8 options for the Chicago Sky in the WNBA draft, including Hailey Van Lith and Saniya Rivers
Only days after the conclusion of March Madness, it's almost time for the Chicago Sky to be on the clock once again.
This year's WNBA draft won't be as explosive for the Sky as it was in 2024, when the team maneuvered to secure the No. 3 pick. Instead, the Sky traded out of the lottery and added veteran guard Ariel Atkins.
That trade was further rewarded when top stars such as Olivia Miles and Azzi Fudd elected to remain in the NCAA for an additional year. Those absences significantly weakened the value of a lottery pick in 2025. During a media call Thursday, Sky general manager Jeff Pagliocca brushed off the idea that the trade was connected to players delaying their draft eligibility.
'The decision to try to go get Ariel Atkins was an Ariel Atkins decision, not due to the strength of the draft,' Pagliocca said. 'If anything, it just shows how much we're dedicated and how much we believe in her to move such a strong pick. We probably didn't know any more than anybody else and obviously we made that deal quite a bit ago before some of these players made decisions.'
But moving out of the lottery ultimately paid off for the Sky. The lack of clear talent also creates a wider variance in uncertainty for this year's selections. No big board is the same, even in the top-four picks. And although this year's selection might not be as splashy, the Sky still need to utilize the draft to keep building their young core. So who should they take with the No. 10 pick?
The only position the Sky absolutely doesn't need to draft is a center. Second-year star Kamilla Cardoso is the future at the position, and veteran Elizabeth Williams will be a valuable backup after successfully returning from a knee injury that prematurely ended her 2024 season. But outside of the 5, the Sky have flexibility for their selection.
The Sky are set for this season with veteran Courtney Vandersloot as the starting point guard — but at 36, she doesn't offer a long-term solution at the position. Drafting a backup point guard would give the team a clear road map for the future without asking a first-year player to take on that facilitating responsibility.
On the other hand, the Sky don't have a true backup at the 4 position for when Angel Reese isn't on the court. Backup players don't need to be like-for-like matches to their starter, so the Sky might draft a wing or forward who plays significantly different than Reese. This could be an overall positive, offering more adaptability to rotations.
It would make the most sense for the Sky to draft one of each at Nos. 10 and 16. When front offices take this approach, they often draft by best talent available rather than position.
Here are eight options for the Sky.
Hailey Van Lith
It's unclear if Van Lith will fall to No. 10, but the former TCU guard would be an effective selection for the Sky. She averaged 17.9 points and 5.4 assists in a redemptive season with TCU, making a strong case as a prospect when she dropped 26 points on Notre Dame in the Sweet 16.
The Sky also would be a great situation for Van Lith, whose draft stock has fluctuated wildly throughout the last two years. She wouldn't be asked to dive into a starting rotation or carry the scoring. But running the secondary rotation — while learning under Vandersloot and Atkins — could give Van Lith the ideal foundation to succeed in the WNBA.
Saniya Rivers
Rivers is a Swiss army knife option for teams. Pagliocca described her as 'maybe the best overall athlete in the draft' for a reason — Rivers is lengthy and versatile, a 6-foot-1 guard with a 6-5 wingspan who can cover a variety of positions from the 2 to the 4.
Rivers would be an investment piece. At N.C. State, she often overrelied on her athleticism, which means she will have plenty of fundamentals to train up as a rookie. But as a savvy defender who can stretch and run the floor, Rivers has plenty of tools to make an impact off the bench while fine-tuning her shot and offensive skills.
Maddy Westbeld
Notre Dame's Westbeld could be the answer for the Sky in the search for a backup power forward. Pagliocca noted Westbeld's unique 3-point accuracy for a 6-3 frontcourt player — she is a career 34.9% shooter from deep, although that accuracy fell to 30.8% this season as she battled injury.
The Sky might be able to snag Westbeld at either the No. 10 or No. 16 pick, depending on how the rest of the selections fall. Either way, they would be gaining a solid glue player who can stretch the floor, providing versatility at the 4 position alongside Reese.
Sania Feagin
Another power forward option is South Carolina's Feagin, who played a crucial part in the team's return to the NCAA championship game this season. Feagin is a reliable defender who would add another layer to the Sky on the boards and around the rim.
But she also showed crucial improvement in her midrange shooting this season, especially in spot-up 2s from inside 15 feet. This would help her fit with the Sky, who are attempting to space the floor better this season by pulling forwards away from the basket.
Ajša Sivka
The current Sky front office has yet to take any big swings on European players, either through the draft or free agency — but there's never a bad time to start.
Sivka, a Slovenian wing, has been a mainstay in this year's draft projections for months. The 19-year-old offers a truly rare skill set. At 6-4, she's a confident perimeter shooter who also can create her own shots off the dribble. Pagliocca has been emphasizing length and 3-point shooting throughout the construction of the 2025 roster. Sivka provides both in droves.
Justė Jocytė
Jocytė, a 19-year-old Lithuanian phenom, has been playing in the EuroLeague since she was 14 and averaged 11.9 points and 2.8 assists as a pro for Lyon last season. Jocytė has decent length for a guard and prodigious creativity as a young player.
The Sky might want to spend their picks on something a little more surefire. But if they're willing to commit to a longer-term project, Jocytė could be an interesting selection.
Aziaha James
The first round of the draft will be fairly unpredictable. But if NC State's James drops to the second round, she would be a reliable pick for the Sky as a potential backup guard. Although she's slightly undersized at 5-9, James makes up for it with considerable athleticism. Her continued growth as a 3-point shooter — averaging 33.3% as a senior — would be a welcome addition.
Makayla Timpson
If the Sky go with a guard in the first round, Timpson could make sense as a second-round pick at forward. Pagliocca noted that any player with a wingspan that measures several inches more than her height is an intriguing prospect, especially as a defensive recruit. And Timpson's ability to score for Florida State this season — averaging 17.5 points on 54.3% shooting — showed potential for her transition to the WNBA.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
6 hours ago
Federal judge approves $2.8B settlement, paving way for US colleges to pay athletes millions
A federal judge signed off on arguably the biggest change in the history of college sports Friday, clearing the way for schools to begin paying their athletes millions of dollars as soon as next month as the multibillion-dollar industry shreds the last vestiges of the amateur model that defined it for more than a century. Nearly five years after Arizona State swimmer Grant House sued the NCAA and its five biggest conferences to lift restrictions on revenue sharing, U.S. Judge Claudia Wilken approved the final proposal that had been hung up on roster limits, just one of many changes ahead amid concerns that thousands of walk-on athletes will lose their chance to play college sports. The sweeping terms of the so-called House settlement include approval for each school to share up to $20.5 million with athletes over the next year and $2.7 billion that will be paid over the next decade to thousands of former players who were barred from that revenue for years. The agreement brings a seismic shift to hundreds of schools that were forced to reckon with the reality that their players are the ones producing the billions in TV and other revenue, mostly through football and basketball, that keep this machine humming. The scope of the changes — some have already begun — is difficult to overstate. The professionalization of college athletics will be seen in the high-stakes and expensive recruitment of stars on their way to the NFL and NBA, and they will be felt by athletes whose schools have decided to pare their programs. The agreement will resonate in nearly every one of the NCAA's 1,100 member schools boasting nearly 500,000 athletes. 'Approving the agreement reached by the NCAA, the defendant conferences and student-athletes in the settlement opens a pathway to begin stabilizing college sports,' NCAA President Charlie Baker said. Wilken's ruling comes 11 years after she dealt the first significant blow to the NCAA ideal of amateurism when she ruled in favor of former UCLA basketball player Ed O'Bannon and others who were seeking a way to earn money from the use of their name, image and likeness (NIL) — a term that is now as common in college sports as 'March Madness' or 'Roll Tide.' It was just four years ago that the NCAA cleared the way for NIL money to start flowing, but the changes coming are even bigger. Wilken granted preliminary approval to the settlement last October. That sent colleges scurrying to determine not only how they were going to afford the payments, but how to regulate an industry that also allows players to cut deals with third parties so long as they are deemed compliant by a newly formed enforcement group that will be run by auditors at Deloitte. The agreement takes a big chunk of oversight away from the NCAA and puts it in the hands of the four biggest conferences. The ACC, Big Ten, Big 12 and SEC hold most of the power and decision-making heft, especially when it comes to the College Football Playoff, which is the most significant financial driver in the industry and is not under the NCAA umbrella like the March Madness tournaments are. The deal looked ready to go since last fall, but Wilken put a halt to it after listening to a number of players who had lost their spots because of newly imposed roster limits being placed on teams. The limits were part of a trade-off that allowed the schools to offer scholarships to everyone on the roster, instead of only a fraction, as has been the case for decades. Schools started cutting walk-ons in anticipation of the deal being approved. Wilken asked for a solution and, after weeks, the parties decided to let anyone cut from a roster — now termed a 'Designated Student-Athlete' — return to their old school or play for a new one without counting against the new limit. Wilken ultimately agreed, going point-by-point through the objectors' arguments to explain why they didn't hold up. 'The modifications provide Designated Student-Athletes with what they had prior to the roster limits provisions being implemented, which was the opportunity to be on a roster at the discretion of a Division I school,' Wilken wrote. Her decision, however, took nearly a month to write, leaving the schools and conferences in limbo — unsure if the plans they'd been making for months, really years, would go into play. 'It remains to be seen how this will impact the future of inter-collegiate athletics — but as we continue to evolve, Carolina remains committed to providing outstanding experiences and broad-based programming to student-athletes,' North Carolina athletic director Bubba Cunningham said. The list of winners and losers is long and, in some cases, hard to tease out. A rough guide of winners would include football and basketball stars at the biggest schools, which will devote much of their bankroll to signing and retaining them. For instance, Michigan quarterback Bryce Underwood's NIL deal is reportedly worth between $10.5 million and $12 million. Losers, despite Wilken's ruling, figure to be at least some of the walk-ons and partial scholarship athletes whose spots are gone. Also in limbo are Olympic sports many of those athletes play and that serve as the main pipeline for a U.S. team that has won the most medals at every Olympics since the downfall of the Soviet Union. All this is a price worth paying, according to the attorneys who crafted the settlement and argue they delivered exactly what they were asked for: an attempt to put more money in the pockets of the players whose sweat and toil keep people watching from the start of football season through March Madness and the College World Series in June. What the settlement does not solve is the threat of further litigation. Though this deal brings some uniformity to the rules, states still have separate laws regarding how NIL can be doled out, which could lead to legal challenges. NCAA President Charlie Baker has been consistent in pushing for federal legislation that would put college sports under one rulebook and, if he has his way, provide some form of antitrust protection to prevent the new model from being disrupted again.
Fox Sports
6 hours ago
- Fox Sports
House v. NCAA settlement approved, paving way for colleges to pay athletes
A federal judge signed off on arguably the biggest change in the history of college sports on Friday, clearing the way for schools to begin paying their athletes millions of dollars as soon as next month as the multibillion-dollar industry shreds the last vestiges of the amateur model that defined it for more than a century. Nearly five years after Arizona State swimmer Grant House sued the NCAA and its five biggest conferences to lift restrictions on revenue sharing, U.S. Judge Claudia Wilken approved the final proposal that had been hung up on roster limits, just one of many changes ahead amid concerns that thousands of walk-on athletes will lose their chance to play college sports. The sweeping terms of the so-called House settlement include approval for each school to share up to $20.5 million with athletes over the next year and $2.7 billion that will be paid over the next decade to thousands of former players who were barred from that revenue for years. The agreement brings a seismic shift to hundreds of schools that were forced to reckon with the reality that their players are the ones producing the billions in TV and other revenue, mostly through football and basketball. The scope of the changes — some have already begun — is difficult to overstate. The professionalization of college athletics will be seen in the high-stakes and expensive recruitment of stars on their way to the NFL and NBA, and they will be felt by athletes whose schools have decided to pare their programs. The agreement will resonate in nearly every one of the NCAA's 1,100-member schools, boasting nearly 500,000 athletes. The road to a settlement Wilken's ruling comes 11 years after she dealt the first significant blow to the NCAA ideal of amateurism when she ruled in favor of former UCLA basketball player Ed O'Bannon and others who were seeking a way to earn money from the use of their name, image and likeness (NIL) — a term that is now as common in college sports as "March Madness" or "Roll Tide." It was just four years ago that the NCAA cleared the way for NIL money to start flowing, but the changes coming are even bigger. [Related: Top 25 college athletes with highest NIL valuations] Wilken granted preliminary approval to the settlement last October. That sent colleges scurrying to determine not only how they were going to afford the payments, but how to regulate an industry that also allows players to cut deals with third parties so long as they are deemed compliant by a newly formed enforcement group that will be run by auditors at Deloitte. The agreement takes a big chunk of oversight away from the NCAA and puts it in the hands of the four biggest conferences. The ACC, Big Ten, Big 12 and SEC hold most of the power and decision-making heft, especially when it comes to the College Football Playoff, which is the most significant financial driver in the industry and is not under the NCAA umbrella like the March Madness tournaments are. Winners and losers The list of winners and losers is long and, in some cases, hard to tease out. A rough guide of winners would include football and basketball stars at the biggest schools, which will devote much of their bankroll to signing and retaining them. For instance, Michigan quarterback Bryce Underwood's NIL deal is reportedly worth between $10.5 million and $12 million. Losers will be the walk-ons and partial scholarship athletes whose spots are gone. One of the adjustments made at Wilken's behest was to give those athletes a chance to return to the schools that cut them in anticipation of the deal going through. Also in limbo are Olympic sports many of those athletes play and that serve as the main pipeline for a U.S. team that has won the most medals at every Olympics since the downfall of the Soviet Union. All this is a price worth paying, according to the attorneys who crafted the settlement and argue they delivered exactly what they were asked for: an attempt to put more money in the pockets of the players whose sweat and toil keep people watching from the start of football season through March Madness and the College World Series in June. What the settlement does not solve is the threat of further litigation. Though this deal brings some uniformity to the rules, states still have separate laws regarding how NIL can be doled out, which could lead to legal challenges. NCAA President Charlie Baker has been consistent in pushing for federal legislation that would put college sports under one rulebook and, if he has his way, provide some form of antitrust protection to prevent the new model from being disrupted again. The Associated Press contributed to this report. [Want great stories delivered right to your inbox? Create or log in to your FOX Sports account, follow leagues, teams and players to receive a personalized newsletter daily .] recommended Get more from College Football Follow your favorites to get information about games, news and more in this topic
Boston Globe
6 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Federal judge approves $2.8 billion settlement, paving way for US colleges to pay athletes millions
Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up The agreement brings a seismic shift to hundreds of schools that were forced to reckon with the reality that their players are the ones producing the billions in TV and other revenue, mostly through football and basketball, that keep this machine humming. Related : Advertisement The scope of the changes — some have already begun — is difficult to overstate. The professionalization of college athletics will be seen in the high-stakes and expensive recruitment of stars on their way to the NFL and NBA, and they will be felt by athletes whose schools have decided to pare their programs. The agreement will resonate in nearly every one of the NCAA's 1,100 member schools boasting nearly 500,000 athletes. Advertisement The road to a settlement Wilken's ruling comes 11 years after she dealt the first significant blow to the NCAA ideal of amateurism when she ruled in favor of former UCLA basketball player Ed O'Bannon and others who were seeking a way to earn money from the use of their name, image, and likeness (NIL) — a term that is now as common in college sports as 'March Madness' or 'Roll Tide.' It was just four years ago that the NCAA cleared the way for NIL money to start flowing, but the changes coming are even bigger. Wilken granted preliminary approval to the settlement last October. That sent colleges scurrying to determine not only how they were going to afford the payments, but how to regulate an industry that also allows players to cut deals with third parties so long as they are deemed compliant by a newly formed enforcement group that will be run by auditors at Deloitte. The agreement takes a big chunk of oversight away from the NCAA and puts it in the hands of the four biggest conferences. The ACC, Big Ten, Big 12, and SEC hold most of the power and decision-making heft, especially when it comes to the College Football Playoff, which is the most significant financial driver in the industry and is not under the NCAA umbrella like the March Madness tournaments are. Related : Winners and losers The list of winners and losers is long and, in some cases, hard to tease out. A rough guide of winners would include football and basketball stars at the biggest schools, which will devote much of their bankroll to signing and retaining them. For instance, Michigan quarterback Bryce Underwood's NIL deal is reportedly worth between $10.5 million and $12 million. Advertisement Losers will be the walk-ons and partial scholarship athletes whose spots are gone. One of the adjustments made at Wilken's behest was to give those athletes a chance to return to the schools that cut them in anticipation of the deal going through. Also in limbo are Olympic sports many of those athletes play and that serve as the main pipeline for a US team that has won the most medals at every Olympics since the downfall of the Soviet Union. Related : All this is a price worth paying, according to the attorneys who crafted the settlement and argue they delivered exactly what they were asked for: an attempt to put more money in the pockets of the players whose sweat and toil keep people watching from the start of football season through March Madness and the College World Series in June. What the settlement does not solve is the threat of further litigation. Though this deal brings some uniformity to the rules, states still have separate laws regarding how NIL can be doled out, which could lead to legal challenges. NCAA President Charlie Baker has been consistent in pushing for federal legislation that would put college sports under one rulebook and, if he has his way, provide some form of antitrust protection to prevent the new model from being disrupted again.
