Cork man accused of attempted murder in arson attack pleads guilty to other related charges
A facing the prospect of trial by judge and jury for attempted murder arising out of an arson attack on a house in Cork city on Christmas Day 2023 confessed to other related charges today.
Shane Casey, aged 32, of Shanowen, Rathcormac, Co Cork, was arraigned on three charges at the Central Criminal Court today and pleaded guilty to all three of them.
He did not plead guilty to another charge on the indictment — namely the attempted murder of Billy Murphy, a man in his 60s, owner of the house at Dyke Parade, Cork, where the arson was carried out. However, defence senior counsel Ray Boland conceded that the plea of guilty to certain charges was entered on the basis that the full facts of the case would be given at the sentencing hearing.
Mr Boland asked for free legal aid to be extended to include the preparation of a psychiatric report on Shane Casey. Ms Justice Eileen Creedon acceded to that application. The case was adjourned until October 6 when it is anticipated a date will be set for sentencing.
Detective Garda Brian Barron originally charged Casey with the attempted murder of Mr Murphy, but there was no plea to that charge. There was a plea of guilty to a charge of assault causing harm to Mr Murphy, production of an article, namely a blade, in the course of the assault, and finally causing criminal damage to the house and neighbouring properties with intent to endanger life.
Evidence
It was previously alleged when the case first came before the courts that the accused set fire to the house on Dyke Parade, Cork, just after 6pm on December 25, 2023, when four people were present in the house and that the accused man stood outside swinging a blade when the first person ran from the burning building, telling him, 'You are going to die here tonight.'
Referring to CCTV and other evidence, Det Garda Barron said: 'At 6.05pm, he exits and stands looking in the open front door at the fire taking hold. At 6.06pm, it is alleged that he closes the front door and attempts to barricade the front door from the outside, using a piece of timber to jam to the side and then under the door.
'It is alleged he takes a blade from his pocket and holds it out in front of him and waits outside. At 6.08pm, the front door bursts open and [one of the men] attempts to escape the now blazing house.
"It was alleged he said (to one injured party), 'My name is Shane Casey and you remember me from two days ago — you are going to die here tonight.''
It was further alleged that one woman had to be rescued from the roof and that it took six units of the fire service more than six hours to bring the fire under control and make the building safe. The fire caused thousands of euro in damage, the detective said.
Jane Hyland prosecution senior counsel said that victim impact statements would be prepared in advance of sentencing.
This case had been listed for trial by judge and jury at the Central Criminal Court on June 18 but it will now be removed from that list.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Journal
a day ago
- The Journal
Israeli authorities deny legal counsel to 70-year-old Irish activist facing deportation
ISRAELI AUTHORITIES HAVE brought 70-year-old Irish woman D. Murphy before the courts without allowing her access to legal representation, nor informing her solicitor of the proceedings, according to several local pro-Palestinian activists. Máire Ní Mhurchú, an activist originally from Cork who goes by the name D. Murphy, has been held in custody in Israel since 1 June, when Israeli authorities issued what local activist groups have described as an 'unjust deportation order' . Murphy was arrested alongside Swedish national Suzanne Björk, who has since been deported from Israel to Athens . The two women were detained shortly after Israeli forces declared the village a 'closed military zone'. Murphy was initially held at Ben Gurion Airport, before being transferred to Givon Prison in Ramla on Tuesday. Advertisement In a statement released today, the International Solidarity Movement (ISM), a Palestine-based group, stated that Murphy was brought before a judge yesterday 'without legal representation and without her lawyer being notified'. According to the ISM, legal counsel was denied despite Murphy's request and her solicitor's repeated attempts to contact her through the prison service. 'Murphy told her family, during a phone call she was permitted to make, that she had been deliberately given an incorrect phone number for her lawyer,' said ISM spokesperson Mariam. Mariam added that the last time Murphy managed to speak with her solicitor was on Monday, noting: 'As of today, we still do not know the outcome of the hearing.' 'These tactics—denying legal advice—are familiar to activists in solidarity with Palestinians, as Israeli authorities continue to act with impunity,' she continued. She also said ISM activists are 'deeply concerned' for D. Murphy, who they believe will likely be deported from Israel soon. 'As it stands, we do not know the outcome or what the next steps will be.' Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
The Journal
a day ago
- The Journal
Two boys who raped teenage girl at Limerick Racecourse sentenced to six years in detention
TWO BOYS WHO raped a teenage girl in a car at Limerick Racecourse when they were aged 13 and 15 years old have each been sentenced to six years in detention. A third defendant (now 18) who was found guilty of aiding and abetting the rapes by moving the car in which it occurred was jailed for three-and-a-half years. The daytime attack against the girl involved humiliation and degradation and was committed by offenders of a very young age, the Central Criminal Court heard. The teenage rapists and their families did not accept the verdicts of the jury and there was a heavy garda presence in court for sentencing today. Justice Paul McDermott said that if the boys – who are all cousins – had been adults at the time of the offending, the headline sentence for the rape offences would have been in the range of 15 years to life imprisonment. 'This was a 16-year-old intoxicated girl in a vulnerable situation subjected to rape and sexual assault,' he said. 'She was raped one after the other by [the two boys] and in the course of these rapes, she was sexually assaulted.' The girl was repeatedly saying no during the assaults. Further indignity was heaped upon her by video footage being taken of the incident, the judge said. Handing down sentence, Justice McDermott noted there was very little to be said in mitigation for the boys, as they have not expressed remorse or any understanding of the harm caused to the complainant. They must be sentenced as juveniles under the Children Act, in which detention is a last resort, the court heard. The judge accepted the third defendant, who aided and abetted the rapes, has taken some responsibility for his involvement but struggles to understand it. He noted they have no previous convictions and have been subject to some childhood trauma, with mental health difficulties in their families. They had a lack of understanding in the areas of sexual relations and consent, the court heard. Justice McDermott sentenced the two rapists to a sentence of seven-and-a-half years of detention, with the final 18 months suspended on a number of conditions, including that they engage in sexual offending programmes and have no contact whatsoever with the complainant. The judge noted this means that part of their sentence will be served in prison. He sentenced the third defendant to five years in jail as he is now over the age of 18 years. He suspended the final 18 months of this sentence on the same conditions. The three boys stood trial at the Central Criminal Court sitting in Cork earlier this year, with two of the boys (now aged 16 and 17) found guilty of sexually assaulting and raping the then 16-year-old girl in a car at the racecourse on 26 December 2022. They were 13 and 15 years old at the time. The third boy (now 18) was found guilty by the jury of four counts of aiding and abetting the rapes and sexual assaults following the six-week trial. The court heard he moved the car during the course of the attack. He was aged 15 at the time. He was acquitted of one count of false imprisonment. Video clips were taken of the incident by one of the boys, including one clip of the girl walking away from the car after she had been raped. When she found her friends, she was extremely upset and immediately told them what had happened to her, the court heard. Advertisement The boys denied raping the girl, telling gardaí differing versions of events including one who said he was in Dublin on the day in question. They all eventually claimed it was a consensual encounter. Detective Garda Lisa O'Regan told Dean Kelly SC, prosecuting, that the girl was socialising with her friends at the racecourse on the day in question. She was, in her own words, 'really drunk' when she got chatting to the three boys, Kelly said. The court heard she agreed to go for a walk with one of the boys because she wanted to kiss him. Instead, she found herself in a car belonging to the father of one of the boys, where she was sexually assaulted and raped by two of them. The third boy moved the car at one point during the attack. The girl said she told the boys 'No' repeatedly and that she was on her period and had a tampon in. She said she told them she needed to go back to her friends, but they repeatedly said no and that she was 'fine'. When medically examined later that evening, she was found to have extensive bleeding and bruising. She had not had sexual intercourse before prior to the attack. The girl (now aged 18) was not in court for the sentence hearing in Dublin. In a victim statement read out on her behalf by counsel, she described her fear and anxiety in the aftermath of the attack, during which she was 'begging them to get off me'. 'At the age of 16, I had my innocence stripped away from me,' she said. 'These two (boys) took what they wanted with no regrets.' She said her parents had to hear every 'vulgar' and 'gruesome' detail of what happened to her and that she will 'forever have guilt on my shoulders – not just for how it affected me, but everyone around me'. 'They not only took away the rest of my childhood, they took away the rest of my life,' she said. 'At the age of 16, I was raped. This is always something I will have to carry around. 'But what I can do is live with the fact that I told the truth.' The court heard the boys have no previous convictions. They are all in detention or custody since the guilty verdicts were handed down last April. The case was previously adjourned for a number of weeks for preparation of probation reports. Cathal McGreal, BL, defending the youngest of the three boys, said his client was then aged 13 and had no previous convictions. He said that a report before the court described him as mild-mannered, introverted and vulnerable from a mental health point of view. Counsel said his client made admissions and described him as 'not a particularly mature 13-year-old, and this was his first sexual experience'. The court heard that the boy's father and his family do not accept the verdict. McGreal said his client wants to pursue his Junior Certificate and is interested in becoming a mechanic or a builder. He is against drugs and alcohol and wants to marry his girlfriend. Vincent Heneghan SC, defending the then-15-year-old boy, said his client comes from a 'good supportive family' and they are concerned for him. He stated that his client does not accept the jury's verdict and that this will limit any potential mitigation. Counsel said his client presents as intermittently distressed since going into custody and is not sleeping well. He said he is engaging in education and sport while in Oberstown. Henaghan said the defendant has no issues with drugs or alcohol and outlined that there was no pre-planning to this offending. He asked the court to consider the reports that were before the court on behalf of his client and requested that the court be as lenient as possible. Donal Cronin BL, defending the third boy, said his sexual knowledge at the time was limited. He outlined that his client has no issues with drink or drugs and that sport has formed a major part of his life. Cronin asked the court to fashion a sentence that would mark the wrongdoing but also include rehabilitation. He asked the court to consider the mitigating factors, including his client's culpability, his involvement and the fact he was a child at the time.
Irish Independent
a day ago
- Irish Independent
Carlow brothers who went on a ‘crime spree' that left man in his 60s with traumatic brain injury appeal sentences
Today at 13:54 Two brothers who went on a Christmas Day 'crime spree' involving the arson of a car and a serious assault that left a man in his 60s with a traumatic brain injury have appealed their ten-year sentences. While barristers for Colin (36) and Glen Murphy (33) submitted to the Court of Appeal that the sentencing judge should not have imposed consecutive sentences, Ms Justice Isobel Kennedy remarked that the assault of the man in his 60s was at the very top end of the scale and arguably could have been a section 4 assault, which is an offence of causing serious harm.
