Mint Explainer: Microsoft envisions a web driven by AI agents. What will it look like?
Next Story
Shelley Singh The 'open agentic web' represents a significant evolution of the internet, moving from a system primarily designed for human consumption of information to one in which AI agents can autonomously understand, interact with, and act upon web content. Microsoft chairman and chief executive Satya Nadella at Microsoft Build 2025 in Seattle on 19 May. Photo: Jason Redmond/AFP Gift this article
At Microsoft Build, the company's annual conclave of web developers and engineers (19-22 May), CEO Satya Nadella introduced a vision of a next-generation web powered by AI agents.
At Microsoft Build, the company's annual conclave of web developers and engineers (19-22 May), CEO Satya Nadella introduced a vision of a next-generation web powered by AI agents.
Microsoft's 'open agentic web' represents a significant evolution of the internet, moving from a system primarily designed for human consumption of information to one in which AI agents can autonomously understand, interact with, and act upon web content.
Unlike AI chatbots, which simply respond to commands, AI agents work autonomously, collaborating with each other across different platforms and services to get things done. This shift will have profound impacts on both users and enterprises.
In a post on X, Nadella elaborated, 'we are building the open agentic web. It is reshaping every layer of the stack, and our goal is to help every developer build apps and agents that empower people and organisations everywhere."
For instance, coding agents are being built into GitHub, Microsoft's platform for software developers, to allow AI to autonomously fix bugs, add new features or simply maintain code.
Let's take a closer look at the changes and their implications. What's the 'open agentic web'?
Championed by Microsoft and others, the open agentic web is a vision of a future web in which AI agents seamlessly interact across platforms, services and devices to help users and organisations complete tasks. It's a vision of the web in which AI agents autonomously retrieve, process and act on information.
On the open agentic web, AI agents will communicate with each other, making decisions and solving problems without constant human input. Enterprises will be able to create custom AI agents that understand their unique processes and workflows.
This marks a step towards making AI more useful and independent, allowing people and businesses to automate tasks, improve efficiency, and create smarter and more intuitive digital experiences.
All of this will be enabled by a standardised AI communication protocol developed by Microsoft called NLWeb, in which NL stands for natural language. Can you tell me more about NLWeb?
NLWeb is an open project that aims to make it easy for any website to integrate natural language interfaces and AI-powered search capabilities. It allows users to engage with web content using conversational language, just like chatting with an AI assistant.
NLWeb is similar to Hyper Text Markup Language (HTML), the foundation of the web as we know it. HTML is used to structure and organise web pages, and text, images and multimedia content on the web). NLWeb will do the same, but with AI agents instead of humans performing the tasks.
The difference is that while HTML structures content for humans to read and interact with directly, NLWeb aims to structure content so that AI agents can understand, process, and act upon it autonomously or to better serve human queries. What difference will NLWeb make?
Microsoft envisions NLWeb as a cornerstone of the open agentic web. Just like HTML revolutionised web accessibility, NLWeb aims to make AI-powered interactions standard.
As AI agents become more prevalent, NLWeb will ensure websites remain discoverable and interactive. Developers will be able to tailor NLWeb to their needs, integrating custom AI models and data sources. How will different AI agents collaborate?
AI agents will collaborate through multi-agent systems, in which specialised AI agents work together to complete complex tasks.
For example, people's experiences with customer service chatbots can be frustrating because these bots cannot comprehend various nuances. In the open agentic web, one AI agent may handle query retrieval while another focuses on sentiment analysis and response generation, ensuring a much better experience.
Also read: Why AI is central to the new browser wars
AI agents will also be able to delegate tasks to other specialised agents, ensuring each focuses on its area of expertise. Agents will communicate using Agent2Agent (A2A) protocols, allowing seamless interaction across platforms. How will the open agentic web impact users and enterprises?
For starters, it will create more personalised and context-aware AI. AI agents will be able to recall past interactions and provide more relevant responses.
AI agents will also be able to process and act on web information autonomously. Eventually, websites will become interactive through NLWeb, allowing users to engage with them through natural language.
For instance, the open agentic web will be able to create personalised experiences for users. AI agents will understand individual preferences and proactively assist with tasks such as research, planning trips, or summarising content, without users needing to hunt for information themselves.
A user interested in, say, FIFA World Cup 2026, to be hosted jointly by the US, Canada and Mexico, will get information and updates on it once AI agents know of his interest.
For routine tasks, AI-driven tools could generate content, suggest ideas, or automate tasks—freeing up users to focus on more creative and meaningful work.
For businesses, it will be easier to deploy AI agents to handle customer service inquiries, manage supply chains, streamline workflows and more. It will also allow for better interoperability and quicker innovation, with AI agents collaborating to deliver results. What are the potential downsides?
While AI agents acting autonomously sounds exciting, there are potential risks as well. That's because they are not passive, like AI chatbots, but can make decisions on their own. There could therefore be issues spanning lack of transparency, trust, ethics, biases, security, accountability to regulators, and other challenges.
AI agents may make decisions in ways that are difficult for users or developers to understand, leading to trust issues. AI systems can also unintentionally reinforce biases present in their training data, leading to unfair or discriminatory outcomes. For instance, if all the CEOs of a 100-year-old company have been male, it might overlook female candidates when asked to select potential replacements.
Autonomous AI agents could also be exploited by malicious actors, leading to data breaches, misinformation, or unauthorised actions. Besides, over-reliance on AI is in itself a risk. Users and businesses may become too dependent on AI agents, reducing human oversight and critical thinking in decision-making.
While the risks of autonomous AI systems are significant, they can be mitigated (though perhaps not completely eliminated) through strong governance, ethical AI development, and user education. Topics You May Be Interested In Catch all the Business News, Market News, Breaking News Events and Latest News Updates on Live Mint. Download The Mint News App to get Daily Market Updates.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
38 minutes ago
- Time of India
The free filing IRS software TurboTax wanted to kill is now open source for all Americans
IRS Direct File software just took a bold step forward—its code is now open source on GitHub, even as the future of the free tax filing tool faces serious threats from TurboTax maker Intuit and Donald Trump's new budget bill. The program, used by over 300,000 Americans, received strong reviews for being fast, free, and user-friendly. Now, with developers leaving the government to continue this mission privately, the battle over free tax software heats up. This story reveals what's at stake, who's fighting for taxpayers, and why corporate lobbying wants it shut down. IRS Direct File open sourced as TurboTax and Trump bill threaten its future, pushing developers to launch a new private effort to save free tax filing tools for Americans. Explore how the IRS code release could reshape tax season ahead. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Why is Direct File under threat from Intuit and Donald Trump's new bill? What does it mean that the IRS open sourced Direct File's code? Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Who are the former IRS developers now shaping the future of tax filing? Why is the fight over free tax software such a big deal for Americans? What happens next for Direct File and taxpayers? Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads FAQs: The IRS just made a major move to protect its free tax filing software—Direct File—by releasing most of its code publicly on GitHub. This decision comes at a crucial moment. As pressure mounts from Intuit, the maker of TurboTax, and political threats from Donald Trump's budget bill, the future of free, government-backed tax filing could be in real move to open source the code not only gives developers a peek into how the IRS built a modern, user-friendly filing tool—it's also a clear message: the work will live on, even if Washington politics try to shut it Direct File program, developed by teams from the US Digital Service (USDS) and 18F, was part of a pilot launched by the IRS in 2024. About 300,000 Americans used the tool, and according to Federal News Network, users gave it rave reviews for being free, fast, and simple. The idea was straightforward—make tax filing easy and accessible, directly through the not everyone is happy about this. Companies like Intuit, whose TurboTax software dominates the paid tax prep market, have lobbied heavily against Direct File. Now, Trump's budget reconciliation bill includes language that could shut down Direct File entirely. According to policy experts, ending the program 'is a gift to the tax-prep industry that will cost taxpayers time and money.'On GitHub, the IRS released much of the source code that powers Direct File. This is a big deal for transparency, accountability, and future development. It means anyone—from independent developers to watchdog groups—can now examine, improve, or even build upon the free move is especially significant because many believe the program is at risk of being dismantled for political reasons. By putting the code in the public domain, the IRS is essentially giving the project a second life—even if the federal government walks core developers of Direct File—Chris Given, Jen Thomas, and Merici Vinton—have left their government roles. They've now joined the Economic Security Project's 'Future of Tax Filing Fellowship,' an initiative dedicated to exploring better ways for Americans to file taxes without paying high not alone. Gabriel Zucker, who helped build Direct File while working at Code for America, is also joining the fellowship. Their goal? Find new, more efficient, and less expensive models of tax filing—keeping the spirit of Direct File alive in the private years, the IRS Free File program—offering no-cost filing options for low- and moderate-income Americans—has been plagued by private sector interference. Intuit and other companies have pushed hard to keep the government from creating a fully free and easy system, because it would directly threaten their like Direct File show that a simple, free tax filing solution can work. And not only that—it's popular. With over 300,000 users in its pilot year and overwhelmingly positive feedback, the public appetite for such a service is as corporate lobbying ramps up and Trump's bill threatens its existence, it's a reminder of how political power can override public benefit—unless the public speaks now, the fate of Direct File rests in the hands of Congress and policymakers. If the Trump-backed bill passes as written, the program could be killed despite its success. However, by releasing the code to the public and rallying around the cause of free tax tools, developers and citizens are making it harder to erase the program the fellowship led by Given, Thomas, Vinton, and Zucker is pushing forward. They're building something new—maybe even better—by applying the lessons learned from Direct short, this isn't just a tech story—it's a fight over who controls tax filing in America: the people or the a free IRS tax filing tool that helps Americans file their taxes easily without using paid services like it threatens their profits by offering a government-backed free tax filing option for the public.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
How Steve Ballmer may have just agreed with Android co-founder for Bill Gates being responsible for Microsoft losing $400 billion-plus in smartphone war
Steve Ballmer , former CEO of Microsoft recently admitted how overconfidence in Windows prevented the software giant from capitalizing on the smartphone market. Speaking on the Acquired podcast, Ballmer said, 'We were too confident,' as he reflected on Microsoft's past strategy of pushing Windows into markets where it didn't fit, instead of building solutions tailored to specific platforms. His remarks echoes with Android co-founder Rich Miner who – earlier this year – attributed Microsoft's loss of smartphone wars to Android to Bill Gates 's decision. In an X post in January, Miner wrote 'I literally helped create Android to prevent Microsoft from controlling the phone the way they did the PC - stifling innovation. So it's always funny for me to hear Gates whine about losing mobile to Android'. 'I helped Orange launch the first Windows Mobile phone in 2002, the SPV. I worried MSFT might end up controlling mobile like they did the PC, I wanted something more open. So, sorry Bill, you're more responsible for losing the $400B than you realize,' he then stated. What Steve Ballmer said on Microsoft losing the smartphone war Stating that the company was 'too confident', Ballmer admitted on the podcast: 'I don't think we stuck with Windows too long. I think what we did is we tried to put Windows in places that it didn't naturally go.' He pointed to Windows Mobile and automotive applications as key examples, where Microsoft's push to use Windows APIs and interfaces led to forced and unnatural user experiences. During the podcast, Ballmer revealed that Microsoft's strategy was driven by a mix of 'paranoia and confidence' in Windows, which the company saw as its 'birthright' and 'permission to enter' new markets. This mindset influenced its push into areas like media center applications and TV integration, where simplified versions of Windows struggled to match the performance and user experience of purpose-built solutions. OnePlus Pad 3 Unboxing and first look: What's in the box? AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
India.com
2 hours ago
- India.com
Followers of this religion are the richest in the world, Muslims only have...
There are over 7 billion individuals who adhere to various religions, traditions, and customs. They belong to a wide range of social and economic spheres: from the ultra-rich and wealthy elite to the middle class and poorer people. While speaking about the richest people in the world, Tesla's Elon Musk, Amazon's Jeff Bezos, Microsoft co-founder and philanthropist Bill Gates, and Meta's Mark Zuckerberg are some of the names that pop up in the minds of people. Not only are they among the wealthiest in the world, but they also have great power in controlling the world economy. We tend to look at rich people through different spectacles. Moreover, the amount of wealth that believers of many religions possess draws a bigger picture. A new global study has shown which religious denomination is richest worldwide. The research provides interesting facts about economic differences worldwide. Christians are reportedly the richest religious denomination worldwide, according to the report cited by Zeenews. Members of Christianity as a denomination own assets worth about $107.28 trillion, covering about 55% of global wealth, reported ZeeNews. This predominance can be attributed to industrialized countries like the United States, Canada, European nations, and Australia, where the majority are Christians. The Hindu community collectively holds around $655 billion in assets, a figure significantly lower compared to that of the Muslim community. One possible reason for this disparity is that a large number of Hindus live in developing or emerging economies. What's even more surprising is that despite having a relatively small global population, the Jewish community holds substantial wealth. Jews collectively own about $2.079 trillion in assets — more than three times the wealth of the Hindu community. This financial strength is often attributed to their strong presence in fields like education, technology, finance, and defense. Many Jewish individuals are prominently featured on billionaire lists. In the United States in particular, the Jewish community has had a significant social and economic impact. A significant portion of global wealth is also held by individuals who have no religious affiliation. According to recent study data, non-religious individuals collectively own $67.832 trillion in assets, accounting for 34.8% of the world's total wealth. This reflects a notable rise in the number of wealthy individuals who consider money their ultimate belief, without following any particular faith. From the United States to Western nations—especially in Europe—and across all seven continents, a deep analysis of the global population revealed some startling facts. Countries like India (with the highest population), followed by China, as well as nations with the largest Muslim populations and other religious demographics, were all considered in the study. Notably, the report also includes data on wealthy atheists, offering a broader perspective on wealth distribution beyond religious boundaries. When it comes to global wealth, followers of Islam—Muslims—hold the second-highest share. Collectively, Muslims possess assets worth approximately $11.335 trillion. Despite accounting for around 25% of the world's population, the Muslim community still holds the second-largest share of global wealth. This highlights their significant presence in global economic dynamics, particularly in regions rich in natural resources and emerging financial hubs.
