Mayor Adams slams NYC Council push to probe NYPD over alleged sanctuary city violations
Mayor Eric Adams hit back Wednesday at City Council members' push to probe the NYPD over alleged violations of the city's sanctuary city laws — saying they should instead be focused on 'those who commit serious crimes.'
This week, mayoral candidate Speaker Adrienne Adams and Oversight Chair Gale Brewer sent a letter to the city Department of Investigation accusing the NYPD of handing over information to the feds that's being used in civil immigration proceedings.
'We've made it clear over and over again that we will not collaborate with any agencies when it comes to civil enforcement,' Adams shot back on CNN.
'The law does not allow us to do that. But we will collaborate when it comes down to criminal enforcement.'
The Big Apple's sanctuary city policies generally limit the city's ability to cooperate with the feds, especially when it comes to civil immigration enforcement.
While the NYPD can work with them on criminal investigations, the letter signers allege information from investigations is being used to deport people who haven't faced any criminal charges.
In the letter — first reported by The City — the council members suggest Adams is compromised and beholden to the Trump administration to play ball on immigration issues after his historic corruption case was tossed in April.
'This interference to drop criminal charges against the mayor has been attributed to the Trump administration's desire for his cooperation in civil immigration enforcement,' said the letter, obtained by The Post.
Adams noted, however, that the charges were dismissed with prejudice, meaning they're 'not coming back.'
In response to Adams' CNN interview, council rep Rendy Desamours doubled down.
'We've all seen the mayor be unwilling to stand up to Trump or the overreach of ICE in our own city,' he said.
'These are incidents that the NYPD has admitted it is investigating, but the public still has no answer. The Council wants an independent investigation to restore the trust that the mayor and these recent incidents have undermined.'
The NYPD reiterated Wednesday that it is not involved in civil immigration enforcement.
'As it has for many years, the NYPD works with local, state, and federal law enforcement agencies on criminal investigations, including work on federal criminal task forces. That work is critical to getting dangerous individuals out of our communities, protecting our city from terrorism, and keeping our families safe,' a police spokesperson said.
NYPD Commissioner Jessica Tisch has repeatedly made the same point.
'We will obviously continue to work with our federal partners on criminal matters, but a person's immigration status is not something that we track, and we cannot and will not, by law, participate in civil immigration,' she has said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
NYPD investigates arson attack on police vehicles in Brooklyn
BUSHWICK, Brooklyn (PIX 11) — Flames erupted in an NYPD parking lot after detectives say a masked arsonist torched 11 police vehicles in Bushwick Thursday morning. According to investigators, a perp wearing all black and yellow gloves hopped a fence to gain entry to the lot, which houses vehicles assigned to Patrol Borough Brooklyn North. Police Commissioner Jessica Tisch said a police officer caught the perp in the act. 8 police cruisers set on fire in Brooklyn parking lot: NYPD 'A member of service assigned to our station house security at Brooklyn North interrupted the perpetrator as he was setting fire to a number of vehicles, at which point the perpetrator removed a piece of plywood and fled through an alleyway back to Hart Street,' said Tisch. City officials say three vehicles were discovered, untouched by the flames, with unignited fire starter balls and bundles of hay strewn across their windshields and around the front and rear passenger tires. Mayor Eric Adams said there's reason to believe that the suspect is connected to the anti-ICE protests taking place across the country. 'We received some information that is going to be part of the investigation, but there's a clear indication that someone that had first hand knowledge of this and taking credit for it,' Adams said. He added, 'One has a right to peacefully protest, but you do not have a right to destroy the property of the city of New York.' Maddie Flynn lives nearby and said she heard commotion after the fire broke out just before 1:30 Thursday morning. 'Just woke up in the middle of the night. Police helicopters kind of swirling above,' said Flynn. She added 'I think it just reflects how maybe people are feeling in this moment. There's a lot of tension in this moment and can't say that I'm surprised.' The charred vehicles were towed from the scene later in the evening as the NYPD Arson & Explosion unit and the ATF continue investigating the incident. Meanwhile, Adams is vowing to hold the suspect accountable. 'We are going to find you and we're going to bring you to justice,' said Adams. 'This is a felony. It is arson and we're going to treat it as such.' Submit tips to police by calling Crime Stoppers at 1-800-577-TIPS (8477), visiting downloading the NYPD Crime Stoppers mobile app, or texting 274637 (CRIMES) then entering TIP577. Spanish-speaking callers are asked to dial 1-888-57-PISTA (74782). Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Associated Press
an hour ago
- Associated Press
Israeli strikes on Iran lead to new test of Trump's ability to deliver on 'America first' agenda
WASHINGTON (AP) — Just hours before Israel launched strikes on Iran early Friday, President Donald Trump was still holding onto tattered threads of hope that a long-simmering dispute over Tehran's nuclear program could be resolved without military action. But with the Israeli military operation called 'Rising Lion' now underway — something Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu says will go on for 'as many days as it takes' — Trump will be tested anew on his ability to make good on a campaign promise to disentangle the U.S. from foreign conflicts. The administration's immediate reaction to the Israeli assault came not from Trump, but from Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who is doubling as Trump's national security adviser. He made clear that the U.S. was 'not involved' and that the administration's central concern was protecting U.S. forces in the region. 'Israel advised us that they believe this action was necessary for its self-defense,' Rubio said in a statement. 'President Trump and the Administration have taken all necessary steps to protect our forces and remain in close contact with our regional partners. Let me be clear: Iran should not target U.S. interests or personnel.' As Israel stepped up planning for strikes in recent weeks, however, Iran, had signaled that the United States would be held responsible in the event of an Israeli attack. The warning was issued by Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi even as he engaged in talks with Trump special envoy Steve Witkoff over Tehran's rapidly advancing nuclear program. On Thursday, just hours before the strikes, Trump made the case that there was still time for diplomacy — but it was running out. The White House had even planned to dispatch Witkoff to Oman on Sunday for the next round of talks with Araghchi. It wasn't immediately clear how the strikes would affect plans for those discussions. Trump is set to meet with his National Security Council in the Situation Room on Friday to discuss the tricky path ahead. Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., offered rare words of Democratic praise for the Trump administration after the attack 'for prioritizing diplomacy' and 'refraining from participating in tonight's actions.' But he also expressed deep concern about what the Israeli strikes could mean for U.S. personnel in the region. Iranian officials made clear that they intended to retaliate with decisive action after the Israeli strikes targeted Iran's main enrichment facility in Natanz and the country's ballistic missile program, as well as top nuclear scientists and officials. 'I cannot understand why Israel would launch a preemptive strike at this juncture, knowing high level diplomatic discussions between the United States and Iran are scheduled for this weekend,' Kaine said. Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., said the U.S. Senate 'stands ready to work with President Trump and with our allies in Israel to restore peace in the region and, first and foremost, to defend the American people from Iranian aggression, especially our troops and civilians serving overseas.' Trump in the hours before the attack still appeared hopeful that there would be more time for diplomacy. The president, in an exchange with reporters, again urged Iran to negotiate a deal. He warned that a 'massive conflict' could occur in the Middle East without it. He later took to social media to emphasize that his 'entire Administration has been directed to negotiate with Iran.' As long as there was a chance for an agreement, Trump said of Israel, 'I don't want them going in because I think it would blow it.' But it was clear to the administration that Israel was edging toward taking military action against Iran. The State Department on Wednesday directed a voluntary evacuation of nonessential personnel and their families from some U.S. diplomatic outposts in the Middle East. 'I don't want to be the one that didn't give any warning, and missiles are flying into their buildings. It's possible. So I had to do it,' Trump explained. Before Israel launched the strikes, some of Trump's strongest supporters were raising concerns about what another expansive conflict in the Mideast could mean for the Republican president who ran on a promise to quickly end the brutal wars in Gaza and Ukraine. Trump has struggled to find an endgame to either of those conflicts and to make good on two of his biggest foreign policy campaign promises. And after criticizing President Joe Biden during last year's campaign for preventing Israel from carrying out strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, Trump found himself making the case to the Israelis to give diplomacy a chance. The push by the Trump administration to persuade Tehran to give up its nuclear program came after the U.S. and other world powers in 2015 reached a long-term, comprehensive nuclear agreement that limited Tehran's enrichment of uranium in exchange for the lifting of economic sanctions. But Trump unilaterally withdrew the U.S. from the Obama-administration brokered agreement in 2018, calling it the 'worst deal ever.' The way forward is even more clouded now. 'No issue currently divides the right as much as foreign policy,' Charlie Kirk, the founder of Turning Point USA and an ally of the Trump White House, posted on X Thursday. 'I'm very concerned based on (everything) I've seen in the grassroots the last few months that this will cause a massive schism in MAGA and potentially disrupt our momentum and our insanely successful Presidency.' Jack Posobiec, another prominent Trump supporter, warned a 'direct strike on Iran right now would disastrously split the Trump coalition.' 'Trump smartly ran against starting new wars, this is what the swing states voted for — the midterms are not far and Congress' majority is already razor-thin,' Posobiec added in a posting on X. Rosemary Kelanic, director of the Middle East program at Defense Priorities, said the job ahead for Trump and his team is to protect U.S. forces who are highly vulnerable to Iranian retaliation. 'Israel's strike on Iran must not become the United States' war,' Kelanic said. 'The U.S. public overwhelmingly opposes another military engagement in the Middle East for good reason — an open-ended military campaign in Iran would risk repeating the catastrophic mistakes of the 2003 war in Iraq, which inadvertently strengthened Tehran's influence there.' ___ AP Congressional Correspondent Lisa Mascaro contributed reporting.
Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
Padilla cuffed, McIver indicted: Can Congress come back from the brink?
You have lots of places to choose from to get your message out to the press if you're House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La. It's best to get your message out succinctly, clearly and free of interference. So when Johnson decided to boast about the House making good on the first bill to codify DOGE cuts and slash $9.4 billion from USAID and public broadcasting, he stepped just outside the House chamber and into a throng of reporters gathered by the Will Rogers Statue. "Republicans will continue to deliver real accountability and restore fiscal discipline," said Johnson. But the Will Rogers Statue area is a major thoroughfare in the Capitol. At the moment Johnson spoke Thursday, dozens of House Democrats were headed toward the office of Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D. They were demanding answers about why federal agents tossed Sen. Alex Padilla, D-Calif., to the ground and handcuffed him during a press conference in Los Angeles with Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem. When Johnson finished talking about reeling in the money for public broadcasting and USAID, reporters only wanted to ask about Padilla. Yours truly included. "Did the federal agents go too far," I asked. "Was that a bridge too far?" A long line of angry House Democrats squeezed past Johnson in the Will Rogers corridor. But because Johnson chose to speak in such a heavily-trafficked locale, Democrats hectored Johnson as they marched to the Senate. "Yes it was!" shouted an unidentified Democrat as she strode past the scrum, answering my question for Johnson. But Johnson immediately pivoted to what Padilla did, standing up at Noem's press conference to holler questions at her from the back of the room. "It was wildly inappropriate," said Johnson of Padilla as he spoke to the Capitol press corps. "You don't charge a sitting cabinet secretary…" "That's a lie!" shouted another unidentified Democrat. "A lie!" yelled someone else. Rep. Sam Liccardo, D-Calif., stopped to snarl something at the Speaker. But it was impossible to hear over the din. "He was acting like a senator," charged Rep. Dan Goldman, D-N.Y. "Why don't you stand up for Congress!" "Can you respond to these people heckling you Mr. Speaker?" I asked. "I'm not going to respond to that," replied Johnson. The Capitol was pulsing at this point. The crush of House Democrats barged into the office of Thune, who was at the White House. Lucky him. The Democrats then trooped back across the Rotunda and poured into Johnson's office. "When the Speaker of the House refers to a sitting Member of the U.S. Senate who simply tried to exercise his First Amendment rights as acting like a thug, we're very concerned about that," said Congressional Hispanic Caucus Chairman Adriano Espaillat, D-N.Y. "Both the Speaker and Leader Thune should step up to the moment and preserve the institution of Congress, which are a balance in democracy and important balance in democracy." One lawmaker who didn't join the angry Democratic mob was Rep. Madeleine Dean, D-Pa. Dean stood apprehensively just beyond the wall of reporters and outside the invisible bubble created by Johnson's security detail. When Johnson concluded speaking, Dean tried to pierce the security ring to have a civil conversation with the Speaker. "Mike! Mike!" said Dean, trying to capture Johnson's attention. "It's Madeline." Johnson finally realized that "Madeleine" wasn't some reporter trying to squeeze in an extra question for the Speaker. But someone he obviously knew. A fellow lawmaker. Someone from across the aisle with whom he must have a friendship and working relationship. Johnson and Dean spoke in hushed tones as they walked quietly across Statuary Hall. Some in the press corps followed, trying to divine what they were saying. This wasn't an offstage chat back in the Speaker's Suite or on a private telephone call. But it went down in a very public part of the U.S. Capitol. The conversation continued as the duo stopped adjacent to the "British Steps" near the Speaker's Office. Dean clenched both of her hands into fists as she and the Speaker were about to part ways. She lightly touched Johnson on the right arm as he ducked into the Speaker's Office. "Thank you, sir," said Dean. "What were you speaking to the Speaker about?" I asked the Congresswoman. "I just want to keep that to myself," answered Dean. "But the one thing I wanted to say is that it's up to the President to turn the temperature down. Everyone is inflamed. And agitated. But it starts with the President. He said 'I'm talking to the President,'" said Dean. But other Republicans may have tried to dial up the temperature by blasting Padilla. Padilla left Washington earlier in the week to be in LA during the riots. The senator was supposed to start at first base for the Democrats in the Congressional Baseball Game on Wednesday night. Republicans charged that Padilla should have stayed moored in Washington. "He has a responsibility to show up at work not to go make a spectacle," said Senate Majority Whip John Barrasso, R-Wyo. "The fact that he's in California and not in D.C. while the Senate is voting means he's not as concerned about doing his job here," said Senate Majority Leader Steve Scalise, R-La. Scalise conceded he had gone home to Louisiana when hurricanes threatened the state. He argued that he "wouldn't go back home to try to stir angst against the federal agents that were coming and help us get back on our feet." Outraged Democrats thundered on the Senate floor, railing against the plight of Padilla. "This is the stuff of dictatorships. It is actually happening," said Sen. Brian Schatz, D-Hawaii. "It's despicable. It's disgusting. It is so un-American," said Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y. "I think it's unprecedented," said Sen. Mark Kelly, D-Ariz. "It's obnoxious, and it's rather escalatory." But the outrage wasn't limited to Democrats. "I've seen that one clip. It's horrible. It is shocking at every level. And it's not the America I know," said Sen. Lisa Murkowski," R-Alaska. The band of Democrats who ran over to Thune's office never did find him. But by nightfall, Thune said he spoke to Padilla, Senate Sergeant at Arms Jennifer Hemingway and tried to contact Noem. "We want to get the full scope of what happened," said Thune. This falls against the backdrop of the feds charging Rep. LaMonica McIver, D-N.J., for assaulting federal agents at a Newark detention facility earlier this spring. These episodes have shaken Congress. Lawmakers wonder what would happen if the shoe were on the other foot. And despite the partisan chasms, they're all lawmakers. They know that if something like this can happen to Padilla, well, they could be next. Confidence and trust are waning. "I remain hopeful that Leader Thune and other Republicans can walk us back from the brink," said Schatz. "But I am not so sure anymore."
