
Blues' top offseason priority? Center options? Match a Joel Hofer offer sheet? Mailbag, part 1
ST. LOUIS — Considering how aggressive the St. Louis Blues were in making moves in 2024-25, you can picture general manager Doug Armstrong champing at the bit to get his follow-up offseason officially underway.
Not that Armstrong would've sat on his hands if the Blues had missed the playoffs, but as he noted at his end-of-season news conference, the team's performance down the stretch has raised expectations and, he said, 'Now it's how quickly do we move up and continue to expand?'
Advertisement
That certainly gives this offseason more intrigue.
There's always something unexpected when Armstrong is working behind the scenes, and we'll find out what that could be in the coming months.
Of course, fans already have their own ideas for how it should go. In The Athletic's latest call for Blues mailbag questions, subscribers seemed to have bigger ambitions for the possibilities than if St. Louis had missed the postseason for the third straight year.
Let's see just how ambitious — and how realistic — the landscape is, in Part 1.
(Note: Some questions have been lightly edited for length and clarity.)
What do you think Armstrong's two biggest offseason moves will be? And if they happen, do you think they'll make the Blues a legitimate Stanley Cup contender? — Michael B.
For me, the two areas that need to be addressed are center and right-side defense.
Let's start with center, where most of the talk is about the Blues needing a No. 2. I can understand that. It was a pretty good season for Brayden Schenn, who had a lot of chemistry with Dylan Holloway and Jordan Kyrou, but he'll turn 34 in August, and there's no guarantee he won't regress.
But to me, this is more about the overall situation at center. The Blues got 50 points from Schenn and 20 from Oskar Sundqvist, so a combined 70 points from their Nos. 2 and 3 centers. For comparison, the Dallas Stars got 153 points from Matt Duchene (82) and Wyatt Johnston (71). Granted, the Stars are the favorite to win the Stanley Cup this season, but that's a big discrepancy.
So yes, the Blues could serve themselves well by picking up a No. 2 center with more scoring potential. If they did, Schenn could be No. 3, the depth up the middle would be vastly improved, and prospect Dalibor Dvorsky would have more time to develop.
This is where the heightened expectations can change things because, in a perfect world, Schenn could hold down the fort until Dvorsky can be No. 2, assuming he's capable. But with the Blues believing they can be more competitive sooner, they might feel the need to upgrade now and not wait for Dvorsky to be that guy. Either way, they need to find some help at the position this offseason.
Advertisement
Now let's look at the right-side defense.
Can the Blues find a taker for Justin Faulk and a replacement? Faulk is 33 and has two more seasons left on his contract, which has a $6.5 million average annual value. He has a full no-trade clause, but that changes to a modified NTC on July 1, when he'll have a 15-team NTC. The trade protection won't matter, though, if there aren't any takers for a defenseman whose offense has nosedived over the past two seasons.
If there's no trade partner, the Blues might have to keep rolling with Faulk, barring a buyout, which doesn't seem likely.
As for the last part of your question — could they be a Stanley Cup contender if they make these moves? — it depends on who they get. If it's the Florida Panthers' Sam Bennett and Aaron Ekblad, then yeah. But we'll have to see what Armstrong comes up with to know how high it raises the ceiling.
So what's the bigger priority: second-line center for Holloway and Kyrou or a top-four defenseman for Philip Broberg? — Patrick H.
I'd say center depth. That move would have a more dramatic impact on the team's success.
Armstrong mentioned his desire for a 200-foot forward. Any thoughts on who that might be and how that fits into our salary cap? — Chuck B.
Let's operate under two assumptions:
1. The Toronto Maple Leafs' Mitch Marner would be too rich for the Blues' blood at a projected $13 million to $14 million AAV.
2. Center, not wing, is the focus.
If those are the assumptions, then Bennett, a pending UFA, would be attractive. He doesn't bring more offense than Schenn, and his defensive numbers aren't overly impressive, but he plays a hard style and contributes at both ends.
He'll be 29 in June, and the projection for his next contract (if with another team) is seven years at a $7.55 million AAV, according to Evolving-Hockey. That might be too much term for the Blues, but they'd be getting a player who has won recently with the Panthers and would make them more competitive now.
Advertisement
Who could the Blues target as a second-line center, aside from Bennett? — Shawn F.
The Leafs' John Tavares turns 35 in September, so he doesn't fit the Blues' preferred age bracket, but he did have 38 goals and 74 points this season, and going back to what I noted earlier, you're adding depth and giving Dvorsky time to develop.
That said, The Athletic's Pierre LeBrun was at the Maple Leafs' end-of-season news availabilities Tuesday and reported that Tavares, a pending UFA, is 'optimistic' about returning to Toronto. His projected next contract (if with another team) would be a four-year deal with a $7.89 million AAV.
John Tavares says he spoke with Leafs GM Brad Treliving today and he's optimistic that maybe he will be back perhaps. But obviously none of that is for sure at this point.
— Pierre LeBrun (@PierreVLeBrun) May 20, 2025
What about the Colorado Avalanche's Brock Nelson? — Gerald J.
Nelson wouldn't be the worst option. He'll turn 34 in October, so again, he's a bit older. The issue with Nelson is his consistency. The Avs gave up Calum Ritchie, one of their top prospects, to get Nelson in a trade from the New York Islanders, and he had no goals and four assists in their first-round playoff loss to the Stars.
Are any centers available via trade? — Matt S.
This is always a hard type of question to answer because you don't know who's available, but names such as Ryan O'Reilly (Nashville Predators), Shane Pinto (Ottawa Senators), Marco Rossi (Minnesota Wild) and Elias Pettersson (Vancouver Canucks) have been mentioned. With one or two of those players, I doubt their current club would actually trade them, and with others — Pettersson, cough, cough — run!
Any chance the Blues bring in Brad Marchand in the offseason? — Evan R.
I'll leave this one for subscribers in the comment section.
What trade package would you accept for Kyrou? — Jackierosemunro
If I'm trading Kyrou, I want proven offense in return. In the past three seasons, he's tied for 21st in the NHL in goals (104) and tied for 47th in points (210).
Martin Necas is the type of player the Blues would have taken in return for Kyrou before Necas was traded from the Carolina Hurricanes to Colorado in the Mikko Rantanen deal. Necas hasn't come close to matching Kyrou's goal totals, so they would probably want more than someone like him, and I wouldn't blame them.
Say what you want about Kyrou, but if I'm the Blues, I want an equally productive offensive player or someone close and a draft pick(s).
Unpopular opinion: The Blues should be looking to trade Dvorsky, not Kyrou. A trade for a second-line center fits their window better, and it would unlock Kyrou and Holloway. Agree? — Jack M.
Just because you don't trade Kyrou doesn't mean you have to trade Dvorsky. Just like when the Blues drafted Robert Thomas in 2017, they brought in Ryan O'Reilly in 2018 and allowed Thomas to put in the work before he got his time to shine at center.
The Blues have a lot of valuable pieces at forward with Dvorsky, Jake Neighbours, Zack Bolduc, Jimmy Snuggerud, Otto Stenberg, Juraj Pekarcik, Adam Jecho, Aleksanteri Kaskimaki, Jakub Stancl, Ondrej Kos and others. Do you envision Armstrong dealing a few of those pieces for an impact player? — Alexander M.
Perhaps, but outside of Neighbours and Bolduc, I don't know who in that group would yield an impact player at this point. With Snuggerud and Dvorsky still unproven, how good is the player coming back?
Advertisement
Yes, you have to consider moving one or more of them because they can't all play in St. Louis, and at some point, the shine may wear off. But unless a trade for Neighbours or Bolduc is a no-brainer, I'm holding on to this group of players for now because their potential, with the prospects specifically, is worth more to the Blues than what they can get in a deal.
Would you entertain trading for the New Jersey Devils' Simon Nemec or the Los Angeles Kings' Brandt Clarke, even if you had to trade Neighbours or Bolduc? — Todd H.
So now you have to put me on the spot! I really like Neighbours and think he could be a captain one day. I envision him being part of the Blues' success in the future. I really like Bolduc, too. I think he has arguably the best shot on the team (haven't watched enough of Snuggerud yet to see if his will be even better), and likewise, he can be a big part.
But if you can get one of these two young right-shot defensemen — Nemec, 21, the No. 2 pick in 2022, and Clarke, 22, the No. 8 pick in 2021 — you have to do it. I don't know if New Jersey or L.A. would make these deals, but if they would, it would be hard for the Blues to pass up on one of those two defensemen.
Could you provide a prospect depth chart for the Blues defense? Who's next in line for a call-up, and did anyone rise or fall last season? — Tom K.
Blues returners: Broberg, Faulk, Colton Parayko, Cam Fowler, Nick Leddy, Tyler Tucker and Matthew Kessel.
AHL Springfield: Corey Schueneman, Leo Lööf, Michael Buchinger, Lukas Fischer and Marc-Andre Gaudet.
In the system: Adam Jiricek, Theo Lindstein, Colin Ralph, Quinton Burns, Arseni Koromyslov, Matthew Mayich and William McIsaac.
As far as call-ups, Schueneman would likely be No. 1. Regarding any rising stock, probably Fischer, who had a great season with OHL Sarnia. And any fallen stock, Jiricek, just because of the number of games he missed with OHL Brantford due to injury.
Advertisement
Should the team explore trading the rights to Torey Krug to a team that needs to reach the lower threshold of the salary cap? — Ron H.
It's a fair question because if a team is willing to pay Krug's salary, why wouldn't you do it? However, if he's unable to play again, he'll remain on long-term injured reserve (LTIR) and his $6.5 million AAV won't count against the salary cap. Additionally, insurance will help offset his actual cash salary in '25-26 ($6 million), so the situation is not much skin off the Blues' back.
What's your limit on Joel Hofer if someone offer-sheets him? Around $2.2 million? — G.R.
If Hofer is unsigned by July 1 and becomes an RFA, an offer sheet is a possibility, but let's keep the compensation figures in mind when deciding whether to match. Let's use your number of $2.2 million. According to this year's recently released compensation, if Hofer were signed to that salary by another team, the Blues would receive a third-round draft pick. If it's $2.34 million or higher, it's a second-rounder.
I don't believe a second-rounder is worth losing a potential future starter in Hofer, 24, who in 63 starts has a record of 35-22-5 and a .908 save percentage. His progression chart lines up with the final two years of Jordan Binnington's contract, so I'd hang on to Hofer up to any reasonable amount, and I don't think that'll be an issue because, although he has played well, it's not enough of a resume to break the bank.
(Top photo of Torey Krug, Justin Faulk, Sam Bennett and Joel Hofer: Jasen Vinlove / Imagn Images)

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Times
25 minutes ago
- New York Times
Which Edmonton Oilers players have increased their value for next season?
The Edmonton Oilers' 'heart of the order' is clearly established and is unlikely to change next season. The group of 'inner circle' roster players begins with Connor McDavid, Leon Draisaitl and Evan Bouchard, then extends to a veteran roster deep in quality and no-movement clauses. From the trade deadline (March 7) through the first two games of the Stanley Cup Final, several players have increased their chances of staying on the Edmonton roster for the 2025-26 campaign. Advertisement Oilers general manager Stan Bowman signed John Klingberg a couple of months before the trade deadline. The early days of his time with the team amounted to an extended training camp. On March 5, I wrote, 'Klingberg could be a real asset if he had a full training camp as a healthy player. Klingberg defensively looks out of position at times and isn't fast enough to recover in real time if he makes the wrong read. For a team that has defensive issues elsewhere, that kind of coverage is a problem.' Fast forward to today, and Klingberg is having great success in the postseason. Paired with Jake Walman, the two men have become a key component of Edmonton's breakout offence. Here's a look at Klingberg's progression, from the early days of his season through the playoff run: All numbers five-on-five, via Natural Stat Trick Klingberg's on-ice goal share in the postseason is pristine. The expected share suggests he has been a bit lucky and regression should occur, but the season is running out, and all indicators are positive for Walman-Klingberg. One of the key factors in Klingberg's game is outlet passing. He delivers breathtaking passes tape-to-tape across 100 feet routinely. He's always had that ability. Now the rest of his game has caught up. Klingberg has earned a contract. Power forward Evander Kane is signed for next season, but for much of the winter was rumoured to be a trade exit at the deadline. His modified no-trade clause allowed an out for an organization that has stacked and racked no-movement deals across the NHL roster. Kane's meandering medical issues took the entire season to solve, and his possible impact on the playoffs was unknown. Since his first game of the postseason, he has been exceptional. Kane has delivered across the board, with offence, hard hits and solid passing. Big men who can play the enforcer role are often death to offensive sorties, but the play hasn't died on Kane's stick this playoff run. His performance in several playoff springs with the Oilers shows a massive range in results. When he's healthy, Kane is money. All numbers five-on-five, via Natural Stat Trick The Oilers' patience with Kane's recovery and ensuring full health is one of the keys to the current run. His unique qualities (the population of Kane-line players in the NHL is one) make him impossible to replace if he's healthy. He has earned the final season of his Oilers contract with a wonderful spring performance. Advertisement After turning 40 in May, it would be easy for Oilers management to walk veteran winger Corey Perry this summer. He has many miles on him, the foot speed is not a plus and he is playing less than 12 minutes per game at five-on-five. On the other hand, he still has impressive offensive instincts and has been key in setting up some of the most important goals scored by Edmonton in these playoffs. When Zach Hyman was injured, it was Perry who elevated his game and helped the No. 1 line perform at a high level. There are arguments to be made in favour of a younger man (like Kasperi Kapanen) taking over for Perry. He will hit a wall at some point, and Father Time is undefeated. Signing Perry for another year is an easy choice for Bowman, though. The most controversial name on the list is probably Trent Frederic. The hype (rugged winger with skill) surrounding his arrival in a deadline deal from the Boston Bruins was followed immediately by news he would not be available for game action until late in the regular season. Looking at Frederic's performance for the Oilers, some fans are wondering where the edgy play has gone. The injury Frederic suffered (high-ankle sprain) has robbed him of some of that. On the other hand, his playoff stats for the Oilers this year are a close comparison to the totals he delivered for the Bruins one year ago: All numbers five-on-five, via Natural Stat Trick Elliotte Friedman reported on the weekend that the Oilers and Frederic's agent are negotiating a long-term deal that could be consummated after the final. Frederic is a perfect fit for the Oilers, as he can play a physical game while also providing the team with strong two-way acumen. Depending on the price and term, signing Frederic could make the 2025 deadline (acquiring Frederic and Walman) a key team-building moment. Advertisement All of the extension and trade talk will subside for the week, as the final takes centre stage. Win or lose, Bowman has some difficult decisions to make. The cap will make signing long-term deals at $5 million or more difficult, but the organization has successfully coaxed several veterans into low-cap or short-term deals with a championship run as the major selling point. The 2025 playoffs have shown the roster needs players like Kane, Frederic, Perry and Klingberg. Strong outlet passing, punishing forwards who can take a pass, win a board battle and score goals are vital. Each name above brings a combination of skill and guile to the game. The Oilers are three wins from the Stanley Cup. No matter the outcome, the desire to win next spring will inform all decisions of summer. These four men have earned the opportunity to return for another season in Edmonton. (Photo of Evander Kane: Perry Nelson / Imagn Images)


Forbes
30 minutes ago
- Forbes
Johnny McDermott: America's Forgotten US Open Champion
After sixteen long years, the United States would finally claim a win by a native-born player, ending a long streak of foreign-born winners at the U.S. Open. The first U.S.-born winner of the U.S. Open has a complex history and a golf résumé that reads more like a work of fiction than a true story, an epic rise and fall fit for the silver screen. Johnny McDermott came from humble beginnings. Born to a West Philadelphia mailman, he learned the game of golf while caddying at Aronimink Golf Club and would go on to become the first U.S.-born winner of the U.S. Open and, to this day, remains the youngest winner in the tournament's history. McDermott's early years were tumultuous. His father, McDermott Sr., was quick to anger, and by age six, McDermott Jr. was living part-time with his maternal grandmother. This may have benefited his golf game, as her home was next to a new nine-hole course. At age nine, McDermott began caddying at Aronimink Golf Club. It was said he would go for weeks at a time in immaculately clean, polished clothing, full of spunk and ego, then spend a week wearing the same poorly washed, crumpled clothes, withdrawn and reclusive. It's presumed he was in one of his high phases when he marched into the Aronimink clubhouse and demanded a caddying position, announcing he would be 'the best caddy they would ever hire.' He quickly found beauty in the golf swing. With guidance from club professional Walter Reynolds, McDermott learned to swing, grasped the strategy of the game, and even began manufacturing his own clubs. In 1906, at age 15 and under orders from his father, McDermott left school to join the workforce. Urged to work the docks and 'earn an honest living,' he instead became the assistant professional at Camden Country Club in New Jersey. He began competing in money matches, common at the time, where club members financially backed their pros. Still relatively unknown, McDermott pushed for more recognition and sought a position at a more prestigious club. From the writings of A.W. Tillinghast: 'One day a little fellow came up to me and recalled that he had caddied for me on a number of occasions and that he had become the head pro at a small nine-hole club in Merchantville, South Jersey. He yearned for better things and asked me to help him get the vacancy at Philadelphia Country Club. The suggestion, coming from an utterly unknown, staggered me. When I told him I had already placed former champion Willie Anderson there, he said it was a shame, as he could beat Anderson for red apples or green money. This supreme egoism left me quite cold. I regarded McDermott merely as a bumptious youth who needed a good trimming to show him his place.' Three years later, at age 18, McDermott played in his first U.S. Open. Unlike Francis Ouimet, McDermott faced less resistance entering the tournament as an established professional. However, professionals were still considered socially and morally inferior to their amateur counterparts. He finished 49th. Standing only 5'6' and weighing 130 pounds, McDermott was small even by the standards of the day. But his personality loomed large. Following his debut, he placed ads in New York newspapers challenging anyone to $500 matches (equivalent to over $13,000 today). His arrogance became public at the 1910 U.S. Open, where he finished second after a loss in the playoff. Afterward, he told winner Alex Smith, 'I'll get you next time, you big tramp.' McDermott's game and bravado soon carried him to victory at the Philadelphia Open. That win helped him move from the small nine-hole club to the prestigious Atlantic City Country Club, where he began playing money matches for $1,000. At the 1911 U.S. Open at Chicago Golf Club, McDermott arrived as t he American favorite. His fast, athletic swing, grimacing expressions, large hands, and the audible thwack of ball-on-club distinguished him. He started with a shaky 81 but rebounded in rounds 2, 3 and 4 to tie for the lead. In a playoff, he triumphed, despite rain and wind, thanks to his powerful, aggressive game and swing. At just 19, McDermott became (and still remains) the youngest winner of the U.S. Open. The following year, he defended his title at the Country Club of Buffalo, shooting two under par and winning by two strokes, the first under-par finish in U.S. Open history. Later that year, he placed fifth in his first Open Championship in Britain. British journalists, known for their bluntness, dubbed him the 'Little American Boy.' Shortly after returning, McDermott won the Shawnee Open by eight shots against a field that included Harry Vardon. In his post-round speech, McDermott famously said: 'We hope our foreign visitors had a good time, but we don't think they did, and we are sure they won't win the National Open.' The comment nearly ended his career. The USGA was furious, and despite his two U.S. Open wins and status as the only American-born champion, they considered banning him. His brash behavior, coupled with his status as a professional (rather than an amateur 'gentleman'), alienated many. In 1913, at The Country Club in Brookline, McDermott returned to defend his title. Rattled by controversy, he finished eighth. His reign ended as another American emerged, Francis Ouimet, a mild-mannered amateur who defeated Vardon and Ted Ray in a playoff. The media embraced Ouimet. Like McDermott, he had caddied and taught himself the game. But unlike McDermott, he was seen as noble, humble, and deserving. While Ouimet became America's Cinderella story, McDermott was cast aside. His attempted comeback unraveled tragically. After arriving late for the 1914 Open Championship, his ferry having collided with another ship, McDermott withdrew. The incident, though minor, seemed to mentally shatter him. In October 1914, McDermott suffered a major mental breakdown. Today, his behavior might be diagnosed as bipolar disorder or schizophrenia. Voluntarily institutionalized, he became a patient at Norristown State Hospital but was occasionally allowed to play golf. He frequented Atlantic City Country Club and often played the hospital's modest six-hole course. Walter Hagen, a golf legend of the era, would visit and sometimes play with McDermott. Sitting with Hagen one day, McDermott repeatedly said: 'I don't think I ever saw a more beautiful view than from here. I think it is fine. Tell the boys I'm doing well.' Despite his mental decline, McDermott appeared to find some comfort. Norristown offered early occupational therapy, and patients engaged in making wicker baskets, leather goods, and rugs. However, treatments at the time also included digitalis, electroshock therapy, opioids, binding, and bloodletting. In his later years, McDermott suffered memory and speech loss, often mumbling incoherently and failing to recognize friends and family. In one final indignity, McDermott was removed from a tournament clubhouse for wearing shabby clothing. Arnold Palmer, witnessing the incident, ensured he was allowed to stay and acknowledged his immense contribution to American golf. McDermott died later that year. Johnny McDermott was a remarkable figure in American sports. His meteoric rise placed enormous pressure on his young mind, which eventually collapsed under the strain. He was a pioneer, his swing bold, his voice louder still. But his mind pushed too far, and he spent the majority of his life institutionalized. A boy from humble beginnings who conquered the golf world before being consumed by it, McDermott is a tragic American hero. He reached the summit of golf greatness, but the price of that pursuit was everything else


New York Times
35 minutes ago
- New York Times
How did the Thunder bounce back in Game 2 of the NBA Finals?
After a gut-wrenching loss to the Indiana Pacers in Game 1 of the NBA Finals — sealed by Tyrese Haliburton's last-second game-winning shot — the Oklahoma City Thunder responded as expected and evened the series with a dominant 123-107 win in Game 2. Shai Gilgeous-Alexander followed his 38-point performance in Game 1 with 34 points Sunday night. His 72 total points are the most ever by a player in his first two career NBA Finals games. Advertisement While the Thunder have largely controlled the series, the Pacers head back to Indianapolis with the split they wanted and home-court advantage for the next two games. On the latest episode of 'The Athletic NBA Daily,' Zena Keita and Es Baraheni broke down how Oklahoma City's size wore down Indiana, Gilgeous-Alexander's continued offensive dominance, Tyrese Haliburton's quiet first three quarters and why Pascal Siakam needs to be more aggressive as a scorer. Later in the show, Dave DuFour and Andrew Schlecht joined live from Paycom Center in Oklahoma City to reflect on Game 2. They discussed how the Thunder's double-big lineup got them going after a nervous start, the key bench contributions from Aaron Wiggins and Kenrich Williams, how Oklahoma City constantly attacked Indiana's bigs on defense and the palpable tension in the arena throughout the night. They also looked at the importance of both teams getting into the paint to create open looks, how Lu Dort and the Thunder kept Haliburton in check for most of the game and why winning the 3-point shooting battle will be crucial for the Pacers moving forward. Watch the full episode of 'The Athletic NBA Daily' below or on the YouTube channel, or via 'The Athletic NBA Daily' podcast feed on Apple Podcasts and Spotify.