
We're minimizing the horror of Trump's military birthday parade
In 2017, watching a two-hour Bastille Day procession, Donald Trump told the French president that we'd have one too, only better. That time, the grown-ups said no. The reasons given were costs – estimates ran to $92m – hellish logistics, and the Washington DC mayor Muriel Bowser's worried that tanks and other armored vehicles would tear up Washington's streets.
Some retired generals objected publicly to the totalitarian-adjacent optics, especially given the US president's praise for such bad actors as Saddam Hussein and Vladimir Putin. Several Republican lawmakers also expressed their distaste. 'Confidence is silent, and insecurity is loud,' the Louisiana senator John Kennedy told MSNBC. 'America is the most powerful country in all of human history ... and we don't need to show it off. We're not North Korea. We're not Russia, we're not China,' he continued, 'and I don't wanna be.'
This time, as Washington prepares for a huge military shindig on 14 June, Trump's 79th – and, oh yes, the US army's 250th – birthday, the generals are silent. The Republicans have sworn allegiance to the king. And the media are focused on the price tag, the potholes and the impending pomp; on tensions between the blue city of Washington and the red capital; and on the decimation of veterans' healthcare, housing, and pensions while the administration throws $25m to $45m at a circus of war.
All are important parts of the story. Yet commentary is muted and the debate mischaracterized as normal political discourse. The horrific point is missed: the spectacle of a massive show of military might, before a president who behaves like a dictator and views the armed forces as his personal foot soldiers, evinces memories of the worst totalitarian regimes. History may mark 14 June 2025 as the ceremonial birth of a new American fascism.
Military Parade in Capital on Trump's Birthday Could Cost $45 Million, Officials Say, reported the New York Times in mid-May. CBS also led with the cost. The Washingtonian described in detail the street-damage-preventive measures the army is installing: metal plates under the parade route, rubber padding on the tank treads – though transportation experts warn that running, at last count, 28 Abrams tanks, 28 Bradley fighting vehicles, 28 Strykers, and four Paladins, each behemoth weighing as much as 70 tonnes, could buckle the asphalt and smash power, water and telecom lines underneath.
Even the New Republic, the president's daily disparager, put the cost up top, tallied the ordinance, and noted that the man who 'signed an executive order creating a program to 'beautify Washington DC'' was now 'plotting to transform his expensive birthday party into a demolition derby that will cause serious damage to the roads that line the nation's capital'.
In late May, three weeks after the Associated Press first revealed the parade plan, the army promised it would pay to fix the streets. It did not commit to picking up the multimillion-dollar tab for policing and cleanup, however, which will come out of a city budget from which the House cut $1.1bn in March and didn't get around to restoring.
Still, the partial resolution of the infrastructure problems liberated the press to get on with the fun stuff: 'what to expect' on the festive day: not just planes, tanks and 6,700 soldiers, but also fireworks, football players and fitness competitions. USA Today linked to the free tickets page and published the parade route, plus a map of the military goodies on display, including robots and night-vision goggles. It called the event an 'unofficial birthday party'. ABC News ran a feature on Doc Holliday, the dog who will join the parade in a mule-drawn cart.
Tucked into some stories was a sentence or two indicating controversy, such as this from Reuters: 'Critics have called a parade an authoritarian display of power that is wasteful, especially as Trump slashes costs throughout the federal government.'
'The plans have drawn some criticism from Democrats,' said CBS.
The Hill wrote: 'Democrats and critics have questioned both the cost of the parade and whether it politicizes the military, which has traditionally been nonpartisan. The fact that the parade falls on Trump's birthday has only fueled criticism from Democrats who view it as a way for the president to celebrate himself.'
Over at Fox, they were telling the critics to get over themselves. 'The Democratic party, they've chosen to be an outrage machine at a time when there is outrage fatigue in this country,' scoffed Kayleigh McEnany, Trump's former press secretary and current Fox News host. 'People are fed up with the 'authoritarianism coup' language.'
It's true. Only one party is complaining. But what is striking about their complaints is the relative dearth of authoritarian coup language. 'The egotist-in-chief wants taxpayers to foot the bill for a military parade on his birthday,' said Steve Cohen, a US representative from Tennessee, in a statement. As if the president were moved by mere narcissism.
Reported Forbes on 15 May: 'There has been no formal pushback to the proposal.'
Trump likes hulking lethal toys, but he hasn't always been partial to the people who run them. There was the fight he picked with a couple of Muslim Gold Star parents during his first campaign; the comments on a 2018 European trip that fallen soldiers are 'losers' and 'suckers'; the undisguised queasiness about seeing or being seen with wounded veterans; the Pentagon session where he called his top officers 'a bunch of dopes and babies'.
But he is warming to the role of commander in chief. In his commencement speech at West Point, between bloviations on Nato, drag shows, golf and trophy wives, he boasted about the unprecedented $1.1tn military budget. 'You'll become officers in the greatest and most powerful army the world has ever known,' he said. 'And I know because I rebuilt that army, and I rebuilt the military ... like nobody has ever rebuilt it before.'
Also breaking from script on Memorial Day at Arlington Cemetery, he suggested that the parade, on top of nabbing the World Cup and the Olympics, was divinely ordained. 'Look what I have, I have everything,' he cried. 'Amazing the way things work out. God did that.'
If he is to ease from commander of the armed forces to commander of everything, he will need more than God on his side. He'll need to own the military. Forty-five million bucks is a good starting bid.
Stalin's 50th birthday celebration, in 1929, is considered the kickoff of his cult of personality. Hitler's 50th birthday military parade, in April 1939, was organized by the propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels for maximum grandeur, including a motorcade of 50 white limousines. Five months later, Germany invaded Poland.
Kim Jong-un changed Loyalty Oath Day from 1 January to his birthday, 8 January. This February, the Republican US representative Claudia Tenney of New York introduced a bill to designate Trump's birthday as a national holiday. It hasn't gone anywhere – yet.
The pieces are lining up like a phalanx of soldiers. The website of America250, the non-profit fundraising and marketing arm of the Semiquincentennial Commission, is an advertisement for Trump. Its description of the 'grand military parade' refers to him in the second sentence and proclaims that under his 'leadership, the U.S. Army has been restored to strength and readiness'.
At the parade, the crowd of 200,000 parade spectators will be dominated by Maga idol worshippers. Trump will watch the extravaganza from a reviewing stand, just like Xi Jinping and Putin did recently at Red Square. The army's Golden Knights parachute team will land on the Eclipse and hand the president a flag. Officials say there are 'no plans' to sing Happy Birthday, but there are rumors the army will also give Trump a birthday gift.
Let's call 14 June what it promises to be: the ceremonial birth of the US's 21st-century fascist regime.
Judith Levine is a Brooklyn journalist and essayist, a contributing writer to the Intercept and the author of five books. Her Substack, Today in Fascism, is at judithlevine.substack.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
34 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Alice Evans shares housing update after claiming she could end up homeless amid financial troubles following Ioan Gruffudd divorce - as her GoFundMe reaches $18k
Alice Evans has shared a housing update after turning to her fans to help her support her children amid financial troubles. The actress, 56, claimed in court documents earlier this month that she would be homeless in three weeks because her financial situation is so 'dire' following her divorce from Ioan Gruffudd. She then created her own Divorce fundraiser, setting up a GoFundMe which has so far raised $18,828, but admitted she was 'so embarrassed' to have to do so. But in a positive update shared on Instagram on Monday, Alice revealed that she and her daughters now have a 'roof over their heads' and had retained their possessions after worrying she would lose them as she thanked fans for donating. She said: 'Just wanted to tell everybody that me and the girls and Emma are safe with a roof over our heads! It's been a whirlwind but we made it through the last three days and managed to save all our belongings too! From A-list scandals and red carpet mishaps to exclusive pictures and viral moments, subscribe to the Daily Mail's new Showbiz newsletter to stay in the loop. 'We could never, ever have done this without the incredible love and kindness from all of you. Honestly I was at my wit's end and you saved me. 'Thank you from the bottom of my heart. I will keep you posted. Love you so much.' Taking to Go Fund Me, the star created her own Divorce fundraisers and has already raised an incredible $16,927 from generous fans after admitting 'I cannot explain how low things got'. Confessing she felt shame in turning to the public for help she penned: 'I'm so embarrassed about this. If you're here you know my story. 'You know how much I struggle to keep my two girls healthy and happy and a roof over their heads. 'You know what I've been through. It never ends. I'm just getting squeezed in every which way and smeared in the media so that nobody even wants to employ me.' And now the star has provided an update after raising almost $17,000, out of a $25,000 goal, as she revealed the family are now able to move her furniture into storage next week. She wrote: 'Quick update. The donations have allowed us to afford a moving truck and a persons to help us move all our furniture into storage next Saturday. She previously explained to fans: 'I need help getting the girls and I to our next place. Moving costs and deposit. We have found such lovely little places - tiny, but they felt like home' 'This is amazing because my main worry was having to abandon it here. Looking for temp accommodation after that and will keep you posted. 'I am so incredibly grateful and humbled by your generosity. I cannot explain how low things got last Wednesday when I reached out. I am unbelievably appreciative and forever indebted to you all. Thank you.' Alice had previously explained she was struggling to cover the moving costs. She told fans: 'I need help getting the girls and I to our next place. Moving costs and deposit. We have found such lovely little places - tiny, but they felt like home. We don't need much. 'I am selling most of my stuff and have jobs lined up to keep us on our feet. We just need that extra bit to get us over the finish line. To be able to present a cash payment upfront that will get us in the door.' Expressing her gratitude she added: 'Thank you from the bottom of my heart to all those of you who have shown me compassion and love and understanding. 'I will never, ever forget your kindness - every single one of you.' Alice previously claimed that her ex was living in comfort in a $5,500 a month apartment with a home gym while she and their two children cannot afford 'basic necessities'. She claimed she would be on the streets by June 1st because she cannot pay her rent and all the shelters in Los Angeles are full. She accused Ioan, 51, who married his second wife Bianca Wallace last month, of 'intentionally' turning down acting gigs to keep his income low during their split and avoid having to pay her more. Meanwhile, in February this year, Alice revealed she's being evicted from her LA home after being 'unable to pay her rent'. The actress wrote on Instagram that she and her daughters have 'no way of renting even the cheapest room in the city' after being beset by financial woes amid her bitter court battle with ex-husband Ioan. Sharing a sweet throwback snap with her two daughters, Alice shared that she is like many others in Los Angeles trying to find a new place to live after the city was devastated by fires in January. The bombshell legal filing at a court in Los Angeles comes after Ioan accused Alice of using cocaine in front of their two daughters - and even offering the girls the drug. Meanwhile Ioan and his wife Bianca put on a very smitten display while attending the 32nd Annual Race To Erase MS Gala in Los Angeles last week. The Fantastic Four actor, 51, and Aussie actress Bianca, 32, packed on the PDA on the star-studded red-carpet - just a month after happily tying the knot. The couple took to their respective Instagrams on Friday to share a grainy video of the them tying the knot in a romantic ceremony, captioning their posts: 'Mr & Mrs Gruffudd' Last month, the couple took to their respective Instagrams to share a video of them tying the knot in a romantic ceremony, captioning their posts: 'Mr & Mrs Gruffudd. Marriage now, wedding later.' The marriage comes two years after the Welsh actor's bitter divorce from ex Alice with whom he shares two daughters. Ioan and Alice Evans divorced in July 2023. However, they are still battling fiercely over spousal support and custody and financial support for their two daughters Ella, 15, and Elsie, 11. At the September 9 court hearing, Judge Josh Freeman Stinn signed off on a stipulated agreement in which Ioan pays $3,000 a month temporary child support and $1,500 a month temporary spousal support until another February 13 hearing where a more permanent support arrangement will be forged. Ioan planned to call his then fiancée Bianca as a witness at the February hearing to testify that his ex wife 'stalked, harassed and abused' her, repeatedly violating a three-year domestic violence restraining order (DVRO) which she and Ioan took out in August 2022, after enduring a 'smear campaign' of hateful text messages, emails and social media posts from her. Ioan claims that Alice 'engaged in a pattern of damaging and defamatory conduct against me, aimed at intimidating and harassing me and my fiancé, Bianca Wallace, while alienating our two young children from me.' Ioan – whose latest movie, Bad Boys: Ride or Die has grossed more than $403 million worldwide – has fought Evans' demands for more money, claiming he's paid some $400,000 more in spousal support that he needed to under their pre-marital agreement. In earlier court papers, he called her claims of poverty 'exaggerated' and said it's a 'false narrative' that she and the children have been left destitute. The former couple met on the set of the movie 102 Dalmatians more than 20 years ago. They fell in love in real life and were married in Mexico in 2007. Ioan filed for divorce in March 2021, shortly after Alice announced on social media that her husband of 14 years was walking out on her and their two daughters.


Telegraph
40 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Britain should ditch ‘distorting' stamp duty, says Reagan's economic tsar
Britain should ditch 'distorting' stamp duty charges that 'lock people in their homes', Arthur Laffer has urged. The economist behind the Laffer curve said property transaction taxes are such a big problem in the national tax system that the UK would be better off with an American-style annual property wealth tax. Mr Laffer, who has served as adviser to both former president Ronald Reagan and president Donald Trump, told The Telegraph that the UK would be better off if homeowners paid annual property taxes as they do in the US instead of stamp duty. He said: 'The [annual] property taxes in Britain are low, but the transaction tax is very high. The US is the reverse. We have property taxes everywhere, which is a wealth tax, and we don't have transaction taxes on houses. 'All property taxes do in Britain is lock people into their homes that they can't get out. It just distorts the whole tax system in Britain, it's just awful. 'It is one of the very biggest problems in Britain's tax system.' Mr Laffer is most famous for conceiving the Laffer Curve, an illustration of the concept that increasing tax rates can eventually lead to lower revenue because the higher taxes trigger so much behavioural change. Stamp duty is widely hated by economists and consumers alike because it makes it increasingly difficult to move home and makes the housing market inefficient – which in turn takes a toll on productivity. In America, by contrast, homeowners do not pay large taxes when they purchase their homes but instead pay an annual tax based on a percentage of their property's value. Mr Laffer said: 'Income tax is a problem in Britain, but these transaction taxes are big stuff too.' Stamp duty is taxed in bands that are not adjusted to account for house price growth, meaning homeowners get dragged into higher tax brackets as house prices rise. Since the tax bands were last adjusted in 2014, the average London house price has climbed by 30pc. Over the same time period, the stamp duty bill on the average home in the capital has surged by 54pc. The Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) forecast in March that the Treasury's tax take from property transactions will nearly double from £15bn in 2024-25 to £26.5bn in 2029-30. Trump's tax cuts will 'save us from a disaster' Mr Laffer was an adviser to Donald Trump's 2016 campaign and says he has met with the US president several times since he took office earlier this year. He said he has told the Mr Trump that he should scrap US corporation tax on profits and replace it with a value added tax on sales. Although Mr Laffer is i n favour of Mr Trump's tax bill, he said the president should go further with measures to boost the economy. The biggest measure in the bill will be an extension to the tax cuts that Mr Trump introduced in 2017 and are due to expire this year. Mr Laffer said: 'I know they talk about it as being a tax cut. It's not. It's just making Trump's tax cuts permanent. 'If it were not passed, there would be a huge increase in taxes across the board, which would be very detrimental. The bill going through the Senate right now does not create something wonderful but it saves us from a disaster.' Mr Laffer said that America should establish a free trade agreement with the UK, and that Ireland should leave the EU to become part of the trading bloc too. 'You're gonna hate me for this, but I think it should be with Ireland too. I think they should get out of the EU and should become part of the sort of the US/ UK/Ireland group. I think that would be a terrific free trade group.'


Times
40 minutes ago
- Times
Dive-bombing buzzard forces school to keep pupils indoors
Act now to keep your subscription We've tried to contact you several times as we haven't been able to take payment. You must update your payment details via My Account or by clicking update payment details to keep your subscription.