logo
GOP runs into voter buzzsaw of criticism on Trump's ‘big, beautiful bill'

GOP runs into voter buzzsaw of criticism on Trump's ‘big, beautiful bill'

Yahoo6 days ago

Fresh off a huge victory in passing their 'big, beautiful bill' through the House, Republican lawmakers are finding that President Trump's agenda is a much tougher sell at home.
In a series of contentious town halls, rank-and-file Republicans seeking to promote the virtues of the massive domestic policy package have run into a buzzsaw of criticism from constituents leery that the legislation will do more harm than good.
Some of the critics are voicing concerns that the proposal cuts too deeply into federal programs that benefit Americans across party lines. Others are griping that the package piles trillions of dollars onto federal deficits, breaking an early promise from GOP leaders that the bill would help bring budgets closer to balance.
The pushback not only highlights the headaches facing Republican leaders battling to get Trump's domestic agenda to the president's desk this summer, but also forecasts the political challenges facing the GOP as it fights to keep control of the House in next year's midterms in the face of persistent attacks from Democrats, who like their odds of flipping the chamber and are vowing to make the 'big, beautiful bill' a central piece of their pitch to anxious voters.
Those tensions were all on full display in recent days in parts of the Midwest, where a pair of lawmakers staged town halls — a strategy GOP leaders have cautioned against — and got an earful from voters furious over the legislation.
In Nebraska, Rep. Mike Flood (R) faced a tsunami of misgivings about his vote in favor of the 'big, beautiful bill,' with voters asking about Medicaid changes; cuts to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), previously known as food stamps; and how the package would pile on to the federal deficit.
'How do you justify extending the 2017 temporary tax cuts and offsetting that federal loss by cutting Medicaid and SNAP benefits — tax cuts [that are] expected to add $5 trillion to [the] deficit?' one participant asked.
One of the most viral moments from the event, however, came in response to a question about a small provision in the package that seeks to restrict federal judges' ability to hold government officials in contempt when they violate a court order. The language — a small paragraph in the 1,000-plus-page bill — flew largely under the radar ahead of the vote.
Asked about why he supported a bill with those terms, Flood said it was 'unknown' to him when he cast his vote — a signal that he did not read the full bill before formally weighing in on the matter.
'I am not going to hide the truth: This provision was unknown to me when I voted for that bill,' Flood said, prompting the crowd to break out in shouts. 'And when I found out that provision was in the bill, I immediately reached out to my Senate counterparts and told them of my concern.'
In Iowa, GOP Rep. Ashley Hinson encountered a similarly tough crowd, which erupted into a chorus of boos when the third-term Republican hailed the legislation as 'a generational investment' in American prosperity.
'I can't believe you would boo tax relief for working Americans,' she responded.
And in Colorado, members of the state's Republican delegation held a press conference to tout the bill, only to be shouted over by protesters throughout their remarks, Colorado Public Radio reported.
It's unclear how many attendees of the GOP town halls are Republicans, and how many are Democrats who opposed the legislation from the start. Outside liberal groups such as Indivisible have encouraged their members to attend such events, and the Nebraska Democratic Party urged supporters to 'pack' Flood's recent town hall in Seward.
Still, Flood made a point to shake everyone's hand at the outset of the event, and he rejected the accusations from many in his party — including some GOP leaders — that Democrats are paying people to heckle Republicans in public settings.
'I don't think one of you is here because you're getting paid,' Flood said. 'I don't think one of you is here because you were trucked in.'
The heat Republicans are facing is unlikely to subside any time soon. The Senate is expected to make changes to the bill in the coming weeks, then send the package back to the House for a final stamp of approval, forcing GOP lawmakers to vote once again on the contentious provisions, potentially sparking a new round of criticism back home.
Conservative Senate Republicans are pushing for steeper spending cuts — Sen. Ron Johnson (Wis.), for example has said he wants federal spending to roll back to 2019 levels — while moderates are warning against deep slashes. Medicaid is also poised to be the subject of debate in the upper chamber, with moderate Republicans — along with conservative Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) — saying they will not support a bill that makes cuts to the social safety net program.
Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.), for his part, has urged Senate Republicans — both privately and publicly — to make minimal changes, citing the 'very delicate equilibrium' he achieved within his conference to get the package over the finish line. Trump, however, has given the upper chamber the green light to make whatever tweaks they wish, which could set up another politically prickly vote for House Republicans.
'I want the Senate and the senators to make the changes they want. It will go back to the House and we'll see if we can get them,' Trump said last weekend. 'In some cases, the changes may be something I'd agree with, to be honest.'
'I think it's going to get there,' he added of the package. 'I think they are going to have changes. Some will be minor, some will be fairly significant.'
The contentious town halls are far from a new scene for House Republicans. Since Trump took office, numerous GOP lawmakers across the country have faced crowds hostile to Trump's boundary-busting mass deportations, blanket pardons for loyalists, and other actions that have defined the early months of his second term. The events grew so extensive — and tense — that House GOP leaders in March urged their members to avoid in-person town halls and instead host call-in and livestream conversations to avoid the chaotic confrontations.
The recent protests have been unique, however, in that the lawmakers have become the target based on their votes in favor of Trump's specific policy agenda.
'I was also proud to vote for President Trump's one big, beautiful bill last week,' Hinson said at the beginning of her town hall, prompting boos from the audience. 'I'm here to clear up a lot of the misinformation that's out here today' — she added, prompting laughs — 'because this bill is about securing our borders, this bill is about providing continued tax relief for working Americans and returning out country to prosperity.'
Democrats, meanwhile, are hoping to capitalize on both the internal GOP divisions surrounding the debate, and the unpopularity of the more controversial provisions of legislation, like the Medicaid and SNAP cuts, which they're hoping will backfire on Republicans in the midterms.
'Now that vulnerable Republicans are on the record voting for it, this betrayal of the American people will cost them their jobs in the midterms and Republicans the House Majority come 2026,' Rep. Suzan DelBene (D-Wash.), head of the Democrats' campaign arm, said after the House vote.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ukraine Got a Major Battle Victory. Trump Is Not Happy.
Ukraine Got a Major Battle Victory. Trump Is Not Happy.

Atlantic

time33 minutes ago

  • Atlantic

Ukraine Got a Major Battle Victory. Trump Is Not Happy.

Ukraine's drone strikes deep into Russia delivered a humiliating blow to Moscow last weekend. Kyiv's defenders celebrated the attack as a triumph of modern warfare and a warning to Russian President Vladimir Putin. But the extraordinary operation got a different response inside the White House: anger. Donald Trump has openly vented in recent weeks about Putin's unwillingness to end the war. But since Sunday's attack, which hit a series of Russian military airfields, the president has privately expressed frustration that the strike could escalate the conflict, according to three administration officials and an outside adviser to the White House. (They spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss internal deliberations.) These sources told me that the drone strike has reignited the president's long-held displeasure with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, and prompted a new debate in the White House about whether the United States should abandon Ukraine. Throughout the war, Trump has deemed Zelensky a 'bad guy' and a 'hothead,' the outside adviser said—someone who could be pushing the globe toward World War III. Trump privately echoed a right-wing talking point this week by criticizing Zelensky for supposedly showboating after the drone attacks; according to the adviser, Trump was impressed with the audacity of the strikes but believes that Zelensky's focus should have been on Ukraine-Russia negotiations in Istanbul. Trump spoke with Putin yesterday, and, in a readout of the call on Truth Social, the U.S. president relayed the Kremlin's plans to strike back against Ukraine. 'We discussed the attack on Russia's docked airplanes, by Ukraine, and also various other attacks that have been taking place by both sides,' Trump wrote. 'It was a good conversation, but not a conversation that will lead to immediate Peace. President Putin did say, and very strongly, that he will have to respond to the recent attack on the airfields.' Trump did not say whether he had warned Putin against retaliating, and two of the administration officials told me that he has not decided on his next steps. Officials have presented him with options that include sanctioning Russia and reducing American aid to Ukraine. Meanwhile, Trump told aides this week that he does not believe a summit with him, Zelensky, and Putin—which he once hoped would be a way to bring the war to a close—will happen any time soon, one of the administration officials told me. Trump, who on the campaign trail last year vowed to end the war within his first 24 hours in office, made a renewed push for a peace deal last month. While Zelensky agreed to an immediate cease-fire, Putin rejected the offer and ratcheted up his bombing of Ukrainian cities. That led Trump to threaten to walk away from peace talks, and to flash some rare ire at Putin. The president had hoped that some progress would be made in this week's talks in Turkey, but the meeting was overshadowed by the drone strikes and went nowhere. The White House has said that the U.S. was not told in advance about the surprise attack, which was carried out by drones hidden across five of Russia's time zones that hit nuclear-capable bombers and inflicted billions of dollars in damage, according to a preliminary estimate from the White House. Steve Bannon and other influential MAGA voices have berated Ukraine for the attack and are attempting to push Washington further from Kyiv. On his podcast this week, Bannon blamed Ukraine for, in his view, sabotaging peace talks while potentially provoking a massive response from Russia. 'Zelensky didn't give the president of the United States a heads-up to say he's going to do a deep strike into strategic forces of Russia, which is going up the escalatory ladder as quickly as you can, on the day before your meeting in Turkey?' Bannon said. 'On the eve of peace talks or cease-fire talks, he takes the Japanese role in Pearl Harbor—the sneak attack.' Bannon has conveyed similar messages to senior West Wing advisers, a fourth administration official told me. Keith Kellogg, Trump's Ukraine envoy, warned on Fox News that 'the risk levels are going way up' because the drones struck part of Russia's 'national survival system'—its nuclear program—potentially pushing Moscow to retaliate in significant ways. Trump has not increased aid to Ukraine since taking office again in January, and he has yet to endorse a bipartisan Senate push, led by his ally Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, to impose harsh economic penalties against Russia and countries that do business with it. There have been other recent signs that the White House is distancing itself from Ukraine, too. Yesterday, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth did not attend a meeting of 50 defense ministers at NATO headquarters in Brussels. In the past, the meeting has been an important venue for coordinating military aid for Ukraine. Hegseth was the first U.S. defense secretary to skip the event in three years. The Pentagon cited scheduling issues for his absence. When I asked a White House spokesperson for comment about the drone strikes, she pointed me to Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt's briefing-room remarks on Tuesday, when Leavitt said that Trump 'wants this war to end at the negotiating table, and he has made that clear to both leaders, both publicly and privately.' In public remarks about the strikes, Putin downplayed the chances of a cease-fire, asking, 'Who has negotiations with terrorists?' But Zelensky told reporters that the operation over the weekend, code-named Spider's Web, would not have been carried out if Putin had agreed to a U.S.-proposed truce. 'If there had been a cease-fire, would the operation have taken place?' Zelensky asked. 'No.' Exasperated with the conflict, Trump continues to muse about walking away from any sort of diplomatic solution. In his Truth Social post about his call with Putin, the president seemed eager to change the subject to focus on ending a different international crisis. 'We also discussed Iran,' Trump wrote about ongoing talks regarding Tehran's nuclear ambitions. 'President Putin suggested that he will participate in the discussions with Iran and that he could, perhaps, be helpful in getting this brought to a rapid conclusion.'

Musk Digs Up Trump's 12-Year-Old Tweet To Attack His Policy Bill
Musk Digs Up Trump's 12-Year-Old Tweet To Attack His Policy Bill

Forbes

time34 minutes ago

  • Forbes

Musk Digs Up Trump's 12-Year-Old Tweet To Attack His Policy Bill

Elon Musk directly jabbed President Donald Trump over his policy bill Thursday— in his most pointed attack on Trump himself—over the legislation Musk has previously mostly blamed Republican lawmakers for. President Donald Trump speaks during a news conference with Elon Musk in the Oval Office of the ... More White House in Washington, DC, on May 30, 2025. (Photo by ALLISON ROBBERT/AFP via Getty Images) Musk reposted a 2013 tweet from Trump that said he was in disbelief and 'embarrassed' Republicans were extending the debt ceiling, captioning the repost 'wise words.' Trump on Wednesday said the debt limit should be 'entirely scrapped' as a provision of his 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act,' which would raise the debt ceiling ahead of its expected expiration date in August. This is a developing story and will be updated.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store