logo
Why Did Mahatma Gandhi Cut Off Ties With His Eldest Son Harilal?

Why Did Mahatma Gandhi Cut Off Ties With His Eldest Son Harilal?

News1829-05-2025

Last Updated:
Bright, articulate, and full of ambition, Harilal Gandhi dreamt of following in his father's footsteps by travelling to England to study law and becoming a barrister.
Few examples in history of a father-son fallout are as complex as the rift between Mahatma Gandhi and his eldest son, Harilal. What unfolded between the two was not merely a family disagreement but a profound ideological and emotional chasm.
Harilal Gandhi, born in 1888, was the eldest of Gandhi's four sons. Bright, articulate, and full of ambition, Harilal dreamt of following in his father's footsteps by travelling to England to study law and becoming a barrister. But his aspirations clashed sharply with his father's evolving philosophy.
By the early 20th century, Gandhi had begun to distance himself from Western values and formal education systems, increasingly advocating for indigenous practices, self-reliance, and spiritual discipline. For Gandhi, sending Harilal to study in England would be tantamount to endorsing the very colonial mindset he sought to free India from.
Harilal, however, saw this denial not as idealism but as personal betrayal. To him, it was an unjust suppression of his dreams. The father-son bond began to fray.
The first signs of rebellion were private disagreements, but soon, Harilal began publicly opposing his father's principles. He refused to participate in Gandhi's freedom movements and instead wrote critical essays in newspapers, accusing his father of hypocrisy, championing justice for a nation while allegedly denying it to his own kin.
Gandhi, in turn, became increasingly exasperated with his son's defiance. In The Story of My Experiments with Truth, Gandhi briefly touched on this emotional fracture.
Over the years, Harilal drifted further from his father's world. He descended into alcoholism, financial ruin, and scandal. He borrowed money in Gandhi's name from businessmen, social leaders, and even extended family, leaving behind a trail of embarrassment. At one point, Gandhi had to publicly declare that Harilal had no right to use his name for personal gain.
Then came the incident that stunned not only the Gandhi family but the nation at large. In 1936, Harilal converted to Islam and adopted the name 'Abdullah Gandhi'. The move, splashed across newspaper headlines, was widely interpreted as a symbolic rejection of his father's legacy. Though Harilal later reconverted to Hinduism, the damage was irreversible.
Ramachandra Guha, in his book Gandhi: The Years That Changed the World, writes that the Mahatma was devastated by the conversion, which he saw not merely as a spiritual decision but a final severance of familial ties. 'You are my biggest failure," Gandhi once wrote to Harilal, words heavy with sorrow and disillusionment.
Harilal later went on to marry Gulab Gandhi, a woman of quiet resilience who endured years of hardship, including his spiraling addictions and unstable behaviour. Despite her efforts, she succumbed to the plague in 1918. Harilal was left with five children, most of whom led lives marked by financial and emotional instability.
By the time of Gandhi's assassination in 1948, Harilal was a broken man, living in poverty and near-anonymity on the streets of Bombay. He died just months after his father, from complications related to his alcoholism and declining health. Few attended his funeral.
Today, the story of Harilal Gandhi stands as a somber testament to the emotional toll that ideals and expectations can exact within families.
First Published:

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Letters to The Editor — June 16, 2025
Letters to The Editor — June 16, 2025

The Hindu

time30 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

Letters to The Editor — June 16, 2025

Bharat Mata and protocol of dignity I write this letter as the Additional Private Secretary to the Governor of Kerala. The recent controversy surrounding the image of Bharat Mata at a World Environment Day function held at the Kerala Raj Bhavan reflects a troubling trend — the politicisation of cultural and national symbols. What should have been a dignified state event turned into a needless flashpoint when the Agriculture Department objected to the inclusion of a traditional lamp and an image of Bharat Mata in the programme. Although the objection to the lamp was later withdrawn, the image of Bharat Mata was rejected on the grounds that it was allegedly associated with a particular political organisation. Raj Bhavan, in a spirit of accommodation, even suggested an alternative image — Bharat Mata holding the national flag. Participation in the floral tribute was made voluntary. Yet, on the morning of the event, citing vague 'protocol', the government called it off altogether. This raises uncomfortable questions: when did a floral tribute to a national symbol become unconstitutional? Do symbols such as Bharat Mata — once celebrated by leaders such as Gandhi and Bose — now deserve suppression due to imagined partisan overtones? Governor Arlekar's response was measured and moving: for him, Bharat Mata is above all politics — a sacred symbol of India's unity, heritage, and spirit. That this image is now being rejected not out of reason, but political insecurity, signals a drift from our civilisational roots. The Governor's intent was not to politicize, but to uphold cultural dignity. Sadly, the State government's unwillingness to find common ground reflects a deeper reluctance to acknowledge the legitimacy of India's symbolic heritage. To question Bharat Mata's presence in a national event is not secularism — it is cultural denial. It is time we stop viewing every national symbol through the lens of partisanship. Let us reclaim the space where we can stand together — lighting a lamp, placing a flower, and saluting Bharat Mata — not as ideologues, but as Indians. P. Sreekumar, Thiruvananthapuram

India must stand with international law and UN charter: Ukraine Minister
India must stand with international law and UN charter: Ukraine Minister

The Hindu

time3 hours ago

  • The Hindu

India must stand with international law and UN charter: Ukraine Minister

Ukraine is ready for direct summit-level talks with Russia, said a senior Minister here, adding that the role of India and other countries should be to facilitate talks, rather than seek to mediate at this point. In an interview to The Hinduahead of the G-7 summit outreach sessions in Kananaskis, Canada, on June 17, where Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskyy are both special invitees, Ukraine's First Deputy Foreign Minister Sergiy Kyslytsya said that he couldn't confirm if the two leaders would hold bilateral talks, but hoped that India would choose to support 'international law and the UN charter', when it comes to the Russia-Ukraine conflict. 'India is the largest democracy on the world's political map... And if India wants to continue to build up its image as a democratic state, then India has only one choice, of being on the side of the international law and UN Charter,' Mr. Kyslytsya said when asked about Ukraine's expectations from India. Asked about an Indian role in mediating the conflict given its ties with both countries, Mr. Kyslytsya said that in the present scenario, Ukraine would welcome any country that facilitates talks like the Istanbul process where two rounds of Russia-Ukraine talks have been held. 'India has a history of centuries and traditions in the area of peaceful resolutions. So it's for India to say if it is ready and willing to play a role,' he said, expressing gratitude for the humanitarian assistance provided by India to Ukraine thus far. He also said that India-Ukraine trade could be built in a number of areas from food to high-tech advanced weaponry, especially drone technology that has been enhanced since the Russian invasion in 2022. No change in stance Despite requests from Ukraine during Mr. Modi's visit to Kyiv in August last year, and another Modi-Zelenskyy meeting in September, New Delhi has not thus far changed its position on the Russia-Ukraine war, or calls to stop importing Russian oil under Western sanctions. In February, India abstained from another resolution at the UN General Assembly calling for a ceasefire, and its imports of Russian oil reached record highs of 1.8 million barrels last month. Asked this week about India's position, External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar said in an interview in Brussels to news portal Euractiv that India has strong ties with both Russia and Ukraine, but that 'every country, naturally, considers its own experience, history and interests'. Pointing to Western inaction over Pakistan's occupation of Kashmir since 1947, Mr. Jaishankar said that 'if [Western] countries – who were evasive or reticent then – now say 'let's have a great conversation about international principles', I think I'm justified in asking them to reflect on their own past,' he said, when pressed about why India does not criticise Russia for being an 'aggressor' in Ukraine. 'Ceasefire first' The Ukrainian Minister said Mr. Zelenskyy will declare clearly at the G-7 summit outreach that Ukraine is prepared for summit-level talks between Mr. Putin and Mr. Zelenskyy, although it is unlikely Russia would accept that immediately. 'The Russians have a different logic, that Ukraine must surrender first, and then after we surrender, they will commit to a summit meeting and a ceasefire. Our logic is the reverse. We say, let's have the ceasefire that will contribute to a conducive environment for the meeting of the presidents,' he said. Speaking about 'Operation Spider Web' in which Ukraine attacked several Russian military bases and destroyed Russian strategic fighter jets using 117 drones smuggled into Russia on June 1, Mr. Kyslytsya said Ukraine's military operation had 'debunked' all the 'doomsday scenarios' that its forces were failing in the war by carrying out the complex attack. However, he accepted that the drone attack was not 'enough to change the tide and to change the situation in the battlefield. 'We are clearly dealing with the war of attrition [by Russia], and neither of the two sides, either in terms of resources or capacities, is able to achieve a major breakthrough,' Mr. Kyslytsya told The Hindu on the sidelines of a conference on conflict resolution in Oslo last week.

Muslim Population in India: 97 out of 100 people follow Islam in this Indian region, but Islam Is hardly practiced in this place; it is...
Muslim Population in India: 97 out of 100 people follow Islam in this Indian region, but Islam Is hardly practiced in this place; it is...

India.com

time3 hours ago

  • India.com

Muslim Population in India: 97 out of 100 people follow Islam in this Indian region, but Islam Is hardly practiced in this place; it is...

India is a land of remarkable religious diversity. Many faiths are practiced, particularly Hinduism, Islam, Christianity, Buddhism, Jainism, Zoroastrianism, and Sikhism. These faiths are reflected in each community's festivals, traditions, and day-to-day customs. The Pew Research Center estimates that India is projected to have the largest Muslim population in the world, exceeding Indonesia, at 311 million by the year 2050. The Muslim population resides in almost every state in India, but their density varies from state to state. In this article, we look specifically at the distribution of the Muslim population in several Indian states. Uttar Pradesh is the most populous state in the country, and it has a sizeable Muslim population. According to the 2011 Census, Uttar Pradesh had a total population of approximately 200 million, with approximately 38.4 million Muslims – about 19.26% of the total population. Thus, Uttar Pradesh has the highest number of Muslims of any state in India. India has a Union Territory with almost the entire population practicing Islam. Well, the place is Lakshadweep. About 97 out of every 100 people living in this region practice Islam. However, although the aggregate total population is very small, there were 64,473 individuals in Lakshadweep according to the 2011 Census. Of this, 62,268 people were Muslims, making up 96.58% of the population. The Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir is the next region with a fair amount of Muslim population after Lakshadweep. According to the 2011 Census data (when Jammu and Kashmir was still a state), it had a total population of approximately 12.5 million, of which 85.67 lakh were Muslims, constituting about 68.31% of the total population. In 2019, the Government of India restructured Jammu and Kashmir, splitting it into two Union Territories and designating Ladakh as a separate entity.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store