logo
Qatar pushes back on reports of $400M Boeing jet gift to Trump

Qatar pushes back on reports of $400M Boeing jet gift to Trump

Independent12-05-2025

Qatari officials have described reports that the country's royal family is gifting a $400 million Boeing jet to President Donald Trump as 'inaccurate.'
ABC News reported Sunday that the plane would be available to President Donald Trump to use as the new Air Force One until shortly before his departure, at which point it will be transferred to the foundation responsible for the Trump presidential library.
The president has made it no secret that he is tired of waiting for Boeing to produce a new Air Force One to replace the current planes, two modified 747-200 jumbo jets known by the model number VC-25A, which date from 1990.
Ali Al-Ansari, Qatar's Media Attaché to the US, told Politico that the deal involving the plane had yet to be finalized.
'The possible transfer of an aircraft for temporary use as Air Force One is currently under consideration between Qatar's Ministry of Defense and the U.S. Department of Defense, but the matter remains under review by the respective legal departments, and no decision has been made,' Al-Ansari said.
In February, Trump said he was 'not happy' with the slow progress and cost overruns on the new presidential aircraft, which were ordered in 2018, during his first term.
The Wall Street Journal first reported that the federal government is hiring defense contractor L3Harris to refurbish a Boeing 747 previously used by the Qatari government. It now appears that the plane will be gifted to the U.S. next week during Trump's first official foreign trip, barring the funeral of Pope Francis in Rome.
ABC's report cites sources that are familiar with the arrangements.
Trump toured the plane in February when it was parked at Palm Beach International Airport. It is said to be so opulently configured that it has been referred to as a 'flying palace.'
The president hit out at those who were critical of the gift in a post on TruthSocial.
'So the fact that the Defense Department is getting a GIFT, FREE OF CHARGE, of a 747 aircraft to replace the 40 year old Air Force One, temporarily, in a very public and transparent transaction, so bothers the Crooked Democrats that they insist we pay, TOP DOLLAR, for the plane. Anybody can do that! The Dems are World Class Losers!!! MAGA.'
Meanwhile, the arrangement has set off alarm bells about the legality of accepting such a valuable gift from a foreign government under the Constitution's emoluments clause. The clause prohibits any government official from accepting gifts from 'any King, Prince or foreign State.' Qatar is a U.S. ally and major diplomatic force in the Middle East.
Sources told ABC News that lawyers for the White House counsel's office and the Department of Justice drafted an analysis for Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth that concluded it is legal for the Department of Defense to accept the aircraft as a gift and later turn it over to the Trump Presidential Library Foundation.
They claim it does not violate bribery laws as it is not conditioned on any official act and is not being given to an individual, but rather to the Air Force and then the Trump library.
Attorney General Pam Bondi and White House lawyer David Warrington said it would be 'legally permissible' for the donation of the aircraft to be conditioned on transferring its ownership to Trump's presidential library before the end of his term, and not the president, personally, the sources told the network.
They said Bondi provided a legal memorandum on the matter to the White House counsel's office last week after her advice was sought on the legalities of the gift.
Nevertheless, Democrats and even Trump's far-right ally Laura Loomer have condemned the reported arrangement.
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said on X: 'Nothing says 'America First' like Air Force One, brought to you by Qatar. It's not just bribery, it's premium foreign influence with extra legroom.' There were similar allegations from others on social media.
Axios reports that Democratic Rep. Ritchie Torres of New York wrote to the U.S. Government Accountability Office, the acting Department of Defense inspector general, and the Office of Government Ethics requesting a probe into the matter. The Democratic National Committee called it Trump's 'latest grift.'
Loomer also posted her disapproval: 'I love President Trump. I would take a bullet for him. But, I have to call a spade a spade. We cannot accept a $400 million 'gift' from jihadists in suits.'
'The Qataris fund the same Iranian proxies in Hamas and Hezbollah who have murdered U.S. Service Members. The same proxies that have worked with the Mexican cartels to get jihadists across our border,' she continued, pushing a far-right conspiracy theory. 'This is really going to be such a stain on the admin if this is true. And I say that as someone who would take a bullet for Trump. I'm so disappointed.'
Any aircraft used to transport the president must meet strict U.S. military specifications, and so the 13-year-old plane will initially be transferred to the Air Force for modifications.
The full scope of modifications is unknown, but existing planes include radiation shielding, a variety of communications systems, and anti-missile technology. Notably, neither the Qatari plane nor the upcoming VC-25B aircraft being built by Boeing will have the air-to-air refueling capabilities of the current presidential plane, allowing it to stay airborne essentially indefinitely and with unlimited range.
Once modified, Trump will be able to use the aircraft until January 1, 2029, when it will be transferred to the library, less than three weeks before his term ends. The Air Force will pay for any costs relating to its transfer, the sources told ABC News.
Boeing estimated that the new Air Force One planes currently on order will not be ready until 2029. Trump asked Elon Musk to work with them on the project, and an updated timeline of 2027 was given, though the president was insistent that he wants a new plane this year.
Trump will make his first official foreign trip of his second term this coming week, visiting Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates. The focus will be on 'economic agreements.'
The Trump Organization, run by the president's two eldest sons, has growing interests in the Middle East. An ethics agreement released by the company in January forbids deals with foreign governments but allows those with private companies.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Israel-Iran news live: Donald Trump says strikes on Iran were ‘devastating attack' amid row over claims of success
Israel-Iran news live: Donald Trump says strikes on Iran were ‘devastating attack' amid row over claims of success

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

Israel-Iran news live: Donald Trump says strikes on Iran were ‘devastating attack' amid row over claims of success

Update: Date: 2025-06-26T06:34:10.000Z Title: Trump claims US strikes on Iran were 'devastating' with 'new intelligence' supporting success Content: Donald Trump's administration ratcheted up its defence of the US's weekend attacks on Iran, citing 'new intelligence' to support its initial claim of complete success and criticising a leaked intelligence assessment that suggested Tehran's nuclear programme had been set back by only a few months. The growing row came amid reports that the White House will to try to limit the sharing of classified documents with Congress, according to the Washington Post and the Associated Press. 'This was a devastating attack, and it knocked them for a loop,' Trump said on Wednesday, apparently backing away from comments he'd made earlier in the day, that the intelligence was 'inconclusive'. Senior Trump officials publicly rejected the leaked initial assessment of the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) which concluded key components of the nuclear programme were capable of being restarted within months. Director of national intelligence Tulsi Gabbard said in a post on X that 'new intelligence confirms' what Trump has stated. She said: Iran's nuclear facilities have been destroyed. If the Iranians chose to rebuild, they would have to rebuild all three facilities (Natanz, Fordow, Esfahan) entirely, which would likely take years to do. CIA director John Ratcliffe in a statement said that new intelligence from a 'historically reliable' source indicated that 'several key Iranian nuclear facilities were destroyed and would have to be rebuilt over the course of years.' Update: Date: 2025-06-26T06:27:15.000Z Title: Welcome and summary Content: Hello and welcome to the Guardian's continuing coverage of the crisis in the Middle East. Donald Trump's administration has cited 'new intelligence' to support its initial claim of complete success of the US's weekend attacks on Iran, while criticising a leaked intelligence assessment that suggested Tehran's nuclear programme had been set back by only a few months. The growing row came amid reports that the White House will to try to limit the sharing of classified documents with Congress. 'This was a devastating attack, and it knocked them for a loop,' Trump said on Wednesday, apparently backing away from comments he'd made earlier in the day, that the intelligence was 'inconclusive'. The claim comes after the US president hit back at a leaked intelligence report that said US strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities had likely only set back the country's nuclear programme by a few months. Trump had earlier criticised CNN and the New York Times for their reports on the leaked intelligence assessment, claiming they had teamed up to 'demean one of the most successful military strikes in history', and declared Iran's nuclear sites were 'completely destroyed'. The White House earlier called the intelligence assessment 'flat-out wrong'. In other key developments: US senators are also set to meet with top national security officials on Thursday as many question President Donald Trump's decision to bomb three Iranian nuclear sites — and whether those strikes were ultimately successful. The classified briefing, which was originally scheduled for Tuesday and was delayed, also comes as the Senate is expected to vote this week on a resolution that would require congressional approval if Trump decides to strike Iran again. Donald Trump has weighed in on ally Benjamin Netanyahu's long-running corruption trial, saying in a social media post that the trial was a 'witch hunt' and should be cancelled. 'Bibi and I just went through HELL together, fighting a very tough and brilliant longtime enemy of Israel, Iran, and Bibi could not have been better, sharper, or stronger in his LOVE for the incredible Holy Land,' Trump said on Wednesday night, using a nickname for the Israeli leader. US secretary of state Marco Rubio told Politico on Wednesday that Iran is 'much further away from a nuclear weapon' after a US strike on Iran's three main nuclear sites over the weekend. There is a chance that much of Iran's highly enriched uranium survived Israeli and US attacks because it may have been moved by Tehran soon after the first strikes, UN nuclear watchdog chief Rafael Grossi said on Wednesday. Trump said the US will hold talks with Iran next week, with a possible agreement on the table about Tehran's nuclear programme. The US president said that Israel and Iran are 'tired' but the conflict between the two countries could start again. Speaking alongside the Nato secretary general, Mark Rutte, Trump compared the US strikes on Iran to the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, saying: 'This was essentially the same thing: that ended that war; this ended the war.' Mark Rutte defended Donald Trump's swearing outburst on Tuesday when commenting on the Israel-Iran war. 'Daddy sometimes has to use strong language,' Rutte told reporters. France is conducting its own analysis on damage to Iran's nuclear facilities after US and Israeli strikes, French President Emmanuel Macron told reporters on Wednesday. Iranian authorities are pivoting from a ceasefire with Israel to intensify an internal security crackdown across the country with mass arrests, executions and military deployments, particularly in the restive Kurdish region, according to officials and activists. Iran's parliament approved a bill on Wednesday to suspend cooperation with the UN nuclear watchdog, state-affiliated news outlet Nournews reported. Parliament speaker Mohammad Bagher Qalibaf was quoted by state media as saying Iran would accelerate its civilian nuclear programme.

Pro-Iran protests are alarming. Why do people hate Israel?
Pro-Iran protests are alarming. Why do people hate Israel?

The Herald Scotland

timean hour ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Pro-Iran protests are alarming. Why do people hate Israel?

Now that Israel - and the United States - have taken military action against Iran (the authoritarian state that sponsors anti-Israel terrorist groups like Hamas) and its nuclear program, many so-called pro-Palestinian protests have morphed into pro-Iran demonstrations. Over the weekend, such protests took place around the country - and the world. Activist groups, including the Palestinian Youth Movement and the People's Forum that applauded the Oct. 7 attack on Israel, are the same ones that rallied in New York City to oppose the attacks on Iran. "We demand an immediate end to US and Israeli attacks on Iran and its sovereignty," the groups said in a statement on Sunday, June 22. It would be one thing if this were just an anti-war movement. But it's much more than that. That's evident from the people carrying signs in support of Iran and against Israel. It's no surprise that anti-Israel activist Mahmoud Khalil, who led the disruptive and often violent protests at Columbia University in 2024 and was recently freed from months in federal immigration detention, joined one of the anti-Israel demonstrations wrapped in a Palestinian flag. Similar events were held in other Western cities, including London. It makes me wonder: Do these activists really know whom - and what - they're supporting? Opinion: Trump is winning on immigration - and Democrats are falling right into his trap In Iran, freedom does not exist. So what are Westerners thinking? I would rather think these protesters are cheering for terrorists out of ignorance or stupidity than that they honestly side with the religious extremists who exert full control over the Iranian people. But it's hard to tell. The National Students for Justice in Palestine, for instance, put out a statement on Instagram: "The empire will fall, from Gaza to Tehran," which called Israel a "Zionist vassal state" of the United States. The same group openly celebrated the Oct. 7 attack on Israel. One thing is certain. Many of those who are chanting in favor of Iran and Palestine - particularly women and LGBTQ+ people - would not be treated favorably in either country. The human rights abuses in Iran are well-documented. Amnesty International sums up the situation in Iran this way: "Authorities further suppressed the rights to freedom of expression, association and peaceful assembly. Women and girls, LGBTI people, and ethnic and religious minorities experienced systemic discrimination and violence. Authorities intensified their crackdown on women who defied compulsory veiling laws, the Baha'i community, and Afghan refugees and migrants. Thousands were arbitrarily detained, interrogated, harassed and/or unjustly prosecuted for exercising their human rights. Trials remained systematically unfair. Enforced disappearances and torture and other ill-treatment were widespread and systematic. Cruel and inhuman punishments, including flogging and amputation, were implemented. The death penalty was used arbitrarily, disproportionately affecting ethnic minorities and migrants." Opinion: Democrats scream democracy is in peril ... while proving that it's absolutely fine Most Iranians don't support the regime they live under. Americans should know better. It's jarring to see so many people in America, which has the greatest set of freedoms in the world, cheering for a regime that has zero respect for the rights of its citizens. Abbas Milani, codirector of the Iran Democracy Project at the Hoover Institution, recently told Fox News that 80% of Iranians are opposed to the ruling regime, although most live in fear of expressing what they really think. Opinion: Imagine surviving the Holocaust only to be attacked in America. It happened in Colorado. On the day Israel launched its air strikes on Iran, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told the Iranian people via video that Israel was "clearing the path for you to achieve your objective, which is freedom." Following the Israeli strikes, one Iranian, on the condition of anonymity, told the BBC: "The enemy has been killing us slowly for decades. The enemy is the Islamic Republic!" Opinion alerts: Get columns from your favorite columnists + expert analysis on top issues, delivered straight to your device through the USA TODAY app. Don't have the app? Download it for free from your app store. It's a shame that Americans - and others in the Western world - would rather cheer for the authoritarians than for the freedom of an oppressed people. Standing up for Iranians' freedom actually would be something worth fighting for. Ingrid Jacques is a columnist at USA TODAY. Contact her at ijacques@ or on X, formerly Twitter: @Ingrid_Jacques

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store