Congress must defund Planned Parenthood
I am a mother of three, including my son Cole, who was born with Down syndrome. I am also a former congresswoman who served Eastern Washington for 20 years. In these capacities, I have lived the profound joy and responsibility of nurturing life.
When Cole was born, doctors told me his condition might limit him, but his boundless spirit has taught me that every life is a gift brimming with potential. This conviction, rooted in faith and family, drove my work in Congress. It also fuels my call today for Congress to defund Planned Parenthood, the nation's largest abortion provider and the second-largest distributor of transition-inducing cross-sex hormones to children.
Taxpayer dollars should not bankroll an organization that ends lives and pushes harmful, irreversible treatments on vulnerable children who are too young to consent. This is even more true at a time when our nation is grappling with a $36 trillion debt.
Planned Parenthood, shaped by its founder Margaret Sanger's eugenics-driven vision, has long masked its true aims. Sanger, who in 1923 called the poor, disabled, and people of color 'human weeds,' sought to eliminate those she deemed inferior.
Today, the Planned Parenthood Federation of America and Planned Parenthood Global hide behind the pretext of caring for poor women, but their actions tell a different story. They falsely claim that unless their organization receives Medicaid dollars, women will lose medical care. They also perpetuate the myth that abortion comprises only 3 percent of their services.
In truth, abortion dominates their business model. According to their 2021-2022 annual report, Planned Parenthood for America performed 374,155 abortions — over 1,000 daily —making it the nation's leading abortion provider. Since 1973, Planned Parenthood has ended more than 8 million lives in this manner.
This is not healthcare — it is the systematic termination of human potential on an unimaginable scale.
The harm extends beyond abortion itself. A 2023 study in BMC Psychiatry found that women post-abortion face a 34 percent higher risk of depression and anxiety, with many enduring long-term distress. A 2023 study in Issues in Law & Medicine documented physical complications like infertility and chronic pain. Planned Parenthood dismisses these harms, leaving women to face the consequences alone.
As a mother, I have seen the stark difference between such abandonment and genuine support. My experience with Cole, navigating a world that sometimes undervalues those with disabilities, has shown me the power of choosing life and the need for care that uplifts, not destroys.
Equally alarming is Planned Parenthood's role as the second-largest provider of cross-sex hormones for so-called 'gender-affirming care,' according to a 2023 Senate report by Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.). With 41 of 49 affiliates offering puberty blockers, estrogen, and testosterone, their 2021-2022 report noted a 1,400 percent spike in 'Other Procedures' — including gender transition services — from 17,791 to 256,550 in a year.
These treatments, given to children as young as 12, lack long-term safety data, according to a 2022 Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism study, and can cause irreversible damage such as infertility, stunted growth, depression, blood clots, and cancer.
Across Europe, countries such as the United Kingdom, Sweden, Finland, Norway, and Denmark have sharply restricted these treatments for minors, with the U.K. indefinitely limiting puberty blockers to clinical trials in 2024 due to insufficient evidence of safety, and others allowing hormones only in exceptional cases or research settings.
As a mother, I am heartbroken that Planned Parenthood pushes such experimental treatments on vulnerable children, often bypassing parental consent, just as so many nations are pulling back and moving in a better direction.
Fiscally, subsidies to Planned Parenthood are indefensible. In 2021-2022, they received $670.4 million in taxpayer funds, siphoned from such programs as Title X, despite the Hyde Amendment's restrictions on funding abortions. These dollars, as I argued in Congress, free up resources for Planned Parenthood to run its abortion and hormone programs.
Over the last five years, Planned Parenthood's national office funneled $899 million to affiliates for legal battles and political campaigns, including $40 million in 2024 to back pro-abortion Democrats, according to a 2025 New York Times report.
As former chair of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, I fought to ensure that taxpayer funds were spent responsibly, prioritizing families over ideology. Planned Parenthood's $2 billion in annual revenue is proof that it can survive without taxpayer support. Forcing taxpayers to fund an organization that so many find morally bankrupt undermines the values of millions.
Defunding Planned Parenthood would merely redirect resources to federally qualified health centers, which serve more than 30 million patients annually with comprehensive care — mammograms, prenatal support and mental health services, among other things — without abortion or experimental treatments, according to the Health Resources and Services Administration.
These centers embody the kind of care I championed in Congress, as when I voted for the No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act and spoke out against bills designed to funnel money to Planned Parenthood.
As Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy noted in their November 20, 2024, Wall Street Journal op-ed, the Department of Government Efficiency aims to cut more than $500 billion in unauthorized spending, citing Planned Parenthood's funding as a prime target. Recent Supreme Court rulings such as West Virginia v. EPA (2022) and Loper Bright v. Raimondo (2024), affirm that agencies cannot impose policies without clear congressional approval — a principle that applies to PPFA's bloated funding.
Before retiring in December 2024, I stood on the House floor, as I did in 2020 at a pro-life hearing, saying, 'Abortion doesn't bring hope or healing. There is a despair that has come over our country.'
My journey with Cole has shown me the beauty of embracing life's challenges instead of erasing them.
Defunding Planned Parenthood is about reclaiming moral clarity and fiscal responsibility, investing in care that respects the dignity of every human person — born and unborn. Congress must act now to honor the constitutional promise of life and protect our children from harm. As a mother and former congresswoman, I urge my former colleagues to defund Planned Parenthood and choose hope.
Cathy McMorris Rodgers represented Washington's Fifth Congressional District in Congress from 2005 to 2025.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
28 minutes ago
- The Hill
Speaker Johnson teases follow-ups to the ‘one big, beautiful bill'
The 'one big, beautiful bill' may not be so singular, after all. Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) is teasing follow-up legislation to the megabill of President Trump's tax cut and spending priorities that Republicans can push though using the same special budget reconciliation process that requires only GOP votes. That tool can be used once per fiscal year, with the current fiscal year ending on Sept. 30. So after Republicans are done with the 'big, beautiful bill,' the GOP trifecta has, in theory, two more shots to muscle through party-line legislation before the next Congress comes into power after the midterms. Johnson floated plans for a second reconciliation bill while rebutting concerns from deficit hawks on the budget impact of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act — which includes an extension of tax cuts and boosts to border and defense funding, with costs offset in part by new requirements on low-income assistance programs like Medicaid and food aid. 'Everyone here wants to reduce spending,' Johnson said Friday morning on CNBC. 'But you have to do that in a sequence of events. We have a plan, OK? This is the first of a multistep process.' 'We're going to have another reconciliation bill that follows this one, possibly a third one before this Congress is up, because you can have a reconciliation bill for each budget year, each fiscal year. So that's ahead of us,' Johnson continued, also pointing to separate plans to claw back money based on recommendations from the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). 'We're also doing rescissions packages. We got the first one delivered this week from the White House, and that will codify many of the DOGE cuts.' The promise of another reconciliation bill is somewhat surprising given the crux of the debate that dominated the early weeks of the year: Should Republicans divide up their agenda into two bills, passing the first quickly to give Trump an early win on boosting funding for border enforcement and deportations? Or would putting all of Trump's priorities into one bill — which would contain both bitter pills and sweeteners for different factions of the razor-thin majority — be a better political strategy? Trump eventually said he preferred 'one big, beautiful bill,' a moniker that became the legislation's official title in the House last month. It's not clear what would be in a second piece of legislation. Multiple House Republicans who spoke with The Hill were unaware of plans for more reconciliation bills and were not sure what could be included in them. 'I think we need to see what's left on the table after the first one,' Rep. Michael Cloud (R-Texas) said. And to muster through multiple reconciliation bills is a delicate prospect. If members know more reconciliation bills are coming, that complicates the argument that everything in the current package — even policies some factions dislike that others love — need to stay in one megabill. The Speaker declined to elaborate on what might be in such a package when asked in a press conference last week. 'I'm not going to tell you that,' Johnson said. 'Let's get the first one done.' 'Look, I say this is the beginning of a process, and what you're going to see is a continuing of us identifying waste, fraud, abuse in government, which is our pledge of common sense, restoring common sense and fiscal sanity. So we have lots of ideas of things that might be in that package.' Republicans had started planning for the current legislative behemoth months before the 2024 election so they would be prepared to quickly execute on their policy wish list if they won the majority. 'This isn't something we just drew up overnight. So, we'll go through that same laborious process,' Johnson said. But some members have ideas of what else they'd like to see. Rep. Ralph Norman (R-S.C.) said that he'd hope a second bill would do more to tackle rolling back green energy tax credits and make further spending cuts. Ultimately, though, it will be Trump's call, Norman said: 'I know when the president gets involved, it adds a lot of value.' And Rep. August Pfluger (R-Texas) speculated that passing the 'big, beautiful bill' would inspire members to keep going with another bill. 'People like the feeling of winning,' Pfluger said.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Magic dust and mayhem: The Great GOP Panic over Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill'
Trump's so-called 'Big Beautiful Bill' narrowly passed the House by a single vote and is now stalled in the Senate. We take a closer look at this massive tax plan that gives permanent breaks for the wealthy while slashing Medicaid, food assistance, and clean energy programs. According to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, it would add at least $2.4 trillion to the national deficit–hardly a win for fiscal conservatives. Even Elon Musk slammed it as a 'disgusting abomination.��
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
‘Idiocy': Sac PD must rectify situation with Sen. Sabrina Cervantes
'Sacramento police must apologize for harming a California state senator | Opinion,' ( May 30) My wife and I live down in Riverside County, in Sen. Sabrina Cervantes' district. We know her and we believe in her. We believed immediately in the senator's protest because the allegation that she was driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol was so preposterously out of character. Aside from the city budget deficit, is this idiocy an example of what the Sacramento Police Department is wasting their time and taxpayers' money on? To Sacramento Police Chief Kathy Lester: Shame on what your officers have been encouraged or taught to do. It just may backfire on the department when the city takes up the budget for next year. Brian Finander Moreno Valley 'Nine California Republicans voted for Trump's cruel budget bill. Remember them,' ( May 22) Rep. Kevin Kiley claims to support Medicaid, but his vote for a congressional budget that guts the program tells another story. By backing cuts that threaten healthcare for millions — including over 100,000 of his own constituents — Kiley is turning his back on children, seniors and people with disabilities who rely on this essential lifeline. He blames Medi-Cal expansion for the strain, but that's no excuse for dismantling a program that serves our most vulnerable. Even more galling, the same budget that slashes social safety nets hands massive tax breaks to the wealthy — ballooning the national debt while sacrificing essential services. You can't claim to support Medicaid while voting to destroy it. John Bergmann Lincoln 'Nine California Republicans voted for Trump's cruel budget bill. Remember them,' ( May 22) Republican Rep. Kevin Kiley just voted for the largest ever transfer of wealth from the poor to the rich in American history. The budget bill they passed insures that the richest 0.1% percent will gain while the rest of us will lose vital services such as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program and Medicaid. The most vulnerable among us — hungry and uninsured kids and seniors — will be directly affected; but the middle class will also see increasing home electric bills, health care premiums and costs and higher interest rates. These cuts don't reduce the debt, they exist so billionaires can pay even less in taxes and buy more yachts. Republicans are solely focused on enriching billionaires, no matter the cost to you, me or the country. Kiley's priority should be his constituents, not his wealthy donors. Edward Farinsky Browns Valley 'How Newsom wants to fill 'Trump slump' fueled $12B deficit,' ( May 14) With annual state funding, the California Peer-Run Warm Line has been providing free emotional support to residents statewide 24/7 via phone, text or chat since 2019. Its success has enabled more growth: the CalHOPE and Spanish Warm Lines. March and April each saw nearly 40,000 contacts — about double their monthly average. Why would we give up on such a vital resource seeing skyrocketing demand? The cuts in Gov. Gavin Newsom's May Revise are so severe that we would only be able to answer about 5% of requests for help, leaving tens of thousands to suffer in silence. We wouldn't be able to stay open. We urge the Legislature to prioritize mental health and to fully fund the warm lines. Such investments often prevent people from going into crisis, which require more expensive treatment. Mark Salazar Mental Health Association of San Francisco
