
What matters to voters in Mississauga in the federal election
Social Sharing
The voters of Mississauga have backed the winning party in each of the past four federal elections.
That makes the city a good litmus test of voter sentiment in a campaign that's rolling out amid U.S. President Donald Trump's threats of slapping crippling tariffs on Canadian goods and even forcing the country to become the 51st state.
CBC News spoke to voters at random in a Mississauga in a supermarket parking lot, outside a shopping mall and beside the city's main library. Here's what they had to say about what matters most to them heading into the April 28 federal election.
'Trump, that's my first thought'
Manuel Vieira is undecided about how he'll vote but is quite decisive when asked what issue is top of mind.
"Trump, that's my first thought," said Vieira. "If we don't have a.country, then there's no point of worrying about health care or anything else."
He says he has voted both Liberal and Conservative in the past and backed Doug Ford's Progressive Conservatives in last month's provincial election, specifically because of Ford's stance against Trump's threats.
'Inflation, taxes, tariffs'
This will be Waheed Hyder's first federal election since becoming a Canadian citizen. He says "inflation, the effect of taxes and the tariffs" are what matter most to him.
Hyder says he has not decided which party he'll support but is now open to voting Liberal since Justin Trudeau resigned.
Whoever forms the government, Hyder says they need to put the people first in their decisions.
'Give back to Canadians'
For Tanisha Francois Cassel, the U.S. president is also top of mind.
"Obviously Trump, he's one of the issues," she said.
She says she's also concerned about the affordability of housing and the cost of post-secondary education.
She says governments should invest more in education to make it cost less. "Give back to Canadians, and we're able to give back to our economy."
'Economic knowledge and experience'
Asked what matters to her most in the election, Eniber Cabrera says it's "that Canada stays strong as a country, that we're independent and free."
She says the affordability of housing and a healthy economy are also important.
What does that mean for who she's thinking of supporting? "I would prefer somebody that is strong in economic knowledge and experience, who can get us out of this crisis," Cabrera said.
'Cost of living'
Cerise Lee says Trump's tariff threats concern her, but it's not the only thing that matters as she considers how to vote.
"Also cost of living, the overall cost of food, and housing for those who need it, those are issues that are worrisome for me," said Lee.
Lee says she tries to research what policies the leaders are proposing about the issues — "especially the ones that hit home for me'' — before she makes up her mind how to vote.
'Actions more than words'
Mississauga residents Bassam and Deena Majid say they're concerned about the turmoil caused by the U.S. president and they're looking for politicians who'll do more than just talk.
"We'd like to see actions more than words," said Bassam. "We hear all kind of good things from everybody but would like to see action."
"I personally find the minute they're elected and they're sitting on the chair, nothing really happens, and that's what's so frustrating," said Deena.
Both say they feel the need for a change in government and are leaning toward the Conservatives.
'Stand up to Donald Trump'
Ziyad Khan, a warehouse worker, believes the best candidate for prime minister is "whoever can stand up to Donald Trump" and best protect Canada from the tariff threats, but says he hasn't decided yet who that is.
Trump "wants to make Canada the 51st state, he's threatening to annex Canada," said Khan. "We want to show him that we will never be the 51st state, that we will always be an independent country."
Khan says he "wouldn't have voted for Trudeau" had he stayed on as Liberal leader. "I think he made a lot of controversial decisions and alienated a lot of Canadians," he said.
'Speak for the middle class'
The affordability of basic items such as food and housing are what matters most to Melissa Shin.
"I need somebody to really speak for the middle-class people," said Shin.
She says she intends to vote for Pierre Poilievre's Conservatives because the Liberal government "didn't do the work" that needed to be done.
'Create more jobs'
Zandro Chivinda, a plumber who works in Mississauga, says he wants a government that will "create more jobs, lower interest rates and make life more affordable."
Chivinda says a lot of people are struggling financially right now. "We don't want to buy luxury stuff, we just want to be able to afford living," he said.
He also says it's important for politicians to listen to the people and keep their promises. "They always tell us what we want to hear, but they don't give us what we really want," he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Canada Standard
33 minutes ago
- Canada Standard
How far-right ideas in Canada are working their way into mainstream politics
The fortunes of the Conservative Party and its leader Pierre Poilievre in Canada's April 2025 election seemed to have shifted dramatically after United States President Donald Trump called for Canada to become the 51st state. Political pundits regarded Mark Carney and the Liberal Party's victory - along with the failure of Poilievre to retain his own seat - as a "Trump slump" and a repudiation of both Trump's and Poilievre's style of politics. But is that an accurate assessment? The Conservative Party received its largest vote share since Prime Minister Brian Mulroney. Exit polling data suggested stronger support for the Conservative Party among people aged 18-34 than among people aged 55 and older. Although Trump has said Poilievre is "not a MAGA guy," some political analysts have likened the rhetoric of Poilievre and other Canadian Conservatives to American Republicans who lean towards far-right Christian nationalist politics.. As an inter-religious humanities scholar of the U.S. far right, I have observed alarming parallels between the rise of the far right in mainstream politics in the U.S. and the scene in Canada. Read more: A 'Trump slump' has lifted the left in Canada and now Australia - what are the lessons for NZ? In the U.S., both scholars and news media have been highlighting the connections between far-right Christian ideology and politics. Trump's first presidential term ended with the Jan. 6, 2021 violent attack on the U.S. Capitol. Scholars like Matthew Taylor, author of The Violent Take it by Force , have pointed to Christian nationalism and other far-right ideologies as factors that motivated the rioters. In February 2025, Trump appointed televangelist Paula White-Cain to head the newly created White House Faith Office. White-Cain's appointment followed an executive order establishing a task force to eradicate anti-Christian bias. Thea appointment adds to the the narrative that U.S. Christians are facing persecution, a refrain since at least the 1970s and heightened during Barack Obama's presidency. Scholars have linked the assertion that "Christianity is under attack" to the rise of Christian nationalism in mainstream politics. Read more: Trump may have emboldened hate in Canada, but it was already here American sociologists Andrew Whitehead and Samuel Perry define Christian nationalism as "a cultural framework that blurs distinctions between Christian identity and American identity, viewing the two as closely related and seeking to enhance and preserve their union." It's tempting to read "Christian idenity" and "American identity" and assume it does not affect Canada. But Christian nationalist ideologies were present during the so-called Freedom Convoy in Ottawa in 2022. According to Canadian scholars, national identity is blurred in online spaces, allowing U.S. nationalist ideals to take hold in Canada.] Christian nationalism is not synonymous with Christianity or any specific branch of Christianity, like evangelical Christianity. According to U.S. sociologist Daniel Miller, Christian nationalism is not a set list of ideological or religious beliefs. Instead, Miller says, Christian nationalism emerges when people identify with "a very narrow, idealized prototype of the 'real or 'authentic' American." He says two mechanisms connect people to Christian nationalism. The first is perceived loss of power by the people who historically held power. This is known as a "power devaluation crisis." The second is a narrative of decline - known as a a "declensionist narrative" - which asserts that American society has declined since the 1960s and needs repair and reclamation. Poilievre is not open about his religion and does not call for Canada to be a Christian nation. But whether Poilievre intends to stir up Christian nationalists, some of his rhetoric has indicated support for the classic definitions of Christian nationalism. According to Miller, support for Christian nationalism is not always direct. It can be activated by stoking a crisis of lost power, like the decline of the "traditional" family or by asserting a narrative of decline, like "Canada is broken." For example, Poilievre's 2025 campaign mobilized both of the narrative mechanisms that attract Christian nationalist mentioned by sociologists: a power devaluation crisis and the narrative of decline. In the lead-up to his 2025 campaign, Poilievre repeatedly called Canada "broken.". He cited increased crime, addiction, high grocery prices and more as evidence of Canada's brokenness, accusing the Liberal government of erasing Canada's past. When Poilievre calls Canada "broken," it affirms the world view of Christian nationalists. Another strategy Poilievre reportedly adopted from Trump was his work to court conservative Christians. In an 2024 interview with The Tyee , religious right scholar Carmen Celestini of Waterloo University said Poilievre had "ramped up" his presence at churches. Additionally, The Globe and Mail reported there were fewer photos ops of Poilievre visiting mosques in 2024. Of course, visits to churches are not enough to signal alignment with Christian nationalists. And Poilievre has not espoused any Christian evangelical ideals in any public speech. But it's still important for Canadians to remain alert about Christian nationalists and their ambitions to become part of mainstream politics. A study from the U.S. has linked the rise in Christian nationalist ideologies to attacks on religious minorities. The 2024 qualitative data from the study indicates that when politicians rhetorically supported Christian nationalist values, there was a increased violence against minority groups. According to Statistics Canada, the violent crime rate in Canada rose 13 per cent from 2021-2022.. Police-reported hate crimes increased 32 per cent from 2022 to 2023. Crimes targeting religion rose 67 per cent in 2023, primarily targeting Jewish and Muslim communities. While I know of no studies showing the rise of the far right is directly leading to violence in Canada, Canadians should be aware of the pattern in the U.S. Research shows that growing Christian nationalists and far-right world views south of the border are, in fact, connected to a rise in violence.


Winnipeg Free Press
40 minutes ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Judge tosses lawsuit over Trump's firing of US African Development Foundation board members
A federal judge has tossed out a lawsuit over President Donald Trump's dismantling of a U.S. federal agency that invests in African small businesses. U.S. District Judge Richard Leon in Washington, D.C., dismissed the case on Tuesday, finding that Trump was acting within his legal authority when he fired the U.S. African Development Foundation's board members in February. In March, the same judge ruled that the administration's removal of most grant money and staff from the congressionally created agency was also legal, as long as the agency was maintained at the minimum level required by law. USADF was created as an independent agency in 1980, and its board members must be confirmed by the U.S. Senate. In 2023, Congress allocated $46 million to the agency to invest in small agricultural and energy infrastructure projects and other economic development initiatives in 22 African countries. On Feb. 19, Trump issued an executive order that said USADF, the U.S. Institute of Peace, the Inter-American Foundation and the Presidio Trust should be scaled back to the minimum presence required by law. At the time, USADF had five of its seven board seats filled. A few days later, an administration official told Ward Brehm that he was fired, and emails were sent to the other board members notifying them that they had also been terminated. Those emails were never received, however, because they were sent to the wrong email addresses. The four board members, believing they still held their posts because they had not been given notice, met in March and passed a resolution appointing Brehm as the president of the board. But Trump had already appointed Pete Marocco as the new chairman of what the administration believed to now be a board of one. Since then, both men have claimed to be the president of the agency, and Brehm filed the lawsuit March 6. Leon said that even though they didn't receive the emails, the four board members were effectively terminated in February, and so they didn't have the authority to appoint Brehm to lead the board. An attorney for Brehm did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Monday Mornings The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week. Another lawsuit over the dismantling of the agency is still pending before the same judge. In that case, two USADF staffers and a consulting firm based in Zambia that works closely with USADF contend that the Trump administration's efforts to deeply scale back the agency wrongly usurps Congress' powers. They also say Marocco was unlawfully appointed to the board, in part because he was never confirmed by the Senate as required. Leon's ruling in Brehm's case did not address whether the Trump administration had the power to install Marocco as board chair on a temporary basis.


Global News
44 minutes ago
- Global News
B.C. Sikh temple whose president was murdered calls for Modi's G7 invite to be pulled
The British Columbia Sikh temple whose president was allegedly murdered by agents of the Indian government has written to Prime Minister Mark Carney expressing 'deep disappointment' that Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi has been invited to the upcoming G7 meeting. Last week, Modi confirmed he would attend the meeting, to be held in Kananaskis, Alta., from June 15 to 17. The move comes amid elevated tensions between the two countries following allegations of foreign interference and former prime minister Justin Trudeau's public claims linking 'agents of the Indian government' to the murder of Hardeep Singh Nijjar, president of Surrey's Guru Nanak Sikh Gurdwara and prominent advocate for an independent Sikh state. 2:05 Carney's G7 invite to India's Modi stirs up controversy with suspected ties to B.C. murder In the letter, the Guru Nanak Sikh Gurdwara Society cites those allegations, which they say were further validated last October when Canadian law enforcement confirmed clandestine operations by Indian agents in Canada, and the subsequent expulsion of six Indian diplomats. Story continues below advertisement 'We all feel it is adding insult to injury and the community is reeling from continuous violence over the last several years that has been carried out by agents of the inidan government as per the foreign affairs commission,' said Moninder Singh, spokesperson for the Sikh Federation Canada. Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy 'This new signalling of a softening of relations … it just signals that Sikh lives, Canadian lives, the sovereignty of the country as well which has been undermined by India, all of that is secondary to issues of economics and trade and diplomacy which shouldn't be the case ever for a country like Canada.' 3:02 Carney asked if he believes Modi was involved in murder of B.C. Sikh leader Hardeep Singh Nijjar The letter calls for Modi's invitation to be withdrawn and all further diplomatic engagements with India to be paused until the investigation of Nijjar's murder is complete. 'The Sikh community perceives this diplomatic action as undermining Canada's commitment to justice, citizen safety, and national sovereignty, potentially signalling tolerance for state-sponsored violence and foreign interference,' it states. Story continues below advertisement India has denied any involvement in Nijjar's killing. During a press conference on Friday, Carney avoided giving a yes or no answer when repeatedly asked if he believed Modi was involved in Nijjar's killing. 'There is a legal process that is literally underway and quite advanced in Canada, and it's never appropriate to make comments,' Carney said. 'My message is that we are a country of the rule of law, the rule of law is proceeding as it should in Canada, and I am not going to disrupt that process.' 2:28 Evidence links violent crimes in Canada to Indian government Carney has said Modi is being invited to the conference, despite foreign interference concerns, because the meeting would tackle energy security and building infrastructure, and India should be involved in those discussions. Story continues below advertisement His office later said Ottawa's top priority for the summit will be strengthening global peace and security, which includes countering foreign interference and transnational crime. Surrey Liberal MP Sukh Dhaliwal said he has received dozens of complaints from constituents, and is encouraging the prime minister to reconsider the invite. 'All of the events that are happening, some of that I can't even mention, that people are worried about their lives right now. So it is sending the wrong message basically, they are telling me,' he told Global News on Saturday. Singh said Sikh groups in Canada are calling on MPs of both parties to speak out against the invite, and to affirm a commitment to a public inquiry on India's transnational repression. He also called on the government to end any intelligence sharing with India. The groups plan to meet with both Liberal and opposition MPs this week to press their case.