'1923' lovers Brandon Sklenar, Julia Schlaepfer on finale reunion, Dutton birth, death
'1923' lovers Brandon Sklenar, Julia Schlaepfer on finale reunion, Dutton birth, death
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Brandon Sklenar, Julia Schlaepfer talk '1923' S2 finale
Stars Brandon Sklenar and Julia Schlaepfer dish to USA TODAY on season two '1923' finale details.
Spoiler alert! This story discusses plot details of the "1923" Season 2 finale.
For most of "1923" Season 2, Alexandra (Julia Schlaepfer) has desperately sought to reunite with her new husband Spencer Dutton (Brandon Sklenar), while the prodigal fighting machine hightailed it back to the besieged Yellowstone Dutton ranch to save his uncle Jacob (Harrison Ford) and aunt Cara (Helen Mirren).
Star-crossed lovers Alex and Spencer overcame every conceivable obstacle separately on ships, cars and trains before joyously coming together near frozen Montana train tracks in Sunday's two-hour season finale (now streaming on Paramount+). After Spencer jumps from his moving train for a final sprint to his stranded, near-frozen wife, their rapturous reconciliation is so hot.
Like, literally hot. The cruel Montana winter for the Taylor Sheridan series was recreated with special effects and fake snowbanks on an Austin soundstage in the dead heat of Texas summer.
"Oh my God, it was like 100 degrees hot, the opposite of winter," Schlaepfer, 30, says during a joint interview with Sklenar, 34, for USA TODAY. "We had to do this weird combination of shivering while actually drenched in sweat."
We mapped '1923' out: Inside Spencer Dutton's journey back to the ranch in 'Yellowstone' prequel
We bow to the power of storytelling and new-fangled technology, because that much-awaited moment works. "It's powerful," says Sklenar. "Running that last distance in the snow, you see how they've been fighting to find one another."
The new Dutton wife is preggers, Spencer discovers. He gallantly bundles up his weakened spouse to sprint towards warmth on the tracks. Unorthodox acting was required.
"It was really funny," says Sklenar, laughing while recalling the dead-serious moment. "I had to hold Jules and pretend to just sort of run in place, and jostle her about. I've never had to fake run for such a pivotal, intense scene."
Alexandra gives birth to John Dutton. But which John Dutton?
Fortunately, the train had stopped, making the fake run shorter than expected. But the finale never gets easier for Alex, covered in severe frostbite from her frigid ordeal. Things get much worse for the Dutton family enemies, who Spencer gets to smiting almost single-handedly.
Alex miraculously gives birth to their premature son and names him John. This is the awaited Big Bang in the Yellowstone-Dutton-verse. Bet the ranch that this is TV-series-connecting child John Dutton II, the father of John Dutton III, played by Kevin Costner in "Yellowstone."
"It's fun to think about. That it ties into the whole world," says Schlaepfer of baby John. She hastily adds that she's not confirming that the child is Costner's TV daddy in swaddling clothes. "The only person who could confirm that is Taylor Sheridan himself, out of his mouth."
"John's a popular name," adds Sklenar, avoiding confirmation of being Costner's TV grandfather.
Who dies in the '1923' finale?
New-found Dutton family bliss is short-lived. Alex dies in the hospital holding baby John, with Spencer lying next to her.
"They fall asleep together and she drifts away," Schlaepfer says, adding that Ford and Mirren were present for the scene out of respect. "There's no other way to say it. It hurt to film."
Spencer puts on his revenge face to take his feelings out on family archenemy, Donald Whitfield (Timothy Dalton), the sadistic developer and early downhill skiing visionary. With Jacob at his side, Spencer shoots Whitfield dead at his pastry-filled breakfast table.
"Men at that time weren't really exactly attuned to their emotions. There weren't podcasts on how to process your grief at the time," says Sklenar. "His pain moves through his physicality, and his revenge is vindicating. It's a little bit of the power of Spencer, the power of love and the power of the bullet."
Is this the end of '1923'?
Alex is bestowed with the ultimate posthumous Dutton honor, a gravestone in the famed ranch cemetery for top-tier clan only. She is an English aristocrat in Montana, yet still, Alex earns her plot in the Deceased Dutton Hall of Fame.
"It's such an honor. I know that everyone will be upset about (Alex) being a part of the Dutton family cemetery," says Schlaepfer.
But Alex lived strong, died well, gave birth to a pivotal Dutton baby, dumped her feeble aristo fiancé for Spencer, and gave viewers a love story saga.
Sheridan and Paramount Global have always planned to keep "1923" to two seasons while moving the story onto the next chapter, "1944" (presumably with a grown-up John Dutton II). So for Ford, 82, and Mirren, 79, the Season 2 finale appears to be the end of the line. Jacob already admits he's retiring from ranching. Cara points out that baby John is "the future." The finale fast forwards to an obscured view of the never-remarried, aged Spencer lying down by his wife's grave. Sklenar refuses to confirm his character's death.
"He's an old man, possibly just taking a nap," he says. "There might be a ("1923") version with geriatric Spencer dragging his gun because he's too weak to hold it."
Even if "1923" is over, it's been a ride. "We did our best to bring this couple's story to life and do justice to their role in Dutton history," says Sklenar. "It was such an honor."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Kate Beckinsale says 'Canary Black' producers made her perform 'dangerous' action stunts
Kate Beckinsale is suing the producers of her 2024 film "Canary Black," claiming she was exposed to "unsafe" working conditions and forced to perform stunts resulting in "debilitating" injuries. In a lawsuit first filed anonymously in December, amended May 21 and obtained by USA TODAY June 12, Beckinsale alleged that the "extremely challenging and physically demanding" action role, in which she plays a former CIA agent, caused "significant trauma to her left knee." Media site Puck was first to report the lawsuit. Beckinsale is suing producer John Zois, Anton Entertainment Media Services and Canary Black LTD for negligence, intentional infliction of emotional distress and battery. Beckinsale, 51, is requesting a jury trial, as well as economic, non-economic and punitive damages. USA TODAY has reached out to Beckinsale and Zois' reps for comment. Kate Beckinsale details assault on set at 18, more abuse after Blake Lively complaint Beckinsale, who filmed the movie from late 2022 to early 2023, said despite prior agreements and the actress and her team raising the alarm on what they call "unsafe" conditions – including 15-hour shooting days, surprise stunts and lack of adequate equipment and medical personnel on set – the production "recklessly and intentionally" forged ahead, according to the lawsuit. Before filming began in Croatia in September 2022, Beckinsale and the movie's producers had agreed to have physical health resources – including gym equipment, a physical trainer or a qualified massage therapist – but none were provided, the lawsuit stated. She was also contracted to be on set for no more than 12 hours, which filming routinely pushed past. She said the producers would often deviate from the filming schedule and inform her of stunts "spur of the moment," therefore "recklessly increasing the risk of injury." And she recalled being told on the same day that scenes previously set to be filmed via green screen were suddenly "practical." At one point, Beckinsale's stuntwoman broke an ankle after a "dangerous" scene. As a replacement, the producers provided an "unqualified" stunt performer who was "simply the girlfriend of the stunt coordinator." According to Beckinsale, Zois at another point told her "that the production company had failed" to do "any significant training period" for things like harness work. In November 2022, Beckinsale and her team brought concerns to Zois, per the filing, which he purportedly acknowledged. "I don't know what else to say other than you're right," he said, according to the suit. And "bottom line, we need to shorten these days…The days are too packed for the pace we are moving and it's CLEARLY not sustainable." However, conditions did not change, the lawsuit states. And in a December 2022 incident, Beckinsale was directed to perform a "dangerous" stunt with a male actor that involved throwing and slamming her into a wall, per the filing. The actor was fully padded, while Beckinsale only received mini pads, providing no protection. Despite her complaints, many takes were shot, resulting in her suffering a complex meniscus tear in her left knee, the suit said. The lawsuit stated that Beckinsale was immediately pressured to return to finish the film, with the actress asserting her return was contingent upon her doctor approving the shot list and the team sticking to strict physical limitations. Despite the medical orders, when the actress returned in February 2023, the film's producers failed to adhere to orders, continuing to inform her of unsafe action shots last minute, which caused further injury. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Kate Beckinsale lawsuit: 'Canary Black' stunts were 'unsafe'
Los Angeles Times
an hour ago
- Los Angeles Times
Paramount's ‘South Park' streaming deal is in limbo as Skydance merger drags on
Media giant Paramount Global is trying to avoid a streaming future without Cartman, Stan, Kyle and Kenny. As Paramount struggles to complete a key merger, the company is in the midst of a protracted negotiation to extend one of its biggest and most important franchises: the long-running foulmouthed cartoon 'South Park.' Paramount's $900-million overall deal with 'South Park' creators Matt Stone and Trey Parker doesn't expire for another two years. New episodes run first on Paramount's basic cable network Comedy Central. But efforts to renew that venture and bring the show to the Paramount+ streaming service have hit a major snag, according to three people familiar with the discussions who were not authorized to speak publicly. The situation highlights deep tensions and disagreements as a trio of executives try to manage Paramount until the company's sale to David Ellison's Skydance Media, which has the right to approve or deny large deals such as the 'South Park' pact under covenants made with Paramount. Paramount leaders are desperate to lock down 'South Park's' streaming rights in the U.S. and abroad. They've long been frustrated by a licensing arrangement made six years ago by the previous regime that sent 'South Park' to rival HBO Max, owned by Warner Bros. Discovery. That deal expires this month. 'South Park' is one of Paramount's most important shows. Along with 'The Daily Show With Jon Stewart,' the four boys and their celebrity-skewering ways put Comedy Central on the map for basic cable viewers, taking on hot-button issues from Scientology and the War on Terror to the royal family and the Trump administration. During a May earnings call, Paramount co-Chief Executive Chris McCarthy — who runs Paramount's media networks as well as Showtime and MTV Entertainment Studios — told investors that 'South Park' episodes would begin streaming on Paramount+ in July. However, Paramount hasn't nailed down the streaming rights to 'South Park,' according to the three people familiar with the conversations. Since earlier this year, Paramount has made at least one offer to Parker and Stone as an early extension of their overall deal. The company also wants to secure rights to stream the 333 episodes of 'South Park' on Paramount+. Some of the knowledgeable people expect 'South Park' distribution fees to be valued at more than $200 million a year. But Skydance hasn't signed off, believing the deals to be too rich, according to the sources. Paramount executives believe the show is worth the big bucks, given the show's enduring popularity and legacy. Representatives for Paramount and Skydance declined to comment. Hollywood agent Ari Emanuel, whose firm WME represents Parker and Stone, defended Paramount and Skydance's handling of the situation on Friday by phone. 'Nobody has rejected anything. They are just doing their analysis,' Emanuel told The Times in a brief interview. 'We've got offers from other distributors. Everybody wants this show.' Skydance's $8-billion takeover of Paramount has been in a holding pattern for months as the two companies wait for federal regulators' approval. Skydance, backed by tech mogul Larry Ellison and RedBird Capital Partners, is eager to take over the storied media company. They intend to bring increased financial rigor to Paramount's operations, other sources have said. Paramount and Skydance have told Wall Street the deal will bring $2 billion in cost savings, with half of that coming in the first year. Deadlines are looming. The new season, the program's 27th, is scheduled to debut July 9 on Comedy Central. Unless Paramount strikes a deal with the creators by June 23, the company risks losing the franchise's streaming rights because Parker and Stone could shop the show to other interested streamers, such as Netflix, Amazon Prime Video or Hulu. However, sources cautioned that negotiations could go past the June deadline and that the parties expect a deal to get done. Represented by their longtime attorney Kevin Morris, who is leading the current negotiations, the duo carved out the internet rights nearly two decades ago. They formed a joint venture with Paramount (then known as Viacom) called South Park Digital Studios. That decision proved highly lucrative for Parker and Stone, also known for the hit Broadway musical 'The Book of Mormon.' Paramount runs the joint venture with Stone and Parker, sharing control of the streaming rights to the show that launched in 1997 on Comedy Central, although the duo can veto streaming deals they find unfavorable. Companies are typically not supposed to wade too deeply into another firm's affairs. Federal antitrust laws prohibit so-called gun-jumping, when an acquiring company begins calling the shots before a deal's official closure. But Paramount agreed to accept Skydance's input on big-ticket expenditures while the two sides wait for the deal to close. The 'South Park' streaming rights negotiations also have been complicated by a lawsuit brought two years ago by Warner Bros. Discovery. That company accused Paramount of violating terms of its 2019 licensing pact for 'South Park,' after Warner paid about $540 million for the show's streaming rights. Paramount and the 'South Park' creators developed specials featuring the four animated boys in a fictional Colorado mountain town to stream exclusively on Paramount+. Warner argued the move violated its licensing deal. HBO Max declined to comment. Two years after the HBO Max deal, Paramount struck a new accord with Parker and Stone for $900 million, sealing their partnership and ensuring new episodes of 'South Park' would be made. That deal runs to 2027, although Paramount executives have offered to extend that arrangement for several years. Paramount has long intended to shift the show to Paramount+ as soon as the HBO Max deal expires. The various parties have long envisioned a scenario where domestic and international rights would be shared by at least two different streaming services. Although neither partner would have exclusive rights, the current trend in television is for studios to maximize revenue to help pay for expensive programs, like 'South Park,' while maintaining some streaming rights. Paramount also has been dealing with another crisis that has been complicated by the Skydance merger. The company has sought to settle President Trump's $20-billion lawsuit claiming subsidiary CBS News deceptively edited a '60 Minutes' interview with then-Vice President Kamala Harris, an allegation CBS denies. Trump's case hasn't been resolved, and the Federal Communications Commission has been slow to review Skydance's proposed takeover of Paramount, extending the deal review. The Skydance transaction has been pending at the FCC since last fall, leaving Paramount executives in limbo.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
‘Yellowstone' spinoff among new Utah film productions approved under tax incentive program
The Capitol in Salt Lake City is pictured on Thursday, April 10, 2025. (Photo by Spenser Heaps for Utah News Dispatch) Four new film productions are headed for Utah and will receive a tax credit under the state's film incentive program, including a 'Yellowstone' spinoff and a new season of 'The Secret of Skinwalker Ranch.' That's according to the Utah Film Commission, which made the announcement on Friday. The four productions will generate an estimated economic impact of about $57.4 million and more than 380 jobs, with filming set to take place in Salt Lake, Summit, Wasatch and Uintah counties. The 'Yellowstone' spinoff — titled 'Y: Marshals' — is the latest addition to the popular series that drew millions of viewers and was partly filmed in Utah. But after filming three seasons in the Beehive State, the production packed up and relocated to Montana, where it was offered a better tax break. That loss contributed to lawmakers expanding the state's film incentive for rural productions. 'Y: Marshals' will star Luke Grimes as Kayce Dutton, continuing the arc of his 'Yellowstone' character as a member of the U.S. Marshalls. Production will begin in Summit County this fall, and the show has a $52 million budget. 'Utah is such a draw for film and television because of its diverse landscapes, fantastic crews, and amazing, knowledgeable film office,' said Adam Morra, vice president of planning and finance for Paramount Global, in a statement. 'There is no doubt, though, the film incentive is a vital and necessary part of the package.' SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX The seventh season of 'The Secret of Skinwalker Ranch' will also receive a tax credit under the state's rural film incentive program. Focused on the notorious Skinwalker Ranch in Uintah County, the History Channel show follows researchers who explore the ranch's reported paranormal activity. It has a $3.2 million budget. Filmed in Wasatch and Summit counties with a $1.8 million budget, 'Keep Coming Back' is the third production to receive incentives under the state's rural film program. It's an independent film from director and producer Mark Rosman, who said the tax incentives, experienced film crews and proximity to Los Angeles made Utah a draw. 'When it came to picking a state to shoot the film, it was natural to look at Utah,' Rosman said in a statement. And the new competition show 'Freshman Inventors' will receive a rebate under the Utah Community Film Incentive Program. With plans to film in Salt Lake County with a $300,000 budget, the Netflix show highlights Gen Z inventors. The Utah Motion Picture Incentive Program currently offers a refundable tax credit up to 25% for funds spent in the state, with different sums of money set aside for productions that meet certain criteria. The rural film incentive — which 'Y: Marshals,' 'The Secret of Skinwalker Ranch' and 'Keep Coming Back' qualified for — sets aside $12 million per year for projects that spend at least 75% of production days in a rural county. The community film incentive program is a 20% post-performance cash rebate for projects that originate in Utah. It's aimed at helping smaller productions with budgets between $100,000 to $500,000, and is meant to promote up-and-coming local filmmakers, according to Utah Film Studios. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
