logo
"Important that the world knows India's stance on terrorism": Congress MP Shashi Tharoor on Op Sindoor outreach

"Important that the world knows India's stance on terrorism": Congress MP Shashi Tharoor on Op Sindoor outreach

India Gazette25-05-2025

New York [US], May 25 (ANI): Congress MP and the leader of the all-party delegation Shashi Tharoor on Saturday (local time) emphasised that India's Operation Sindoor against Pakistan was a message against terror and not a desire for warfare.
Tharoor explained that India has tried dialogue and diplomacy with Pakistan, but the country's continued support for terrorism has left India with no choice but to take action in the aftermath of the Pahalgam terror attack.
Speaking to ANI, Tharoor said, 'We are all together in this and we too should show a resolution to the world like America that we are absolutely against this kind of terrorist attack and we will take action. And if we remain empowered, all these were very important I think. After that we talked to the people here for about two hours. There were many people who were not Indians, but of American origin. There were various people of media backgrounds, some from universities and I think it is very important to listen to their questions and answer and explain it to them. My team answered their questions because it is important that the world knows India's stance.'
Tharoor emphasised that India's stance on terrorism is clear: zero tolerance. He stated that the delegation's visit aims to convey India's national consensus and firm stance on combating terrorism to the global community.
Tharoor, leader of an all-party delegation to the US, emphasized India's solidarity with the global community in combating terrorism. The delegation visited the 9/11 memorial in New York to pay respects and convey India's shared experience with the US in fighting terrorism.
'Look, we went to the Memorial of September 11 to send a message that New York also suffered due to the issue of terrorists twenty years ago, this is our experience as well. We want them to understand that solidarity is essential in this matter,' he said.
He emphasized that India has been a victim of terrorism for decades and will take action against terrorist threats.
Earlier, while addressing think tanks, academic leaders, and media in New York, Tharoor highlighted Pakistan's denial of its role in terrorism, citing examples such as the 26/11 Mumbai terror attack and the Pathankot attack. He emphasized that Pakistan's denial has been proven false, and the country has failed to take action against terrorist groups operating within its borders.
'I'll just take you briefly through what happened. You may remember in 2015 in January there was an attack on an Indian airbase, a place called Pathankot. And our Prime Minister had just made a goodwill visit to Pakistan the previous month. On the 25th of December, he'd attended the birthday celebrations of then Pakistan Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, whose granddaughter's wedding was on the same day, given gifts,' he said.
As Prime Minister Narendra Modi was left astonished by the attack, he asked Pakistan to join hands in the investigation, after which the Pakistani side concluded that Indians did this to themselves!
'So when this happened, he was so astonished that he actually called the Pakistani Prime Minister and said, Why don't you join the investigation? Let's solve who's doing this. And the Pakistani, you can imagine the horror of the Indian military establishment of this idea that Pakistani Investigators are going to come to an Indian airbase, but they came and uh they went back to Pakistan and said, all the Indians did it to themselves. That was the last straw,' he said.
Tharoor said that earlier too in 26/11 Mumbai terror attack, the terrorists killed 170 people, and a terrorist confessed to having Pakistani links.
'We'd already gone through the horrors of 2008 in Mumbai when 170 people had been killed. And the Pakistani denials at that time were laid bare not just by the fact that we caught one of the terrorists alive and his identity, his address, his family, etc. were identified in Pakistan, with the chilling voice of the Pakistani handler giving minute by minute instructions to the killers in Mumbai,' he said.
Tharoor said that even after having evidence, Pakistan had been in denial.
'So the evidence was there. They've been in denial and that denial was proven to be completely false, and as you know, thereafter, the Pakistanis claimed not to know where Osama bin Laden was until he was found in a safe house right next to an army cantonment in a city dominated by the army,' he said.
Tharoor said that in 2016 too, Pakistan attacked Uri and they still remain in denial.
'This is Pakistan and I'm afraid for us 2016 was the last opportunity for them to behave, to cooperate, to really show they were serious about ending terror as they claimed every time that they were, and since they did not do it in January, in September 2016. There was another attack in a place called Uri, also not far from the border, and this time India breached the line of control which we had rigorously observed throughout in every previous skirmish we had never crossed the Line of Control. We crossed it with a surgical strike in September of 2016,' he said.
Tharoor said that though things seemed to be calmer since then, Pakistan again attacked Pulwama in 2019, killing 40 Indians and breached the international border.
'That seemed to calm things down a bit, but unfortunately in January of 2019 there was another terror attack in a place called Pulwama killing 40 Indians at that point, and then India responded not just by breaching the line of control but also breaching the international border and striking with our air force a known terror training camp in a place called Balakot,' he said.
Tharoor highlighted that after years of failed attempts at diplomacy, India adopted a new approach with Operation Sindoor, striking the nine terror bases in Pakistan and PoJK in the intervening night of May 6-7.
'Now we have not just crossed the LOC, we have also crossed the international border. We have hit Pakistan in their heartland, and we have done so, as I say, only to send a message about terror. We are not interested and we still remain absolutely clear that we are not interested in warfare with Pakistan,' he said.
Tharoor said that India is interested in its own development, and would like to be left alone by Pakistan.
'We would much rather be left alone to grow our economy and pull our people into the world that they're getting ready for in the 21st century. We have no desire to have anything. That the Pakistanis have sadly we may be a status quo power. They are not. They are a revisionist power,' he said.
Tharoor said that Pakistan covets Indian territory and wishes to acquire it by any means which is not acceptable by India.
'They covet territory that India controls, and they want to have it at any price. And if they can't get it through conventional means they're willing to get it through terrorism. That is not acceptable to us, and that's really the message that we are here to give all of us, all of you in this country and elsewhere,' he said.
Tharoor said that India is now determined to draw a bottom line to this, as they have tried dialogue and diplomacy with Pakistan already.
'We are determined now that there's got to be a new bottom line to this. We have tried everything international dossiers, complaints and sanctions committee, diplomacy, even this joint investigation attempt. Everything has been tried. Pakistan has remained in denial. There has been absolutely no conviction, no serious criminal prosecution, no attempt to dismantle the terror infrastructure in that country, and the persistence of safe havens,' he said.
Tharoor said that India has rightly exercised its right to self defence, and did not warrant a wider conflagration.
'So from our point of view, this is it. You do this, you're going to get this back, and we have demonstrated with this operation that we can do it with a degree of precision and with a degree of restraint that the world we hope will understand. We have a right to self-defense. We've exercised that right. We have not done so irresponsibly and we have not done so in a way that would have warranted a wider conflagration,' he said.
The all-party delegation to United States, Guyana, Panama, Brazil, and Colombia led by Congress MP Shashi Tharoor comprises of Shambhavi Chaudhary (Lok Janshakti Party), Sarfaraz Ahmed (Jharkhand Mukti Morcha), G M Harish Balayagi (Telugu Desam Party), Shashank Mani Tripathi, Tejaswi Surya, Bhubaneswar K Lata (all from BJP), Mallikarjun Devda (Shiv Sena) and Former Indian Ambassador to the US, Taranjit Singh Sandhu.
The delegation will project India's national consensus and firm stance on combating terrorism in all its forms. They will carry India's strong message of zero tolerance against terrorism to the global community during their outreach. (ANI)

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

BJP to highlight double-engine govt success
BJP to highlight double-engine govt success

Hans India

time31 minutes ago

  • Hans India

BJP to highlight double-engine govt success

Dhenkanal: The BJP has decided to reach out to every village and inform people about the successful works and achievements of 11-year-old Modi government and one-year-old Majhi government in Dhenkanal district. The decision was taken at a meeting held under the chairmanship of State BJP vice president Golak Mohapatra at district BJP office. The BJP workers, led by leaders and MLAs, will participate in the campaign from June 9 onwards. The BJP team will highlight India overtaking Japan to become the world's fourth-largest economy, development in sectors such as agriculture , IT, infrastructure, drinking water and power and also resounding success of Operation Sindoor. Similarly, the State government's decisions such as providing MSP of Rs 3,100 per quintal for paddy, launching an integrated health card of AB-Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana (AB-PMJAY) and Gopabandhu Jan Arogya Yojana (G-JAY), reserving 11.25 per cent of seats for the students belonging to Socially and Economically Backward Class (SEBC) in higher education and ushering in development through 'Utkarsh Odisha' will also be highlighted. The BJP will also seek feedback from people. District BJP president Rasa Bihari Behera said they will reach out to villages and wards to underline the success stories of double-engine government. Parjang MLA Bibhuti Bhusan Pradhan, Kamakshyanagar MLA Satrughan Jena, Dhenkanal Municipality Chairperson Jayanti Patra , Block chairman and senior leaders participated in the programme.

MPs united against terrorism: Aparajita
MPs united against terrorism: Aparajita

Hans India

time31 minutes ago

  • Hans India

MPs united against terrorism: Aparajita

Bhubaneswar: Lawmakers may have differences of opinion on various internal issues, but on terrorism, they spoke in one voice and informed the world about Pakistan's role behind it, BJP MP Aparajita Sarangi said on Saturday after returning from a five-nation tour as part of a multi-party delegation. Sarangi, the MP of Bhubaneswar, was given a rousing welcome by her supporters on her arrival here. 'We may have differences of opinion on issues inside the country. But, on terrorism, all of us spoke in one voice and apprised the foreign countries of how Pakistan is peddling lies and nurturing terrorism,' she told reporters. 'All members of the delegation raised India's voice together,' she added. Sarangi's delegation had members from the Congress, TMC, JD(U) and CPI(M). 'During our trip, we spoke to politicians, women, youth, academia, media and community representatives, and people from different walks of life. Indian diaspora was all along with us,' she said. 'There were elaborate discussions on India's policy of zero-tolerance to terrorism,' she said. A grand rally, organised by her supporters, accompanied Sarangi from Biju Patnaik International Airport to her office, with party workers and locals lining the route to celebrate her return. Sarangi reflected on the objectives and outcomes of the international visit and responded to the Opposition's call for a special session of Parliament to discuss Operation Sindoor. 'It was a privilege to engage with a wide spectrum of stakeholders -- from political leaders and women's groups to youth forums, think tanks and community associations,' she said. 'Wherever we went, the Indian diaspora came out in strength, and the conversations were meaningful and inspiring,' she added. Sarangi said the delegation had a clear mandate from Prime Minister Narendra Modi -- to assert India's zero-tolerance policy on terrorism and explain the strategic shift in India's security doctrine. 'India now operates under a 'New Normal' -- zero tolerance and immediate response,' she emphasised. Referring to Operation Sindoor, Sarangi said: 'In just four days, we neutralised over 100 terrorists, dismantled major terror infrastructure, and eliminated around 11 top operatives. However, we also suffered deeply -- 26 lives were lost, including innocent tourists. Their sacrifice will never be forgotten, nor forgiven.' She described the global response to the delegation's visit as 'overwhelmingly supportive'. Addressing the Opposition's demands for a special session of Parliament, Sarangi pushed back. 'I don't see the necessity for it. This delegation included 59 MPs -- only 20 of them from the BJP. Others were from Congress, TMC, JD(U), CPI(M), and more. If we could present a united voice on foreign soil, why create divisions at home? Even senior leaders in Delhi appreciated the coordination and purpose we demonstrated.'

How Trump's trade war is supercharging fast fashion industry
How Trump's trade war is supercharging fast fashion industry

Mint

time32 minutes ago

  • Mint

How Trump's trade war is supercharging fast fashion industry

Sydney, When US President Donald Trump introduced sweeping new tariffs on Chinese imports the goal was to bring manufacturing back to American soil and protect local jobs. However, this process of re-shoring is complex and requires years of investment and planning – far too slow for the world of ultra-fast fashion, where brands are used to reacting in weeks, not years. Many clothing companies started to move production out of China during Trump's first term. They relocated to countries such as Vietnam and Cambodia when the initial China-specific tariffs hit. This trend accelerated with the newer 'reciprocal' tariffs. Instead of re-shoring production, many fashion brands are simply sourcing from whichever country offers the lowest total cost after tariffs. The result? The ultra-fast fashion machine adapted quickly and became even more exploitative. From Guangzhou to your wardrobe in days Platforms such as Shein and Temu built their success by offering trend-driven clothing at shockingly low prices. A USD 5 dress or USD 3 top might seem like a bargain, but those prices hide a lot. Much of Shein's production takes place in the so-called 'Shein village' in Guangzhou, China, where workers often sew for 12–14 hours a day under poor conditions to keep pace with the demand for new items. When the US cracked down on Chinese imports, the intention was to make American-made goods more competitive. This included raising the tariff on Chinese goods as high as 145 per cent , and closing the 'de minimis' loophole, which had allowed imports under USD 800 to enter tariff-free. But these tariffs did not halt ultra-fast fashion. They just rerouted production to countries with lower tariffs and even lower labour costs. The Philippines, with a comparatively low tariff rate of 17 per cent, emerged as a surprising alternative. However, the country can't provide the industrial scale and infrastructure to match what China can offer. So why does Australia matter? Much of the cheap fashion previously bound for the US is now flooding other markets, including Australia. Australia still allows most low-value imports to enter tax-free, and platforms such as Shein and Temu have taken full advantage. Australian consumers are among the most frequent Shein and Temu buyers per capita globally. Just 3 per cent of clothing is made in Australia and most labels rely on offshore manufacturing. This makes Australia an ideal target market for ultra-fast fashion imports. We have high purchasing power, lenient import rules and strong demand for low-cost style, especially due to the cost-of-living crisis. The hidden costs of cheap clothes The environmental impact of fast fashion is well known. However, amid the chaos of Trump's tariff announcements, far less attention has been paid to how these policies – together with the retreat from climate commitments – worsen environmental harms, including those linked to fast fashion. The irony is that the tariffs meant to protect American workers have, in some cases, worsened conditions for workers elsewhere. Meanwhile, consumers in Australia now benefit from faster delivery of even cheaper goods as Temu, Shein and others have improved their shipping capabilities to Australia. Australian consumers send more than 200,000 tonnes of clothing to landfill each year. But the deeper problem is structural. The entire business model is built on exploitation and environmental damage. Factory workers bear the brunt of cost-cutting. In the race to stay competitive, many manufacturers reduce wages and overlook hazardous working conditions. Will ethical fashion ever compete? Fixing these problems will require a global rethink of how fashion operates. Governments have a role in regulating disclosures about supply chains and enforcing labour standards. Brands need to take responsibility for the conditions in their factories, whether directly owned or outsourced. Transparency is essential. Alternatives to fast fashion are gaining traction. Clothing rentals are emerging as a promising business model that help build a more circular fashion economy. Charity-run op shops have long been a sustainable source of second-hand clothing. Australia's new Seamless scheme seeks to make fashion brands responsible for the full life of the clothes they sell. The aim is to help people buy, wear and recycle clothes in a more sustainable way. Consumers also matter. If we continue to expect clothes to cost less than a cup of coffee, change will be slow. Recognising that a USD 5 t-shirt has hidden costs, borne by people on the factory floor and the environment, is a first step. Some ethical brands are already showing a better way and offer clothes made under fairer conditions and with sustainable materials. These clothes are not as cheap or fast, but they represent a more conscious alternative especially for consumers concerned about synthetic fibres, toxic chemicals and environmental harm. Trump reshuffled the deck, but did not change the game Trump's trade rules aim to re-balance global trade in favour of American industry, yet have cost companies more than USD 34 billion in lost sales and higher costs. This cost will eventually fall on US consumers. In ultra-fast fashion, it mostly exposed how fragile and exploitative the system already was. Today, brands such as Shein and Temu are thriving in Australia. But unless we address the systemic inequalities in fashion production and rethink the incentives that drive this market, the true cost of cheap clothing will continue to be paid by those least able to afford it. PY PY This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store