Beltrami County GOP set to meet April 14
Apr. 9—BEMIDJI — The Beltrami County GOP will hold its monthly meeting at 6:30 p.m. on Monday, April 14, at its office in the Paul Bunyan Mall, Suite 102, 1401 Paul Bunyan Drive NW.
Coffee and treats will be served starting at 6 p.m. All interested Republicans are invited to attend, a release said.
For more information about Republican activities and programs, visit
beltramigop.com
or call
(218) 760-1624.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
27 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Trump is turning the US into an electric vehicle laggard
President Donald Trump's efforts to unravel policies supporting electric vehicles threatens to turn the US into a laggard for years to come, according to a new report. BloombergNEF reduced both its near- and long-term EV outlook for the first time, cutting 14 million battery-powered cars from its sales projections through 2030 due to the US rollback. The researcher now sees the country trailing not only China and Europe, but also the global average adoption rate until 2040. 'Global EV sales are growing, but the national picture is more varied than ever,' BNEF analysts write in the report released Wednesday. Whereas China is expected to account for nearly two-thirds of the almost 22 million plug-in vehicles sold globally this year, in part thanks to government incentives, 'all major EV policies in the US are under fire.' Trump ordered the elimination of subsidies and other measures boosting electric vehicles during his first day back in the White House in January. His administration and the Republican-controlled Congress are heeding his directive by moving to ease national fuel-economy standards, phase out EV tax credits and strip California's ability to set its own emissions limits. BNEF's outlook assumes national gas-mileage and tailpipe regulations will revert back to where they were during Trump's first term, and that the up-to-$7,500 consumer tax credit will end for most EVs after this year. There's potential for further downside to the researcher's outlook for EV sales in the US, depending on the ultimate fate of waivers allowing states to impose more stringent clean-air rules. A coalition of states led by California Attorney General Rob Bonta sued last week to challenge the administration's move to scrap state-level policies. 'If this attempt at revoking the waiver is successful, it would have dire consequences for EV sales in California, and because of the state's oversized influence on the EV market in the country, in whole of the US,' BNEF says. 'Removing all of the supply-side mandates in the country, at the same time as demand incentives, would push down EV sales in the US sharply.' China, by contrast, is expected to keep up its momentum in transitioning to plug-in vehicles, largely due to simple economics: It's the only large market where EVs are cheaper, on average, than comparable combustion cars. Demand also is getting a boost from the government extending subsidies that encourage consumers to trade in older cars for new EVs and hybrids. BNEF predicts the country's electric vehicle market will be larger than the total US car market within the next year. 'China is emerging as a major electric vehicle manufacturing powerhouse,' BNEF says in its report, estimating that the country accounted for just shy of 70% of worldwide EV production last year. China's dominance of EV manufacturing and the battery supply chain contributed to rising trade tensions and increased tariffs since BNEF last published its annual outlook. The European Union imposed duties on imports of battery-electric vehicles from China for five years starting in October, with added tariffs ranging from 35% for MG maker SAIC Motor Corp. to 7.8% for Tesla Inc. 'Policymakers face growing tension between environmental targets and other competing policy priorities, and as a result many automakers have reduced previously announced EV goals or quietly shelved them,' BNEF says in its report, citing walk-backs by manufacturers including Toyota, Ford, Mercedes-Benz and Volvo. In addition to taking measures to protect domestic manufacturers from cheaper EVs imported from China, the EU relaxed its CO2 emissions standards by sparing manufacturers from likely fines this year and allowing companies to meet tougher targets more gradually. As a result of the change, BNEF cut its forecast for electric vehicle sales in affected markets from this year through 2027 by about 19%, or roughly 2.6 million cars. The UK — which left the EU in 2020 and has maintained relative openness to Chinese imports — has emerged as the leading major market for electric vehicles after China. BNEF expects plug-in cars to reach 40% share of the UK market by next year. Trudell writes for Bloomberg News.
CNBC
29 minutes ago
- CNBC
Senate's budget proposal offers student loan borrowers fewer repayment options, loan limits for grad school
The U.S. Senate has released details about its version of the budget reconciliation package known as President Donald Trump's "One Big Beautiful Bill Act." The House passed its version of the bill on May 22, which included a number of proposals to reform the current federal student loan landscape, including the elimination of existing repayment plans and new limits on federal borrowing. The Senate's version — released by the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions committee on June 10 — keeps most of those proposals in place, but takes out other regulations, like a loan limit on undergraduate borrowers. Critics say the bill removes important protections for vulnerable student loan borrowers, such as affordable repayment plans and recourse when students are harmed by their institution. "While the Senate has pared back or rejected many of the most harmful changes proposed by the House, the bill still harms the lowest-income loan borrowers and students to pay for tax cuts," Sameer Gadkaree, president of The Institute for College Access & Success, said in a statement on June 11. Proponents, however, say the bill addresses some of the major contributing factors to the student loan crisis and puts the onus on borrowers to repay their debts, rather than taxpayers. "While [former President Joe] Biden and Democrats unfairly attempted to shift student debt onto taxpayers that chose not to go to college, Republicans are taking on the root causes of the student debt crisis to lower the cost of tuition and improve Americans' access to opportunities that set them up for success," Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.), who chairs the HELP committee, said in a statement on June 10. Republicans hope to move the bill forward by July 4, but some provisions, namely cuts to Medicaid, are raising concerns about whether it will pass the Senate as is. But if the Senate's provisions remain in place, here's what it would mean for student loan borrowers. Both the House and Senate versions of the bill aim to streamline the repayment options for federal student loan borrowers. Borrowers currently have at least three different income-driven repayment plans available, as well as the standard repayment plan, to pay back their loans on timelines ranging from 10 to 25 years. If passed as proposed, borrowers whose loans are disbursed on or after July 1, 2026 will only have two options: a standard fixed-payment plan and a new income-driven repayment plan lawmakers have coined the Repayment Assistance Plan. Existing borrowers will be able to stay on older plans or switch into one of the new repayment plans. The new standard repayment plan will have borrowers paying back their loans for 10 to 25 years, depending on how much they borrow. Currently, the standard repayment plan calculates monthly payments to have the debt repaid in 10 years. RAP, the new income-driven repayment plan, will calculate monthly payments as between 1% and 10% of a borrower's discretionary income, down from the current offerings that set payments at 10%, 15% or 20% of a borrower's income, depending on the plan and when the loans were disbursed. On RAP, borrowers would be eligible to have their remaining balances forgiven after 30 years, up from the current 20 or 25 years. The House's proposal includes a stipulation that borrowers who enroll in RAP will not be able to switch out of the plan later, but the Senate's did not include that rule. The Senate's version of the bill maintains the House's goal of limiting the amount of loans students and their families can take out, but with different thresholds. Under the Senate's proposal, graduate borrowers would have a lifetime borrowing limit of $100,000, and up to $200,000 for students in professional programs, like medical school. Parents would have a borrowing limit of $65,000 per undergraduate student. Undergraduate borrowers would maintain the current aggregate limit of $31,000 for dependent students and $57,500 for independent borrowers. The House's version would impose a $50,000 lifetime borrowing limit for undergraduate students and eliminate subsidized loans that don't accrue interest while students are in school. That version also caps lifetime graduate borrowing at $100,000 or $150,000 for professional programs, and parent PLUS loans at $50,000 per parent. Currently, borrowers have a $138,500 lifetime limit for graduate loans, including any amount borrowed for undergraduate studies. Parents can borrow up to the cost of their student's attendance after any federal aid. Both bills eliminate grad PLUS loans, which have a higher interest rate than unsubsidized loans, but allow grad students to borrow up to their entire cost of attendance minus any federal aid. Both versions of the bill roll back regulations put in place to help borrowers who didn't get the full benefit of the education they went into debt for. The House and Senate proposals both eliminate borrower defense to repayment and closed school discharge rules, which allow borrowers to have their federal debt discharged if they prove they were defrauded by their academic institution or if their school wound up closing. The House version of the bill went a step further, eliminating the 90/10 and gainful employment rules, which aim to hold schools accountable for ensuring borrowers are getting the education necessary to land well-paying jobs. Both versions of the bill also eliminate deferment options that currently allow qualifying borrowers to pause payments when dealing with the economic hardship and unemployment.
Time Magazine
35 minutes ago
- Time Magazine
Breaking Down the Escalating Feud Between Trump and Tucker Carlson Amid Divide Over Israel-Iran Conflict
As the active conflict between Israel and Iran enters its sixth day, and with the latter issuing new grave warnings to the United States, divides are starting to show across the political spectrum as to what U.S. President Donald Trump should do next. Trump's openness to a possible U.S. involvement has led to schisms within the Republican community and beyond, and has notably impacted his allyship with a certain former Fox News host. Tucker Carlson—who was fired from Fox News in 2023 and has since gone on to host his own podcast, The Tucker Carlson Show —has shared a friendly relationship with Trump over the years. Trump sat down with Carlson for an exclusive interview during the 2024 election, and they even hit the campaign trail together. But on June 13, Carlson made it clear that he opposed any potential U.S. military intervention in the Israel-Iran conflict, arguing that the 'real divide' is between 'those who casually encourage violence, and those who seek to prevent it—between warmongers and peacemakers.' 'Who are the warmongers? They would include anyone who's calling Donald Trump today to demand air strikes and other direct U.S. military involvement in a war with Iran,' Carlson said via social media. The podcast personality listed several Republicans and high-profile businesspeople and media persons, including Sean Hannity, Mark Levin, Rupert Murdoch, Ike Perlmutter, and Miriam Adelson. "At some point they will all have to answer for this, but you should know their names now," Carlson signed off. Trump was dismissive of Carlson's viewpoint when reporters asked him to comment during the 2025 G7 Summit. 'I don't know what Tucker Carlson is saying. Let him go get a television network and say it so that people listen,' the President said. Later that same day, Trump took to Truth Social to take another jab at Carlson. 'Somebody please explain to kooky Tucker Carlson that IRAN CANNOT HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPON," he urged. Other Republican commentators and lawmakers—those who have typically supported Trump's 'America First' policies—have come to Carlson's defense amid Trump's escalation, including far-right Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene from Georgia. Greene said that Carlson is one of her "favorite people ' and he 'unapologetically believes the same things" she does. '[F]oreign wars/intervention/regime change put America last, kill innocent people, are making us broke, and will ultimately lead to our destruction,' Greene said. "That's not kooky. That's what millions of Americans voted for. It's what we believe is America First." Carson doubled down on his stance on fellow right-wing commentator Steve Bannon's podcast, The War Room, on Monday, in which he warned that involvement in the Middle East could 'weaken' the U.S. 'I think we're going to see the end of the American empire,' he said. Bannon, who served as the White House's chief strategist during the first few months of Trump's first term, has also called for the U.S. to stay out of conflict in the Middle East. Carlson, meanwhile, has broken away from other notable Republicans over the Israel-Iran argument. Notably, he and Texas Sen. Ted Cruz rowed over the Senator's knowledge of Iran during an interview on his podcast, released in full on Wednesday. 'How could you not know that?' Carlson asked in disbelief, after Cruz was unable to answer when asked to list the population of Iran (something Carlson identified as around 92 million). After Cruz said that he does not 'sit around and memorize population tables,' Carlson replied: 'Well, it's kind of relevant, because you're calling for the overthrow of the government.' The two continued to argue over about their respective knowledge of the Middle Eastern country, the alleged Iranian Trump assassination plot, and the level of potential U.S. involvement in the current conflict and how that might look. 'We're carrying out military strikes today,' Cruz said. Carlson then pointed out that Cruz and other U.S. officials had stated that the strikes were being carried out by Israel, making Cruz's "we" a curious choice of wording. Cruz clarified: 'With our help. I said 'we.' Israel is leading, but we're supporting them.' 'You just said 'we' were,' Carlson said. 'This is high stakes. You're a Senator. If you're saying the United States government is at war with Iran right now, people are listening.' Cruz took to social media after the interview with Carlson, arguing that Carlson's question was a 'silly game' and that the former Fox News host had 'attacked' Trump and the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) during their sit-down. Trump has echoed Cruz's 'we' in his own Truth Social posts. 'We now have complete and total control of the skies over Iran. Iran had good sky trackers and other defensive equipment, and plenty of it, but it doesn't compare to American made, conceived, and manufactured 'stuff,'" he said on Tuesday. 'Nobody does it better than the good ol' USA.'
