Campaigners urge Riverside Theatre co-funder from 1970s to help save it: ‘This is not a dying theatre – it is an underfunded one'
The 350-seater Riverside Theatre was built in 1976 by the New University of Ulster, in partnership with Coleraine Borough Council, the Arts Council of Northern Ireland, a public fundraising appeal and the Gulbenkian Foundation.
Steven Millar, from the Save the Riverside Theatre group, has written to the Gulbenkian Foundation, as well as Communities Minister Gordan Lyons and Economy Minister Caoimhe Archibald, with 'urgent concern' about the imminent closure of the Riverside Theatre in Coleraine an institution which Gulbenkian Foundation helped found.
The Gulbenkian Foundation is an international organisation promoting the development of individuals and organisations through art, science, education, and charity, for a more equitable and sustainable society.
In March of this year, UU suggested that Causeway Coast and Glens Borough Council could take on a lease of the theatre, and also pay the annual running costs and the necessary repairs.
Ulster University has previously said the building would require significant capital investment to remain in use – with refurbishment works estimated to cost in the region of £745,000, on top of annual running costs of £495,000.
"In the face of unprecedented financial challenges… it is more important than ever that we focus our resources on core academic activities," a university spokesperson said.
Mr Millar said Ulster University (UU) has announced its intention to close the Riverside Theatre in Coleraine by the end of July 2025 without public consultation, without a feasibility study, without an equality impact assessment, and without any formal process to explore viable alternatives.
'This isn't just a devastating civic and cultural loss. It also violates the public and charitable commitments under which Riverside was founded and dishonors the spirit of Gulbenkian's original investment,' he said.
'This is not a dying theatre. It is an underfunded one. There are viable options: we are actively exploring a charitable trust or a lease model to allow continued operation.
'But these alternatives are being shut out before they can be tested. Ulster University has declined, so far, to pause the closure timeline or publicly engage.
'That is why we are calling on you as a founding funder and cultural leader to intervene. You co-built Riverside Theatre. Your voice now could help protect it.'
Designed by Peter Moro, Riverside remains the only flexible-format theatre of its kind on the island of Ireland. From its inception, the Riverside was never a conventional university department it was a civic and cultural asset, created for the benefit of the wider public.
Mr Millar has claimed this decision breaches legal and public duties on multiple grounds, citing that it was co-funded by charitable and public taxpayer money including the Gulbenkian Foundation.
Under UK and Northern Irish law, he said, such assets may be subject to charitable purpose restrictions, requiring that they continue to serve the public benefit for which they were created.
Chris Robinson Chair, Equity Lagan & East Branch obo Lagan & East Branch, has also written to UU's Vice Chancellor Professor Paul Bartholomew.
He said: 'This announcement by the University of Ulster comes as yet another body blow to the Arts in Northern Ireland and is further evidence of the lack of importance that local decision makers place in the arts and the community who engage with them.'
Mr Robinson also accused the local council and department for communities of 'passing the blame'.
Ulster University, DfC and Causeway Coast & Glens Council have been contacted.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
4 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Holyrood 2026 will test voters' trust in public spending
READ MORE Speaking to journalists, Ian Murray said the increased settlement raised fundamental political questions ahead of the 2026 election. 'The question then becomes, who do you trust to spend that?' he said. 'The record of the SNP Government of the last 18 years has not been beneficial in terms of how they would spend it. 'In fact, I think there will be broad support for the view that the £4.9bn that they got in the budget last year has not been spent wisely either. 'So this is an incredible investment. It is the largest settlement in the devolution era. We promised to end austerity, and we have.' (Left to right) Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson, Secretary of State for Scotland Ian Murray and Energy Security and Net Zero Secretary Ed Miliband leave Downing Street (Image: Stefan Rousseau) In total, the Scottish Government's resource budget will rise by £2.4bn per year from April 2026, while its capital funding will increase by more than £510 million annually over a slightly longer period. However, Scottish Finance Secretary Shona Robison warned that despite the uplift, the real-terms increase in day-to-day funding was just 0.8% annually — below UK departmental averages — and amounted to £1.1bn less than if it had matched UK departmental spending. The Scottish Government will respond to the announcement in the medium-term financial strategy on June 25, the Finance Secretary said. Speaking to journalists in Holyrood, the SNP minister said there had been a deterioration in relations with the Treasury. She said that despite repeated requests, devolved governments were refused a meeting with Darren Jones, the Chief Secretary to the Treasury. 'I have to say, in recent weeks, the lack of engagement around the Spending Review has been a concern,' she said. 'Ourselves, the Welsh and Northern Irish governments asked for a meeting with the Chief Secretary to the Treasury to talk about the details of the Spending Review and we were not given one because he was too busy in departmental meetings and negotiations with UK departments — and then pops out the end of that to meet with us. 'I do not think that is good enough and it went down really, really badly.' (Image: Andrew Milligan/PA) In their analysis, the Fraser of Allander Institute also queried Labour's claim that the block grant would increase by £9.1bn over the Spending Review period. They said that figure was based on a flawed baseline and assumed there would be no funding increase otherwise. 'A much more insightful — though perhaps less cheery — conclusion from looking at the Scottish Fiscal Commission's forecast is that by 2028–29, funding will be £0.7bn lower than their central estimate published on 29 May.' In the Spending Review, the Chancellor confirmed funding for the long-awaited Acorn carbon capture project at St Fergus, a £250m redevelopment of Faslane naval base, and the reversal of a cut to a £750m AI supercomputer at Edinburgh University. Ms Reeves also confirmed £25m for the Inverness and Cromarty Firth Freeport, and funding for hydrogen production projects at Cromarty and Whitelee. There was also the announcement of a new local growth fund, with investments in up to 350 deprived communities across the UK — including Kirkcaldy High Street and seafront. 'We are renewing Britain,' Ms Reeves told MPs. 'I know that too many people in too many parts of our country are yet to feel it. This Government's task, my task as Chancellor, and the purpose of this spending review is to change that, to ensure that renewal is felt in people's everyday lives, in their jobs and on their high streets. 'The priorities of this spending review are the priorities of working people, to invest in Britain's security, in Britain's health, and to grow Britain's economy so that working people are better off.' The Chancellor outlined £190bn in extra spending on the day-to-day running of public services and £113bn on investment. The health service in England was the biggest winner in terms of day-to-day spending, increasing in real terms by 3% a year. That will result in substantial consequentials for the Scottish Government. As expected, defence also saw a significant boost, with spending rising to 2.6% of GDP by April 2027. The Chancellor also promised significant savings on asylum, including a commitment to end spending on hotels for asylum seekers by the end of the parliament. This, she told MPs, would save £1bn. READ MORE The sheer scale of the spending, and a promise to stick to her fiscal rules, led to speculation that Ms Reeves would need to hike taxes in the autumn budget. In his response in the Commons, Mel Stride, the Conservative shadow chancellor, said the spending rise was 'not worth the paper that it is written on'. 'This is the spend now, tax later review, because [she] knows she will need to come back here in the autumn with yet more taxes, and a cruel summer of speculation awaits.' In a round of media interviews, Ms Reeves defended her plans and rejected claims she would need to increase taxes. The Chancellor told GB News: 'Every penny of this is funded through the tax increases and the changes to the fiscal rules that we set out at last autumn. 'We are not spending a penny more or a penny less than the envelope that we set last autumn. 'So all of this is fully funded. I said at the budget last year, and I repeated again in the spring statement in March, that public services now needed to live within the envelope that we have set. 'That has meant difficult conversations, it has meant difficult decisions, but we have stuck to that spending envelope that we set out in the budget last year.' Most government departments have been asked to find 5% in efficiency savings by 2028–29. Some, like HMRC, face targets as high as 13%. The Scotland Office, grouped with other smaller departments, is expected to contribute to a £296m cut across the UK — but no breakdown has been provided on how much of that will fall on Mr Murray's own department.
Leader Live
a day ago
- Leader Live
Welsh FM accused of doing ‘nothing' to protect pensioners from winter fuel cut
Darren Millar, leader of the Welsh Conservatives, called for Eluned Morgan to apologise to the pensioners affected by the change last winter, arguing the Welsh Government should have stepped in to support those in need. Speaking during First Minister's Questions on Tuesday, Mr Millar said the cut had forced vulnerable people to choose between heating and eating. Baroness Morgan, leader of the Welsh Labour Government, said she was 'absolutely delighted' that the UK Government had reversed the cut for many. The payment, worth up to £300, will be restored to the vast majority of pensioners, with anyone with an income of under £35,000 a year now getting the payment automatically. The decision last July to restrict the winter fuel payment to the poorest pensioners was intended to save around £1.5 billion a year, with more than nine million people who would have previously been eligible losing out. Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor, announced the partial U-turn on Monday, following significant backlash from charities, opposition MPs and the Government's own backbenchers. Speaking in the Senedd, Mr Millar said: 'Yesterday we saw a screeching U-turn on the winter fuel allowance by Rachel Reeves, after considerable pressure from the Conservative Party. 'You will know that over half a million Welsh pensioners were deprived of their winter fuel payments last year, leaving some very vulnerable people with the unenvious choice of having to choose between heating and eating – it's an absolute disgrace. 'You are meant to stand up for Wales but what did you actually do in terms of this winter fuel allowance? You did absolutely nothing.' Mr Millar argued Baroness Morgan should have implemented a Welsh winter fuel payment or stood up to Sir Keir Starmer and demanded the payment be restored sooner. Baroness Morgan responded that she was 'absolutely delighted' that Sir Keir Starmer had listened to pensioners in Wales and across the country. 'I'm really pleased that because we have made representations to the Prime Minister on this issue that he has changed his mind and that will make a difference to hundreds of thousands of pensioners across Wales this winter, in a country where we do have more older people and housing which is more difficult to heat. 'I don't think that it's bad to listen to people and then to make sure that you respond to them.' Baroness Morgan had previously pushed back against the cut, having called for a 'rethink' in early May, saying it was something 'that comes up time and again'. At the time, the Government said there would 'not be a change to the Government's policy'. On Monday, Ms Reeves suggested that the 'stability we've brought back to the economy' meant the Government was able to change the eligibility threshold for winter fuel payments.
Rhyl Journal
a day ago
- Rhyl Journal
Welsh FM accused of doing ‘nothing' to protect pensioners from winter fuel cut
Darren Millar, leader of the Welsh Conservatives, called for Eluned Morgan to apologise to the pensioners affected by the change last winter, arguing the Welsh Government should have stepped in to support those in need. Speaking during First Minister's Questions on Tuesday, Mr Millar said the cut had forced vulnerable people to choose between heating and eating. Baroness Morgan, leader of the Welsh Labour Government, said she was 'absolutely delighted' that the UK Government had reversed the cut for many. The payment, worth up to £300, will be restored to the vast majority of pensioners, with anyone with an income of under £35,000 a year now getting the payment automatically. The decision last July to restrict the winter fuel payment to the poorest pensioners was intended to save around £1.5 billion a year, with more than nine million people who would have previously been eligible losing out. Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor, announced the partial U-turn on Monday, following significant backlash from charities, opposition MPs and the Government's own backbenchers. Speaking in the Senedd, Mr Millar said: 'Yesterday we saw a screeching U-turn on the winter fuel allowance by Rachel Reeves, after considerable pressure from the Conservative Party. 'You will know that over half a million Welsh pensioners were deprived of their winter fuel payments last year, leaving some very vulnerable people with the unenvious choice of having to choose between heating and eating – it's an absolute disgrace. 'You are meant to stand up for Wales but what did you actually do in terms of this winter fuel allowance? You did absolutely nothing.' Mr Millar argued Baroness Morgan should have implemented a Welsh winter fuel payment or stood up to Sir Keir Starmer and demanded the payment be restored sooner. Baroness Morgan responded that she was 'absolutely delighted' that Sir Keir Starmer had listened to pensioners in Wales and across the country. 'I'm really pleased that because we have made representations to the Prime Minister on this issue that he has changed his mind and that will make a difference to hundreds of thousands of pensioners across Wales this winter, in a country where we do have more older people and housing which is more difficult to heat. 'I don't think that it's bad to listen to people and then to make sure that you respond to them.' Baroness Morgan had previously pushed back against the cut, having called for a 'rethink' in early May, saying it was something 'that comes up time and again'. At the time, the Government said there would 'not be a change to the Government's policy'. On Monday, Ms Reeves suggested that the 'stability we've brought back to the economy' meant the Government was able to change the eligibility threshold for winter fuel payments.
