
With new digital hub, N.B. expected to play key role in Canada's cyber defences
An international technology company says work done at its new digital centre in Fredericton will increase Canada's cyber defences.
The National Digital Excellence Centre will handle cybersecurity for some of the country's industries and critical infrastructure, according to Chris Pogue, CEO of Thales Canada.
Pogue, who is also the managing director of the company's defence and security business, said the centre's opening comes at a time of growing tension between Canada and the United States.
"I couldn't have imagined six weeks ago the chaotic world we're living in … and that chaos and change is going to make cyber resilience increasingly necessary," Pogue said.
Threats unexpected and increasing
He was referring to the trade war threatened by President Donald Trump and his rhetoric about annexing Canada, which have led to worries about sovereignty. There are also concerns that Canada's position in Five Eyes, the intelligence-sharing network that includes the U.S. and several other countries, may be at risk.
"There are increasing threats coming from angles that we wouldn't have expected," Pogue said. "We are seeing an increasing pace of cyber threats from ransomware, increasing malicious state and non-state actors that we know are trying to influence what goes on in Canada and even around the world."
Thales specializes in defence, aerospace and cyber and digital sectors on five continents, and its centre at Knowledge Park in Fredericton is its first first location in Atlantic Canada.
The company provides digital identity and security for things such as driver's licences and transactions made on the internet, Pogue said, as well as cybersecurity of operational systems, such as power plants, manufacturing machinery, warehouses, naval vessels and transportation systems.
Pogue said he would like to see "all of our industry, particularly critical infrastructure having robust cybersecurity built into it, not added on, but built into the very design of the way we operate."
The new centre was established in partnership with the McKenna Institute at the University of New Brunswick and the city development agency Ignite. It has received funding from the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency, Opportunities New Brunswick, and Post-Secondary Education, Training and Labour.
Hard to interpret the president
Frank McKenna, the deputy chair at TD Securities, said cybersecurity is "a major preoccupation of just about every industry, every business that I'm involved in."
"I think … New Brunswick is going to have a really important role to play in equipping all of Canada with cyber defences so that we can protect our democracy and protect our critical infrastructure," said McKenna, who attended the opening by video and spoke in an interview afterwards.
As a former New Brunswick premier, and a one-time ambassador to the United States, McKenna has seen his share of challenges to Canada's sovereignty, including negotiations for the original free trade agreement, and the proposed Constitutional Amendments that came under the failed Meech Lake Accord.
But he said he hasn't seen anything quite like the current souring of international relations with the United States.
"I've never seen the country feel there's a greater existential threat to its existence," McKenna said. "It's hard to interpret the president and … it's just hard to get into a fact-based conversation with the [Trump] administration."
He said Canadians are getting whiplash from the constantly changing messaging from Washington, and Trump's goading about making Canada the 51st state, which McKenna said is making Canadians "viscerally angry."
"The efforts he's using [with] tariffs to try to squeeze us into being more closely integrated with the United States …. are driving us further apart. It's bizarro land," he said.
"We're not part of their problem. And yet we provide them with oil, we provide them with aluminum and steel and potash and uranium, all of the things they need. The backbone of the US economy comes from Canada.
Although it's "disconcerting," McKenna said he expects Canada will be successful in the end.
'Security battlefield' a massive challenge
Peter MacKay, who was minister of national defence and foreign affairs under the former Stephen Harper government, said he knows first hand what types of security threats the country deals with behind the scenes.
The Thales digital hub is "the front line against cyber attacks, which can cripple an economy, can collapse our communication systems, [and] our critical infrastructure," said MacKay, who attended the opening of the centre.
"I say this having had the very real advantageous viewpoint of having worked at National Defence and we have incredible people … on the front lines of that security battlefield, which is a massive, massive challenge given the pernicious and persistent nature of cyber attacks … trying to break into our system of government for information theft, intellectual property theft, for businesses, for banks."
This is a volatile time, which has "people full of uncertainty and anxiety," MacKay said, because of the changing course taken by a country that has been Canada's friend and partner in security.
But he said he believes security institutions like NATO and NORAD and Five Eyes will hold.
Pogue said people are now paying attention to cybersecurity, given recent events in the U.S.
"Whether that attention is desirable or not, that attention causes us to often take action, sometimes actions that we should have taken before," he said.
"At the end of the day, if any sort of disruption in what we call the global world order causes Canadians to realize how important cybersecurity is, how important defence is, how important their investment in those things are to the way of life that Canadians enjoy, the better we'll be in the long run."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Toronto Star
22-05-2025
- Toronto Star
Carney says Canada in talks with U.S. on ‘Golden Dome' missile defence
OTTAWA - Prime Minister Mark Carney confirmed on Wednesday that Canada is considering joining in U.S. President Donald Trump's new Golden Dome missile defence program. Speaking with reporters on Parliament Hill, Carney said high-level discussions are underway with the U.S., but he refused to provide a ballpark figure for how much Canada might contribute to the massive undertaking. 'We are conscious that we have an ability, if we so choose, to complete the Golden Dome with investments and partnerships,' he said. 'It's something that we are looking at and something that has been discussed at a high level, but not I'm not sure one negotiates on this. These are military decisions that have been taken in that context, and we will evaluate it accordingly.' ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW Carney warned that Canada faces potential missiles threats in the 'not-too-distant future' that could come from space. The comments come after Trump said the day before that the Canadian government contacted his administration indicating it wants to join the US$175-billion program and that he will work with Ottawa to ensure it contributes its 'fair share.' 'Canada has called us and they want to be a part of it,' Trump said. 'We are dealing with them on pricing. They know about it very much.' If all of this sounds a little familiar, that's because Canada has been at this crossroads before. Frank McKenna felt a sense of déjà vu on Tuesday when Trump asserted that Canada is interested in buying into the program. Canada's former ambassador to the U.S. told The Canadian Press that he vividly remembers walking into a committee hearing in Ottawa two decades ago — just as the foreign minister was attempting to warn him on an overseas call that then-prime minister Paul Martin had decided against joining the U.S. in its ballistic missile defence plans. ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW But McKenna said the call never went through and when he went ahead with the hearing, he declared that Canada was 'somewhat involved' in the project — a statement that quickly blew up into a hot-button political issue. He said it complicated Canada's relationship with the U.S. at the time and stoked heated political debate in Canada. 'Quite frankly, a lot of my staff felt that we should find ways of trying to get to 'yes' with the Americans on some issues because we had so many issues that we were offside on. We were fighting on softwood lumber, we're fighting on other issues,' he said. 'My view and the view of my staff was that this would have been an easy one for Canada, but it attracted a lot of hostile public opinion in Canada and became quite toxic.' Fast forward to now, and joining U.S. ballistic defence is on the front-burner again. 'For it to appear that Canada is actually participating in the discussion, I felt somewhat vindicated,' McKenna said. ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW McKenna said Trump's new defence project could help to solve some of Canada's trade woes with the United States, as Ottawa looks to de-escalate tariffs and renegotiate its trilateral trade pact with the U.S. and Mexico. 'We don't need to make a decision yet, but we need to engage and have that conversation,' he said. 'It should also be part of a broader discussion, not a one-off, so it will be seen by the United States as a concession on our part should we end up participating in the defence shield.' But the head of an Ottawa-based defence think tank said if Canada wants to fully join Trump's 'Golden Dome,' it should make its decision soon. 'The history of Canada's decision making on missile defence is that we tend to punt decisions and just never make them,' said David Perry, president of the Canada Global Affairs Institute. 'But if we want to be in and be in fully as this is being shaped and configured, we want to make a decision soon.' Canada contributes to continental defence through Norad by monitoring and detecting threats. But while it can deal with cruise missiles, decisions on shooting ballistic missiles out of the sky are up to the Americans. Perry said Canada's past heel-dragging on ballistic defence has made it harder to get involved now. ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW 'Why on Earth we didn't do this during the Biden administration is beyond me, which would have been a much better time to have had a discussion about joining with the United States, particularly when we had the president here announcing plans, modernizing Norad,' he said. Perry said that because of Canada's initial 'no' to the George Bush administration in 2005, United States Northern Command is the entity responsible for dealing with defeating a missile. 'Our 'no' has complicated the potential involvement of Norad, which would be the more sensible organization to be dealing with all of the issues. But the U.S. can't do that because Canada hasn't wanted to deal for 20 years now with the defence of that one particular missile type,' he said. 'I don't know that people just really register how supremely illogical it is to decide that you'd be fine with Parliament getting blown up, so long as it is a particular type of missile that goes boom on the Peace Tower.' This report by The Canadian Press was first published May 21, 2025. Politics Headlines Newsletter Get the latest news and unmatched insights in your inbox every evening Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. Please enter a valid email address. Sign Up Yes, I'd also like to receive customized content suggestions and promotional messages from the Star. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Politics Headlines Newsletter You're signed up! You'll start getting Politics Headlines in your inbox soon. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page.


National Observer
22-05-2025
- National Observer
Canada is considering Trump's Golden Dome missile defence program
Prime Minister Mark Carney confirmed on Wednesday that Canada is considering joining U.S. President Donald Trump's new Golden Dome missile defence program. Speaking with reporters on Parliament Hill, Carney said high-level discussions are underway with the U.S., but he refused to provide a ballpark figure for how much Canada might contribute to the massive undertaking. "We are conscious that we have an ability, if we so choose, to complete the Golden Dome with investments and partnerships," he said. "It's something that we are looking at and something that has been discussed at a high level, but I'm not sure one negotiates on this. These are military decisions that have been taken in that context, and we will evaluate it accordingly." Carney warned that Canada faces potential missiles threats in the "not-too-distant future" that could come from space. The comments come after Trump said the day before that the Canadian government contacted his administration indicating it wants to join the US$175-billion program and that he will work with Ottawa to ensure it contributes its "fair share." "Canada has called us, and they want to be a part of it," Trump said. "We are dealing with them on pricing. They know about it very much." If all of this sounds a little familiar, that's because Canada has been at this crossroads before. Prime Minister Mark Carney confirmed on Wednesday that Canada is considering joining U.S. President Donald Trump's new Golden Dome missile defence program. Frank McKenna felt a sense of déjà vu on Tuesday when Trump asserted that Canada is interested in buying into the program. Canada's former ambassador to the U.S. told The Canadian Press that he vividly remembers walking into a committee hearing in Ottawa two decades ago — just as the foreign minister was attempting to warn him on an overseas call that then-prime minister Paul Martin had decided against joining the U.S. in its ballistic missile defence plans. But McKenna said the call never went through and when he went ahead with the hearing, he declared that Canada was "somewhat involved" in the project — a statement that quickly blew up into a hot-button political issue. He said it complicated Canada's relationship with the U.S. at the time and stoked heated political debate in Canada. "Quite frankly, a lot of my staff felt that we should find ways of trying to get to 'yes' with the Americans on some issues because we had so many issues that we were offside on. We were fighting on softwood lumber, we're fighting on other issues," he said. "My view and the view of my staff was that this would have been an easy one for Canada, but it attracted a lot of hostile public opinion in Canada and became quite toxic." Fast forward to now, and joining U.S. ballistic defence is on the front-burner again. "For it to appear that Canada is actually participating in the discussion, I felt somewhat vindicated," McKenna said. McKenna said Trump's new defence project could help to solve some of Canada's trade woes with the United States, as Ottawa looks to de-escalate tariffs and renegotiate its trilateral trade pact with the U.S. and Mexico. "We don't need to make a decision yet, but we need to engage and have that conversation," he said. "It should also be part of a broader discussion, not a one-off, so it will be seen by the United States as a concession on our part should we end up participating in the defence shield." But the head of an Ottawa-based defence think tank said if Canada wants to fully join Trump's "Golden Dome," it should make its decision soon. "The history of Canada's decision-making on missile defence is that we tend to punt decisions and just never make them," said David Perry, president of the Canada Global Affairs Institute. "But if we want to be in and be in fully as this is being shaped and configured, we want to make a decision soon." Canada contributes to continental defence through Norad by monitoring and detecting threats. But while it can deal with cruise missiles, decisions on shooting ballistic missiles out of the sky are up to the Americans. Perry said Canada's past heel-dragging on ballistic defence has made it harder to get involved now. "Why on Earth we didn't do this during the Biden administration is beyond me, which would have been a much better time to have had a discussion about joining with the United States, particularly when we had the president here announcing plans, modernizing Norad," he said. Perry said that because of Canada's initial "no" to the George Bush administration in 2005, United States Northern Command is the entity responsible for dealing with defeating a missile. "Our 'no' has complicated the potential involvement of Norad, which would be the more sensible organization to be dealing with all of the issues. But the U.S. can't do that because Canada hasn't wanted to deal for 20 years now with the defence of that one particular missile type," he said.


National Post
20-05-2025
- National Post
2025 Thales Data Threat Report Reveals Nearly 70% of Organizations Identify AI's Fast-Moving Ecosystem as Top GenAI-Related Security Risk
Article content Article content 73% are investing in AI-specific security tools with either new or existing budgets. Malware remains top attack type since 2021; phishing rises to second, ransomware drops to third. 60% identified future decryption of today's data and future encryption compromise as major concerns among quantum computing security threats. Article content MEUDON, France — Thales today announced the release of the 2025 Thales Data Threat Report, its annual report on the latest data security threats, trends, and emerging topics based on a survey conducted by S&P Global Market Intelligence 451 Research of more than 3,100 IT and security professionals in 20 countries across 15 industries. This year's report found that nearly 70% of organizations view the rapid pace of AI development 1 —particularly in generative AI—as the leading security concern related to its adoption, followed by lack of integrity (64%) and trustworthiness (57%). Article content 'The clock is ticking on post-quantum readiness. It's encouraging that three out of five organizations are already prototyping new ciphers, but deployment timelines are tight and falling behind could leave critical data exposed.' – Todd Moore at Thales Article content The 2025 Thales Data Threat Report results reveal a major focus on the transformative impact of AI, especially GenAI, which relies heavily on high-quality, sensitive data for functions like training, inference, and content generation. As agentic AI emerges, ensuring data quality becomes even more critical for enabling sound decision-making and actions by AI systems. Many organizations are already adopting GenAI, with a third of respondents indicating it is either being integrated or is actively transforming their operations. Article content As GenAI introduces complex data security challenges and offers strategic opportunities to strengthen defenses, its growing integration marks a shift among organizations from experimentation to more mature, operational deployment. While most respondents said rapid adoption of GenAI is their top security concern, respondents in the more advanced stages of AI adoption aren't waiting to fully secure their systems or optimize their tech stacks before forging ahead. Because the drive to achieve rapid transformation often outweighs efforts to strengthen organizational readiness, these organizations may be inadvertently creating their own biggest security vulnerabilities. Article content 'The fast-evolving GenAI landscape is pressuring enterprises to move quickly, sometimes at the cost of caution, as they race to stay ahead of the adoption curve,' Eric Hanselman, Chief Analyst at S&P Global Market Intelligence 451 Research, said. 'Many enterprises are deploying GenAI faster than they can fully understand their application architectures, compounded by the rapid spread of SaaS tools embedding GenAI capabilities, adding layers of complexity and risk.' Article content Seventy-three percent of respondents report investing in AI-specific security tools, either through new budgets or by reallocating existing resources. Those prioritizing AI security are diversifying their approaches: over two-thirds have acquired tools from their cloud providers, three in five are leveraging established security vendors, and nearly half are turning to new or emerging startups. Notably, security for generative AI has quickly risen as a top spending priority, securing the second spot in ranked-choice voting, just behind cloud security. This shift underscores the growing recognition of AI-driven risks and the need for specialized defenses to mitigate them. Article content Data Breaches Show Modest Decline, Though Threats Remain Elevated Article content While data breaches remain a significant concern, their frequency has slightly decreased over the past few years. In 2021, 56% of surveyed enterprises reported experiencing a breach, but that figure has dropped to 45% in 2025. Additionally, the percentage of respondents reporting a breach within the last 12 months has fallen from 23% in 2021 to just 14% in 2025. Article content Malware continues to lead as the most prevalent threat, maintaining its top position since 2021. Phishing climbed to second place, overtaking ransomware, which now ranks third. When it comes to the most concerning threat actors, external sources dominate—hacktivists hold the top spot, followed by nation-state actors. Human error, while still significant, has dropped to third, down one position from the previous year. Article content The 2025 Thales Data Threat Report reveals that most organizations are increasingly concerned about quantum-related security risks. The top threat, cited by 63% of respondents, is future encryption compromise—the risk that quantum computers could eventually break current or future encryption algorithms, exposing data once considered secure. Close behind, 61% identified key distribution vulnerabilities, where quantum advancements could undermine the secure exchange of encryption keys. Additionally, 58% highlighted the 'harvest now, decrypt later' (HNDL) threat, where encrypted data intercepted today could be decrypted in the future. In response, half of organizations are assessing their encryption strategies, and 60% are actively prototyping or evaluating post-quantum cryptography (PQC) solutions. Only one-third, however, are placing their trust in telecom or cloud providers to manage the transition. Article content 'The clock is ticking on post-quantum readiness. It's encouraging that three out of five organizations are already prototyping new ciphers, but deployment timelines are tight and falling behind could leave critical data exposed,' Todd Moore, Global Vice President, Data Security Products at Thales, said. 'Even with clear timelines for transitioning to PQC algorithms, the pace of encryption change has been slower than expected due to a mix of legacy systems, complexity, and the challenge of balancing innovation with security.' Article content While this year's survey results indicate improvements in security posture, much more is needed to elevate operational data security to fully support the capabilities of emerging technologies such as GenAI and to pave the way for future innovations. Article content Thales (Euronext Paris: HO) is a global leader in advanced technologies for the Defence, Aerospace, and Cyber & Digital sectors. Its portfolio of innovative products and services addresses several major challenges: sovereignty, security, sustainability and inclusion. Article content The Group invests more than €4 billion per year in Research & Development in key areas, particularly for critical environments, such as Artificial Intelligence, cybersecurity, quantum and cloud technologies. Article content Thales has more than 83,000 employees in 68 countries. In 2024, the Group generated sales of €20.6 billion. Article content Article content Article content Article content Article content Contacts Article content Article content Article content