logo
Can an unborn baby survive if the mother is brain dead? The science behind such critical cases explained

Can an unborn baby survive if the mother is brain dead? The science behind such critical cases explained

Time of India15-05-2025

A recent case from Georgia has drawn attention to a complex medical and ethical issue: a brain-dead pregnant woman being maintained on life support so her unborn child can reach viability. Adriana Smith, 30, was nine weeks pregnant when she was admitted to the hospital with severe headaches. Unfortunately, no tests were conducted initially, and by the following morning, she became unresponsive.
A subsequent CT scan revealed multiple blood clots in her brain, leading doctors to declare her brain dead, reported 11 Alive. Due to Georgia's Heartbeat Bill, which prohibits abortion after cardiac activity is detected in an embryo—usually around six weeks—Adriana is being kept on life support until the baby can be delivered.
Adriana's mother, April Newkirk, expressed profound heartbreak over the situation. She described her daughter as "breathing, but unresponsive" and voiced her concerns about the unborn child's health, fearing he "may be blind, may not be able to walk, may not survive once he's born." This case has reignited debate on what science can achieve, legal constraints, and the outcomes for babies born under such extraordinary circumstances.
Medical History and Precedents
Cases involving brain-dead pregnant women maintained on life support are rare but not unheard of. A study published in the International Journal of Critical Illness & Injury Science reviewed 30 such cases between 1982 and 2010. Out of these, only 12 infants survived the neonatal period, indicating the complexity and risks involved.
Previously, medical decisions largely depended on the fetus's gestational age when brain death was declared. However, advances in critical care now allow for sustaining maternal bodily functions regardless of pregnancy stage, making gestational age less of a limiting factor in decision-making.
One notable success was documented in the journal Cureus, describing a 31-year-old woman declared brain dead at 22 weeks pregnant. After 11 weeks of life support, a cesarean section at 33 weeks resulted in the birth of a healthy infant. Similarly, the American Journal of Case Reports described a brain-dead woman at 16 weeks gestation kept on life support for 117 days, with the child showing good health outcomes one year after birth. A systematic review in the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology further highlighted that with proper medical care, most infants born under such conditions had favorable outcomes.
Challenges in Maintaining Pregnancy and Fetal Health
The key factor influencing infant survival is the gestational age at the time of the mother's brain death. Survival rates improve significantly with later gestational ages—approximately 20–30% at 24 weeks, 80% at 28 weeks, and nearly 98% at 32 weeks.
Sustaining a brain-dead mother on life support comes with major challenges. Complications like infections, hormonal imbalances, and cardiovascular instability can threaten both maternal somatic functions and fetal development. The mother's body may struggle to maintain sufficient blood pressure and oxygen supply, which can cause fetal hypoxia and ischemia, potentially leading to long-term neurological damage.
Nutritional support for the fetus is another concern, as a brain-dead mother might not properly digest or absorb nutrients, complicating efforts to sustain the pregnancy. Additionally, the inability to sustain the pregnancy full-term often results in premature birth, raising the risk of complications for the infant.
While medical advances have made it possible to maintain brain-dead pregnant women on life support to allow fetal development, the situation remains fraught with medical, ethical, and legal challenges.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Brain-Dead Pregnant Woman Forced To Carry Foetus To Birth Due To Abortion Ban In US
Brain-Dead Pregnant Woman Forced To Carry Foetus To Birth Due To Abortion Ban In US

News18

time16-05-2025

  • News18

Brain-Dead Pregnant Woman Forced To Carry Foetus To Birth Due To Abortion Ban In US

Last Updated: The woman is currently 21 weeks pregnant, and removing breathing tubes and other life-saving devices would likely kill the foetus. A 30-year-old pregnant woman in Georgia, Adriana Smith, has been on life support for over three months after a medical emergency led to her being declared brain dead. Smith's mother, April Newkirk, said that her daughter was declared brain dead in February after a medical emergency, and doctors have told the family that they are not allowed to remove life support due to the state's strict anti-abortion law. According to the 'heartbeat law," once the cardiac activity is detected, which is generally around six weeks into pregnancy, abortion cannot be performed. Newkirk said her daughter is currently 21 weeks pregnant, and removing breathing tubes and other life-saving devices would likely kill the foetus. 'She's pregnant with my grandson. But he may be blind, may not be able to walk, may not survive once he's born," Newkirk said, expressing concern about the potential outcome for her grandchild. The situation highlights the complexities surrounding Georgia's abortion laws, particularly the requirement to prioritise foetal life. Supporters argue that unborn children deserve protection, with some interpreting this to mean preserving foetal life even when the mother is declared brain dead. Georgia state Sen. Ed Setzler, a Republican who sponsored the 2019 law, said he supports Emory's interpretation, stating, 'I think it is completely appropriate that the hospital do what they can to save the life of the child." Monica Simpson, executive director of SisterSong, a national activist organisation dedicated to reproductive justice for women of colour, criticised the situation, saying the family should have had the autonomy to make medical decisions for Adriana. 'Her family deserved the right to have decision-making power about her medical decisions. Instead, they have endured over 90 days of retraumatisation, expensive medical costs, and the cruelty of being unable to resolve and move toward healing." The law has faced criticism for its potential consequences, particularly in light of two tragic cases where women, Amber Thurman and Candi Miller, died due to complications from abortion medication, highlighting concerns about restricted access to timely medical care. Democrat Kamala Harris spoke out about the issue, saying that the deaths were the result of the abortion bans that went into effect in Georgia and elsewhere after the Dobbs decision. First Published: May 16, 2025, 22:22 IST

Adriana Smith, a 30-year-old brain-dead pregnant woman from Georgia, is grabbing headlines in the U.S.; here's why and what could happen next
Adriana Smith, a 30-year-old brain-dead pregnant woman from Georgia, is grabbing headlines in the U.S.; here's why and what could happen next

Time of India

time16-05-2025

  • Time of India

Adriana Smith, a 30-year-old brain-dead pregnant woman from Georgia, is grabbing headlines in the U.S.; here's why and what could happen next

Adriana Smith , a 30-year-old mother and nurse from Georgia, was found to be brain-dead in February. But because she is pregnant and living in Georgia, which has strict abortion laws, she has been kept on life support. Why is Adriana Smith still on life support? Her situation has created outcry, bewilderment, and new controversy about personhood, medical ethics, and who gets to decide life or death. The brain-dead pregnant woman, Adriana Smith, has spent over 90 days on life support because of the state's abortion ban. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like War Thunder - Register now for free and play against over 75 Million real Players War Thunder Play Now Undo Her family says doctors invoked legal restrictions, but specialists say prolonging her life is not required by law. The highly charged case reignited the nation's debate over reproductive rights, as per a report by The AP. What happened to her and how did she end up brain-dead? According to her family, a hospital informed them that the state's stringent anti-abortion law required the pregnant woman in Georgia who was declared brain dead following a medical emergency to remain on life support for three months in order to allow the foetus to grow sufficiently to be delivered, as per a report by the AP. Live Events It might be one of the longest pregnancies of this kind, as her due date is still over three months away. ALSO READ: Should Diddy have taken a plea deal in the ongoing trafficking trial in exchange for a lesser sentence? Offer was tempting, says 50 Cent What does Georgia's abortion law actually say? The fact that Georgia's law prohibiting abortion after cardiac activity is detected denies family members a voice in deciding whether to keep a pregnant woman on life support has angered her family. Since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade three years ago, restrictive abortion laws have been implemented in numerous conservative states, including Georgia's so-called "heartbeat law." April Newkirk, Adriana Smith's mother, told Atlanta TV station WXIA that her 30-year-old daughter, Adriana Smith, was officially declared brain-dead, or legally dead, in February. More than three months ago, Newkirk said, her daughter experienced severe headaches and went to Northside Hospital in Atlanta. After receiving medication, she was discharged. Her boyfriend woke up the following morning to find her struggling to breathe and dialled 911. She was deemed brain-dead after Emory University Hospital discovered blood clots in her brain, as quoted in a report by The AP. How viable is the fetus? According to Newkirk, Smith's pregnancy is now 21 weeks. It is likely that the foetus would die if breathing tubes and other life-saving equipment were removed. While stating in a statement that it "uses consensus from clinical experts, medical literature, and legal guidance to support our providers as they make individualised treatment recommendations in compliance with Georgia's abortion laws and all other applicable laws," Can doctors remove life support in this case? Emory's doctors have informed Smith's family that they cannot remove or stop the devices that are keeping her breathing because state law forbids abortions once cardiac activity is detected, which is typically around six weeks into a pregnancy. Abortion is illegal in twelve states at all stages of pregnancy, and three more have laws similar to Georgia's that take effect after roughly six weeks. Legal and political debates have centred on Georgia's ban, which includes an exception if an abortion is required to preserve the woman's life. What are experts saying about the issue? The situation is problematic, according to Monica Simpson, executive director of SisterSong , the primary plaintiff in a lawsuit contesting Georgia's abortion law. In a statement, Simpson said, "Her family deserved the right to have decision-making power regarding her medical decisions." In this case, a pregnant woman who is brain-dead has been kept on life support for two months. Over 90 days of retraumatization, high medical expenses, and the inability to move past the incident and find healing have been left to the woman's family. Georgia is not one of the states with laws that specifically restrict taking away treatment from a pregnant woman who is alive but brain-dead or incapacitated. Removing the woman's mechanical ventilation or other support would not be considered an abortion, according to bioethicist Thaddeus Pope, a bioethicist and attorney at Mitchell Hamline School of Law in St. Paul, Minnesota. According to Lois Shepherd, a professor of law and bioethicist at the University of Virginia, life support is not legally necessary in this situation. What rights does Georgia give to a fetus? A foetus in Georgia is granted personhood by law, and proponents of personhood contend that fertilised eggs, embryos, and foetuses ought to be accorded the same rights as individuals who have already been born. Republican state senator Ed Setzler of Georgia, who sponsored the 2019 law, agrees with Emory's interpretation and thinks it's okay to take a brain dead person off life support in certain situations. FAQs Is life support legally required in Adriana Smith's case? Legal experts say Georgia law does not require life support for brain-dead pregnant women, but the hospital is interpreting it more conservatively. What is the foetus' health status? Doctors say the foetus could face serious complications such as fluid on the brain, blindness, or death after birth.

Brain-Dead Woman Forced To Carry Fetus To Birth In US Because Of Abortion Ban
Brain-Dead Woman Forced To Carry Fetus To Birth In US Because Of Abortion Ban

NDTV

time16-05-2025

  • NDTV

Brain-Dead Woman Forced To Carry Fetus To Birth In US Because Of Abortion Ban

Quick Reads Summary is AI generated, newsroom reviewed. Adriana Smith, a 30-year-old brain-dead pregnant woman in Georgia, remains on life support due to strict anti-abortion laws. Her family's struggle highlights the law's implications, raising concerns over medical decisions and potential outcomes for her fetus. A 30-year-old pregnant woman in Georgia, Adriana Smith, has been on life support for three months after being declared brain dead, sparking a complex and contentious situation. According to her mother, April Newkirk, Smith was declared brain dead in February after a medical emergency, and doctors have told the family that they are not allowed to remove life support due to the state's strict anti-abortion law. The law, known as the "heartbeat law," restricts abortion once cardiac activity is detected, which is generally around six weeks into pregnancy. Newkirk said her daughter is currently 21 weeks pregnant, and removing breathing tubes and other life-saving devices would likely kill the fetus. "She's pregnant with my grandson. But he may be blind, may not be able to walk, may not survive once he's born," Newkirk said, expressing concern about the potential outcome for her grandchild. The family's situation highlights the challenges and uncertainties surrounding Georgia's abortion ban, which confers personhood on a fetus. Those who favor personhood argue that fertilised eggs, embryos, and fetuses should be considered people with the same rights as those already born. Georgia state Sen. Ed Setzler, a Republican who sponsored the 2019 law, said he supports Emory's interpretation, stating, "I think it is completely appropriate that the hospital do what they can to save the life of the child." However, Monica Simpson, executive director of SisterSong, a national activist organisation dedicated to reproductive justice for women of colour, said, "Her family deserved the right to have decision-making power about her medical decisions. Instead, they have endured over 90 days of retraumatisation, expensive medical costs, and the cruelty of being unable to resolve and move toward healing." The law has been criticised for its potential consequences, including the story of two Georgia women who died after not receiving proper medical treatment for complications from taking abortion pills. The deaths of Amber Thurman and Candi Miller have been cited as examples of the devastating consequences of abortion bans. Democrat Kamala Harris spoke out about the issue, saying that the deaths were the result of the abortion bans that went into effect in Georgia and elsewhere after the Dobbs decision.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store