
With Iran-Israel Conflict In Fourth Day, Many Indians in Tehran Bussed Out, Some Remain Stranded
Menu
हिंदी తెలుగు اردو
Home Politics Economy World Security Law Science Society Culture Editor's Pick Opinion
Support independent journalism. Donate Now
World
With Iran-Israel Conflict In Fourth Day, Many Indians in Tehran Bussed Out, Some Remain Stranded
The Wire Staff
19 minutes ago
Internet issues meant some were unable to receive information on time. Meanwhile, others still headed to Iran's borders on their own.
Smoke rises from an oil storage facility on June 16, 2025 after it appeared to have been struck by an Israeli strike on Saturday. Photo: AP/PTI.
Real journalism holds power accountable
Since 2015, The Wire has done just that.
But we can continue only with your support.
Contribute now
New Delhi: As the skies over Iran turned perilous, residents of the capital and other major cities began fleeing to safer areas, clogging highways as traffic built up with those trying to leave. Among them were Indian nationals being bussed out, though many remained stranded, either unable to navigate the gridlocked city or having missed their transportation altogether.
While Israel had targeted nuclear sites and military infrastructure, missile strikes also began hitting civilian neighbourhoods, intensifying fears across the country.
Images circulating on social media showed long lines of cars jammed on Tehran's arterial roads as families tried to escape the capital.
According to official figures, more than 200 people have been killed in Israeli attacks on Iran, while Iranian retaliatory strikes have claimed the lives of at least 24 in Israel.
In the early hours of Monday (June 17), the Ministry of External Affairs issued a short statement that the Indian embassy was going to relocate students to other places in Iran.
Earlier, on Sunday, two Indian students received minor injuries after their hostel in Tehran was hit in an Israeli strike, which amplified the sense of anxiety prevalent since Friday.
More than 10,000 Indian nationals live across Iran. Students, the majority of whom hail from Kashmir, account for about 20% of that figure.
One message instructed Indian students to report by 9:30 am to gate no. 2 of 'Velenjak University', from where buses had been arranged.
'No Indian student should stay back in the boys' or girls' dormitories or in private apartments,' the message warned. 'Please ensure this message is widely circulated and followed without exception.'
In the same online coordination group, another organiser issued a blunt directive: 'We need everyone in Tehran to leave today. Please spread the word.'
Tourists and business travellers on short-term visas were also urged to make their way to the departure point. But navigating a sprawling city like Tehran with minimal access to local transport or reliable internet proved daunting.
'Is this gate number 2?' wrote one Iranian national who was helping her Indian friend locate the bus stop, attaching a photo of a university gate for confirmation.
Others had their relatives in India try to get information as they could not get onto the internet themselves. One woman said her husband was in Tehran's industrial district and asked whether he should move. Another person shared, 'My parents are in Mashhad, and I don't know whether to send them to Tehran or wait for instructions there.'
The difficulty in accessing the internet meant that there were intermittent complaints from people unable to access the registration forms needed to get on the embassy's radar.
By the end of the day, approximately 600 Indian students had been evacuated from Tehran and were en route to Qom, about 140 kilometres to the capital's south. The majority were enrolled at the Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Iran University of Medical Sciences and Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences.
Separate arrangements were also made for Indian students studying at the Urmia University of Medical Sciences in the country's far west.
But it was clear that many Indian nationals remained in Tehran – some of them unable to receive the information in time.
There were also Indians who chose, at least for now, to stay put.
'I want to leave too, but it is not about if, but how. All the roads, highways to Qom are blocked,' said Tejpal Singh Sahni, a Delhi-based businessman who had arrived a week earlier on a business visa.
'The area I'm staying in is relatively unscathed. I'm in touch with ten to 12 other Indians in Tehran and we're all coordinating on what to do,' he told The Wire.
Adding to the confusion was a flurry of misinformation. Some social media posts falsely claimed that Indians had been asked to leave Iran within 48 hours. Screenshots of the posts circulated widely, prompting repeated clarifications from more reliable channels debunking them as fake news.
With the Iranian airspace shut, alternatives like travelling via Azerbaijan, Armenia or Turkey gained traction.
An Indian who went to a border crossing between Iran and Azerbaijan posted that he was not allowed to cross until the Azerbaijani embassy provided clearance based on a letter from the Indian embassy.
Until a day earlier, the official advice from the Indian embassy was not to travel through land and maritime routes, with only those near the border making such attempts. But several Indians noted that they had managed to get to a 'safer' place and would prefer facilitation at the border, as most border crossings require visas from Indian passport holders.
The challenges of reaching the border remained formidable. When an Indian left behind in Tehran enquired if there will be more buses, an official coordinator had said candidly that it was not clear if the road to Qom was 'safe anymore'.
Late on Monday night, the Israeli Air Force claimed to have bombed a truck carrying weapons on a highway between Tehran and Qom, heightening fears.
Qom had become a de facto safe zone, with Indians from Tehran and other cities like Qazvin and Arak now gathering there. But for those already in Qom, uncertainty loomed large.
'We are 14 people in Qom. What now?' asked one. Another confirmed, 'We too are 28 people stuck in Qom. Where should I share the list [of people present with them]?' A third added, 'Please let me know if evacuation is in process from Qom.'
They were told to be patient and remain in Qom, where accommodation would be arranged, till further notice.
There was also added concern about families with mixed citizenship. One woman wrote: 'I live in Qom with two Indian-nationality children. I am Iranian. How do I return to India?' Another echoed this worry from Tehran: 'I have two small children. I'm of Indian origin. Will the embassy help us evacuate?'
Later in the day, Israel's military issued a warning in Persian on Monday saying it was going to strike infrastructure belonging to the Iranian military in Tehran's District 3 and urging residents to evacuate the area immediately. Shortly afterwards, an Israeli attack hit the building of a state broadcaster on camera.
As night fell, pleas came in for more buses from cities that had already seen one round leave earlier in the day. Late on Monday night, it was confirmed that another batch of buses was scheduled to leave Tehran the following morning. 'Please carry your passport with yourself. Keep your luggage to minimum,' the message instructed.
The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.
Make a contribution to Independent Journalism
Related News
As Israeli Missiles Hit Iran, Indian Students in Tehran Are Being Relocated to Safer Areas
Worried Parents of Kashmiri Students in Iran Urge Indian Govt to Explore Evacuation Methods
Iran Nuclear Programme: How Did We Get Here and Where Do Israel's Strikes Leave Things?
As Iran-Israel Conflict Escalates, Modi Speaks of Need for 'Early Restoration of Peace'
Iranian Activists, Nobel Laureates Call For Ceasefire With Israel, Islamic Republic to Step Down
'Kidnapped, Beaten': Three Punjab Men Missing in Iran After Taking 'Dunki' Route
Three Punjabi Youths Missing in Iran Rescued by Cops in Tehran
In Photos: Israel After Iran's Long-Range Missile Attack
Israel Bombs Iran, Targeting Nuclear Facilities, Military Leaders, Scientists; US Says It's Not Involved
About Us
Contact Us
Support Us
© Copyright. All Rights Reserved.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
13 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Trump's three excruciating choices on Iran
DONALD TRUMP promised to end the wars in the Middle East. Instead America's president finds himself supervising a new one. No matter: he thinks the conflict between Israel and Iran, now in its fourth day, will be simple to stop. 'We can easily get a deal done,' he wrote in a social-media post on June 15th. A few hours later he implied that peace between the two countries, bitter foes since 1979, was merely a matter of convincing them to trade more. His breezy optimism is easy to dismiss, out of place with a war that has rained air strikes on Tehran and missile barrages on Tel Aviv. But Mr Trump will nonetheless have a big say in when and how that war ends. In the coming days he will have to make several decisions that will either restrain or embolden Binyamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister. Mr Netanyahu started the war, but he is relying on Mr Trump to end it; how the president plans to do so, though, is anyone's guess. The first decision is whether to demand a diplomatic solution. Before the war America was trying to negotiate a new nuclear pact with Iran, to replace the one Mr Trump abandoned in 2018. A sixth round of talks had been scheduled for this weekend. Unsurprisingly, it was cancelled. Still, Mr Trump continues to urge negotiations. Iran's nuclear project is the ostensible focus of Israel's war effort; an agreement to restrict it would be a key part of a ceasefire. But Mr Trump will face a string of obstacles. More on the war between Israel and Iran: For a start, neither warring party is ready to make such a deal. Israel has spent years planning this war. It will not want to stop fighting after a few days, with many of its goals unmet. And while Iran says it is willing to accept a mutual ceasefire, it is not yet prepared to make major concessions on its nuclear programme. America will want it to forswear uranium enrichment and dismantle many of its nuclear facilities, things it has resisted doing for decades. Perhaps Iran will be more willing to capitulate as the damage mounts. The regime wants to survive. But it does not trust America in general, and Mr Trump in particular: he ditched the nuclear pact in 2018, assassinated Iran's top commander in 2020 and allowed Israel to start a war. The German foreign minister has offered, alongside Britain and France, to negotiate with the Iranians. But America would still have to play a central role in the talks. No one else could assure both Israel and Iran that an agreement would stick. If it is serious about a deal, it will need to be a more competent negotiator this time around. Steve Witkoff, the president's Middle East envoy, managed just five meetings with Iran in two months, while juggling a portfolio that also included the wars in Gaza and Ukraine. He also scorned help from American allies (a European diplomat says he received more detailed readouts on the talks from Iran than from America). If Mr Trump is not serious about diplomacy, his second choice is whether America should join the war. Satellite imagery suggests that Israel has destroyed the so-called 'pilot-fuel enrichment plant' at Natanz, an above-ground facility where Iran enriched uranium to 60%, a small step below weapons-grade. But it has yet to damage the enrichment facility at Fordow, which is dug into the side of a mountain, too deep for Israeli ordnance to reach. Israel could damage the entrances and ventilation shafts, in effect entombing the facility for a time. It would rather enlist help from America, which has specialised bombs capable of burrowing deep underground. It has asked Mr Trump to join strikes on Fordow (he has not yet agreed). In the most optimistic scenario those sorties would both cripple the facility and spook Iran into submitting to a deal. Reality is rarely so tidy, however. Iran may fear that strikes on Fordow are merely the opening act in a broader campaign to topple the regime. That could lead it to retaliate against America or its allies in the region. Iran has so far refrained from such actions, fearing they would draw America into the war; if America was already involved, though, Iran may feel it had nothing to lose. Some of Mr Trump's supporters in Washington, and some analysts in Israel, suspect Mr Netanyahu has such a scenario in mind. When the war began, after all, Israel said it only needed America's permission. Now it wants America to join a limited military campaign—one that could easily morph into something bigger. The prime minister seems increasingly fixated on toppling Iran's regime. In a statement addressed to the people of Iran on June 13th he urged them to 'stand up' against their rulers. Two days later, in an interview with Fox News, he was asked if regime change was Israel's goal. 'It could certainly be the result, because the Iran regime is very weak,' Mr Netanyahu replied. Several of Mr Trump's advisers have urged him not to approve American strikes, fearing it would become an open-ended campaign. That points to Mr Trump's third choice. Israeli leaders like to say that their country defends itself by itself. But it relies on America to protect it against Iranian ballistic missiles, to share intelligence and to resupply its army. If Mr Trump stays out of the war, and if he declines to pursue serious diplomacy—or if his efforts are aimless and futile, a hallmark of his administration—he will have to decide how much continued support to give Israel. He could urge Israel to end the war anyway. Or he could allow it to continue, much as he has done in Gaza since March, when Israel abandoned a ceasefire there. Israel could probably continue its strikes in Iran for weeks, especially if Iran runs short of the ballistic missiles it uses to counter-attack. Would it eventually declare victory? Or would it keep bombing and hope it could destabilise the regime? And if Iran could no longer effectively strike back at Israel, would it widen the war to neighbouring countries? The longer the war goes on, the more unpredictable it becomes. 'There's no end game for Israel unless it draws in the US or unless the regime falls,' says a Western diplomat. 'Both are big gambles.' Eventually the only plausible way out may be a deal. But getting one will require diplomatic savvy from Mr Trump and flexibility from both Israel and Iran—things that none of them are known for. Sign up to the Middle East Dispatch, a weekly newsletter that keeps you in the loop on a fascinating, complex and consequential part of the world. Get 360° coverage—from daily headlines to 100 year archives.

Hindustan Times
16 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Iran Israel war LIVE: Loud blasts heard near Iran's Natanz nuclear facility, report says
Iran Israel war news live updates: As the conflict between Iran and Israel continues to escalate, both sides have warned each other of the "largest attacks" yet to come. Meanwhile, the death toll in Iran and Israel continues to climb as a result of the exchange of missile and drone attacks. In Iran, at least 224 people have been killed and more than 1,200 wounded. ...Read More Meanwhile, in Israel, at least 24 people have been killed and 592 others have been wounded due to Iran's retaliatory attacks. Earlier, the Israeli Air Force bombed the office of Iran's state broadcaster IRIB in Tehran. The strike was captured during a live show at the IRIB offices in the Iranian capital. The attack on the state broadcaster came after Israeli defence minister Israel Katz stated that Tel Aviv will make "Iranian propaganda" disappear. 'The Iranian propaganda and incitement mouthpiece is on its way to disappear," Katz was quoted as saying. Katz also warned Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, saying that Israel will "strike everywhere" against the "Iranian director". Key updates Donald Trump has warned US citizens and asked them to leave Tehran in light of Israel vowing to launch massive attacks against Iran. During the G7 summit he also offered his support for Israel. Iranian air defences thwarted an Israeli attack on a gas field shared between Iran and Qatar Israeli PM Netanyahu called for Iranians to stand up against the 'weak regime' of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei and stated that Israel was on their side.


Hindustan Times
17 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Why Tucker Carlson, Steve Bannon are clashing with Trump over Iran-Israel conflict
President Donald Trump on Monday took a dig at MAGA allies Tucker Carlson and Steve Bannon over their criticism of the United States' involvement in the Iran-Israel conflict. This comes as the 78-year-old warned people in Tehran to 'evacuate immediately' as tensions between the countries increased overnight. Since the conflict began, Carlson and Bannon have been critical of Washington's involvement. On the War Room podcast earlier on Monday, Carlson said that he actually does 'really love Trump'. Read More: Netanyahu says Iran 'wants to kill' Trump, was behind assassination attempts 'He is a deeply humane, kind person, and I am saying this because I am really afraid that my country is going to be further weakened by this. I think we are going to see the end of American empire. Other nations would like to see that, and this is a perfect way to scuttle the U.S.S. America on the shoals of Iran. But it is also going to end Trump's presidency,' he said. Trump retaliated during the G7 summit. 'I don't know what Tucker Carlson is saying. Let him go get a television network and say it so that people listen," he said. Only hours later, Trump slammed the former Fox News host on Truth Social. "Somebody please explain to kooky Tucker Carlson that,' IRAN CAN NOT HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPON!' the president wrote. Read More: UK citizen stranded in Jerusalem describes city after Iran attack: 'Ghost town' President Trump has cut short his G7 trip and is returning to Washington on Monday, the White House confirmed. 'President Trump will return to Washington tonight so he can attend to many important matters,' White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said on X, platform formerly known as Twitter. She added that he made the decision due to the situation in the Middle East. 'President Trump had a great day at the G7, even signing a major trade deal with the United Kingdom and Prime Minister Keir Starmer,' Leavitt wrote. 'Much was accomplished, but because of what's going on in the Middle East, President Trump will be leaving tonight after dinner with Heads of State.'