Asin's husband Rahul Sharma recalls starting Micromax with Rs 20 crore, turning it into Rs 12,000 crore company before going bust: ‘Things became crazy'
Former actor Asin's husband, Rahul Sharma, is considered a pioneer of the mobile phone industry in India. As one of the co-founders of Micromax, he successfully challenged international brands such as Nokia and Samsung, at least for a while. Not too long after Micromax became one of the biggest players in the industry, incoming competition from Chinese brands brought the company to its knees. Rahul pivoted, and is now in the manufacturing business. In a recent appearance on Nikhil Kamath's podcast, he recalled the origins of his company, and said that the idea to make mobile phones came to him while he was travelling in remote areas of India.
He discovered that entire villages would pay exorbitant amounts of money to one vendor just to charge their phones. Rahul said that he decided to make a phone with long battery life. He said, 'I sat with the guys, worked on the GSM technology, and said, 'Why don't we make a mobile phone?' The first reaction internally was, 'Are you crazy? Who's going to fight these Nokias and Samsungs and Motorolas? We are doing so well, you are driving a BMW 3 Series, why do you want to disturb the apple cart?' I said, 'No, the food is being cooked in different countries, we need an Indian flavour'.'
Also read – Asin's husband Rahul Sharma turned down more than Rs 6,500 crore funding, says it could've saved Mircromax from downfall
He continued, 'I fought a lot with my co-founders internally, and they said, 'Okay, we'll make 10,000. If it works, it's fine, otherwise our business is doing well.' They gave me around Rs 20 crore. We decided to make a phone with long battery life, because of all these experiences. That's how the first Micromax phone came, and the tagline was, 'Mobile ka baap'. The standby time was 30 days… We made a phone, and then went to the distributors. The real problem started from there.'
Rahul said that he couldn't find a distributor for his product, and was sitting on an inventory of 10,000 phones. 'Even the Delhi distributor of Nokia was bigger than us,' he said, adding, 'We went back to our fixed wireless guys, and asked if they'd be willing to distribute it. We left some of our inventory with them, and within 10 days, they were sold out. Repeat orders started coming in, and things became crazy.'
In the same interview, Rahul said that at its peak, Micromax was doing a turnover of more than Rs 12,000 crore. Because they had so much operating income, they decided against raising investment even though they were in talks with Alibaba for Rs 6,700 crore. Rahul said that he regrets the decision, because taking the money would have given him ammunition in a battle with Chinese competitors. But, things worked out for him. He said that his company is making more money now than Micromax did back in the day. Rahul and Asin tied the knot in 2016, after being introduced to each other by Akshay Kumar.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Pink Villa
15 minutes ago
- Pink Villa
Housefull 5 vs Raid 2 Day 1 Territorial Break Down India Box Office: Here's how Akshay Kumar's comic caper compares to Ajay Devgn's crime-drama
Akshay Kumar led Housefull 5 has taken a good start of Rs 22 crore net in India, driven by higher than expected spotbookings. The film is all set to make solid gains over the holiday weekend. It is the 3rd biggest opener of the year, only behind Chhaava and Sikandar. Raid 2 which was previously the 3rd biggest, has slipped down to fourth. Here's analysing the territory wise collection of Housefull 5 and Raid 2 for the opening day. Raid 2 took a very good opening of Rs 18.50 crore net at the Indian box office. The film's opening day numbers were aided by the May Day holiday but it had to lock horns with two significant regional biggies Retro and Hit 3 from the opening day itself. Housefull 5 has released a day after Thug Life but that movie's negative word of mouth has affected it so much that has started seeing very high drops. Raid 2 put up strong collections across India but what stands out is its collections in the Mumbai circuit. Raid 2 collected Rs 8.35 crore in this circuit and even Housefull 5, which is much bigger a film than the former, has netted lesser. Housefull 5 has collected Rs 7.80 crore, marking a difference of slightly over Rs 50 lakh. In every other circuit, Housefull 5 has established a comfortable lead over Ajay Devgn's crime-drama. The Territorial Breakdown For The Opening Day Box Office Of Housefull 5 And Raid 2 Is As Under Raid 2 went on to net over Rs 162 crore in India, emerging a bonafied hit. All eyes are on Housefull 5 to see if it can go beyond what Raid 2 has collected, and if yes, by what margin. Housefull 5, being a much pricier film, must net atleast 40 crore more than Raid 2 to be in contention to be called a hit movie. The weekend should bring in around Rs 85 crore net for Akshay Kumar 's comic caper and then it is to be seen if the weekdays can remain strong. Talking about international collections, Housefull 5 has taken a very good opening of USD 1.25 million and it should cross the lifetime collections of Raid 2 internationally by the end of day 2. You can watch Housefull 5 in theatres now.
India Today
17 minutes ago
- India Today
From the India Today archives (2011)
(NOTE: This article was originally published in the India Today issue dated June 20, 2011)"As I begin to paint, hold the sky in your hands; as the stretch of my canvas is unknown to me."—M.F. Husain With the death of Maqbool Fida Husain in a London hospital on the morning of June 9, India has not only lost her most iconic contemporary artist but also perhaps one of the last living symbols of the very idea of her modern, secular and multicultural nationalism. Born in 1915 at the temple town of Pandharpur in Maharashtra, Husain came from a lower middle class Sulemani Muslim family and rose through the ranks to become India's most famous painter of people, places and a visual artist-especially a mid-20th century modernist painter-Husain was precariously perched on the crest of a nascent and evolving national consciousness. In the post-Partition era, when he first burst on the Indian art scene, Husain became a much celebrated symbol patronised by the Nehruvian state looking to create modernist role models. Yet, that very celebrity made him and his works vulnerable to be hijacked, misrepresented and reviled three decades later by a semi-literate cabal claiming to represent the collective voice of a largely silent Hindu majority. In fact, the torrid love affair between Husain and 'modern secular' India and their eventual dismaying disengagement makes for a civilisational sociologist Veena Das remarks, this "impossible love" had an inherent fragility because the idol, the image and the word are all strongly contested entities. It is also further complicated by the illicit intimacy between history and the 'perception of history' in post-colonial imaginations. The tantalising and tragic relationship-between a nation's notion of the self and Husain's visualisation of it in his art practice-became the vexed terrain over which competing political alignments fought their proxy wars for a good two decades before it eventually led to Husain's self-imposed exile from India in 2006. Four years later, he accepted Qatari nationality, spending his time between Dubai, London and Husain was educated in the streets of Indore, a madrassa in Baroda, the Indore School of Arts and very briefly the J.J. School of Arts, Mumbai. He was an immensely talented and intelligent man with an enormous curiosity about the world who learnt effortlessly from life and people. He arrived in what was then Bombay in the early 1930s, penniless but bursting with enthusiasm and energy, traits that he retained all through his first started out by walking the streets of Bombay offering to paint portraits of people who could afford to pay him Rs 25. There were not too many commissions but some of these early portraits still survive. In 2008 in London, I saw a portrait Husain had done of Lord Ghulam Noon's elder brother in a Bhendi Bazaar sweet shop. Soon, he moved to painting cinema hoardings, first for V. Shantaram's Prabhat Studios and later for New perched high on bamboo scaffolding, Husain learnt to be able to concentrate amid the noise and chaos of the street below. He used to paint 40 foot hoardings for four annas a foot under the blazing sun in Mumbai for many years. From painting hoardings, he progressed to designing toys and painting children's furniture for Rs 300 a month. "But even at that time I knew I would be an artist one day," he used to say, adding, "there was a time when I painted furniture by day and my own art by night. I painted non-stop." Cinema held a life-long fascination for Husain and decades later, he went on to make several much-talked about films. Of these Through the Eyes of a Painter (1967) won the Golden Bear at the Berlin Film Festival but the most well-known is Gaja Gamini (2000) that featured Madhuri Dixit as his muse. In 2004 he made the semi-autobiographical Meenaxi: A Tale of Three Cities with Tabu in the lead role which ran into trouble with Muslim life started to change radically around the time of Independence. Francis Newton Souza (1924-2002), the prodigious enfant terrible of Indian art, spotted Husain's talent by chance and immediately included him in his Progressive Artists Group (PAG) in 1947. Husain's work was noticed right from that first showing and with the encouragement of Rudi von Leyden, the German Jewish art critic, he held his first one-man show in Mumbai in 1950. With prices ranging from Rs 50 to Rs 300, the exhibition sold out. As Husain told me with a chuckle, "I was a best seller right from start."advertisementWhat differentiates Husain from his Progressive contemporaries is his deeply rooted 'Indianness' and his celebration of Indian life and people. While his contemporaries were busily assimilating European art from Byzantium downwards, Husain sought inspiration in temple sculptures (Mathura and Khajuraho), Pahari miniature paintings and Indian folk the mid-1950s Husain got national recognition with two very seminal canvases 'Zameen' and 'Between the Spider and the Lamp'. 'Zameen' was inspired by Bimal Roy's Do Bigha Zameen (1955) but instead of bemoaning rural poverty and indebtedness, it presents a symbolic celebration of life in rural India with a vibrancy that had never been seen before. "I realised one did not have to paint like Europeans to be modern," he maintained. Nor did he, at any time, understand the angst of existentialism."Alienation as a concept is alien to my nature," he would joke. The next year he painted the more enigmatic 'Between the Spider and the Lamp'. This painting, considered by cognoscenti to be his best of all time, features five women reminiscent of ancient Indian sculpture with an oil lamp hanging from the top of canvas and some unintelligible words in a script that looks like ancient Brahmi, Magadhi or some long forgotten dialect. From the hand of one woman, painted as if frozen in a mudra, hangs a large spider by its thread. Some critics have suggested the women were the pancha kanyas (Ahalya, Kunti, Draupadi, Tara, Mandodari) of Hindu mythology. When this painting was shown, despite the ripples it created, no one came forth to buy it for Rs 800. It now hangs at the National Gallery of Modern Art, New Delhi, on loan from the Husain became a living icon of Hindu-Muslim, gangajamni culture, his art acquired a quintessentially Indian form and content while being global in its relevance and appeal. Moreover, Husain invariably brought relevance to his paintings by making them topical. He was ever ready with the 'image of the day' whether it entailed painting the 'Man on the Moon' in 1969 or Indira Gandhi as Durga after the Bangladesh war in modern Indian art gained wider acceptance through the 1970s and 1980s, Husain was steadily scaling up his prices and using the media to create hype around his colourful persona and his escapades. "Life without drama is too drab," he used to say. Detractors screamed commercialisation and friends frowned in exasperation; but Husain insisted that "the fiscal worth of a painting is in the eyes of the buyer". And buyers came in Badri Vishal Pitti, the Hyderabad businessman for whom he painted 150 paintings, to Chester Herwitz, a handbag tycoon from Boston, who bought up anything that Husain produced through the 1970s. Two decades later, Kolkata industrialist G.S. Srivastava struck a deal for 124 Husain paintings for Rs 100 crore; not for love of art but as good investment. Indian art was appreciating at a higher rate than most stocks and brand Husain was now Husain Inc. After his emigration from India, Sheikha Mozah of Qatar was his last great all his fame and wealth, Husain was personally untouched by both. He could be as comfortable in a dhaba as in a five-star hotel relishing an expensive meal. He stopped wearing footwear as a tribute to the Hindi poet Gajanan Madhav Muktibodh in 1974 and he used to walk barefoot into the most exclusive and august gatherings as well as clubs the world epic saga is ever perfect. And Husain had more than his share of controversies and brickbats. However, it is in posterity that Husain's art and persona will get a truer reckoning. Perhaps the best tribute the Indian state could give would be to set up a museum devoted to the life and art of this most talented son of the to India Today Magazine
Time of India
18 minutes ago
- Time of India
Archana Puran Singh slams a troll who mocked her family setup by calling their home an 'Old Age Home'
Archana Puran Singh , who started her own YouTube channel a few months ago, and keeps giving a sneak peek of her family life through her videos, recently slammed an Instagram troll who mocked her family setup by calling her home an "old age home'. The comment came under one of Archana's social media posts, where a user questioned why her elderly mother and other senior family members were living with her. The remark was made on one of Archana's social media uploads, where someone asked why she had her aging mother and other elderly relatives staying with her. The comment read, "Just for academic interest, why is your Daadu and Naani living together? Is it like an old age home? (sic)." This comment made by the troll did not go unnoticed by Archana and she gave a befitting reply to the remark. She responded, "Just for your academic knowledge: it's not an 'old age' home. It's an Indian home. Let me further give you the definition of an 'Indian home'; it's where elders are loved and respected and kept close to the family." That's not all, Archana shared the screenshot of the remark on her Instagram account, calling out the troll. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 인천 임플란트 특가! 33만원으로 건강한 치아 완성! [지금 알아보기] 플란치과 더 알아보기 Undo In her videos, Archana often shares family moments wherein she is seen having a gala time with her mother and other elderly family members. In fact, her sons and husband Parmeet also accompany her in the videos. Archana is currently vacationing in Switzerland with her sons Aaryamann and Ayushmaan Sethi and husband Parmeet Sethi . The family has been sharing videos from the trip where they can be seen enjoying the breathtaking views of the snowclad mountains and scenic beauty of Switzerland. The actress is gearing up to return with the season 3 of The Great Indian Kapil Show and recently even shot a promo with the team. Archana Puran Singh gives apt reply to a troll who termed her good deeds as 'show off' Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Eid wishes , messages, , and quotes !
