logo
How Mastercard Helped Blenheim Palace Cut Costs with Reusable Cups

How Mastercard Helped Blenheim Palace Cut Costs with Reusable Cups

In an era when organizations are discovering that circular economy models can reduce costs and create new revenue streams, forward-thinking businesses are capitalizing on the shift from wasteful linear systems to more profitable circular alternatives.
The transition from take-make-dispose models to circular systems represents one of the most profound operational shifts of the 21st century. Those who embrace it may discover competitive advantages.
And when implemented thoughtfully, circular economy initiatives can create multiple layers of value that extend far beyond environmental benefits.
Circular Innovation
Blenheim Palace, a UNESCO World Heritage site in Oxfordshire, England, demonstrates how businesses can implement circular economy initiatives while improving operational efficiency, enhancing visitor experiences, and cutting costs.
Two years ago, Blenheim Palace faced a common costly problem; it was spending over $100,000 annually on single-use cups that added to the many single-use cups reaching a landfill or an incinerator every day. Today it's achieved a notable 50% reduction in beverage packaging costs by implementing a deposit return scheme (DRS) with reusable cups, like other reusable cup deposit return schemes, such as in Denmark.
'The transition wasn't merely about sustainability metrics,' says David Green, head of innovation at Blenheim Palace. 'Our reusable cup scheme has significantly cut costs and fundamentally transformed our operations,' reimbursing customers rapidly and conveniently for returning their cups.
'The transition wasn't merely about sustainability metrics,' says David Green, head of innovation at Blenheim Palace. 'Our reusable cup scheme has significantly cut costs and fundamentally transformed our operations,' reimbursing customers rapidly and conveniently for returning their cups.
The Mechanics of Circular Success
Blenheim Palace's approach is elegant in its simplicity.
Visitors pay $2.70 deposits to rent RFID-enabled reusable cups they will later return to reverse-vending machines. Circularity solutions provider re-universe assigns each cup a digital identity for data tracking and tracing throughout its usage.
Blenheim Palace collects, washes, and reintroduces the cups into circulation—and visitors get secure, near-instantaneous refunds to their payment cards.
'With return machines streamlining the process,' Green says, 'we're achieving remarkable results that prove sustainable operations can be financially viable, too.'
In a 12-month period, Blenheim Palace has cut 1,150 kg of carbon emissions and kept 320,000 single-use cups out of landfills.
The Business Case for Circularity
'For circular initiatives to scale, the consumer experience must be seamless,' says Pratik Khowala, Mastercard's global head of transfer solutions. 'Our payments technology enables Blenheim Palace to offer near-instant deposit returns without requiring visitors to download apps or share additional banking information—a critical factor in achieving high participation rates, especially among international visitors.'
Beyond environmental benefits, the financial case for this circular system is compelling. Blenheim Palace reports a 50% cost savings during the second year of implementation, including reduced waste management expenses and increased operational efficiencies. Each $2 reusable cup needs only four uses for its cost to break even, versus the $0.35 to $0.67 it spent for each single-use cup.
The system also provides valuable data insights that allow continuous optimization—information that was absent from the previous model.
'The metrics we now track go well beyond basic environmental indicators,' Green says. 'We're measuring operational efficiency, visitor satisfaction, and return rates by location. This data allows us to continually refine the system for maximum impact and is leading us to invest more in the program. We're starting with hot cups, but we are planning to expand into cold cups and other packaging soon.'
The Visitor Experience
'Visitor feedback has been overwhelmingly positive,' Green says. 'Guests specifically mention the reusable cup program in visitor surveys, noting how it aligns with their own values around environmental stewardship.'
This alignment with consumer values represents an increasingly important competitive advantage for organizations across sectors.
Retailers, manufacturers, hospitality providers, and service organizations across numerous industries and product categories can adapt these circular economy principles to their specific contexts.
'The technology behind the Blenheim experience can be applied to numerous circular economy initiatives beyond cups—from deposit-based redemption for reusable packaging to product buyback and peer-to-peer resale,' says Khowala.
6 Keys to Successful Implementation
Blenheim Palace's initiative reveals six critical factors organizations should consider when they implement their own circular economy programs:
1. Consumer education: Clear communication about the process and its benefits drives participation.
2. Staff training and engagement: Frontline employees must understand the system to support it and encourage consumers to participate.
3. Frictionless user experience: Simplicity in participation—making deposits and returns as easy as possible—is nonnegotiable for high adoption.
4. Inclusivity: Systems must accommodate diverse user needs, including those of international visitors.
5. Optimized incentive structure: Deposit fees must balance motivation for returns without deterring participation.
6. Data-driven management: Real-time data visibility enables continuous improvement and optimization.
5 Strategic Implications for Leaders
For executives considering circular economy initiatives, the Blenheim Palace case offers several clear takeaways:
1. Start with high-visibility waste streams: Focus initial circular economy efforts on visible, high-volume waste that resonates with stakeholders.
2. Design for user experience: Prioritize simplicity and convenience in circular systems to drive adoption.
3. Use technology appropriately: Digital tools should reduce friction, not add complexity.
4. Measure multidimensional value: Track environmental, financial, operational, and customer experience metrics.
5. Communicate authentically: Share transparent progress and insights with stakeholders.
Organizations that approach circular economy initiatives as strategic opportunities rather than compliance requirements stand to gain significant advantages in operational efficiency, cost reduction, brand perception, and environmental impact.
Circularity is not a new idea, but as organizations course-correct away from linear models, the circular economy is presenting new opportunities for businesses. As Blenheim Palace's experience demonstrates, organizations that embrace this transition thoughtfully can achieve positive results across the triple bottom line of people, planet, and profit.
'The most surprising aspect of our journey has been discovering that circular systems often outperform linear ones on pure business metrics,' Green says. 'Sustainability is no longer a trade-off against profitability—increasingly, it's becoming a driver of it.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Newcastle's summer transfer strategy: Are fans right to worry about the lack of activity?
Newcastle's summer transfer strategy: Are fans right to worry about the lack of activity?

New York Times

timean hour ago

  • New York Times

Newcastle's summer transfer strategy: Are fans right to worry about the lack of activity?

After three successive transfer windows without strengthening their first XI, Newcastle United will be active in the market this summer, but nothing has happened yet. High-profile targets already appear to be heading elsewhere, prompting the usual array of fury, froth and frustration on social media. Advertisement When the 2025 close-season's Club World Cup-enforced first mini-window shut on Tuesday, Newcastle had done little more than announce their retained list, with no senior arrivals. The window reopens on Tuesday, June 16, and runs until the night of September 1. With Paul Mitchell, the sporting director, standing down effective June 30, and Darren Eales, the chief executive, already serving his notice, are Newcastle in a state of limbo? Or are they merely biding their time? Our Newcastle writers Chris Waugh and George Caulkin examine the pressing issues at the club. Caulkin: This is multi-layered. Most obviously, head coach Eddie Howe needs some help. Last season's achievements by him and his players represent a miracle, given the discomfort of a year ago, when the squad was weakened. Howe's first XI needs refreshing — greater competition. For too long, motivation has come from within. Those players now need pushing via an injection of quality. Returning to the Champions League next season also gives them another front to fight on. Two years ago, when they last played in that competition, a skinny squad was stretched to translucency by injury. Newcastle require more depth. GO DEEPER Newcastle are back in the Champions League. It changes everything After the PSR (the Premier League's profit and sustainability rules) debacle of last summer, Newcastle are in a far stronger position, particularly after recouping fees for Miguel Almiron and Lloyd Kelly in January. So they have money available, but there are caveats. They are not the biggest wage-payers and will not be taken advantage of when it comes to the so-called 'Saudi tax' — a reference to the deep pockets of their majority owners, Saudi Arabia's Public Investment Fund (PIF). Waugh: Fundamentally, Newcastle want to significantly bolster Howe's squad while maintaining financial prudence. The owners are determined to avoid going multiple windows without investing again; they want to leave PSR headroom to recruit again in next year's winter window and beyond. Advertisement Newcastle are adamant they will not overpay for players, though, believing present asking prices are inflated. However, sizeable expenditure is anticipated; the boardroom-level desire to support Howe within sustainable limitations is absolute. There is a recognition that the squad's average age, especially at centre-half and goalkeeper, requires lowering. The majority of players being targeted are between 21 and 24; they have been recognised for their elite potential, given Newcastle cannot afford to bring in multiple established stars. Those under consideration are players who can improve the first XI and, so, the squad. Quality will take precedence over quantity. A complicating factor is UEFA's homegrown quota. Only Sean Longstaff qualifies as a 'club-trained' senior player and, while Newcastle believe they should have the depth to manage regardless, this detail has been a consideration. With John Ruddy, the reserve goalkeeper, in negotiations over an extension, now free-agents Fraser Forster and Tim Krul are unlikely to be recruited, even if their names were mentioned internally, given their homegrown credentials. Waugh: The priorities are obvious. A right-sided centre-back and right-winger (or at least another attacking player of some sort) are wanted, alongside a goalkeeper. A versatile forward is desired, and a midfielder may arrive. Brentford's Bryan Mbeumo was their top right-winger target, but his preference to join Manchester United has led to a re-evaluation. Previous offers were made for Nottingham Forest's Anthony Elanga, Antoine Semenyo of Bournemouth is admired at Newcastle and Brighton & Hove Albion's Joao Pedro is a long-term target. The club must determine whether they have the capacity to sign an adaptable attacker, a right-winger, or both. Advertisement At centre-half, Crystal Palace's Marc Guehi is still highly regarded and James Trafford of Burnley is the priority goalkeeper target. Further details can be found in the latest DealSheet. Caulkin: That idea of priority is fluid. There have been initial negotiations with Burnley over Trafford, the optics of which are not ideal, given his arrival would leave Newcastle with six goalkeepers if nobody departs before then. Yet it isn't a case of saying it should be a right-winger who comes in first. Newcastle are responding to where the market takes them and acting accordingly. Two summers ago, they already had established full-backs, but went out and signed Tino Livramento and Lewis Hall, who are both fundamental to their team now. It is not all about immediacy. Clubs who are not in need of money can hold firm. Priorities change according to circumstances. Caulkin: On the face of it, sub-optimally. 'Speed is key for us and I've reiterated that many times internally, because we have to be dynamic,' Howe said last month. 'We have to be ready to complete things very quickly because good players don't hang around for long.' Since then, Mbeumo has seemingly become unobtainable. Ipswich striker Liam Delap opted for Chelsea. Defender Dean Huijsen left Bournemouth for Real Madrid. With Manchester City already spending big and Liverpool pushing to sign Florian Wirtz and Milos Kerkez to go with early signing Jeremie Frimpong, it doesn't feel like Newcastle are moving with the dynamism Howe referenced. Yet good players are going to attract rival suitors, and when it comes to salaries, Newcastle cannot compete with a flailing Manchester United, let alone City, Liverpool or Chelsea. Other targets may simply not be available yet. One long-established mantra at Newcastle under PIF's ownership is 'process-driven' decision-making. The problem is that getting transfers over the line often requires being fleet of foot; how and whether this can work, given the flux at director level within the club, is not yet clear. Advertisement Waugh: It is only June 12. As dismissive as that sounds, it is important. Most players are either on holiday, have just finished international duty or are off to take part in the Club World Cup, while club executives are also on their breaks. The majority of the deals concluded so far have involved release clauses (Huijsen, Delap and Matheus Cunha's move from Wolves to Manchester United) or have been driven by sides wanting players signed in time for the Club World Cup. Liverpool are perhaps an exception. Putting last year's PSR-dominated window aside, Newcastle's first senior signing of the corresponding 2022-23 one was Nick Pope on June 23 (excluding Matt Targett's loan becoming permanent) and the following summer, it was Sandro Tonali on July 3. Mitchell's exit is inopportune and Howe would ideally have liked a signing by now, but it is premature to be dismayed. Waugh: Sort of, in the sense some fans are (to an extent, understandably) growing concerned about the lack of incoming. Internally, the mood is not as extreme. There has been frustration, but speed costs money and Newcastle are confident fees will become more realistic as the summer progresses. There is a recognition that it is worth waiting for the targets they want, rather than rushing to acquire someone who is not the ideal fit. Most targets whose names are in the public domain are at English clubs, leading some fans to suggest Newcastle are prioritising Premier League experience over cost. Yet the message from some insiders is that the market in continental Europe is also distorted and will not necessarily prove much cheaper. Newcastle insist they are ready to act — and, crucially, can do so even before June 30. Those at the top are confident the club will end the summer in a far stronger position than they started it. Advertisement Caulkin: Managers always want more. They always want business done early. Howe talks about being motivated by a fear of failure, so he will be fretting. The first team continue to drive everything at Newcastle; if they are considered an elite outfit, it's because of what the head coach has done, not because of their infrastructure or commercial income. So far, the help he needs has not materialised. The situations with Eales and Mitchell — two roles which should shape Newcastle's future – do not encourage stability. The Athletic has spoken to other senior figures who have talked about their uncertainty in terms of the bigger picture. Ultimately, that uncertainty will not dissipate until new appointments are in place and their vision established. The message is that Eales' successor is close to being determined — David Hopkinson, a former executive at Real Madrid, is a leading candidate — and the search for Mitchell's replacement is underway. In the short term, Newcastle have to demonstrate that the status quo remains operational and then that a new leadership model can get things done while building relationships. That first signing, whenever it comes, will calm nerves. Caulkin: The club maintain it is 'business as usual'. Mitchell will continue to direct Newcastle's transfer policy — with Howe retaining the final say — until June 30, when Eales is expected to pick up the slack. A year in charge without making a game-changing signing would not be the glossiest entry on Mitchell's CV, but this is not driving his agenda. Newcastle's plan for this entire window is his plan, at least in part. Last summer demonstrated that having a new sporting director in place guarantees nothing. Will whoever comes in next have the same ideas about strategy and recruitment? Advertisement Waugh: Steve Nickson, head of recruitment, and Andy Howe, assistant head of recruitment, took on prominent roles in the post-Dan Ashworth interim and will be empowered again. The latter has been an influential voice since the takeover, following Eddie, his uncle, to the club from fellow Premier League side Bournemouth. Targets have been selected by the head coach. He would ideally like one or two additions before pre-season begins on July 7, and definitely before the squad leave for a training camp in Austria — by which time the true direction of their window will have become clearer.

Klarna's CEO is now taking your calls — over an AI hotline
Klarna's CEO is now taking your calls — over an AI hotline

The Verge

timean hour ago

  • The Verge

Klarna's CEO is now taking your calls — over an AI hotline

Klarna CEO Sebastian Siemiatkowski has already used AI to replace himself during earnings reports, and now Klarna is using AI to clone him another way: through an AI-powered phone hotline. The hotline is now open for users to provide feedback to an interactive AI version of Siemiatkowski that's trained on his 'real voice, insights, and experiences,' according to a press release. 'Customers, including consumers and merchants alike, can speak to it about product features, issues and suggestions for improvements,' Klarna says. ''AI Sebastian' can also answer questions about Klarna's vision and mission, and speak about its founding story and journey so far, based on learnings from 'real life Sebastian.'' After the hotline takes a call, a transcript and summary are generated that are 'automatically analyzed by a large language model (LLM), populating an internal live feed and innovation dashboard.' Klarna says its product and engineering teams will then review the 'actionable insights immediately' and assign 'priority tasks.' The company claims that issues raised today could 'translate into tangible product improvements already the following day.' Phone numbers for the hotline are available now in the US, +14246675385, and Sweden, +46852512594. I called the US hotline just to see what the experience was like. After a brief message telling me the call may be recorded, the AI version of Siemiatkowski prompted me to share feedback about using Klarna. No matter what I asked AI Siemiatkowski, even sillier questions, the AI generally tried to push me back to sharing feedback. When I asked if it had talked to Fortnite's AI Darth Vader, for example, here's what it said: That's an interesting question. My focus is entirely on Klarna and gathering feedback to improve our services. I don't have information or conversations with characters from games like Fortnite. I'm here to hear your thoughts on Klarna. Is there anything else about your experience with Klarna that you'd like to share, or any ideas you have for how we could make things even better?

Klarna, Revolut and Monzo — Pick Your Winning Fintech Upstart
Klarna, Revolut and Monzo — Pick Your Winning Fintech Upstart

Bloomberg

timean hour ago

  • Bloomberg

Klarna, Revolut and Monzo — Pick Your Winning Fintech Upstart

One specializes in gathering money, another in lending it and a third in moving it around — but which of these three fast-growing fintechs offers the most compelling story to potential public investors? Monzo Bank Ltd., Klarna Group Plc and Revolut Group Ltd. are all expected to embark upon initial public offerings in the next year or two. The last of the trio looks like the best prospect — but it's also likely to list at by far the dearest price. All three are rapidly adding customers and revenue, and each one has become profitable. Revolut generates the strongest pretax margin, has the strongest growth and has built a broader range of income sources even if card payments and foreign exchange fees — its original transaction businesses — still contribute more than 40% of sales.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store