the move could result in price increases and shortages. 🎧 Listen here to this What's News podcast, which also covers the Federal Reserve's move to lift the cap on Wells Fargo's assets.
