logo
5 places you're forgetting to apply sunscreen (and need to, according to derms)

5 places you're forgetting to apply sunscreen (and need to, according to derms)

Yahoo5 hours ago

According to a 2023 report published in the scientific journal Cancers, despite an increase in sunscreen use, the number of melanoma cases in the U.S. grew by more than 40% from 2009 to 2019. Researchers attribute this to multiple factors, including a warming planet and a stronger UV index. However, they also make the case that, though most of us know enough to use sunscreen, we may actually be applying our SPF wrong. For starters, "The American Academy of Dermatology recommends using a sunscreen with an SPF minimum of 30 that has broad-spectrum coverage and is water-resistant," says Dr. Brendan Camp, a double board-certified dermatologist at MDCS Dermatology: Medical Dermatology & Cosmetic Surgery in New York City.
But it's not enough to choose the right sunscreen — to avoid heightened skin cancer risk, dermatologists say we must know when to apply, how much to put on and how often to reapply. The official advice from the American Academy of Dermatology is that adults need at least 1 ounce of sunscreen to cover their entire faces and bodies. In terms of reapplication, Camp says, "The AAD recommends reapplying sunscreen every two hours when outside for extended periods and again after sweating and swimming." Remember that it takes around 15 minutes for sunscreen to fully absorb and start protecting your skin. And, even if you have darker skin, it's important to apply sunscreen frequently, as even the deepest skin tones only offer a natural SPF 13.
Last, and maybe most important, is where you're putting all this sun protection. "The face, torso, arms and legs are the first places people apply sunscreen," says Camp. But he explains there are multiple areas of the body that are often neglected or forgotten when we're hurrying to smear it all on. The AAD suggests sun protection must be applied to "all skin not covered by clothing," which obviously includes areas outside the above scope.
Below, we've outlined the most common places you might be missing with your sunscreen and just what kind of protection each area needs.
When it comes to sun protection, the tops of our feet are an easily forgotten zone — first, because they might be in shoes when you start applying, and second, because they may be wet or covered in sand. But, if left unprotected in the sun, this part of the body is at risk for developing multiple forms of skin cancer, including squamous cell carcinoma. In fact, in populations of color, feet are among the highest risk parts of the body for skin cancer. A good foot sunscreen should be non-greasy, water-resistant and contain a high level of SPF.
Studies show that the ears are the third most common place on the body to develop skin cancer (yikes!) and, still, many people forget to protect them. Among the best sunscreens for this area is a potent mineral SPF stick, which allows for a precise application without the product slipping into your hair.
Once the warm weather hits, experts say you should switch out your winter chapped lip treatment for a balm that contains broad-spectrum SPF. If you're eating, drinking or just tend to frequently lick your lips, the best practice here is to apply early and often.
The easiest way to protect your eyelids from the sun is to consistently wear sunglasses, but, even if you do don shades, sunscreen is a good backup plan. To avoid irritation, choose protection that's specifically made for this sensitive area, ideally an eye cream with SPF.
Camp recommends a wide-brimmed hat for protecting your scalp, but if you plan on swimming, he says, "consider a liquid or powder sunscreen to cover any exposed skin, like the part in your hair."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Oklahoma County Jail fails another surprise inspection, per 36-page report
Oklahoma County Jail fails another surprise inspection, per 36-page report

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Oklahoma County Jail fails another surprise inspection, per 36-page report

OKLAHOMA CITY (KFOR) — According to a report from the Oklahoma State Department of Health, the Oklahoma County Detention Center failed another surprise inspection. In the 36-page document, state health officials cited written complaints of bed bugs, roaches, and mice. oklahoma-county-jail-inspection-report-05-07-25Download It also detailed staff members failing to provide inmates the opportunity to bathe at least three times each week. Social studies standards lawsuit tossed out, former AG speaks out Another page stated workers were not doing the required number of safety checks, especially on risk inmates, with some later dying. Mark Faulk, with the People's County for Justice Reform, said the report is the worst he's seen out of the near dozen that have already been issued. 'These problems are not a problem of the building. These problems are a problem of poor management and unconstitutional management,' said Faulk. Faulk also added, 'If this were a private business, it would have been shut down three to four years ago.' The inspection was done in May, as a follow-up for one previously conducted in December. Interim CEO of the Oklahoma County Detention Center, Paul Timmons, sent News 4 a statement about the findings in the report. We acknowledge the Oklahoma County Detention Center's recent health department inspection, a follow-up to December's review, which was twice as extensive. This report underscores the pressing challenges we face and the urgency of addressing them. We are fully committed to moving forward with meaningful progress. Our team takes these findings seriously, working daily to not only resolve these issues but to implement lasting solutions. Our focus remains on continuous improvement of the facility and our operations. Paul Timmons, Oklahoma County Detention Center News 4 also reached out to the Oklahoma State Department of Health to see if they'd be stepping in to address the findings in the report further. A spokesperson said next steps could include filing complaints with the Attorney General and District Attorney's Offices. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Good Supreme Court Sense on Trans Hormones
Good Supreme Court Sense on Trans Hormones

Wall Street Journal

timean hour ago

  • Wall Street Journal

Good Supreme Court Sense on Trans Hormones

It shouldn't be news that the 14th Amendment doesn't give adolescents an effective right to access transgender hormone treatments, but it's still reassuring to see the Supreme Court say so. In a 6-3 decision Wednesday, the Justices upheld a Tennessee statute, called SB1, that bans giving such prescriptions to minors. Many other states have done the same. The 14th Amendment guarantees 'equal protection of the laws,' and the Biden Administration claimed that SB1 discriminates by sex and transgender status. 'A teenager whose sex assigned at birth is male can be prescribed testosterone to conform to a male gender identity,' it argued, 'but a teenager assigned female at birth cannot.' Yet the Supreme Court now holds that the law turns on age and diagnosis, neither of which demands heightened judicial scrutiny.

What Would We Do Without Experts?
What Would We Do Without Experts?

Wall Street Journal

timean hour ago

  • Wall Street Journal

What Would We Do Without Experts?

The question in today's headline has often been asked by this column with a sarcastic chuckle, though sometimes it's been hard to find the humor in an age afflicted by the abuse of academic credentials for political ends. It certainly wasn't funny during the Covid panic when medical authority was used by government officials to silence dissent, restrict human liberty and impose enormous and unnecessary burdens on America's children. But today one has to be feeling a little better about the ability of a free people to make democratic choices without having to bow before an ideological agenda dressed up as scientific consensus. Last December, while it remained unclear who was running the U.S. Government, the nominal Biden administration attempted one last effort to use the court system to take power over a controversial question away from voters. Specifically the government attempted to persuade the Supreme Court to block states from deciding whether sex-transition treatments can be administered to minor children. Team Biden defended such practices with a dubious appeal to expert authority, as if it was settled science that such treatments are appropriate and necessary. Thank goodness the Supreme Court didn't buy this last heaping helping of Biden-era malarkey.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store