French court to rule in September in Sarkozy Libya funding case
Sarkozy, who was president from 2007 to 2012, has denied the charges.
He is already serving a one-year sentence with an electronic bracelet in a separate influence-peddling case.
Prosecutors argue that the former conservative leader and his aides devised a pact with Kadhafi in 2005 to illegally fund his victorious presidential election bid two years later.
They have requested the 70-year-old serve a seven-year prison sentence, pay a fine of €300,000 and be handed a five-year ban on holding office.
As the trial ended on Tuesday, Sarkozy described the prosecution's demand as 'political and violent' in a 'hateful media and political context'.
'I am not here to do politics but to defend my honour and for the truth to be established,' he said, refusing to comment further.
His trial closed soon after another Paris court sentenced far-right leader Marine Le Pen to a jail term and a five-year ban on running for office for embezzling European Union funds.
The move has thrown into doubt her bid to stand for president in 2027 and infuriated her supporters, who have criticised the judiciary.
Prosecutors allege that Sarkozy and senior figures pledged to help Kadhafi rehabilitate his international image in return for campaign financing.
The West has blamed Tripoli for bombing Pan Am Flight 103 over Lockerbie, Scotland, in 1988, and UTA Flight 772 over Niger in 1989, killing hundreds of passengers.
Sarkozy and 11 others have been on trial since January.
Advertisement
They include Sarkozy's former right-hand man, Claude Gueant, his then-head of campaign financing Eric Woerth, and former minister Brice Hortefeux, all of whom deny the charges.
The prosecution's case is based on statements from seven former Libyan dignitaries, trips to Libya by Gueant and Hortefeux, financial transfers, and the notebooks of the former Libyan oil minister Shukri Ghanem, who was found drowned in the Danube in 2012.
Defence attorney Christophe Ingrain on Tuesday urged the court to acquit the ex-president.
He argued Sarkozy, head of the UMP party at the time, did not need Libyan funding for his presidential campaign.
'Why would he feel the need for another means of funding?' he said. 'How much did he ask for? How would this money have arrived in France? How was it used in the campaign? The prosecution does not say, as this funding does not exist,' he said.
Franco-Lebanese businessman Ziad Takieddine, a key figure in the case and a fugitive in Lebanon, claimed several times that he helped deliver up to €5 million from Kadhafi in 2006 and 2007.
But in 2020, Takieddine retracted his statement, raising suspicions that Sarkozy and close allies may have paid the witness to change his story.
Tristan Gautier, another defence lawyer, also argued Takieddine did not withdraw €670,000 in cash from Libya to fund Sarkozy's campaign, as alleged by the prosecution.
Advertisement
Instead he 'systematically used this money for his personal spending' – 'astronomical bills in luxury hotels', 'yacht cruises', or even 'work on villas', Gautier said.
He argued another alleged funding route via Kadhafi's chief of staff made 'no sense' as it involved the purported role of a man who was close to one of Sarkozy's rivals.
Sarkozy's career has been shadowed by legal troubles since he lost the 2012 presidential election. But he remains an influential figure and is known to regularly meet with President Emmanuel Macron.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Local France
13 hours ago
- Local France
Le Pen and Orban lambast EU at far-right rally in France
Aimed at marking one year since Le Pen's National Rally (RN) crushed opponents to win their best-ever vote share in European elections, the get-together, dubbed the Victory Festival, in Mormant-sur-Vernisson south of Paris brought together far-right leaders from across Europe. The mood was buoyant and confident in the wake of Donald Trump's return to the White House earlier this year and strong election results across the continent. Orban, revelling in his self-proclaimed status as the "black sheep of the EU" and "Brussels' nightmare", likened European migration policy to "an organised exchange of populations to replace the cultural base" of the continent. Boasting of having been able to "push back migrants" in his country, even if it meant incurring sanctions from Brussels, Orban told the several thousands present: "We will not let them destroy our cities, rape our girls and women, kill peaceful citizens." 'Finish the game' Le Pen, in her speech, described the European Union as a "graveyard of politically unfulfilled promises" and termed it "woke and ultra-liberal". "We don't want to leave the table. We want to finish the game and win, to take power in France and in Europe and give it back to the people," she said. Her party previously backed France's exit from the EU. But now it preaches European reform while remaining a member as Le Pen seeks to make the party electable and shake off the legacy of her late father Jean-Marie Le Pen. Advertisement Other attendees included Italy's Deputy Prime Minister and leader of the League party Matteo Salvini, the leader of Spain's Vox party Santiago Abascal and former Czech premier Andrej Babis. They are all part of the Patriots for Europe faction in the European parliament, one of no less than three competing far-right factions in the chamber. Salvini meanwhile described migration as a "threat" to Europe. "The threat to our children is an invasion of illegal immigrants, mainly Islamists, financed and organised in the silence of Brussels," he affirmed from the podium, calling on European "patriots" to "work together" to "take back control of the destiny and future of Europe." In a sign of the controversy over the meeting, some 4,000 people from the left, hard left and trade unions protested in the nearby town of Montargis, according to organisers, vowing to "build resistance" and proclaiming the far-right leaders were "not welcome". "You have here the worst of the racist and xenophobic European far right that we know only too well," said French hard-left MEP Manon Aubry. Italy's Deputy Prime Minister Matteo Salvini (L), French President of RN parliamentary group Marine Le Pen (C) and French far-right party RN President and MEP Jordan Bardella (R) wave on stage at the end of the meeting. (Photo by JEAN-FRANCOIS MONIER / AFP) 'Brussels guillotine' The meeting also comes less than two years ahead of watershed presidential elections in France where President Emmanuel Macron, who has long promoted himself as a bulwark against the far right, cannot stand again and the RN sees its best ever chance of taking power. But it is far from certain if Le Pen will stand for a fourth time as her conviction earlier this year in a fake jobs scandal disqualifies her from standing from public office. She has appealed. But waiting in the wings is her protege and RN party leader Jordan Bardella, 29, who would stand if Le Pen was ineligible. Advertisement Bardella, who polls have shown would still be set to win the first round of presidential elections if he stands, is taking care to project his image including a long TV interview with star anchor Karine Le Marchand aimed at showing his softer side. "We reject the Europe of Ursula von der Leyen," Bardella told the rally, referring to the chief of the EU Commission. "We reject the Europe of Macron... We represent the rebirth of a true Europe." As well as Le Pen's legal limbo, the contours of the French 2027 presidential election remain largely unclear, with centre-right former prime minister Edouard Philippe the only major player to clearly state he will stand. Orban urged the RN to emerge triumphant from the elections. "Without you, we will not be able to occupy Brussels (...) We will not be able to save Hungary from the Brussels guillotine," said Orban.
France 24
13 hours ago
- France 24
What is the high seas treaty?
The treaty was adopted by UN member states in June 2023. It has been ratified by 31 nations plus the European Union, and comes into force 120 days after its 60th ratification. But at the UN Ocean Conference this week, hosts France said around 50 countries have ratified the pact, bringing it within reach of enactment. The United States signed the treaty in 2023 under Joe Biden but is not expected to ratify it while Donald Trump is president. Here are the key points of the treaty text: International waters The treaty covers international waters, which fall outside the jurisdiction of any single state, and account for more than 60 percent of the world's oceans. Specifically, it applies to waters beyond countries' exclusive economic zones, which extend up to 200 nautical miles from the coast. It also covers what is known as "the Area", shorthand for seabed and subsoil beyond the limits of national jurisdiction. The Area comprises just over half of the planet's seabed. Once enacted, a decision-making body -- a Conference of the Parties (COP) -- would have to work with regional and global organizations that already oversee different aspects of the oceans. These include regional fisheries bodies and the International Seabed Authority, the arena where nations are hotly contesting a proposed set of rules to govern deep-sea mining. Trump's decision to sidestep the authority -- to which the US is not a member -- and issue deep-sea mining permits in international waters has raised tricky questions of jurisdiction. Marine protected areas Currently, almost all protected marine areas (MPAs) are within national territorial waters. The treaty, however, allows for these reserves to be created in the open ocean. Most decisions would be taken by a consensus of the COP, but an MPA can be voted into existence with a three-quarters majority, to prevent deadlock caused by a single country. One crucial shortcoming: the text does not say how these conservation measures will be monitored and enforced over remote swathes of the ocean -- a task that will fall to the COP. Some experts say satellites could be used to spot infractions. Individual countries are already responsible for certain activities on the high seas that they have jurisdiction over, such as those of ships flying their flags. Sharing the bounty? On the high seas, countries and entities under their jurisdiction will be allowed to collect animal, plant, or microbial matter whose genetic material might prove useful, even commercially. Scientists, for example, have discovered molecules with the potential to treat cancer or other diseases in microbes scooped up in sediment, or produced by sponges or marine mollusks. Benefits-sharing of those resources has been a key point of contention between wealthy and poorer nations. The treaty establishes frameworks for the transfer of marine research technologies to developing countries and a strengthening of their research capacities, as well as open access to data. But it's left to the COP to decide exactly how any monetary benefits will eventually be shared, with options including a system based on specific commercialized products, or more generalized payment systems. Environmental impact studies The treaty requires signatories to assess the environmental impacts of planned activities under their control on the high seas before they are authorized in instances when such activities may have more than a minor or transitory effect. It also calls for countries to assess the potential impact on international waters of activities within national jurisdictions that may cause "substantial pollution" or harm the high sea marine environment. Ultimately, states are responsible for giving the green light to any potentially harmful activity -- a role NGOs hoped would go to the COP, to make controversial approvals more difficult. The treaty also requires states to publish updates on an activity's environmental impacts. Approvals can be called into question if unanticipated impacts arise. Though they are not specifically listed in the treaty, activities that could come under regulation include transport and fishing, as well as more controversial subjects such as deep-sea mining or even geo-engineering initiatives to mitigate global warming. © 2025 AFP
LeMonde
14 hours ago
- LeMonde
'The EU needs to invest more at home'
The European Union is the world's third-largest economy with one of the highest household saving rates, yet when our companies are scaling up, they often turn to financial markets abroad. Why? Because we export much of our vast savings, supporting innovation elsewhere, while many of our own start-ups struggle to access the necessary funding to grow. The time has come for change and the EU needs to invest more at home. That is why seven European countries representing more than half of the EU economic output teamed up on Thursday, June 5, to channel these savings into investment in our continent's economy. Let's first consider the numbers. In 2024, the EU economy generated €17.9 trillion in output. Wealth and value are therefore evidently created in Europe at a very large scale. Meanwhile, European households are some of the greatest savers in the world, setting aside about 13% of their income every year, five points more than American households. That represents €1 trillion of new private savings every year, much of which sits idle in cash or deposit accounts earning low returns. In total, this has created a pool of capital of €35 trillion over the years. Meanwhile, Europe needs to invest at least 5% of its economy, or up to €800 billion a year, to close its technology and productivity gap with major competitors. Add new defense and security needs and that figure could easily surpass €1 trillion. In this time of rising geopolitical tension and increasing barriers to trade and financial flows around the globe, these savings are a strategic asset for Europe that we must mobilize to help fill that investment shortfall. Accelerating integration Vital work is being done to improve the integration of our capital markets. The European Commission also put forward its strategy for a Savings and Investment Union in March. We want to thank Commissioner for Financial Services Maria Luis Albuquerque for her commitment and we will continue to work closely with her to enhance financial opportunities for EU households and businesses.
