
SNP and Reform feed off each other – but Labour is still hungry
Nats activists never tire of referring to Labour & Tories as two cheeks of the same a*** - the same charge can now be levelled at SNP and Nigel Farage's Reform
CHRIS MUSSON SNP and Reform feed off each other – but Labour is still hungry
SNP activists never tire of referring to Labour and the Tories as two cheeks of the same a***.
Well, the same charge can now be levelled at the Nats and Nigel Farage's Reform UK.
1
Reform came a close third to the SNP and winners Labour
Neither will want to hear this, but their equally destructive stances on funding Scotland's public services reveal yet another similarity between the two parties, vying for power at Holyrood next year with Labour.
Both claim to be the outsiders standing up to the Westminster establishment, though for the SNP this is also not-so-subtle code for England.
The stock-in-trade for both is to blame others for all ills. Both engineered referendums to leave major economic unions, and both lean heavily on populist rhetoric.
And as we discovered in the run-up to last week's crunch by-election, they both want to cut Scotland's funding off at the knees.
They want to do so to further their own narrow, political aims. For the SNP, that's independence. For Reform, electoral domination down south.
As underlined by the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election — where Reform came a close third to the SNP and winners Labour — support for Farage is surging amid falls in backing for traditional parties.
Scottish Labour have been buoyed by that Hamilton result. and remain hungry for power. But they still face a huge battle.
Because the more Reform's support grows, the more likely it becomes the SNP can win the 2026 Scottish Parliament elections with a far lower vote share than they got in 2021.
And the two parties don't just share ideas — they are feeding off each other.
There may be a point in the coming years — with Farage in No10 and the SNP in power at Holyrood — that these competing forms of nationalism create a perfect storm.
Moment John Swinney is heckled by Reform UK campaigners as FM breezes past warring activists heads of Hamilton by-election
Both parties have set out how they want the Scottish Government to have more independence in terms of funding, a move that would go a long way to ending the current 'pooling and sharing' of resources which Scotland voted to keep in 2014.
The common theme is the scrapping of the Barnett Formula — the funding mechanism which drives Scotland's significantly higher share of public spending than the UK average.
Last year, this meant thousands of pounds per person extra to spend on Scots services like the NHS and schools.
Scotland spent £22.7billion more than the £88.5bn it raised in taxes in 2023/24. Including oil revenues, we brought in just £60 per head more in tax than the UK average. But we spent £2,417 per head more.
Not a bad deal, you may think — unless you look for the worst in everything, as the SNP do. But Holyrood Finance Secretary Shona Robison wants to scrap this 'Union dividend'.
She has resurrected an SNP aim to ditch the pooling and sharing — which means that extra spending is covered — and turn that £22.7bn overspend into Scotland's problem.
Robison says that short of independence, 'moving to full fiscal autonomy for the Scottish Government would create a fairer system that would protect public services and allow investment in our economy'.
Ms Robison knows full well that the opposite is true. Full fiscal autonomy may mean keeping all taxes raised in Scotland — income tax, VAT, corporation tax, oil revenues and so on.
HOLYROOD sits just three days a week, when it's not enjoying long holidays.
When it does, MSPs spend an inordinate amount of time debating meaningless motions.
Last week, the Scottish Government staged a debate and vote congratulating itself for making 'significant progress' towards becoming one of 'Europe's fastest-growing start-up economies'.
Some brass neck, given how anti-business and anti-growth the SNP have been.
And the previous week, it had emerged that because Scotland's economy has lagged behind the UK average, we are losing hundreds of millions of pounds a year in funds for public services.
That's the reality. So how about knuckling down to sorting that out, rather than grandstanding about this imaginary world?
But it also means we have to pay for everything. And we simply can't afford it.
It means the end of the Barnett Formula, and the Scottish Government having to find ten per cent of its GDP to fill that £22.7bn gap.
Borrowing at these levels, even if it were possible, would provoke a response from the markets making Liz Truss's mini-budget disaster seem small fry.
If you think the NHS and schools and roads are bad now, just wait for the super-charged austerity under full fiscal autonomy.
It would be economic suicide, and Robison is not thick. Which leads me to think this is a kamikaze policy.
Scots public services are the target, leading to the inevitable conclusion from SNP chiefs that things are so terrible the only way out of the wreck is independence.
And what about Farage?
Last week this newspaper tried to get some Scots policies out of him. Reform UK are quite light on those — meaning they really haven't got any.
He did confirm he no longer wanted to axe MSPs — good news for the ones who could be elected for Reform in 2026.
But one thing he did speak on during his Scots trip was scrapping the Barnett Formula.
In his own words, he said it 'seems to me to be somewhat out of date', adding: 'What I'd like to see is a Scottish Government that's able to raise a bit more of its own revenue, and a Scottish economy that has genuine growth.'
Like the SNP's funding policy, the consequences would be the opposite of what Farage says. It would strangle spending and growth.
With a reduced settlement for public services here — while people in England get the same, or closer, to the current Scots levels — it would mean savage cuts, tax rises, or both.
This would also suit the SNP's independence argument.
Does Farage care much about that? I'm not sure he actually does.
Scotland has never been his priority. Domination in England is. There would be a bit more money for England, styled as one in the eye for 'subsidy junkie' Scots, playing well to potential Reform voters down south.
At the heart of it, like the SNP's stance, it's about making Scotland poorer, not wealthier.
As the SNP's Trade Union Group put it last week: 'This is code for a bonfire of public services. And the effective end to devolution.'
Correct. But they may want to look in the mirror, as SNP chiefs are proposing the same.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Western Telegraph
2 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
Chancellor announces funding for Acorn carbon capture project
The Acorn facility had been overlooked by successive UK governments in recent years in favour of investment elsewhere. But the project – which will store carbon emissions from across Scotland under the North Sea – is in line for 'development funding' from the UK Government, according to the Chancellor's spending review announced on Wednesday. Speaking in the House of Commons, Ms Reeves said: 'Today, I can announce support for the Acorn project in Aberdeenshire, supporting Scotland's transition from oil and gas to low carbon technology. 'A challenge and an opportunity well understood by the leader of Scottish Labour Anas Sarwar and the Scottish Secretary.' It is not clear from the 136-page document released by the Treasury how much funding the project will be given, a fact criticised by SNP Westminster leader Stephen Flynn. 'The SNP has campaigned for investment in Scottish carbon capture for over a decade, so it is welcome that after years of Westminster delays and funding snubs we have finally secured a measure of progress towards making the Acorn project a reality to create jobs and investment for our communities,' he said. 'However, the glaring omission in today's announcement was any detail on the scale of funding and the timescales for delivery which stands in stark contrast to the £22 billion commitment the Labour Government has already given to carbon capture projects in England. 'Westminster has had 20 years to hammer out the detail on Scottish carbon capture, so it must now deliver meaningful funding and concrete support at pace.' Urging the UK Government to display 'a seriousness about Scotland's energy industry', Mr Flynn added: 'You cannot secure economic growth, energy security and net zero without harnessing the existing skills we have in our offshore industries and without proper investment in key projects like Acorn – the SNP will always demand our resources are used to the benefit the people of Scotland and an end to the absurd circumstances whereby energy bills are going up in our energy-rich country while energy jobs are going down.' Aberdeen and Grampian Chamber of Commerce chief executive Russell Borthwick welcomed the news, saying he hoped the funding would 'allow work to proceed on the project's preliminary stages and move it forward'. The Chancellor also announced up to £750 million in funding for the creation of a supercomputer at Edinburgh University which could be one of the most powerful in the world. The plan had previously been scrapped by Ms Reeves in the early weeks of her Government taking office. The Chancellor also announced the Scottish Government would receive an average block grant of £50.9 billion per year over the next three years. Announcing the outcome of the spending review, Ms Reeves laid out increased funding for the NHS and housing, stretching into the billions. However, it remains unclear how the announcements will impact Scottish Government budgets this year. Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar praised the spending review as 'game-changing', adding: 'The plans set out today will bring billions of pounds of investment to Scotland, on top of the record budget settlement delivered in the budget. 'From the Acorn Project to a national supercomputer in Edinburgh to our defence industry, this Labour Government is investing in Scotland's future while the SNP carps from the sidelines.'


Daily Record
3 minutes ago
- Daily Record
John Swinney challenged to fix Scotland's housing emergency as Holyrood handed billlions in funding
SNP ministers have been urged to launch a "housing revolution" to end the rise in homelessness in recent years. John Swinney has been challenged to finally fix Scotland's housing emergency after the UK Government announced a multi-billion pound investment to build more affordable homes. Rachel Reeves confirmed today that £39 billion will be spent over the next 10 years in England to boost the supply of properties available for social and mid-market rent. The Chancellor announced the Scottish Government will receive £52 billion in total over the next three years, which means an additional £9 billion for Holyrood coffers by 2029. It comes as Swinney today announced Mairi McAllan would serve as the new Cabinet Secretary for Housing. The Nationalists have faced repeated criticism after the number of new build properties has dropped year-on-year at a time of rising homelessness. Housebuilders and homelessness charities now want SNP ministers to adopt a similar long-term plan on increasing the number of new homes in Scotland. Sally Thomas, chief executive of the Scottish Federation of Housing Associations (SFGA), called on Holyrood to "seize the opportunity". She said: "The Spending Review represents a considerable boost for housing in England and enables the Scottish Government to back the country's housing associations on a long-term basis. "We expect the Scottish Government to seize this opportunity and chart a course out of the housing emergency by introducing a multi-year funding package for housing associations. "It's time to end the uncertainty of budgets which change one year from the next and empower our housing associations to build a better future for everyone who needs a safe, warm and affordable home.' Sean Clerkin, campaign coordinator for the Scottish Tenants Organisation, said: "The Spending Review can be a watershed moment in tackling the housing emergency in Scotland. "£39 billion will be invested in social and affordable housing in Britain over 10 years. We urge that all of the resultant Barnet consequentials for Scotland be spent on building tens of thousands of new social rented homes, and renovating thousands of empty thousands of homes. "The Scottish Government must engage in an immediate housing revolution to tackle the housing and homeless emergency. "We can no longer tolerate the thousands of homeless people being stuck for years in substandard and squalid temporary accommodation especially the 10,300 children whose lives are being ruined."


Glasgow Times
7 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
Government to end use of hotels for asylum seekers
Unveiling her spending review on Wednesday, Rachel Reeves set out how funding will be provided to cut the asylum backlog and save taxpayers billions of pounds. A total £200 million of transformation funding will be used to speed up the overhaul of the asylum system, documents show. Ms Reeves told MPs: 'I can confirm today that led by the work of my right honourable friend the Home Secretary, we will be ending the costly use of hotels to house asylum seekers in this Parliament. 'Funding that I have provided today, including from the transformation fund, will cut the asylum backlog, hear more appeal cases and return people who have no right to be here, saving the taxpayer £1 billion a year. 'That is my choice, Mr Speaker, that is the Labour choice, that is the choice of the British people.' It comes as findings from the National Audit Office revealed the cost of asylum accommodation is expected to be more than three times higher than previously estimated at £15.3 billion over 10 years. Hotel accommodation accounted for 76% of the annual cost of contracts – £1.3 billion of an estimated £1.7 billion in 2024-25. Chancellor Rachel Reeves delivers her Government's spending review to MPs in the House of Commons (House of Commons/UK Parliament/PA) On Tuesday, Home Office minister Dame Angela Eagle told MPs the department is piloting different ways to provide asylum accommodation ahead of break clauses for major contracts coming up next year. One of the ideas is to move away from hotels to medium-sized sites such as old tower blocks and student accommodation, she said. Labour has previously said it is 'committed to end the use of asylum hotels over time'. Latest figures show 32,345 asylum seekers were being housed temporarily in UK hotels at the end of March, down 15% from the end of December, when the total was 38,079. That is also 6% lower than the 34,530 at the same point a year earlier. Mihnea Cuibus, researcher at the Migration Observatory at the University of Oxford, speculated at the time that a 'stubbornly high' backlog of asylum appeals is a challenge for Labour as it works to end the use of hotels. Elsewhere, the Chancellor also announced a further up to £280 million per year for the Border Security Command by the end of the spending review period, which leads on the UK's strategy to crack down on people smuggling and small boat crossings. This follows an initial £150 million to establish the unit last year. The announcements come as Channel crossings continued on Wednesday. A group of people thought to be migrants are brought in to Dover on Wednesday (Gareth Fuller/PA) Pictures show new arrivals wearing life jackets being brought to shore in a Border Force boat in Dover, Kent and being driven away from the port. They are the first to make the journey to the UK so far this month after a record first five months of the year bringing the provisional total so far to 14,812 arrivals. This has also surpassed the highest total recorded for the first six months of the year, which was previously 13,489 on June 30 last year. In 2024, the number of arrivals did not reach more than 14,000 until July 9 (14,058). Following Wednesday's arrivals, shadow home secretary Chris Philp said now 15,000 migrants have crossed the Channel in the 'worst year ever for small boat crossings so far', adding 'this is a total collapse of border control'. The official figures of the number of arrivals will be published on Thursday by the Home Office.