logo
I'm worried about our home being devalued because our neighbour's trees block light. What can we do?

I'm worried about our home being devalued because our neighbour's trees block light. What can we do?

Irish Times13-05-2025

My husband and I built our home on a site we bought in the mid-1980s. All the land adjoining our site was sterilised by the county council so that no further building could take place. We had lovely views of the mountains and plenty of sunshine giving light to our garden and house.
New neighbours moved into the house next door soon afterwards. They planted all of the 23 acres in hardwood forest on two sides of our property, east to south sides, which cuts out our sunshine for a major part of the day, especially in winter. The forest is planted right up to our fence. It is now about
2½ metres high and will grow to nearly
61 metres.
I checked if they had planning permission for it, but was told by the council that they didn't need it as it was under 25 acres. We asked them to reduce the height of the trees on our south side and they agreed they would, but they never did it.
I'm worried that it will seriously reduce the value of our beautiful architect-designed home, which will probably be sold in the next decade or so. At present, our solar panels make no electricity early in the day because the sun is low in the sky and the light is blocked out until later in the afternoon. What are our rights, if any?
READ MORE
Let's look first at afforestation and the relevant licensing requirements. It is worth checking if the planting of trees on your neighbour's property qualifies as afforestation. In Ireland, an afforestation licence is required if the area planted exceeds 0.10 hectares (approximately 0.25 acres). Planning permission, however, is only necessary if the area exceeds 25 acres or involves specific environmental concerns. If the trees were planted for other purposes, such as landscaping or private gardening, licensing rules may not apply. Verifying the purpose of the planting can help clarify whether any rules have been breached.
The right to light is a well-established legal concept that protects access to natural light for specific windows of a property. If you have enjoyed uninterrupted access to light through a window for more than 20 years, you may have acquired an 'ancient lights' easement under the Prescription Act 1832. However, this right applies only to specific windows and not to gardens or open spaces. It is also worth noting that there is limited case law addressing tree-related obstructions, making this a legally uncertain area.
Property Clinic's Patrick O'Connor is a senior partner at P O'Connor & Son solicitors in Swinford, Co Mayo
The distinction between interference by buildings and trees is important. While legal precedents address artificial structures obstructing 'ancient lights,' there is little authority on natural growth such as trees. Planning laws regulate building heights to protect views but leave tree heights unrestricted, offering homeowners minimal options for such obstructions.
[
My son lives abroad and wants to sell his house here but the tenant won't move out. What can he do?
Opens in new window
]
[
Which windows are best to block out noise and retain heat?
Opens in new window
]
Legal protection for solar panels is even more limited, as Ireland does not have specific 'solar rights' laws guaranteeing access to sunlight for renewable energy systems. Homeowners may be able to pursue a nuisance claim if the shading caused by neighbouring trees severely impacts the panels' functionality, resulting in financial loss or operational issues. Strong evidence, such as reduced energy output or higher electricity bills, would be crucial to supporting such a claim.
The right to a view
In Ireland, there is no legal right to preserve a scenic view, even if the loss significantly reduces your property's value. Obstructions caused by natural growth, such as trees or woods, do not constitute grounds for complaint unless they breach local building regulations or overhang your property. Precedents such as Potts v Smith (1868) and Webb v Bird (1862) have upheld that there is no entitlement to maintain uninterrupted access to views, wind or air.
Your best course of action may be to engage with your neighbour directly. Discussing the issue and negotiating a compromise, such as trimming or reducing the height of the trees, could provide a practical solution. If that fails, consulting a solicitor with expertise in property law can help you explore whether nuisance claims or other legal remedies might apply.
Unfortunately, the law provides little relief in many cases involving trees and views, but taking early action and seeking professional advice may help you protect your property's value and functionality.
Patrick O'Connor is a solicitor at
P O'Connor & Son
This column is a readers' service. The content of the Property Clinic is provided for general information only. It is not intended as advice on which readers should rely. Professional or specialist advice should be obtained before persons take or refrain from any action on the basis of the content. The Irish Times and it contributors will not be liable for any loss or damage arising from reliance on any content

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Only the introduction of Tina's maiden name could stir a response from ‘monster' Richard Satchwell
Only the introduction of Tina's maiden name could stir a response from ‘monster' Richard Satchwell

Irish Times

time3 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Only the introduction of Tina's maiden name could stir a response from ‘monster' Richard Satchwell

'My name is Sarah Howard. I am Tina Dingivan's niece.' Richard Satchwell , the man about to be sentenced to life for Tina's murder, moved his head up, ever so slightly, when her name was spoken. Throughout the trial, the woman he killed, his wife, was referred to as Tina Satchwell. His name. Sarah finished reading her victim impact statement. READ MORE If it made any impact, he certainly didn't show it. He never once looked at her. But she made sure to look at him as she passed by the dock, an expression of disgust on her face. Next up. 'My name is Lorraine Howard. I am Tina Dingivan's sister.' Again, just a tiny movement of the head at the mention of that name. Lorraine finished reading her victim impact statement. Satchwell, motionless, eyes cast down, ignored her too. It was only the pointed use of Tina's family name which seemed to stir some flickers of awareness. Lorraine Howard said Richard Satchwell 'stole' precious time she would have had with her sister, Tina (pictured). Photograph: Irish Examiner Both women called him out for the cruel, manipulative 'monster' he really is. They described how he continued to torture them with public outpourings of his love for his 'missing' wife after he killed her and hid the body. They told him how his need to have 'ultimate control' over Tina led to her violent death and a lifetime of pain for her grieving family. Sarah and Lorraine may as well have been talking to the wall. Minutes later, Satchwell's lawyer would confirm to the court that he intends to appeal his conviction. He believes he didn't murder Tina. A jury of his peers agreed unanimously that he did. He couldn't control them. And what Tina's sister and niece did from the witness stand in court number six on Wednesday was something he can never control either – they gave her back her name, the one she had before she met him, reintroducing the woman they knew before his malign influence infested her life. He believes he didn't murder his wife, Tina Satchwell. She belonged to him. He loves her. But, as the court case revealed, and her sister and niece confirmed, he couldn't allow a life for Tina Dingivan. When her maiden name was so deliberately introduced – no mention of his, it was a simple, but very powerful gesture by her family. Richard Satchwell holding a photo of his missing wife Tina at their home in Youghal, Co Cork. Photograph: Irish Examiner And perhaps, with those slight flickers of recognition, Richard Satchwell knows that too. There was little surprise in court when Judge Paul McDermott was told that the English-born, Cork-based lorry driver intends to fight on. He thinks he should not have been found guilty of murdering his wife and dumping her body in a chest freezer before entombing her in a concrete grave under the stairs in their home and then contacting her niece to offer her the empty freezer. Always thinking of others. Gardaí and Fr Bill Bermingham after human remains are found following the search of Richatd and Tina Satchwell's home in Youghal, Co Cork. Photograph: Michael Mac Sweeney/Provision 'To think I could have taken that into my family home and used it. I mean, what kind of person can do that?' said Sarah, in disbelief. But the theatrically loving husband believes he should not be sent down for life because 'he never intended to kill her', said defence counsel Brendan Grehan, acting under instruction from his client. Furthermore, counsel said, Satchwell wanted it to be known that 'despite anything that was said in this trial, Tina was a lovely person'. You could hear people catch their breath in the back rows, where Tina's family and friends were seated. Satchwell's self-centred delusion still had the capacity to surprise after a five week trial. 'It's not right,' a woman in the public gallery loudly whispered as the court rose and the prisoner quickly exited, head down, looking at nobody. Despite feeling so strongly about the nature of his conviction, and being so keen to underline how he wanted people to know that 'Tina was a lovely person' (after lying about her being violent towards him and running off with their life's savings), he made no reaction when his barrister delivered his message for him. But despite all which was said during the trial, Richard wanted to seem nice in public about the 'lovely' woman he murdered. Self-serving until the very end. The details of the case have been well aired. It's the stuff of true crime TV potboilers. But the callous nature of Satchwell's cover-up and his co-option of Tina's grieving family into his sickening narrative of a heartbroken husband desperate for the return of his missing wife was laid bare by the emotional testimony of Sarah and Lorraine. Mary Collins, the mother of Tina Dingivin. Photograph: Collins Courts As Tina's mother Mary Collins listened from the body of the court, Lorraine said Satchwell 'stole' the precious time she would have had with her sister, time he also stole from others 'even before he murdered her by isolating and alienating her from her many friends when she was alive'. How could anyone who claimed to love his wife so much do what he did? 'I feel no sentence could ever be enough for the monster who took Tina from us.' What does a monster look like? A monster looks like a nondescript bespectacled little man in a rumpled over-sized blue and white striped shirt which hangs out over his navy trousers. He silently sits with his stubbled jaw resting on his fist, body angled away from the public and the witness box, head down. When told to stand for sentencing, he sticks his hands in his pockets and looks vacantly into the distance. Cowardly, controlling Richard Satchwell murdered his wife. Tina Dingivan's name lives on.

Death row survivor Sonia ‘Sunny' Jacobs found ‘tranquility' in Connemara before death in house fire
Death row survivor Sonia ‘Sunny' Jacobs found ‘tranquility' in Connemara before death in house fire

Irish Times

time3 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Death row survivor Sonia ‘Sunny' Jacobs found ‘tranquility' in Connemara before death in house fire

Sonia 'Sunny' Jacobs and her husband Peter Pringle lived out their lives in a place of breathtaking beauty and isolation. Each morning when they opened their curtains they had views of the blue-tinged Twelve Pins mountain range , rocky bogland and Lough Glenicmurrin. The 1970s-era bungalow where Ms Jacobs (76) and her caretaker Kevin Kelly (31) died in a house fire in the early hours of Tuesday morning is down a rough boreen. The area is now closed off with Garda tape. It seems scarcely believable that a woman who overcame so much in her life would succumb to the tragedy of a house fire along with a young man who had his whole life ahead of him. READ MORE [ Woman who died in Connemara house fire named as former US death row inmate Sunny Jacobs Opens in new window ] Sonny Jacobs pictured at the Cuirt International Festival of Literature in 2007. Photograph: Joe O'Shaughnessy. Ms Jacobs spent five years on death row in Florida and 16 years in prison for a murder she did not commit. While she was in prison, her parents, who were looking after her two children, were killed in a plane crash. She was released in 1992. Six years later, at a meeting organised by Amnesty International in Galway, she met Peter Pringle. He had also been on death row in Ireland for the murder of gardaí John Morley and Henry Byrne in July 1980. He too was exonerated having spent 14 years in jail. They moved twice in Connemara before settling in Glenicmurrin at the end of a row of about a dozen houses. The nearest town, Costelloe, is 15 minutes drive away. Despite their isolation, they regularly received visitors mostly in connection with the Sunny Centre, which she set up with Mr Pringle to campaign against the death penalty worldwide. Mr Pringle died in December 2023 and Ms Jacobs's beloved dog, Barney, died a short time after that. Postman Michael Leainde got to know the couple better than most. 'People are really shocked and it is only now they are coming to grips with what happened,' he said. 'She was very witty. I'd be talking to her every second day. If I said something and she didn't think it was right, she would say, 'Michael, you were wrong about that'. She was a great woman and we had great chats,' he said. Postman Michael Leainde got to know the couple better than most. Photograph: Ronan McGreevy He thought she and her husband found a happiness in the landscape of Connemara that had denied to them for so long in their lives. 'If you look around you, you have peace and tranquillity. When you get a little bit older in age, you want to have some peace in life. They really appreciated what they had here,' she said. Mr Leainde, who is also a local councillor, spoke to her last Thursday and said she was in great form. She had spoken to her son recently via video call, he recalled. A neighbour, Michael Walsh, said he knew her husband Mr Pringle very well and he would call in occasionally. They were a happy couple who moved to the location in their final years to the house their final location locally having rented an adjacent house for many years. She was a 'nice woman. We all felt sorry for her for all the years she spent in prison', he said. Ruairí McKiernan, a former member of the Council of State, a body that advises the president of Ireland, first met Ms Jacobs 18 years ago and they became good friends. Despite being 76, she worked until the end of her life talking, podcasting and advocating for the Sunny Foundation in the United States, he said in an online tribute. 'She never stopped giving, and, in all of this, she kept gratitude at the heart of her practice. Always grateful for beauty, for animals, for nature, for friendship, for life,' he said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store